OKCPS is refusing to release any teacher for the upcoming school year. District unethical and tricked many teachers into believing they were not on continuing contract. It sucks to work for people that you can't trust to do the right thing! OKC is no place to be!
The Oklahoma City School District will abide by a state law - - for the first time in recent years -- that bars teachers from accepting jobs elsewhere after signing a letter of intent with the district. Almost three dozen city educators have asked to be released from 2005-06 contracts, but district officials are holding them to their word. State law requires teachers to notify districts by April 25 if they intend to leave the school system the following year. In the past, the district has allowed teachers who have given notice after that date to leave. District spokeswoman Sherry Fair said some surrounding districts that have abided by the law in recent years often would recruit Oklahoma City teachers. "They would come and recruit from us after they found out how many teaching positions they would have, which in the past has left us with severe shortages," Fair said. "Just last year, we had over 200 vacancies at the beginning of the school year." Fair said 80 to 100 vacancies are expected the first day of school this fall. Ed Allen, president of the Oklahoma City American Federation of Teachers, said his office has received close to 100 phone calls from teachers wanting out of contracts. "The district has been pretty firm. From everything they've told me, they won't let teachers out unless there is a hardship," Allen said. "From my perspective, it doesn't seem like you'd want to keep an employee who doesn't want to be here." Fair said Superintendent Bob Moore is looking at each request and determining if a teacher will be released. Thirty-four certified employees have made a request to leave; 14 have been granted. Reasons for allowing their dismissal include health problems or relocation of a spouse to another city due to a job. Some teachers also have reached retirement age and have chosen to leave the district. "It's just responsible business practice to comply with state law," Fair said. "It's in the best interest for students to have a permanent teacher in the classroom from day one, and all educators should understand that." Many jobs last school year were filled with substitute teachers because the district couldn't find certified teachers in specific areas. Oklahoma City students return to school Aug. 18. In Tulsa, district spokesman John Hamill said teachers were provided contracts just before they left for the summer. If they didn't sign the contract, it was assumed they wouldn't be returning in the fall.
On 5/30/05, trapped wrote: > OKCPS is refusing to release any teacher for the upcoming > school year. District unethical and tricked many teachers > into believing they were not on continuing contract. It > sucks to work for people that you can't trust to do the > right thing! OKC is no place to be!
A bill just introduced in Congress would take away the right of cities and towns across the country to provide citizens with universal, low-cost Internet access.
Giant cable and telephone companies don’t want any competition -- -- and forward this message to everyone you know, asking them to do the same.
Onward,
Josh Silver Executive Director Free Press [link removed]
P.S. For all of the latest news on Community Internet and municipal broadband, visit the Free Press Web site at [link removed].
Publish Date: 6/12/2005 Colo. is center of debate on energy Times-Call correspondent
Joe Hanel The Daily Times-Call WASHINGTON — Colorado is drawing comparisons to Saudi Arabia these days.
The Senate will begin debating an energy bill this week, and senators are eager to find a way to break America’s dependence on Saudi Arabia, which owns a quarter of the world’s oil reserves.
Many of them are hoping to find answers in Colorado.
The United States doesn’t have nearly enough of its own oil, so senators are considering a mix of ideas, from squeezing oil out of rocks to turning farmers’ crops into diesel fuel to coal-fired electrical plants.
Most money in the energy bill, which has cleared the House of Representatives, goes toward subsidizing oil and gas drillers, but Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., has focused his efforts on renewable or alternative fuels.
“An America independent from foreign oil, and an America with a responsible, diversified energy portfolio, will be a stronger America with a more robust economy,” Salazar said when the Senate Energy Committee passed the bill last month.
Salazar backed several amendments to the bill that take the initial steps down the road to alternative energy:
The Fuels Security Act would double the amount of ethanol America uses by 2012 to 8 million gallons a year. Another amendment lets small ethanol and biodiesel plants double their size.
Salazar also wants to encourage high-tech coal power plants that convert the gasified coal and then capture most of the pollution before it leaves the smokestack. His amendment offers government loan guarantees of 80 percent of a project’s cost to reassure potential investors in the new industry.
Salazar also sponsored a measure to experiment with oil shale — oil trapped in rocks. Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., co-sponsored the measure.
All of these plans would have effects in Colorado, which is already booming because it has some of the country’s best remaining deposits of natural gas.
Oil shale
Oilmen like to call Colorado the Saudi Arabia of oil shale.
The Department of Energy says the United States has enough oil shale to fill 2 trillion barrels. That’s more than all of the conventional oil reserves in the world. The largest deposit is in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, and Colorado has the richest field of the lot in the Western Slope’s Piceance Basin.
But it costs much more money to get oil from shale than it does from traditional oil wells. Colorado experienced an oil shale boom in the late 1970s, when OPEC had driven up oil prices. But when prices fell, Exxon abruptly pulled out of its project in favor of cheaper oil from the Middle East, leaving more than 2,000 people on the Western Slope out of work.
Since then, politicians have steered clear of oil shale — until now.
Salazar and Allard’s plan sets up 10-year research-and- development leases for oil shale projects. It also requires the government to map Western Slope oil shale deposits and do an Environmental Impact Statement.
“The approach we’re taking on this is that we have to go about oil shale development through a very thoughtful process,” Salazar said. “The technologies are still being developed to see if we can develop oil shale in a way that is both economically and environmentally possible.”
Ethanol and biodiesel
Farm-state legislators love ethanol — auto fuel made from crops, often corn — because it’s a domestic fuel source that offers farmers another market for their crops.
Critics say ethanol takes more energy to make than it gives in return. But a 2002 Department of Agriculture study found it has a modest gain in efficiency.
In any case, ethanol plants are planned for Windsor, Eaton and Sterling.
President Bush came out in support of biodiesel fuel — different from ethanol — in April.
“Biodiesel is one of our nation’s most promising alternative fuel sources, and by developing biodiesel you’re making this country less dependent on foreign sources of oil,” Bush said.
A startup company called Blue Sun has a biodiesel operation in the San Luis Valley.
Blue Sun works with farmers to grow soybeans, processes them into biodiesel, then blends it with regular diesel at a plant in Alamosa to make a fuel that can run in any motor that uses a diesel engine — from a semi truck to a Mercedes Benz.
Blue Sun just completed a trial use of the fuel in Boulder buses and found that its blend offers “outstanding” pollution reductions, said CEO Jeff Probst.
The company works with about 100 San Luis Valley farmers and employs 14 people at its Fort Collins headquarters.
Probst said he’s aiming to create a company that can survive without government subsidies or high oil prices.
It is amazing to me that there is not a single post mention or discuss how to improve our education, or how to educate, this is teachers.net, isn't it? I can see how the so-called teachers in this country lead our youngsters to.
There is absolutely "no accountability" for any teacher anywhere. Truely amazing. Can all teachers really sleep at night with just ask for pay raise, but nothing in your part on how to earn it?
What do you suggest, Paul? I know we did a terrible job with George W., but his parents had so much influence in the private schools he attended we couldn't get our hooks into him.
On 7/17/05, Paul wrote: > It is amazing to me that there is not a single post mention > or discuss how to improve our education, or how to educate, > this is teachers.net, isn't it? I can see how the so-called > teachers in this country lead our youngsters to. > > There is absolutely "no accountability" for any teacher > anywhere. Truely amazing. Can all teachers really sleep at > night with just ask for pay raise, but nothing in your part > on how to earn it?
What's up with having to recruit out of state in CA. I know hundreds of aspiring credentialed teachers willing to accept jobs right here, myself included. I've jumped all my hoops, hold a credential including a clad and have worked in a classroom as an aide, substitue and teacher. Moreno Valley hiring out of state makes my blood boil. I hate to sound discouraging but I think CA recruits out of state because it's a cheap hire. Think about it, out of state teachers will still have to jump all CA credential requirements. Until they complete these requirements their only going to get base salary. This is much cheaper then hiring a fully credentialed CA teacher. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
what newspaper/where states CA is "out" of teachers? I tried 2 yrs, 34 districts before I finally got one job offer! And in the 3rd worst district in the state! Now I have been laid off and pursuing the battle again. Fontana hired out of COUNTRY people. Riverside hires out of state and even has job fairs out of state. THis is my 3rd year applying to those districts!
The district I worked in hired long-term subs and they were NCLB compliant b/c they said "we don't have enough teachers/applicants to fill those positions". Which is all BS.
I'm often told in interviews "you were great but the position went to someone with more experience". (but they don't want someone with more experience- they cost more. My position I was laid off from wa filled by an intern. Another co-worker of mines position got filled by a sub.)
And besides, how can I get experience if no one will give me, well, experience?
I've even tried applying to FIVE other STATES all to no avail. sign.
On 8/13/05, Dan wrote: > Lets have a National Day of protest. Tuesday Sept. 20th. > No one buys gas that day.
Yeah, that will kill the oil barons. They know we would have to prepare by filling up the day before or wait till the day after. A better method would be to stop buying anything besides gas at the stations-- the local owners would lose their shirts by not selling the junk food and drinks. Maybe that would cause upward pressure.
Let's face the facts: we are being raped by American companies. There is no shortage (you do not get a ration card do you?). There is no reason for these high prices (all the reasons are speculation, "fear" that something might happen). The companies are giggling like little school girls at how they can prop up the price and reap in the extra billions in PROFIT. If our politicians would stop being bribed-- both sides of the aisle-- and actually do something, we could find relief.
We need to put caps on the profit level these mega oil companies can make. We surely need to scap any tax incentives we give them (that is like the rapist coming for a second go round). Competition alone does not work because they all know they can sell high and we will have to buy it. We are being held hostage.
I think that the reason we are so busy using up the oil is so that there won't be any left for the arabs. We will suck their oil dry, switch to alternative sources, and then they will have nothing to offer anyone.
I'm looking for a fun way to teach Current Events in my sixth grade classroom. I want to have a "News Program" where each week a different group of children prepare the news to share with the class. Does anyone do anything like this in their classroom? If so, can you share some ideas of how to go about it?
September 8, 2005 WASHINGTON - The disastrous federal response to Katrina exposes a record of incompetence, misjudgment and ideological blinders that should lead to serious doubts that the Bush administration should be allowed to continue in office.
When taxpayers have raised, borrowed and spent $40 billion to $50 billion a year for the past four years for homeland security but the officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency cannot find their own hands in broad daylight for four days while New Orleans and the Mississippi Gulf Coast swelter, drown and die, it is time for them to go.
When funding for water works and levees in the gulf region is repeatedly cut by an administration that seems determined to undermine the public responsibility for infrastructure in America, despite clear warnings that the infrastructure could not survive a major storm, it seems clear someone is playing politics with the public trust.
When rescue and medical squads are sitting in Manassas and elsewhere in northern Virginia and foreign assistance waits at airports because the government can't figure out how to insure the workers, how to use the assistance or which jurisdiction should be in charge, it is time for the administration to leave town.
When President Bush stays on vacation and attends social functions for two days in the face of disaster before finally understanding that people are starving, crying out and dying, it is time for him to go.
When FEMA officials cannot figure out that there are thousands stranded at the New Orleans convention center - where people died and were starving - and fussed ineffectively about the same problems in the Superdome, they should be fired, not praised, as the president praised FEMA Director Michael Brown in New Orleans last week.
When Mr. Bush states publicly that "nobody could anticipate a breach of the levee" while New Orleans journalists, Scientific American, National Geographic, academic researchers and Louisiana politicians had been doing precisely that for decades, right up through last year and even as Hurricane Katrina passed over, he should be laughed out of town as an impostor.
When repeated studies of New Orleans make it clear that tens of thousands of people would be unable to evacuate the city in case of a flood, lacking both money and transportation, but FEMA makes no effort before the storm to commandeer buses and move them to safety, it is time for someone to be given his walking papers.
When the president makes Sen. Trent Lott's house in Pascagoula, Miss., the poster child for rebuilding while hundreds of thousands are bereft of housing, jobs, electricity and security, he betrays a careless insensitivity that should banish him from office.
When the president of the United States points the finger away from the lame response of his administration to Katrina and tries to finger local officials in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, La., as the culprits, he betrays the unwillingness of this administration to speak truth and hold itself accountable. As in the case of the miserable execution of policy in Iraq, Mr. Bush and Karl Rove always have some excuse for failure other than their own misjudgments.
We have a president who is apparently ill-informed, lackadaisical and narrow-minded, surrounded by oil baron cronies, religious fundamentalist crazies and right-wing extremists and ideologues. He has appointed officials who give incompetence new meaning, who replace the positive role of government with expensive baloney.
They rode into office in a highly contested election, spouting a message of bipartisanship but determined to undermine the federal government in every way but defense (and, after 9/11, one presumed, homeland security). One with Grover Norquist, they were determined to shrink Washington until it was "small enough to drown in a bathtub." Katrina has stripped the veil from this mean- spirited strategy, exposing the greed, mindlessness and sheer profiteering behind it.
It is time to hold them accountable - this ugly, troglodyte crowd of Capital Beltway insiders, rich lawyers, ideologues, incompetents and their strap-hangers should be tarred, feathered and ridden gracefully and mindfully out of Washington and returned to their caves, clubs in hand.
Gordon Adams, director of security policy studies at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University, was senior White House budget official for national security in the Clinton administration.
I'm not a fan of the federal government but when do teachers, citizens, mayors, governors, congressmen, senators, students, lawyers, or shoe shine boys take the blame for anything?
"Disastrous federal response"...If your kid was in the national guard would you want the prez to run him into the middle of a level 5 hurricane? JEEZ...
I agree. It's time for W to leave but there will still be hurricanes, California fires, and radical Muslims when he's gone. Again I agree, there is lots of waste with Homeland security but....what government program is there no waste? The Department of Education?
The Oklahoma City School District will abide by a state law -
-
for the
first time in recent years -- that bars teachers from
accepting jobs
elsewhere after signing a letter of intent with the
district.
Almost three dozen city educators have asked to be
released from 2005-06
contracts, but...See More