concrete information is the bain of the "soft capitol" system, why would investment fluctuations take place unless we reflected subjetivity, the more accurate we can be about "event" based fluctuations, supposedly the more we run the game, yet....politicians are bound to capitol by their very nature and their actions are almost like a broadcast reality/entertainment for investors concrete information is necisarry for human longevity not limited arguements with respect to ....KWh/m2 or oil or "policy" thereof.
On 9/29/04, bill p dwyer wrote: > concrete information is the bain of the "soft capitol" > system, why would investment fluctuations take place > unless we reflected subjetivity, the more accurate we can > be about "event" based fluctuations, supposedly the more we > run the game, yet....politicians are bound to capitol by > their very nature and their actions are almost like a > broadcast reality/entertainment for investors > concrete information is necisarry for human longevity > not limited arguements with respect to ....KWh/m2 > or oil or "policy" thereof.
Hi bill p dwyer I can help you with regards to concrete information.
Having worked in various building trades--mostly as a laborer--while putting myself through college way back when, I know all too well that concrete is a hard, strong, and somewhat durable construction material that consists of sand, conglomerate gravel, pebbles, broken stone, or slag in a mortar or cement matrix.
Admittedly, I did not know that this specific piece of information was “necisarry” (I think perhaps you might have meant “necessary”) for human longevity. I will just have to trust that visionaries like you can use the information that I have provided in pursuit of this goal. Godspeed, bill p dwyer!
-Dean
p.s. Come to think of it, if you find out that asphalt, drywall, or HVAC information could help to push us humans farther down the road to immortality, please don’t hesitate to ask me about it. I am here to serve.
Finally the media has picked up the most overlooked issue of this presidential campaign – education.
On 10/10/2004 the NY Times had an article entitled “How to Rescue Education Reform” [link removed]
and today (10/17/2004) Yahoo listed an article 'No Child Left Behind' Top Education Issue [link removed]
I have started to set up a grass root movement collecting better ideas and a better name to improve the NCLB: For more details please go to [link removed] .
I want to include your ideas – the ideas of professionals who work in schools every day. Therefore I am asking everybody who thinks the NCLB needs improvement to send a blank email to [email removed].
Your name and email address will be kept secret, I will be your spokesperson, because I cannot be fired for articulating that the NCLB needs improvement. I also have 200 journalists at hand who I will be able to convince that this needs to be discussed further, provided I get at least 1,000 emails. So far, I have 50 emails and I believe 13 great names.
So, please forward his message to anybody who has a stake in education, and who does not, and let’s try to get these emails together.
Emails gives us the perfect opportunity to get a grass root movement together, you don’t need to donate a dime, nor need to march anywhere, all you nee to do is sending an email and spreading the news.
I thank you very much for ever action you take!
Why am I doing this? Because this is the greatest country on the planet and it needs to stay this way. Education is the future of any country and others aren’t sleeping.
Gisela Hausmann
Gisela Hausmann is an educational activist and author of obvious LETTERS and the Hands on Mathematics CD-ROM books. She can be reached at (910) 798-5042 or [email removed] .
I agree Gisela NCLB can be improved. We need more accountability on the part of educators. Please when you quote the NY Times you loose support. This is a Left Wing Rag. Thanks for your concern. Stan On 10/17/04, Gisela wrote: > Finally the media has picked up the most overlooked issue > of this presidential campaign – education. > > On 10/10/2004 the NY Times had an article entitled “How to > Rescue Education Reform” > [link removed] .
How sweet it is. Beating the payroll bloated Yankees any day of the week puts a spring in my step, but for the Red Sox (I'm a life long fan of the team) to humiliate the Yankees in such historic fashion on the Yanks home field in front of possibly the most arrogant and spoiled fan base in the history of the planet erases decades of frustration--the slate is now clean, my friends. This Bosox victory, coupled by the collossal collapse by the Yankees (fondly nicknamed the Yank-offs by individuals who share my feelings for that club) is the most delicious vindication imaginable. Did I mention that I was happy about this?
How much will it cost the tax payers to protect the Kerry- Heinz homes if he is elected? Don't get me wrong I believe the President should be able to go to his home for relaxation, but will we have to provide around-the-clock payed security for each of his six homes? Just a thought!
Why are the warlike Republicans on the wrong list here?
DEMOCRATS: * Richard Gephardt: Air National Guard, 1965-71. * David Bonior: Staff Sgt., Air Force 1968-72. * Tom Daschle: 1st Lt., Air Force SAC 1969-72. * Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 as an army journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade. * Bob Kerrey: Lt. j.g. Navy 1966-69; Medal of Honor, Vietnam. * Daniel Inouye: Army 1943-47; Medal of Honor, WWII. * John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V, Purple Hearts. * Charles Rangel: Staff Sgt., Army 1948-52; Bronze Star, Korea. * Max Cleland: Captain, Army 1965-68; Silver Star & Bronze Star: Vietnam. * Ted Kennedy: Army, 1951-53. * Tom Harkin: Lt., Navy, 1962-67; Naval Reserve, 1968-74. * Jack Reed: Army Ranger, 1971-1979; Captain, Army Reserve 1979-91. * Fritz Hollings: Army officer in WWII; Bronze Star and seven campaign ribbons. * Leonard Boswell: Lt. Col., Army 1956-76; Vietnam, DFCs, Bronze Stars, and Soldier's Medal. * Pete Peterson: Air Force Captain, POW. Purple Heart, Silver Star and Legion of Merit. * Mike Thompson: Staff sergeant, 173rd Airborne, Purple Heart. * Bill McBride: Candidate for Fla. Governor. Marine in Vietnam; Bronze Star with Combat V. * Gray Davis: Army Captain in Vietnam, Bronze Star. * Pete Stark: Air Force 1955-57 * Chuck Robb: Vietnam * Howell Heflin: Silver Star * George McGovern: Silver Star & DFC during WWII. * Bill Clinton: Did not serve. Student deferments. Entered draft, but received #311 in the lottery. * Jimmy Carter: Seven years in the Navy. * Walter Mondale: Army 1951-1953 * John Glenn: WWII and Korea; six DFCs and Air Medal with 18 Clusters. * Tom Lantos: Served in Hungarian underground in WWII. Saved by Raoul Wallenberg.
REPUBLICANS: * Dick Cheney: did not serve. five deferrments, the last by marriage. * Dennis Hastert: did not serve. * Tom Delay: did not serve. * Roy Blunt: did not serve. * Bill Frist: did not serve. * Mitch McConnell: did not serve. * Rick Santorum: did not serve. * Trent Lott: did not serve. * John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments to teach business. * Jeb Bush: did not serve. * Karl Rove: did not serve. * Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. "Bad knee." The man who attacked Max Cleland's patriotism. * Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve. * Vin Weber: did not serve. * Richard Perle: did not serve. * Douglas Feith: did not serve. * Eliot Abrams: did not serve. * Richard Shelby: did not serve. * Jon Kyl: did not serve. * Tim Hutchison: did not serve. * Christopher Cox: did not serve. * Newt Gingrich: did not serve. * Don Rumsfeld: served in Navy (1954-57) as flight instructor. * George W. Bush: failed to complete his six-year National Guard; got assigned to Alabama so he could campaign for family friend running for U.S. Senate; failed to show up for required medical exam, disappeared from duty. * Ronald Reagan: due to poor eyesight, served in a non- combat role making movies. * B-1 Bob Dornan: Consciously enlisted after fighting was over in Korea. * Phil Gramm: did not serve. * John McCain: Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. * Dana Rohrabacher: did not serve. * John M. McHugh: did not serve. * JC Watts: did not serve. * Jack Kemp: did not serve. "Knee problem," although continued in NFL for 8 years. * Dan Quayle: Journalism unit of the Indiana National Guard. * Rudy Giuliani: did not serve. * George Pataki: did not serve. * Spencer Abraham: did not serve. * John Engler: did not serve. * Lindsey Graham: National Guard lawyer. * Arnold Schwarzenegger: AWOL from Austrian army base.
PUNDITS & PREACHERS: * Sean Hannity: did not serve. * Rush Limbaugh: did not serve (4-F with a 'pilonidal cyst.') * Bill O'Reilly: did not serve. * Michael Savage: did not serve. * George Will: did not serve. * Chris Matthews: did not serve. * Paul Gigot: did not serve. * Bill Bennett: did not serve. * Pat Buchanan: did not serve. * John Wayne: did not serve. * Bill Kristol: did not serve. * Kenneth Starr: did not serve. * Antonin Scalia: did not serve. * Clarence Thomas: did not serve. * Ralph Reed: did not serve. * Michael Medved: did not serve. * Charlie Daniels: did not serve. * Ted Nugent: did not serve. (He only shoots at things that don't shoot back.)
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------- Bush can't run on his record. After all, he's lost 1 million jobs, turned record budget surpluses into record deficits, squandered the world's goodwill, and used America's foreign policy to reward Republican fat cat campaign contributors while sticking you with the bill for his failures. ------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------
Finally! Proof that the Republicans are smarter than Democrats. They know how not to be shot at and nearly killed. Thanks for the proof Bear.
On 10/21/04, Bear wrote: > Why are the warlike Republicans on the wrong list here? > > DEMOCRATS: > * Richard Gephardt: Air National Guard, 1965-71. > * David Bonior: Staff Sgt., Air Force 1968-72. > * Tom Daschle: 1st Lt., Air Force SAC 1969-72. > * Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 > as an army journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade. > * Bob Kerrey: Lt. j.g. Navy 1966-69; Medal of Honor, > Vietnam. > * Daniel Inouye: Army 1943-47; Medal of Honor, WWII. > * John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze Star > with Combat V, Purple Hearts. > * Charles Rangel: Staff Sgt., Army 1948-52; Bronze Star, > Korea. > * Max Cleland: Captain, Army 1965-68; Silver Star & > Bronze Star: Vietnam. > * Ted Kennedy: Army, 1951-53. > * Tom Harkin: Lt., Navy, 1962-67; Naval Reserve, 1968-74. > * Jack Reed: Army Ranger, 1971-1979; Captain, Army > Reserve 1979-91. > * Fritz Hollings: Army officer in WWII; Bronze Star and > seven campaign ribbons. > * Leonard Boswell: Lt. Col., Army 1956-76; Vietnam, DFCs, > Bronze Stars, and Soldier's Medal. > * Pete Peterson: Air Force Captain, POW. Purple Heart, > Silver Star and Legion of Merit. > * Mike Thompson: Staff sergeant, 173rd Airborne, Purple > Heart. > * Bill McBride: Candidate for Fla. Governor. Marine in > Vietnam; Bronze Star with Combat V. > * Gray Davis: Army Captain in Vietnam, Bronze Star. > * Pete Stark: Air Force 1955-57 > * Chuck Robb: Vietnam > * Howell Heflin: Silver Star > * George McGovern: Silver Star & DFC during WWII. > * Bill Clinton: Did not serve. Student deferments. > Entered draft, but received #311 in the lottery. > * Jimmy Carter: Seven years in the Navy. > * Walter Mondale: Army 1951-1953 > * John Glenn: WWII and Korea; six DFCs and Air Medal with > 18 Clusters. > * Tom Lantos: Served in Hungarian underground in WWII. > Saved by Raoul Wallenberg. > > > > REPUBLICANS: > * Dick Cheney: did not serve. five deferrments, the last > by marriage. > * Dennis Hastert: did not serve. > * Tom Delay: did not serve. > * Roy Blunt: did not serve. > * Bill Frist: did not serve. > * Mitch McConnell: did not serve. > * Rick Santorum: did not serve. > * Trent Lott: did not serve. > * John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments to teach > business. > * Jeb Bush: did not serve. > * Karl Rove: did not serve. > * Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. "Bad knee." The man who > attacked Max Cleland's patriotism. > * Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve. > * Vin Weber: did not serve. > * Richard Perle: did not serve. > * Douglas Feith: did not serve. > * Eliot Abrams: did not serve. > * Richard Shelby: did not serve. > * Jon Kyl: did not serve. > * Tim Hutchison: did not serve. > * Christopher Cox: did not serve. > * Newt Gingrich: did not serve. > * Don Rumsfeld: served in Navy (1954-57) as flight > instructor. > * George W. Bush: failed to complete his six-year > National Guard; got assigned to Alabama so he could > campaign for family friend running > for U.S. Senate; failed to > show up for required medical exam, disappeared from duty. > * Ronald Reagan: due to poor eyesight, served in a non- > combat role making movies. > * B-1 Bob Dornan: Consciously enlisted after fighting was > over in Korea. > * Phil Gramm: did not serve. > * John McCain: Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, > Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. > * Dana Rohrabacher: did not serve. > * John M. McHugh: did not serve. > * JC Watts: did not serve. > * Jack Kemp: did not serve. "Knee problem," although > continued in NFL for 8 years. > * Dan Quayle: Journalism unit of the Indiana National > Guard. > * Rudy Giuliani: did not serve. > * George Pataki: did not serve. > * Spencer Abraham: did not serve. > * John Engler: did not serve. > * Lindsey Graham: National Guard lawyer. > * Arnold Schwarzenegger: AWOL from Austrian army base. > > > > PUNDITS & PREACHERS: > * Sean Hannity: did not serve. > * Rush Limbaugh: did not serve (4-F with a 'pilonidal > cyst.') > * Bill O'Reilly: did not serve. > * Michael Savage: did not serve. > * George Will: did not serve. > * Chris Matthews: did not serve. > * Paul Gigot: did not serve. > * Bill Bennett: did not serve. > * Pat Buchanan: did not serve. > * John Wayne: did not serve. > * Bill Kristol: did not serve. > * Kenneth Starr: did not serve. > * Antonin Scalia: did not serve. > * Clarence Thomas: did not serve. > * Ralph Reed: did not serve. > * Michael Medved: did not serve. > * Charlie Daniels: did not serve. > * Ted Nugent: did not serve. (He only shoots at things > that don't shoot back.) > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- - > ----------------------------- > Bush can't run on his record. After all, he's lost 1 > million jobs, turned record budget surpluses into record > deficits, squandered the world's goodwill, and used > America's foreign policy to reward Republican fat cat > campaign contributors while sticking you with the bill for > his failures. > ----------------------------------------------------------- - > -----------------------------
Credibilty might have been achieved if you all had not distorted this post. First off where is Bill Clintons name, he ran to England to avoid the draft. Michael Moore did not serve, Ted Kennedy, charged and found guilty of drunk on duty, 1952. I have numerous other prominent names like Gray Davis, who forged a medal and had it taken away. If you want to be honest nad bot try and distort through these false hoods, tell all the truth, and not just what you want people to see. Are you all realy teachers? I think not!
On 12/23/04, Dean wrote: > Hi Alaric > I responded to what you have termed the "nice job" that Bear > did way back in October. I have provided it below in case you > missed it: > On 10/21/04, Dean wrote: >> Howdy Bear- >> >> The stench of irrelevancy permeates your posting. You are >> apparently unaware that military service, while honorable, >> necessary, and appreciated by all freedom-loving Americans, >> is not a prerequisite for a political career. >> >> It does not matter whether a politician has served in the >> military. What matters is how a politician executes his or >> her responsibilities as it relates to the use and morale of >> the military. As such, what is the point of your posting? >> >> Further, I would suggest that the derogatory comments >> publicly made by Mr. Kerry about his military brethren have >> done little to earn the respect of many (probably most) of >> our soldiers and veterans. I would further suggest that Mr. >> Clinton, who is on record as having demonstrated against our >> country while he was visiting foreign soil, also managed to >> alienate many our men and women in uniform. I of course do >> not need to remind anyone that these two gentlemen are >> associated rather intimately with the Democratic Party. (Of >> course, Bill has apparently been intimate with a lot of >> people over the years—even when he was supposed to be >> conducting the country’s business in the Oval office. But >> of course that is another story.) >> >> As for the last paragraph of your posting, there are indeed >> legitimate arguments against re-electing Mr. Bush for >> another term: the explosive growth of discretionary >> spending under his watch and enacting the intrusive and >> ineffective No Child Left Behind Act, are a couple of them. >> However, thoughtful citizens must view Bush’s known >> shortcomings in the context of our only other alternative >> for President, John Kerry. >> >> To state it bluntly, it is a mistake to view Kerry as an >> upgrade or even an equal to Bush. Mr. Kerry’s flaws are not >> only more fundamental than those of Mr. Bush, but they are >> also more dangerous. >> >> Take a critical look at Mr. Kerry’s long and undistinguished >> career as an employee of Uncle Sam: >> 1. Upon returning from service in Viet Nam, Kerry publicly >> equated our military with the armies of Genghis Khan. In so >> doing, he not only insulted American soldiers who were doing >> nothing more than serving their country as they had been >> asked to do, but he also served the purposes of our >> country’s enemies. (Kerry as Commander-In-Chief? I don’t >> so.) >> >> 2. As a U.S. Senator for some 20 years, it is difficult— >> perhaps impossible—to name Kerry as the author of any >> significant piece of legislation. (One must admit that 20 >> years is a darn long warm-up period.) >> >> 3. Kerry has been consistently wrong about national >> security issues while occupying his Senate seat. He favored >> a nuclear freeze in the early 1980’s—if such a freeze had >> been enacted it would have blocked the subsequent European >> missile deployment which in turn aided in bringing the >> Soviet Union war machine to bay. >> >> 4. Kerry opposed Mr. Reagan’s military support of forces in >> Central American countries that are now democracies as a >> result of that support. >> >> 5. Kerry voted against the 1991 Gulf War even though the >> elder President Bush secured UN approval to militarily oust >> Saddam Hussein from Kuwait, enlisted 34 countries to assist >> in the effort, and arranged for other countries to pay for >> most of the military operations. (This seems grossly >> inconsistent with Kerry’s stated position that conflicts of >> this nature need to meet what he has termed a “global >> test”. Let’s face it—if the ‘91 Gulf War didn’t meet >> a “global test” in Kerry’s eyes, then I can’t imagine one >> that ever would.) >> >> Stacking Mr. Kerry’s long public record against that of Mr. >> Bush should make the choice easy for most people, assuming >> that they care about America’s physical security. Given the >> post 9/11 terrorist reality, America needs a President who >> is more likely to resist than to appease. The proper choice >> is thus Mr. Bush. >> >> I am also encouraged by Mr. Bush’s stated goal to privatize >> portions of the Social Security Program in his 2nd term. >> Our entitlement spending programs need a major overhaul if >> they are to remain viable. Done properly, privatization >> would dramatically shrink federal expenditures and promote >> individual responsibility on the part of beneficiaries. >> These things are needed to shore up America’s economic >> foundation from a long-term viewpoint. Again, the proper >> choice is Mr. Bush. >> >> -Dean > > > On 12/20/04, Alaric wrote: >> Nice job, Bear. I wonder if any conservatives will ever >> figure this one out? >> >> On 10/21/04, Bear wrote: >>> Why are the warlike Republicans on the wrong list here? >>> >>> DEMOCRATS: >>> * Richard Gephardt: Air National Guard, 1965-71. >>> * David Bonior: Staff Sgt., Air Force 1968-72. >>> * Tom Daschle: 1st Lt., Air Force SAC 1969-72. >>> * Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 >>> as an army journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade. >>> * Bob Kerrey: Lt. j.g. Navy 1966-69; Medal of Honor, >>> Vietnam. >>> * Daniel Inouye: Army 1943-47; Medal of Honor, WWII. >>> * John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze >> Star >>> with Combat V, Purple Hearts. >>> * Charles Rangel: Staff Sgt., Army 1948-52; Bronze Star, >>> Korea. >>> * Max Cleland: Captain, Army 1965-68; Silver Star & >>> Bronze Star: Vietnam. >>> * Ted Kennedy: Army, 1951-53. >>> * Tom Harkin: Lt., Navy, 1962-67; Naval Reserve, 1968-74. >>> * Jack Reed: Army Ranger, 1971-1979; Captain, Army >>> Reserve 1979-91. >>> * Fritz Hollings: Army officer in WWII; Bronze Star and >>> seven campaign ribbons. >>> * Leonard Boswell: Lt. Col., Army 1956-76; Vietnam, >> DFCs, >>> Bronze Stars, and Soldier's Medal. >>> * Pete Peterson: Air Force Captain, POW. Purple Heart, >>> Silver Star and Legion of Merit. >>> * Mike Thompson: Staff sergeant, 173rd Airborne, Purple >>> Heart. >>> * Bill McBride: Candidate for Fla. Governor. Marine in >>> Vietnam; Bronze Star with Combat V. >>> * Gray Davis: Army Captain in Vietnam, Bronze Star. >>> * Pete Stark: Air Force 1955-57 >>> * Chuck Robb: Vietnam >>> * Howell Heflin: Silver Star >>> * George McGovern: Silver Star & DFC during WWII. >>> * Bill Clinton: Did not serve. Student deferments. >>> Entered draft, but received #311 in the lottery. >>> * Jimmy Carter: Seven years in the Navy. >>> * Walter Mondale: Army 1951-1953 >>> * John Glenn: WWII and Korea; six DFCs and Air Medal >> with >>> 18 Clusters. >>> * Tom Lantos: Served in Hungarian underground in WWII. >>> Saved by Raoul Wallenberg. >>> >>> >>> >>> REPUBLICANS: >>> * Dick Cheney: did not serve. five deferrments, the last >>> by marriage. >>> * Dennis Hastert: did not serve. >>> * Tom Delay: did not serve. >>> * Roy Blunt: did not serve. >>> * Bill Frist: did not serve. >>> * Mitch McConnell: did not serve. >>> * Rick Santorum: did not serve. >>> * Trent Lott: did not serve. >>> * John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments to >> teach >>> business. >>> * Jeb Bush: did not serve. >>> * Karl Rove: did not serve. >>> * Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. "Bad knee." The man >> who >>> attacked Max Cleland's patriotism. >>> * Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve. >>> * Vin Weber: did not serve. >>> * Richard Perle: did not serve. >>> * Douglas Feith: did not serve. >>> * Eliot Abrams: did not serve. >>> * Richard Shelby: did not serve. >>> * Jon Kyl: did not serve. >>> * Tim Hutchison: did not serve. >>> * Christopher Cox: did not serve. >>> * Newt Gingrich: did not serve. >>> * Don Rumsfeld: served in Navy (1954-57) as flight >>> instructor. >>> * George W. Bush: failed to complete his six-year >>> National Guard; got assigned to Alabama so he could >>> campaign for family friend running >>> for U.S. Senate; failed >> to >>> show up for required medical exam, disappeared from duty. >>> * Ronald Reagan: due to poor eyesight, served in a non- >>> combat role making movies. >>> * B-1 Bob Dornan: Consciously enlisted after fighting >> was >>> over in Korea. >>> * Phil Gramm: did not serve. >>> * John McCain: Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of >> Merit, >>> Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. >>> * Dana Rohrabacher: did not serve. >>> * John M. McHugh: did not serve. >>> * JC Watts: did not serve. >>> * Jack Kemp: did not serve. "Knee problem," although >>> continued in NFL for 8 years. >>> * Dan Quayle: Journalism unit of the Indiana National >>> Guard. >>> * Rudy Giuliani: did not serve. >>> * George Pataki: did not serve. >>> * Spencer Abraham: did not serve. >>> * John Engler: did not serve. >>> * Lindsey Graham: National Guard lawyer. >>> * Arnold Schwarzenegger: AWOL from Austrian army base. >>> >>> >>> >>> PUNDITS & PREACHERS: >>> * Sean Hannity: did not serve. >>> * Rush Limbaugh: did not serve (4-F with a 'pilonidal >>> cyst.') >>> * Bill O'Reilly: did not serve. >>> * Michael Savage: did not serve. >>> * George Will: did not serve. >>> * Chris Matthews: did not serve. >>> * Paul Gigot: did not serve. >>> * Bill Bennett: did not serve. >>> * Pat Buchanan: did not serve. >>> * John Wayne: did not serve. >>> * Bill Kristol: did not serve. >>> * Kenneth Starr: did not serve. >>> * Antonin Scalia: did not serve. >>> * Clarence Thomas: did not serve. >>> * Ralph Reed: did not serve. >>> * Michael Medved: did not serve. >>> * Charlie Daniels: did not serve. >>> * Ted Nugent: did not serve. (He only shoots at things >>> that don't shoot back.) >>> >>> >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> - >>> ----------------------------- >>> Bush can't run on his record. After all, he's lost 1 >>> million jobs, turned record budget surpluses into record >>> deficits, squandered the world's goodwill, and used >>> America's foreign policy to reward Republican fat cat >>> campaign contributors while sticking you with the bill for >>> his failures. >>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> - >>> -----------------------------
President George W. Bush: A Record of Accomplishment For Women
The President’s priorities are shared by women from coast to coast, and his decisions and actions have dramatically improved the lives of women at home and around the world.
He has put his compassionate conservative philosophy to work making America more secure; protecting the homeland; strengthening the economy and reducing the tax burden on families and small businesses; making health care affordable and accessible for all Americans; reforming education so that no child is left behind; empowering faith and community-based groups; and building a culture of responsibility.
President Bush has taken decisive action to improve the lives of women, including:
• Making America More Secure by Confronting the Threats of Our World. After America was attacked on Sept. 11th, President Bush determined that the civilized world had to aggressively and proactively challenge terrorists and governments that harbored or supported them. He determined that Al Qaeda, which based its operation and training camps in Afghanistan, was responsible for the attacks, and when the Taliban government refused to close the camps and turn over Al Qaeda leaders, he sent America’s military to liberate the country and shut down the terrorists’ base of operations. Then, President Bush and his administration began to assess other threats throughout the world in the new light of September 11th. He went to the United States Congress and the United Nations and led an international coalition to remove Saddam Hussein, a murderous dictator who supported terrorists, had used weapons of mass destruction on his own people and invaded his neighbors. The world is safer because Saddam Hussein is in prison, not in power. President Bush is pursuing our enemies and expanding the frontiers of liberty to extend peace and freedom throughout our world.
• Protecting the Homeland. President Bush proposed and signed into law the Patriot Act, giving law enforcement in the fight against terrorism the same tools that are used against organized crime. The Patriot Act broke down the wall between law enforcement and intelligence officers, so critically important information about terrorists can be shared. In the most significant reorganization of the U.S. government in over 50 years, President Bush created the Department of Homeland Security to safeguard our borders and ports and to protect the American people. Women are playing a vital role in helping to secure America. Over 21,000 women are currently serving in Iraq or Afghanistan. Today, military women fly combat aircraft, serve in leadership positions aboard aircraft carriers and other naval vessels, support combat land operations, and hold three-star rank in every service.
• Growing the Economy & Reducing the Tax Burden. Steady leadership has transformed a recession into a recovery. Three times President Bush has provided tax relief to pull our economy out of recession and return it to a path of growth. In 2004, 81 million women will save, on average, $1,878 as a result of the President’s tax relief packages. This includes 49 million married couples who will save, on average, $2,602 on their taxes and 11 million single mothers who will keep, on average, $921 of their own money. Forty-three million families with children will save, on average, $2,090 in 2004. According to a June 14, 2004 Wall Street Journal editorial, “women have actually done very well during the Bush years -- their median earnings rose 5.4% between 2000 and 2002, compared to 1.4% for men. That meant the ratio of female-to-male earnings hit an all-time high in 2002. Moreover, the current 4.9% unemployment rate for women is significantly lower than the national average of 5.5%.”
• Promoting Flexibility in the Workplace. President Bush is calling on Congress to pass legislation giving American workers more options to help families better juggle the demands of work and home through comp-time and flex-time.
• Supporting America’s Small Businesses. America’s over 20 million women and women equally-owned businesses employ 18.2 million people and contribute $3.6 trillion to the national economy. Under the President’s Jobs and Growth Act, 25 million small business owners and entrepreneurs are receiving an average tax cut of $3,001 in 2004. Those dollars create jobs and opportunity. Women-owned businesses with $1 million or more in revenues are now growing at twice the rate of all comparably sized firms.
• Ensuring Affordable and Accessible Health Care. Affordable and accessible health care is one of the President’s highest priorities. Last December, President Bush signed historic legislation to strengthen Medicare and provide a first-ever voluntary prescription drug benefit, keeping a commitment to seniors to help them afford the medicines they need. The bill also created Health Savings Accounts, which allow all Americans to save tax-free in order to pay medical expenses. In addition, the President supports the creation of Association Health Plans to make health care more affordable for small businesses and their employees and refundable tax credits as a way to close the coverage gap.
• Fighting Junk Lawsuits. Because medical liability drains up to $110 billion annually from America’s economy, President Bush is fighting to stop frivolous lawsuits to protect patients, doctors and hospitals from wealthy trial lawyers.
• Reforming Education So That No Child is Left Behind. President Bush submitted his framework for education reform, No Child Left Behind, three days after taking office and secured overwhelming bipartisan passage less than a year later. It is the most dramatic education reform in a generation and reflects the President’s belief that every child can learn. Every student will be held to high standards, and every school will be held accountable to parents for results. Parents with children in low- performing schools have new options for their child including transferring to a better public school or securing extra assistance from one of 1,600 state-approved tutoring providers. Backing up these reforms are historic levels of federal funding, including a 49 percent increase for elementary and secondary education funding, 52 percent increase in support for disadvantaged students and 75 percent increase for special education.
• Building a Better, More Responsible America. President Bush is taking action to empower faith based and community charities, defend the sanctity of marriage, tear down barriers for Americans with disabilities, end partial-birth abortion, promote adoption, and stop child pornography. In addition, youth drug use has decreased by 11% or 400,000 kids over the past 2 years.
• Investing in Women’s Health. President Bush fulfilled the commitment to complete the doubling of NIH funding by 2003 and provide $28.8 billion for 2005. Mrs. Bush and the NIH have launched a nationwide campaign called The Red Dress Project to raise awareness of women's risk of heart disease, the leading cause of death for women.
• Protecting America’s Women and Children Against Violence at Home. President Bush believes the home should be a peaceful place. For victims of domestic violence, that is too often not the case. To help combat this, the President secured historic levels of funding for Violence Against Women programs at the Department of Justice, giving communities resources to prosecute the offenders and assist the victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. In addition, President Bush’s “Family Justice Centers” will provide “one-stop-shops” of critical services to domestic violence victims in a dozen local communities. Working with faith-based and community groups, the Bush Administration also recently launched a pilot program in Philadelphia, Atlanta and Phoenix: Local police, health and emergency personnel, and others will be trained to spot and care for victims. In addition, victims will be encouraged to help authorities prosecute their abusers. The President’s efforts are yielding results. Federal prosecutions for crimes involving violence against women have increased 53% in the past two years.
• Safeguarding Health and Rights for Women Around the World. In Iraq and Afghanistan, 25 million women and girls are able to go to school, vote in elections, and play active roles in their societies. In 2002, President Bush launched the International Mother and Child HIV Prevention Initiative and committed $15 billion to combat HIV/AIDS abroad, which increasingly affects women. President Bush is providing over $150 million to combat worldwide trafficking in persons, mostly women and children forced into sexual slavery.
Don’t listen to Stan! As an educator, he does not get it! Note the comment, “Please teach to the test. If we do then our children will at least learn something.” In my long teaching career, I have known many who say, “at least, at least.” It never dawns on them that it should be “at most!” It should always be “at most!” Anytime someone advocates anything with the line “at least” I never listen and I suggest all others do the same!! I advocate not listening, because the “at least” people have no imagination for the bigger possibilities.
On 11/01/04, give me a break wrote: > On 10/29/04, Stan wrote: >> Please teach to the test. If we do then our children will at >> least learn something. MOST high school graduates in >> Washington state, if they do finish school and graduate, have >> to take additional remedial classes to attend the two year >> schools not to mention being behind the curve when they > attempt >> to enter a 4 year school. > > Rewarding and punishing by test results was discredited in the > late 1800s. Current uses of high- stakes, state mandated tests > in all but Iowa violate professional standards for test > development and use. > > For example, high stakes testing programs (those with serious > consequences for students, teachers, schools, districts) use a > fallible single standard and measure of student achievement, a > practice specifically condemned by the professional code of test > developers, test publishers, and educational researchers. Also, > states have been and now will be more compelled to prepare and > use tests without adequate time and attention to proper and > justifiable test development. More bad practices will be heaped > on already widespread bad practices in evaluating student > achievement and schools. > > The research over the past two decades indicates test based > educational reforms do not lead to better educational policies > and practices. Indeed, such testing often leads to educationally > unjust consequences and unsound practices. These include > increased drop out rates, teacher and administrator de- > professionalization, loss of curricular integrity, increased > cultural insensitivity, and disproportionate allocation of > educational resources into testing programs, not into hiring > qualified teachers and providing enriching educational programs. > > The winners, with the passage of this bill, are advocates of > standardized teaching and learning, and the few large > corporations that sell tests and test based curricula, not > children. > > >> >> I just want more children to learn some basics, vs feeling > good >> about themselves because at least they tried. >> >> On 10/29/04, give me a break wrote: >>>> The world is safer because Saddam Hussein is in prison, >>> not >>>> in power. President Bush is pursuing our enemies and >>>> expanding the frontiers of liberty to extend peace and >>>> freedom throughout our world. >>> >>> no, irag is more unsafe than it has been in quite some time, >>> or have you not been watching the news. and this myth of >>> expanding the frontiers of liberty is a joke, he is >>> following the status quo of upping the number one industry >>> in our country....defense. >>> >>>> • Growing the Economy & Reducing the Tax Burden. Steady >>>> leadership has transformed a recession into a recovery. >>>> Three times President Bush has provided tax relief to pull >>>> our economy out of recession and return it to a path of >>>> growth. >>> >>> he is also the first president in 70+ years to lose jobs. >>> >>>> • Reforming Education So That No Child is Left Behind. >>>> President Bush submitted his framework for education >>>> reform, No Child Left Behind, three days after taking >>>> office and secured overwhelming bipartisan passage less >>>> than a year later. It is the most dramatic education >>> reform >>>> in a generation and reflects the President’s belief that >>>> every child can learn. Every student will be held to high >>>> standards, and every school will be held accountable to >>>> parents for results. Parents with children in low- >>>> performing schools have new options for their child >>>> including transferring to a better public school or >>>> securing extra assistance from one of 1,600 state-approved >>>> tutoring providers. Backing up these reforms are historic >>>> levels of federal funding, including a 49 percent increase >>>> for elementary and secondary education funding, 52 percent >>>> increase in support for disadvantaged students and 75 >>>> percent increase for special education. >>> >>> this is the one that really sticks in my craw. The research >>> over the past two decades indicates test based educational >>> reforms do not lead to better educational policies and >>> practices. Indeed, such testing often leads to educationally >>> unjust consequences and unsound practices. These include >>> increased drop out rates, teacher and administrator de- >>> professionalization, loss of curricular integrity, increased >>> cultural insensitivity, and disproportionate allocation of >>> educational resources into testing programs, not into hiring >>> qualified teachers and providing enriching educational >>> programs. >>> >>> The winners, with the passage of this bill, are advocates of >>> standardized teaching and learning, and the few large >>> corporations that sell tests and test based curricula, not >>> children. >>> >>> While the challenges of contemporary schooling are serious, >>> the simplistic application of tests to make decisions about >>> children, teachers, and schools impedes student learning. >>> Comparisons of schools and students based on test scores >>> promotes teaching to the test and undoubtedly cause some >>> teachers and principals to cheat, understandably, in order >>> to make their schools look good on the tests. Punitively >>> oriented testing programs do not improve the quality of >>> schools; diminish disparities in academic achievement along >>> gender, race, or class lines; or move the country forward in >>> moral, social or economic terms. We support accountability, >>> but not test driven accountability that draws teachers and >>> children into a corruption of education. >>> >>> The most serious problem with testing based educational >>> reform is its singularity of voice, its insistence that >>> education be evaluated and improved in a single way. >>> >>>
On 3/18/05, T.E.C. - Iowa wrote: > > Don’t listen to Stan! As an educator, he does not get it! Note the > comment, “Please teach to the test. If we do then our children will > at least learn something.” In my long teaching career, I have known > many who say, “at least, at least.” It never dawns on them that it > should be “at most!” It should always be “at most!” Anytime > someone advocates anything with the line “at least” I never listen > and I suggest all others do the same!! I advocate not listening, > because the “at least” people have no imagination for the bigger > possibilities.
Fine words, but in a "one size fits all" school system where directives from on high within the state determine direction, its not realistic. You seem caught up in semantics. The REALITY is that a lot of children are falling behind because the system, for whatever reason, doesn't work for them. The REALITY is that the "test" measures what is known of the curriculum that our nation has defined. It may be a poor instrument for measuring, but its what is being used. Simply saying "you used the words "at least" so no one should listen to you..." doesn't address the REALITY of teaching. Its all well and good to say "at most", but that both limits the upper possibilities and shuts down any dialogue or cooperation. Why not open your mind instead of dismissing what you don't care to see?
Terrorists hope to defeat Bush through Iraq violence By Borzou Daragahi THE WASHINGTON TIMES BAGHDAD — Leaders and supporters of the anti-U.S. insurgency say their attacks in recent weeks have a clear objective: The greater the violence, the greater the chances that President Bush will be defeated on Tuesday and the Americans will go home. "If the U.S. Army suffered numerous humiliating losses, [Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John] Kerry would emerge as the superman of the American people," said Mohammad Amin Bashar, a leader of the Muslim Scholars Association, a hard-line clerical group that vocally supports the resistance. Resistance leader Abu Jalal boasted that the mounting violence had already hurt Mr. Bush's chances. "American elections and Iraq are linked tightly together," he told a Fallujah-based Iraqi reporter. "We've got to work to change the election, and we've done so. With our strikes, we've dragged Bush into the mud." Mowafaq Al-Tai, a London- educated architect and intellectual, said different types of resistance fighters have different views of the U.S. election. The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life. The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case." Abu Jalal, answering questions submitted to him through the Iraqi journalist, devised a simple formula for how his group's attacks on American soldiers draw votes from Mr. Bush. "They say there are 1,100 dead soldiers. That means 1,100 families hold grudges against Bush and hate him. There are 6,000 families whose sons were injured who hate Bush and will not re-elect him." But even within the resistance, not all agree that removing Mr. Bush from office would make a difference. "The nation of infidels is one, and Bush and Kerry are two faces of the same coin," said Abu Obeida, nom de guerre of a leader of Fallujah's al- Noor Jihadi regiment. "What is taken by force will be returned only by force, and we don't care what the results of the elections are." Among ordinary Iraqis interested only in a return to peace and stability, there is far less clarity about what the American election might bring. Many, like 35-year-old bank branch manager Sahar Mahmoud, say they are bewildered by media reports about the nuances of polling, swing states and attack ads. "It's a very big political game, and something that we are very far from," he said. "We are very tired people, and we're just emerging from a big crisis. So we can't imagine what other people are going through." Zeydoon Mohamad Jassem Najar, a biology student at Baghdad University, simply shakes his head as the U.S. politicians argue over his country's fate. “It's like everybody is looking out for their own interests and nobody is looking for the Iraqi people's interests," he said. "It's like a game of personal interests between Bush and the other guy." Mr. Bashar, a professor at Baghdad's Islamic University, said he and many of those who oppose the U.S. presence in Iraq were rooting for Mr. Kerry. "I think if Kerry wins, he's going to try to get world support and United Nations involvement," he said during an interview at Baghdad's Um al-Qura mosque. "You'll see a different situation in Iraq if the United Nations is involved." But Nazar Judi, a 41-year-old money trader who had his right hand cut off by Saddam Hussein's security forces nine years ago, is squarely in the Bush camp. "I prefer Bush over the other guy because he knows Iraq well," said Mr. Judi, who received a new prosthetic hand from the U.S. Army and was flown to Washington to meet Mr. Bush in person. "I hope he wins his election because he wants to modernize Iraq." A photograph of the American president shaking Mr. Judi's prosthetic hand hangs on the wall of a back room at his Khademiya office. In the front room, however, are portraits of Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the vehemently anti-U.S. Iranian cleric, and his successor, Ali Khamenei, the current theocratic ruler of Iran.
October 18, 2004 Democrats, NAACP Get Crack Squad Out For Voter-Registration Efforts In a story that will redefine the term "crack troops", a volunteer for Democrats and the NAACP tried to pay registration-gatherers in illegal drugs:
Defiance Deputies along with Toledo Police Department detectives conducted a search warrant of a residence on Woodland in Toledo, believed to be the home of the woman who hired Staton to solicit voter registration. Officers confiscated drug paraphernalia along with voter registration forms from the home. The occupant of the home, Georgianne Pitts, age 41, advised law enforcement, along with Ohio B.C.I.&I., that she had been recruited by Thaddeus J. Jackson, II, of Cleveland, to obtain voter registrations. Pitts admitted to paying Staton crack cocaine for the registrations in lieu of money. A business card provided by Pitts indicated that Jackson is the Assistant NVF Ohio Director of the NAACP National Voter Fund.
Predictably, instead of going out and getting valid registrations, the addict instead filled a hundred or so applications out himself. It seems that Democrats and the NAACP in Ohio want to stage their own version of Rock The Vote, one that MTV probably won't approve.
Put this in with Democrats' affiliation with Americans Coming Together, which hired sex offenders and other felons to go door-to-door to get registrations, and you have the makings of a very desperate, and extraordinarily stupid, effort to swing this election. Will the Ohio Democratic Party and the local NAACP terminate anyone associated with this project, or will they make the same kinds of excuses we heard when the news broke on ACT's hiring practices? Ohioans should take careful note of these methods and choose their representatives accordingly.
I'm taking the Praxis 2 tests 0011 and 0012 this Saturday. I am not prepared for the 0012 (I'm a new-teacher-to-be.) Does anyone know of any "quick" information or advice to help me focus my studies?
On 9/29/04, bill p dwyer wrote:
> concrete information is the bain of the "soft capitol"
> system, why would investment fluctuations take place
> unless we reflected subjetivity, the more accurate we can
> be about "event" based fluctuations, supposedly the more
we
> run the game, yet.....See More