I do not see any particular literary device here - other than the design of the argument of the poem:
The argument of the poem should first be considered in two parts: the first three stanzas describe the physical and spiritual distress of the speaker and the relief God has given her. The last four stanzas recite the speaker's thanks for that relief.
The poem moves from a description of earthly ills to that of heavenly praise - the speaker anticipates an afterlife in which she will be with God and will continue to praise Him.
In stanza three, the speaker notes her physical improvement - God's work in her - and her intention to praise God for that benefit.
Each stanza should be examined for its moment: for example, in stanza four, God's "bounty" is expressed in His modification of trials ("Even for His mercies in His rod, Where pity most of all I see.")
In the last stanza, the speaker asks not for further physical or even personal spiritual benefit; she asks merely for the ability to praise God both in this life and in the next - surely an ultimate in prayer. God's instruction in the first stanza ("Live") here is realized in life and afterlife praise of Him. This is "Deliverance".
AimeeOn 11/10/09, Candice Taylor wrote: > On 10/10/09, L.L wrote: >> On 10/03/09, CityTeacher wrote: >>> Hi! >>> I've read a few reviews and they all say to be careful with >>> the book, as it may have some inappropriate content. I'm >>> thinking about ordering enough copies for my entire class >>> (...See MoreOn 11/10/09, Candice Taylor wrote: > On 10/10/09, L.L wrote: >> On 10/03/09, CityTeacher wrote: >>> Hi! >>> I've read a few reviews and they all say to be careful with >>> the book, as it may have some inappropriate content. I'm >>> thinking about ordering enough copies for my entire class >>> (11 year olds)...It's an Accelerated Reader book on a 5.1 >>> level. >>> Has anyone done any lessons using this book? >>> The reviews said the characters smoke and behave badly, but >>> I don't know who reviewed the book. I'd rather get a >>> professional opinion! :) >> >> Yes, I used this novel with 3rd graders. The naughty/wild >> children of one family are characterized as smoking and >> behaving badly.Their pranks and silliness are what make it >> funny. Read it and then decide if it is appropriate for your >> class. You know your community/parents best. > > I read the book aloud to my 6th-graders (11-12 yrs. old.) The > language is a bit spicy in some places (2-3) but I skip those > words or say something else fitting but appropriate. I live in > Utah, and my students are from very conservative homes. The > book is well-worth reading -- good message, and thoughtful > passages.
I read it with my 4th graders. I teach inner city , so it really speaks to them! They love it. The only truly "bad word" in the book is hell. It is actually a very lovely story. The kids are characterized as stealing, smoking cigars, cussing at teachers, etc. But, the point of the story at the end is that they turn around and find the meaning of Christmas and they give back for the first time ever. It's a great story. You know best of all what community you t are teaching to and if they can handle it. I would read it first (it's a quick read for an adult) and then decide. There is also a DVD from the 80's. Your local library probably has it. Also, before you buy a class set, check the library. Our local branch has a class set and teacher resources.
Our 8th grade teachers want to develop a unit around the theme of how conflict leads to change. Are there any engaging short stories or pieces of literature that would address this theme and be suitable for 8th graders? Any advice would be greatly appreciated
GReeceThat's exactly what I was going to say. Profundity and all that . . . > > Doesn't *every* story have either that theme or the theme > that no change takes place but should have? > > L.Swilley
I'm doing goal setting lessons in grades Kinder-6th and looking for some mentor texts to read aloud. Other than "The Little Engine That Could" any other ideas for quick reads about motivation, perseverance, believing in oneself etc??
My grade 10 students have started a novel and I have a whole range of reading abilities - some students I had to get them to promise me they wouldnt read the entire book the first weekend!
My question to you is do you:
A - have them read the novel then do all of your activities, assignments, projects, questions when they are done reading?
or
B - Have assignments along the way? hoping that those who are slower readers get caught up and the quick readers will be able to remember what they have already read....
I found your post quite useful, especially the instruction to target individual students rather than throwing questions out to the whole class. Today I found during discussion that some students had read the story, but had not understood it well. We are reading "The Devil and Tom Walker" and Irving is a bit coy here and there. After Walker's wife is killed by the devil, we learn that "Tom consoled himself for the loss of his property with the loss of his wife, for he was a man of fortitude." To understand, you need to know what "consoled" means, and have a sense of irony. It seems that a close reading was called for. How do you proceed? In the past you've mentioned reading Shakespeare line by line. I don't think that is called for here, but even going a paragraph at a time leaves many students staring into space. How do I slow it down for some without making it excruciating for many?
Today I found during discussion that some > students had read the story, but had not understood it well.
[Were they quizzed on the assigned reading? I use matching tests with 10 items on one side and 13 on the other. This avoids a process of elimination. The quiz takes 5 minutes and determines very well whether the students have read the assigned material.]
We > are reading "The Devil and Tom Walker" and Irving is a bit coy > here and there. After Walker's wife is killed by the devil, we > learn that "Tom consoled himself for the loss of his property > with the loss of his wife, for he was a man of fortitude." To > understand, you need to know what "consoled" means, and have a > sense of irony.
[You mean, I take it, that some or many students did not know the meaning of "consoled". In-class reading of the first few paragraphs of a story is always a good idea, and will resolve such problems. Ask a student to rephrase a sentence, then another to rephrase another. Perhaps you have assigned the whole story when only part of it should be addressed with your group.]
It seems that a close reading was called for.
[Yes, definitely. Never be pressured into that awful "covering of the material"; start slowly and precisely. With that foundation, larger parts of the work can then be addressed.]]
> How do you proceed? In the past you've mentioned reading > Shakespeare line by line. I don't think that is called for here, > but even going a paragraph at a time leaves many students > staring into space. How do I slow it down for some without > making it excruciating for many?
[You won't know how many or how few are involved until you give the quiz described above, then start with the first paragraph, asking what a story beginning so might be about. At this initial point, of course, the possible "paths" are many - but the exercise is to have the student *defend* his "path" by pointing out words or phrases in the first paragraph that give him his idea.]
[Look at the first paragraph of Conrad's "Secret Sharer": it describes the confusion of shore-line and sea. When we see that this is a story about the ambuiguity of law, its inability to judge every case fairly because of the confusing complexity of some cases (like this one of the secret sharer), we can see the possible art and purpose of such an opening. I am sure there are other readings of that first paragraph that anticipate parts of the argument in the story that follows, but there is at least *that*. If the teacher knows the story well - and he must know it as well as possible - he will recognize in the student's projections something he can give direction to, direction by continued questiolning of individual students that "bends" the thought of the class to what he wants them to see. There is NOTHING that can replace the teacher's prior knowledge of the "shape" of the work he is teaching; without that, he has nothing to direct the minds of his students to - and *that*, of course, is the whole purpose of his teaching: to re-create his own mind thinking out the problem into the minds of his students, and this by questioning them to have them "discover" what he knows and - above all - *how* he knows it. This is teaching *par excellence*; there is literally nothing else.]
[By the way, "Secret Sharer" is a wonderful story to teach.]
This poem expresses regret that our excessive worldly interests have blinded us to the nobler images of ourselves to be found in Nature. The argument of the poem is in three parts: part one, lines 1-5, is a description of our frantic worldy life and its opposition to a simpler and nobler existence to be achieved by comtemplating our image in Nature...See MoreThis poem expresses regret that our excessive worldly interests have blinded us to the nobler images of ourselves to be found in Nature. The argument of the poem is in three parts: part one, lines 1-5, is a description of our frantic worldy life and its opposition to a simpler and nobler existence to be achieved by comtemplating our image in Nature; part two, lines 5-9, gives examples of human images in nature to which we are blind. In part three, lines 9-14, the narrator says he would rather be an ancient pagan, for they, at least, had a proper appreciation of Nature which we so sadly lack. The depth of our worldliness is emphasized by "Late and soon, getting and spending," that is late getting but soon spending - we spend *before* we get (very like our current credit-card practices.) To establish the contrast between our excessive worldly interests and a healthier interest in Nature, the sonnet uses two references that focus on the human breast: in our worldly way, we "give our hearts away,' and this is a "sordid boon," a poor gift; but the world of Nature which we are asked to consider is pictured as a healthier, nobler kind of giving, a mother breast-feeding her child ("The sea that bares her bosom...the winds that would be howling at all hours...up-gathered now like sleeping flowers..."). By implication another contrast is made in the third part of the poem (lines 9-14). Here, the narrator says that he would "rather be a Pagan," for pagans not only saw themselves in nature, but saw their noble, god-like images there (Proteus, Triton); whereas we worldly generation have lost that, even though, as the poem implies ("I'd rather be a Pagan...), we are Christians. (And perhaps the image of the mother and child earlier anticipates this inference by suggesting Mary and her Infant Son). Ironically, and much to our discredit, our Christianity sould call us to the images of love in Nature to which the poem draws our attention; but although we profess to be Christians, and therefore unworldly, we are in fact un-Christian and very worldly indeed. The pagans were apparently more "Christian" than we are.
I am going to finish up my TESOL certification that I started 5-6 years ago. All I need to do is take an American Literature class as well as complete the senior TESOL seminar. Since I teach during the day, I cannot take an American Literature course at the college where I started my TESOL certification. So, I'm looking for an easy, cheap course online that is more of a survey of American literature to take. Any suggestions?
Thank you,
Daniel Hanson High School Spanish Instructor/Teacher Modesto, California, USA
I do not see any particular literary device here - other than the design of the argument of the poem:
The argument of the poem should first be considered in two parts: the first three stanzas desc...See More