It is not up to the offended party to make a big deal about it. The offended party only relayed the information along. You must certainly pull in the subbing teacher and start the conversation lightly, giving him (or her) the opportunity to fess up. Should that not occur, you should certainly share your knowledge. You are under no obligation to tell the subbing teacher the source of the information. You should also realize that the students told a teacher (good for them) but I suspect that they also told other students. You didn't mention the age range of the students, so it is tough to answer. But is would suggest some 1) training for the subbing teacher, and 2) training for the student body about walking through life and dealing with others who do not share their views (...on religion, on clothing, on everything) and take this as an opportunity to share witht he students that we need to accept others.
Good luck!
On 3/24/10, jade wrote: > One teacher in my department,who was substituting for > another, made an inappropriate comment to students regarding > the absent teacher's sexuality. The remark was apparently > made in a joking manner. Two students reported the comment > back to the maligned party, who then reported back to me, > the chair. The offended party does not want to make a "big > deal" about it, but was obviously upset enough to come to > me. I, too, am extremely upset. How do you feel this > situation is best dealt with?
Are you new to the chairmanship? I don't know what it means to not make a 'big deal' out of this - does that mean the teacher wants to do nothing officially? Did the teacher come to you as a friend or as the chair?
If they came to you as a friend, then as a friend you listen, you commiserate and you can give friendly advice. If they came to you as the chair, that's another matter entirely. But why someone would come to the chair and say "I don't want to make a big deal out of this" makes NO sense. If as chair you want to make a big deal out of this, you need the maligned teacher's permission to do so.
My friendly advice would be to tell the teacher to go and speak to the offending teacher. My advice as the chair would be that first - you speak with the offending teacher and then mediate with both teachers present.
After much thought, I really feel its not my school, and that it is the core of teaching I do not like. I didnt love student teaching either. I really feel uncomfortable with classroom management, and have a very very soft personality. Many days I dread waking up and going to school, despite the fact that my job is really decent. I just do not like teaching- being in front of an audience, being firm, etc etc. I have been trying to explore my options for next year, because I dont know if I can take another year of being miserable. I know it not only affects me, but my students too! They deserve better.
On the side I have been doing children's book illustrations and selling some of my work. It's not much money, but its my passion. I recently got an offer from a pre-school I worked at one summer to take a full-time lead teacher position for next year. I am really torn about what to do. I am not sure what career direction I want to go in right now. I do know that the preschool would be a paycut, but the hours are shorter. It would afford me more time to pursue my dreams of creating children's book illustrations. (And maybe some more income in to supplement the paycut?)
Anyways, I am not merely posting about my money concerns. I really need some advice from other teachers because I am worried that if I take this preschool job, it might be looked down upon if in fact I decide to go back to teaching. As a veteran teacher, I would like to know your thoughts. If I did decide in the future to go back to teaching at a school......... Do you think an administration would think less of me if I left a full-time contracted teaching job for a district to work at a preschool for a year (or more?)
It would be pretty ideal for me....... except for pay. I am still waiting to find out what the paycut will be, so that will really help me make my decision.
To SC Teach, yes, I am not really happy teaching and feel it is not for me. But I went into teaching for a reason- I do love kids- and worry that down the line- what if theres some slim chance I want to try it again? I mean, I feel pretty sure about my thoughts.. but what if?!
Thats why I posted.. I guess I am just confused and am worried about making the wrong decision, and ruining my career. Its not so much I am worried about what other people will think- I just dont want to make a dumb career move. I feel pretty miserable where I am, and my gut is telling me I should be moving on. But worry that theres some small chance I may regret my decision and want to come back...... and then what?
I also didnt mention that I previously had a degree and job in textile design and went back to school to teach. So I am already a career changer, and do not wish to go back to school at this time. Thanks for listening. Theres a lot I need to work out on my own....
On 4/05/10, Leah wrote: > Did you enjoy the preschool experience??? Do you think you > would have less need to be firm with the younger children, etc. > How much freedom would you have as a preschool lead teacher to > be creative with art or is there a set curriculum you would have > to teach, and only do art now and then? > > Since illustrating children's books is what you love, the > preschool position would allow you more time for that. Can you > afford to take a pay cut? > >>> Do you think an >>> administration would think less of me if I left a full-time >>> contracted teaching job for a district to work at a >>> preschool for a year (or more?) > Nobody knows the answer to that question, but if you quit a > elementary position teaching art, there probably would be some > question about whether you were a good candidate for teaching > art somewhere else in the future. > > However, if you are miserable, it sounds like to need to do > something else for your own mental and physical health.
In my state, there is no standard body of courses that state- certified teachers take so there is no standard body of knowledge they have or any standard way to explain things to kids. Your state may be better organized but please take my assurance that your colleagues are not explaining things to kids all in the same way. Nor even if they were should you assume that way would also work for you and your kids.
Explain to the kids in the way that works for you and them. Did every teacher you ever had explain things in the same way as all the other teachers?
Read these boards and you'll see there is no standard way to teach Social Studies - in fact, recent posts on several of the board are a discussion of just that - how best to teach Social Studies? The fact that the answers to the question can vary widely should tell you once again - there is no standard way to explain things.
In fact, when I teach I try to find as many different ways to explain things as possible - especially when I teach math but also when I teach history. "Well, let's look at it like this", "let's try explaining it this way," here's another way to try to understand it, kids" "Ok, I'll explain it again but this time I'm going to say to you..."
Don't worry about being Alt Cert - for all of time all teachers were 'alt cert' - there was no 'cert' until very recently in history. And the 'cert' process is different from state to state - does that mean some states are better at 'certing' their teachers than others?
Teachers can look askance at 'alt. cert' but that's because they think we somehow cheated the system, didn't pay our dues, who are we anyway and - the teachers' unions don't like us at all. They prefer sheep like followers and anything alternative makes them worry they'll be a decrease in dues coming in.
Are your methods working for you? The worst classes I took when I tried to 'cert' the normal way were the methods classes - they made no sense and were taught by people who'd never taught at any level but the college level - and they weren't using the 'methods' they purported to teach us. Methods classes are a bunch of nonsense.
Teaching is learned on the job - nowhere else. You can learn your subject matter in the classroom and should but some of the worst teachers I've ever seen were excellent students in their 'methods' courses.
But here's a site with a list of 'teaching methods' but the list isn't exactly at the rocket science level of complexity.
[link removed]
Punch 'teaching methods' in google and watch the gobbletygoogle come up.
Does anyone have any great project ideas that include the kids doing most of the process themselves? How can I best guide them through the process without spoonfeeding them the directions?
I propose you determine what needs to be taught. Then allow your students to help develop how they walk through the process of the project and define the components (how they show the results). Think about it?
Why is Music Important? Here is what recent studies say:
- Music Instruction and Education Makes Better Math and Science Students - Music Instruction and Education Enhances Intellectual Development - Music Instruction and Education Helps Students Score Higher on Math Tests - Students with Music Performance and/or Appreciation Score Higher on the SAT than Students without Music Performance and/or Appreciation
What Tier One Tutoring Can Offer You:
- Weekly Sessions (Duration of 60 minutes) – 4 violin lessons each month - Lesson Books - Teacher with over 11 years of Experience playing the Violin, who served as a Former Section Leader and who has More Than Four Years of Experience Working With Children! - An opportunity to adjust the number of weekly sessions (contact to discuss)
Rates:
The price is $140 for the month (4 violin lessons). However, we understand that some parents and students prefer to pay as they go! For that reason, we offer the same service on a weekly payment plan of $45 per session.
Additional discounts may apply, if you choose to take advantage of other services that our company offers, such as Math Tutoring, SAT Prep or Athletic Training or decide to have group sessions (2 or more persons)!
Location:
Our teacher can come to you! Other arrangments can be made where appropriate.
Contact:
For inquiry or to schedule a session, reply to this post or email us at [email removed]]!
This time last year as a student teacher, I was so excited about teaching. Now, at the end of my first year and a week away from THE test, I am so burned out. I can't even imagine doing anything fun in the last month of school.
Please help. I know that I should enjoy spring break-ya da ya da. But really, what are veteran teachers doing to keep from burning out?
Are you burned out or tired out? There's a difference. To me it sounds like you're tired out and from the test. Burned out teachers sound and often are very bitter - I don't sense any bitterness in you.
And you're worried about the test - that's natural. For you to be truly burned out in your first year of teaching, something Really bad would have to happen or - you're one of those teachers who really just doesn't like kids.
but that doesn't seem to be the case to me either. Once the tests are over, it will get better and once you survive your first year including the tests, I think next year won't feel like it's burning you out.
Therefore, I wanted to get some teachers opinion's on whether situated learning is effective in the classroom. Also, if it is effective, what types of activities work better than others?
I thank you for any information you can share, because this could be helpful in my future practice as a speech language pathologist, whenever I may be collaborating with a teacher, etc.
Amanda C.On 4/09/10, Steve wrote: > What does it mean to be effective in terms of learning? We > bandy that concept around but what does it really mean? Or - > what you do mean when you used the word 'effective'? > > Do you mean they'll remember the details of that situated > learning class years later? If it taught them that the Scopes &g...See MoreOn 4/09/10, Steve wrote: > What does it mean to be effective in terms of learning? We > bandy that concept around but what does it really mean? Or - > what you do mean when you used the word 'effective'? > > Do you mean they'll remember the details of that situated > learning class years later? If it taught them that the Scopes > Trial was in 1920, that they'll remember that forever? Or > that they're remember that for the state tests? Or that > they'll remember that and be able to apply it usefully in > some way as they live their lives? > > What is learning anyway? You're a speech pathologist so when > the child no longer lisps, they've learned what you had to > teach them. And you can literally see and hear the > effectiveness of your teaching methods - the kid no longer > lisps. > > What about when you're teaching history as I do? (and how > much of the history taught you do you remember?...) Is it ok > just to learn something for the unit test? The state tests? > And then if it dribbles away over the next year or over > years, was it really learned? > > I'd say this - 'situated learning' is something many kids > seems to enjoy. There's no one right answer for every school > community or every classroom but in my classroom, kids looked > and are terribly bored - out of their gourds - when we do > history in any traditional way. When kids are bored out of > their gourds, are they really learning?? > > And do you think math should be taught in a real world > context? I'm sure you do. English? Any time we're speaking > English, reading English, writing English - we're using it in > a real world context. Science? The experiments we do in > science classrooms are a 'situated learning' experience. So > it must be history/social studies classes of which you're > speaking, right? >> > > But my first question is the one I'd really need the answer > to to be able to answer your question - what do you > consider 'effective' in terms of learning? How do you measure > that, judge that? >
To answer your question about 'effective' learning, I mean.. is the student able to transfer the information they've learned in the classroom. This could be done in a number of ways. Are they able to apply it to other things they are learning? Are they able to use it in every day life? In different Situations? On an exam? If a transfer of learning has occurred, then the student has effectively learned what was being taught in the classroom.
I didn't necessarily mean "situated learning" to be just relevant to history classes. For example, in an English class, a situated learning project could be one such as creating and "submitting" a resume to the teacher who would act as an "employer". The students would get a feel for what it's like to create and write a resume for a real job. The teacher could even take it further and have an interview process involved as part of the project. An example for a history class would be the students developing their own "U.N." where each student or group of students represents a particular Country, and current events or topics are debated. Situated learning can take a number of different avenues, and can be applied to any area of study.
Spoken like a speech therapist - those are good measures for the effectiveness of speech intervention.
On an exam? Why would teachers would continue to use a method instruction that didn't have their kids doing well on exams?
> If a transfer of learning has occurred, then the student has > effectively learned what was being taught in the classroom.
The phrase 'transfer of learning' - is academically lovely but rarely used in secondary education. We are taught to teach for tests - and we were taught to do that before the state tests were instituted. Whether students remembered anything past the test or certainly the final didn't seem to concern anybody. Math would try to wake them up in September and see what they could recall but past math and foreign language, curriculum isn't based on the assumption that they've actually retained anything - though we fervently hope they do.
So that reading The Scarlet Letter in English class is less 'situated' than learning to write a resume? Learning how to calculate mortgage payments or understand a budget would be more 'situated' than quadratic equations?
And learning how to write a resume isn't a valuable skill worthy of being taught in school? It exercises their writing skills, their thinking skills and writing a resume is a real skill but yes, it's of the 'real world' so we shouldn't be doing that in school? > For example, in an English class, a situated > learning project could be one such as creating and "submitting" a > resume to the teacher who would act as an "employer". The students > would get a feel for what it's like to create and write a resume > for a real job. > > Does this clarify what I meant?
Only somewhat because I'd say school itself is a 'situated process' in and of itself - I thought the purpose of school was to prepare students for the real world - how would we do that if we didn't use 'situated learning'?
Maybe give an example of a class or lesson that wasn't situated and that you saw as effective?
And it's very American - and very easy to market to students in that light. Are we an ancient monarchy? Or as Americans are we citizens of the world's oldest continuous democracy? as Americans are we expected to participate in our government and voice our opinions?
I see students as benefitting from discussion and thinking - the discussion you're considering is a thought-provoking one and too many classrooms encourage rote memorization and no thought.
There are 'democratic schools' out there - all private of course I think - where the schools are run together by faculty and students equally. Check out the Summerhill School or look up Jerry Mintz, the guru of democratic schools.
I'd say - have it already in mind what you want them to say or - better - have a short (very) list of rules that you've come up with and give them the option of ratifying them as did we with our list of rules that is our wonderful Constitution.
I have one rules in my classroom - Everything we do here needs to be safe (and that includes me and I tell them that) Physically safe and emotionally safe. I don't need more than that for that covers a lot of ground.
> Would giving elementary school students (let's say, 3rd > grade and up) the ability to make their own rules lead to > an effective school year? I'm looking into using an > approach like this one in my future classroom. However, I'm > afraid it could end up backfiring. Would it make me, as a > teacher, less powerful? Or would the students benefit more > because it's based on their own ideas? What would be some > good ways to encourage student participation in the > rule-making? Any ideas or thoughts are greatly appreciated!
Please take a moment to read about this important summer event for teachers, administrators, teacher-educators, and education policy makers.
On July 12 – 14, 2010, the Kittredge Center for Business and Workforce Development, Holyoke (MA) Community College will host the Institute for 21st Century Teaching and Learning.
The Institute’s purpose is not only to enhance awareness of the skills and ways of thinking students will need in order to meet and successfully address the multiple challenges of the 21st century, but also – and most importantly – to provide strategies and share examples of how to apply this awareness to actual teaching and learning.
In order to provide opportunity for in-depth interaction and long-term impact, the Institute is limited to 100 participants, so register soon. Registration deadline is June 11. The Institute will involve participants in activities that incorporate the processes being addressed and include planning for back home application.
Check out the link below, share it with your colleagues, and consider participating. It will take you to the web site where you will find more detail and registration information.
Hal PortnerSorry the link doesn't work. Please cut and paste it to your browser.
On 4/10/10, Hal Portner wrote: > Dear T-Netter, > > Please take a moment to read about this important summer > event for teachers, administrators, teacher-educators, and > education policy makers. > > [link removed]
It is not up to the offended party to make a big deal about it. The offended party only relayed the information along. You must certainly pull in the subbing teacher and start the conversation lightly, giving him (or her) the opportunity to fess up. Should that not occur, you should certainly share your knowledge. ...See More