Early Childhood education guru Cheryl Hatch has written a primer on teaching math to young children. You don't want to miss it. Also, please share the link with colleagues!
Add, subtract, multiply, and divide decimals to hundredths, using concrete models or drawings and strategies based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between addition and subtraction; relate the strategy to a written method and explain the reasoning used.
On 10/29/15, harpazo w...See MoreSure..., Harpazzo. If I found the general solution to a second order ODE, it means nothing, as I could have "guessed correctly", right?
And if one is "not a good test taker", due to nerves, etc. what makes you think they can handle a complex math problem in front of twenty screaming kids?
On 10/29/15, harpazo wrote: > What does a standardized math test or any > other timed test really prove about a > person's ability to do the job? Some people > are just not good test takers. I can pass a > math test by guessing correctly. What does > that prove? It certainly does not prove that > I am mathematically > gifted. Standardized exams are given to make > money, to reduce the amount of applicants > for a job and to discriminate against people > with a shaky academic background. What do > you say?
Mrs.MissisippiOn 10/30/15, Math Teach wrote: > Sure..., Harpazzo. If I found the general solution to a > second order ODE, it means nothing, as I could have "guessed > correctly", right? > > And if one is "not a good test taker", due to nerves, etc. > what makes you think they can handle a complex math problem > in front ...See MoreOn 10/30/15, Math Teach wrote: > Sure..., Harpazzo. If I found the general solution to a > second order ODE, it means nothing, as I could have "guessed > correctly", right? > > And if one is "not a good test taker", due to nerves, etc. > what makes you think they can handle a complex math problem > in front of twenty screaming kids? > > > > On 10/29/15, harpazo wrote: >> What does a standardized math test or any >> other timed test really prove about a >> person's ability to do the job? Some people >> are just not good test takers. I can pass a >> math test by guessing correctly. What does >> that prove? It certainly does not prove that >> I am mathematically >> gifted. Standardized exams are given to make >> money, to reduce the amount of applicants >> for a job and to discriminate against people >> with a shaky academic background. What do >> you say? Hi there I always have a lot to say but thats what people from Rosewood Pennsylvania are like that is why my class is so smart because they learn from each other so if you get your lot to talk to each other then they can become smarter.
I need to calculate the length of a leg of a right triangle but the angle and heights are variables. I am wondering if some one could help me write a formula in excel that solves with variables
Read the section in your text. Listen to your teacher and follow along the examples he/she works. Do problems.
No matter what anyone tells you, no one ever learned math by any other process than doing problems. There is no substitute and there is no "royal road" to math - you have to work at it.
Unfortunately you haven't yet put in enough work to even know what questions to ask.
Hi all! In a graph of cost of running a newspaper ad vs number of days would the points be connected? Since a portion of a day can't be purchased I would think the data is discrete and the points would not be connected?
I agree. And good for you for realizing this, as it is one of the most overlooked points student forget about. We used to illustrate it with a problem like this: a school bus holds 40 students. 100 student are going on the class trip. How many buses are needed? Many students will answer 2.5 - until we ask them how there could be a half of a bus.
Looks good > On 12/30/15, jasmine wrote: >> Please help with finishing pattern, >> >> 2, 7, 26, 101, 400, ?
give a formula that tells you what the nth term in the series is, as a function of n. Right now you have the pattern in what we call recursive form, meaning that in order to find a given term you do things to prior terms. But what if you do not know the prior terms? What I want is a formula for the nth term where the only variable is n. This is sometimes referred to as the closed form of the pattern.
The recursive form would be written as follows, where a(n) means the nth term of the series (not multiplication):
a(n+1) = 4*[a(n)]-(n-1)
what we now want is a formula that looks something like this: a(n) = some function containing only n's and no a(n)'s.
Because if I were to ask what is the 11th term in the series, or the 157th term in the series is, you could not easily answer it without a TON of work, computing each term to find out what the desired term is. IOW to find the 157th term you would first have to find the first 156 terms. With the closed form you simply plug 157 in for n in your closed form.
Here is a simple example:
2,4,8,16,....
Pattern is previous term times 2.
Recursive form is: a(n+1) = 2*a(n)
But again, if I ask what the 136th term is you first have to compute the first 135 terns to use this form.
Closed form is: a(n) = 2^n
With this I can instantly see that the 136th term is 2^136, without having to compute any of the first 135 terms.
One final caution: while the solution given by the responder is correct, it is NOT a UNIQUE solution. There are literally (used in the correct sense) an infinite number of solutions, it is just that the one we came up with is the simplest.
Think of the five terms we were given as 5 points on a plane (the x coordinate is n, y coordinate is the nth term). So now you have 5 points on a coordinate plane. There are an infinite number of ways you can draw a line through those 5 points. Each one when extended would give different answers to what the 6th, 7th, etc., terms are.
Another simple example. Say the series is 1,2,4
Obviously the next term is 8, right?
Nope it is 7. Why? Because the rule is NOT double the prior term: a(n+1) = 2*a(n).
The actual rule I had in mind was first add 1, then add 2, then add 3, etc. Or: a(n+1) = a(n) + n
BUT, in the absence of any other information providing more specificity, both answers would clearly be correct.