I find that if you preplan by creating a rubric of how you are allocating points; you will find grading to be easier and less subjective. In fact, I further recommend you provide the students with said rubric for their understanding of what you expect. Then, students can self asses their work before handing into you for a final grade. This increases accountability. Why should a student hand in a 2/5 on an introduction? Perhaps you would say, "I will only accept a self assessment rating of 3+, please redo and hand in." By using this method, you ensure you are able to provide meaningful feedback to a students "best work." Hope this helps!!
I'm torn over essays - should efficiency take precedence over everything else? Unfortunately I guess it has to though in the ideal world what would take precedence is grading/evaluating papers in a way that produces the most learning for students, the most motivation to correct and continue to develop their writing.
But we get reduced to trying to do it efficiently. I want to give a thorough evaluation to all student writing. If writing is as important as we make it out to be, then more than any other task it deserves my professional attention. I know rubrics are used and I use them too but not gobs of them. I give the kids a list of things necessary in good writing and usually I give each paper two grades - one for content and one for writing mechanics. I see papers with excellent ideas and insightful points and I think that should be noted and rewarded as it encourages them to continue to develop their writing mechanics. I see papers that are perfect in syntax, punctuation etc but have shallow content and to develop those students as writers I'll give their mechanics an A but writing is Much More than mechanics. A perfectly punctuated sentence can still be dull as dust.
I give fewer papers so I have time to invest in the papers I do assign. I never give another writing assignment until I have the prior one back and I tell both the kids and their parents back and explain why and it's always well- received. "I want to give the papers the benefit of a thorough evaluation."
And I don't want to just give grades - I want to have made a few comments. Not too many because the kids stop reading but three chosen comments in their papers for things to focus on.
And I allow rewrites. If a student wants to rewrite their paper a hundred times, wonderful. I will count the highest grade they achieve through their rewrites.
Is it efficient? I don't know but it lets me sleep with a clear conscience at night - I teach at a charter school where some families wake up at 4 to drive miles and miles to bring their kids to school.
"The last time I checked, a web search for the phrases 'everyone gets a trophy' and 'trophies just for showing up' produced more than 700,000 hits. The links mostly point to expressions of outrage that a thanks-for-playing token might be given to all the kids on the field — in contrast to the good old days, when recognition was permitted only for the conquering heroes. That’s a lot of hating to be directed at loving cups..."
Click below...you might be surprised at what Kohn has to say about this facet of the myth of the spoiled child.
Prior to the 1960s and the development of the birth control pill, family size was problematic.... While there have always been methods used to try to control family size, the birth control pill was easy to use and it worked - if you remembered to take it every day.
Certainly there are exceptions but with the invention of the birth control pill, family size in America shrank. In the 1950s the average number of children in America was 4.5 per family (my students are always amused by that statistic)
After the development of the pill, family size went rapidly down and now it stands at 1.5 children per family on average.
Once there were more children than people perhaps wanted and with little access to reliable effective birth control and then viola - there was the pill and now for the most part you could have exactly the number of children you wanted and no more.
And with that incredible change - the first time in history - the position of children changed. They went from "I hope I don't get pregnant again" to "I want to get pregnant and plan to have a baby next year and then wait three years and have another one."
When I grew up in the 1950s, NO ONE had a bumper sticker that said "I'm a proud grandmother" because - everybody was a grandmother. Children abounded and so did grandchildren.
But now many families have just two children who in turn have just two children. My grandmother had 13 grandchildren, my mother had six grandchildren and based on what my sons and their wives are telling me the most I can expect is four and maybe just three or two depending on finances.
Children went from being a blessing/burden to a controlled substance. Families can do more for two children than for four or give children. The money goes farther. It went from "How can I possibly feed all these kids?" to "Where can I take the kids to dinner tonight?" It went from "Go out and play, I have to take the sheets off all the beds, wash them and put them back on" to "Let's sign you up for soccer."
I'm a big fan of Alfie Kohn but on this one I think he misses the mark. Upper middle class children are certainly pampered today and I guess coddled too. I had a paper route and worked on Saturdays raking leaves and shoveling snow for neighbors. Every kid had a hopeful lemonade stand.
While the gap between the rich and the poor grows dramatically in our country, the way of life in the upper middle class has changed dramatically. My family NEVER went out to dinner - it was an unthinkable expense - and we only had three children in our family. My mother cooked and as kids we were expected to do the dishes. Plastic hadn't been put into wide use so we had very few toys. A wagon and bikes. We were expected to entertain ourselves and stay out of trouble. ( we didn't always stay out of trouble)
Are kids coddled today? I don't like to think I coddled my sons - they were expected to help with household chores and expected to work hard in school. I expected them to play fairly and treat adults, neighbors and other children with respect. But in comparison to my children - my sons were indeed pampered. They played soccer in the fall, basketball at the Y in the winter, Little League baseball in spring and I sent them to day camps. (I never heard of day camp as a child...) They did not have paper routes. I was very pleased when they on their own became Junior Counselors at their camp and worked in the summers.
Maybe here's where coddling comes in - I had a moderately happy childhood. I was frequently blamed for things I did not do and if I had done something, my parents acted as if I had murdered somebody. I thought it an extreme response at the time and still do. I did not want my children to have to live in fear of me. I wanted to be a parent who heard them out and assumed first they were good-hearted, well-intentioned people who needed guiding as they grew. I thought mistakes made were a part of their growing not a abysmal flaw in their characters.
Is that coddling? I think it's decent parenting. And as for the celebrating - I do celebrate my sons. I'm blessed to have them. I'm blessed that they are and have always been - despite my possible coddling - healthy intelligent hard- working young men.
And I wanted their teachers to treat them with the same respect I taught them to show their teachers. I wanted teachers to be reasonable and fair and hear them out. I didn't want them to have busy work... I wanted them to have teachers who - like me - celebrated life's good fortunes and who - like me - enjoyed being around kids.
Very few of my teachers did that. They were rigid and too often downright mean in the name of learning. It was a not uncommon approach to teaching at that time but I did not want that same approach for my sons. Is that coddling?
The endless laughter that once echoed from elementary school playgrounds has unfortunately turned into silence. [Click below to read about how playgrounds have become silent entities in many schools and why recess should be part of the school day.]
Would you like to improve the culture in your classroom and your life? Try gratitude. This is the most powerful tool that I know. [Click below to read the article.]
Students m...See MoreNobody is asking the teacher to read the reading test to the student. A reading test must be read by the student. In my district we have started having some students read the test aloud as they take it. This way the proctor knows the student is reading the test and not just picking an answer and completing the test in 5 minutes.
Students must take the grade level test according to NCLB protocol unless specified in an IEP. The NWEA is leveled and is a better test than most of the current state/national tests.
Deb
On 6/16/14, I don't understand wrote: > I don't get it. How does a reading test that is read aloud to > a student show any indication of that student's ability to > read?? It seems to me to be a measure of the student's > ability to listen. If the kid can't pass the test, why is he > testing on that level? He can't read it! How about teaching > him to read instead of focusing on passing a test? smh
Mrs. H,
I find that if you preplan by creating a rubric of how you are allocating points; you will find grading to be easier and less subjective. In fact, I further recommend you provide the students with said rubric for their u...See More