Bob R/CAIt's not a blind spot. It's intentionally deceptive behavior. When it becomes obvious there's some "there" there, and he continues to deny and deflect from the exposed thread, that's not an accident, that's not stubbornness - that's a guilty actor doing everything he can to evade getting caught.
Beyond that, if you go to th...See MoreOkay, I have written that Russia is not the big issue in our elections, so this is about the sanctions. They did not work with Cuba when we used them for seventy years, and they are a failure everywhere else - except for creating suffering, and in turn hatred for America, by the average citizen in said country.
Beyond that, if you go to the article, "Economic Sanctions Against Russia Flop" you find that our sanctions cost our friends in the EU 100 billion dollars and it is said to cost Russia 55 billion, but that number is false, because it includes the costs due to the fall in the price of oil. That means our sanctions cost our friends more than double what it cost Russia, but we do not care. We want our sanctions against Russia no matter who it hurts!
Then the sanctions may help Russia. Russia has beefed up its own agriculture and its ties to Southeast Asia to meet its needs. This not only means the EU could be permanently hurt, but the article also goes on to say, "Washington's economic sanctions against Russia could thus end up producing a net plus for Russia, on a long-term basis."
So why is America going forward with this unsuccessful policy? IMHO, it is arrogance! America thinks anything we do to punish others will be successful. Thus, in our arrogance, we do not bother to analyze anything. We do not analyze the impact of what sanctions do to our friends, and we do not analyze the other factors that screw over our elections. We are like a child throwing a tantrum - a tantrum motivated by a media driven distain for the president with the intention of keeping Americans from thinking about real issues.
Frankly, it would be great if China sanctioned the US. Then Americans would have to start building their own stuff, and we would find life in America is better. Simply put, sometimes it is better to do things for yourself rather than sit on your butt, buy from others, and create a huge balance of payments deficit.
PS: This is what the report said happened in Russia, "As in many other countries targeted by sanctions, there was a 'rally around the flag' reaction, which led the population to accept the inconveniences caused by the unilateral coercive measures."
PPS: And this is who was impacted, "the sanctions were more political than economic, they have led in the process to a regrettable deterioration of the standard of living of the most vulnerable population groups in the Russian Federation and have also adversely affected smallholder farmers in Europe."
ChalkyPossibly true. But it's doesn't negate the fact that we should defend our country from interference from Russia or any other country who wants to undermine our system.
htt...See More"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election," the report said. U.S. spy agencies are "charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors," the report said, but do "not analyze U.S. political processes or U.S. public opinion."
It should hardly surprise us that a rich man who had the ability to give desperate young women a shot at stardom preyed on them. The Hollywood employment system is capitalism in microcosm, at its rawest and most naked.
(End quote)
At the end point of capitalism, the rich and powerful are largely exempt from the law and that is true in every industry. A union in Hollywood is a bandage on a boil that needs to be lanced! Simply put, abuse and exploitation is part of capitalism.
For too many Americans all they know is capitalism - to the point where they think capitalism and markets are the same. They are not! Yet, it turned out Marx was right about the end of capitalism. We have a society in which the rich are exempt from the law, and do as they please in all sectors of life. The rest of us get to suffer inequality, lack of health care, homelessness, hunger, drug addiction and more - all in the richest country in the history of mankind.
Tim FinneganI notice you didn't comment on my bashing of Weinstein...
Again, what are you claiming?
Did this person not mock someone who survived polio? I know you see everything as black and white, or male and female. How is calling her out for her ugly tweet bashing a woman? She is the one who made fun of a polio survivor.
Through ...See MoreFor two nights in a row, CBS News has done a piece on the city of Roqqa in Syria. It is all about how "American backed troops" are freeing that country from ISIS.
Nothing is said about the American policy of "Assad must go" and the role of Assad's army and the Russian assistance in destroying the fundamentalists in Syria.
Through most of the Obama years, America was supporting the terrorists in pursuit of their "Assad must go" policy - mostly by way of Al Nusra - a.k.a al-Qaeda in Syria. Yet, our side lost - again. So, now, it is all about how America did everything. The victory in Syria - the victory in which Assad will stay - is all about how it was an "American victory." What horse crap!
The truth is, America spends near a trillion dollars per year on the military, but we cannot win a war - or whatever you want to call it. America's military is not worth what we pay. Then again, it is not about winning. It is about spending money on the military industrial complex. With that as a goal, America's military is a phenomenal success.
Beyond that, the Main Stream Media's continual glorification of America for an accomplishment that is, in fact, a lie; is enough to make an honest person vomit!
"...between the November election and January inauguration, he had quietly moved a chunk of assets into trusts for his family members, leaving more than $2 billion off of his financial disclosure report—and therefore out of the public eye. Ross revealed the existence of those assets, and the timing of the transfer, when Forbes asked why his financial disclosure form listed fewer assets than he had previously told the magazine he owned."