"President Trump asked two of the nation's top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government, according to current and former officials.
Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election.
Coats and Rogers refused to comply with the requests, which they both deemed to be inappropriate, according to two current and two former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private communications with the president.
:::end quote:::
Nothing to see here, folks. It's just a Russian ruse.
Over and over, I have been in conversations trying to explain that Pres. Trump is not the problem.
Regarding how we got here, our fatal flaw was when we, as a country, decided we were cowards. The best example is 9/11 and our desire to be "safe." They did not write that line "land of the free, home of the brave" as if you, including your children, can have one without the other. You can't! So we don't!
Here is a sample:
(Quote)
Corporations, cannibalizing the federal budget, legally empower themselves to exploit and pillage. It is impossible to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs or ExxonMobil. The pharmaceutical and insurance industries can hold sick children hostage while their parents bankrupt themselves trying to save their sons or daughters. Those burdened by student loans can never wipe out the debt by declaring bankruptcy. In many states, those who attempt to publicize the conditions in the vast factory farms where diseased animals are warehoused for slaughter can be charged with a criminal offense. Corporations legally carry out tax boycotts. Companies have orchestrated free trade deals that destroy small farmers and businesses and deindustrialize the country. Labor unions and government agencies designed to protect the public from contaminated air, water and food and from usurious creditors and lenders have been defanged. The Supreme Court, in an inversion of rights worthy of George Orwell, defines unlimited corporate contributions to electoral campaigns as a right to petition the government or a form of free speech. Much of the press, owned by large corporations, is an echo chamber for the elites. State and city enterprises and utilities are sold to corporations that hike rates and deny services to the poor. The educational system is being slowly privatized and turned into a species of vocational training.
I have written that driverless vehicles will destroy 5 to 6 million jobs in the future. However, this is small potatoes compared to what is happening in the retail industry. Retail is 10% of America's jobs (16 million jobs) and it is 75% female.
A great article is "The YUGE job losses Trump is ignoring: retail workers." It says:
(Quote)
Donald Trump loves to whine about jobs lost in the disappearing coal industry and in manufacturing. He brags that he will bring back coal and factory jobs—a promise he's unlikely to keep, even as his executive orders weaken industry regulations. But lost retail jobs hit America much harder, and he's silent about those. Those 89,000 people who lost retail jobs are more than the entirety—53,000—of those employed in the coal industry. While the coal, manufacturing, and retail industries have all suffered losses because of globalization and technological advances, the job losses aren't always equal. Department stores have lost 18 times more workers than coal mining since 2001.
(End quote)
It is true the pain is harder to see because it is spread out over the whole country rather than a few states - and it is women and minorities who are losing their jobs. It is also true American capitalism screwed up by over investing in retail space - as the article says, "the United States has 23.5 square feet of retail space per person, compared with 16.4 square feet in Canada and 11.1 square feet in Australia."
Some will say that the lost retail jobs will be replaced by warehouse jobs from eCommerce. Well the article goes on to say"
(Quote)
As retail workers in brick-and-mortar stores have lost jobs, hiring has picked up in online warehouses for companies like Amazon. But there are too few of those jobs to make up the difference, and many of those jobs are quickly getting automated.
(End quote)
And the other point: We are rapidly reaching the point where our economy cannot employ everyone - much less create jobs that pay a decent wage. Yet, our current economic thinking has no solutions that will not result in massive social upheaval.
We are still hearing about "wage flexibility", which is another way of saying "the workers need to be paid less."
"There are some overarching shifts poised to change the nature of work itself over the next decade," says Devin Fidler, research director at Institute for the Future, a nonprofit research center focused on long-term forecasting. That includes a demand for new skills and strategies that could help people to thrive in future work environments,
Black Friday sales last year provided the latest proof of changing dynamics in the retail sector as consumers continued to move their shopping online. Online sales grew to $3.34 billion, up 22% compared to the previous year's figures, while sales at brick-and-mortar stores fell 5%.
The downturn in physical shopping has had ripple effects affecting malls. According to one analyst, more than half of America's malls will either shut down or continue to struggle in the coming years.
(End quote)
AW is correct with the comment "Two-thirds of Americans believe that, in 50 years, robots and computers will do much of the work humans now do."
The part that our current economic thinking does not get is this. If you continue to make one worker more and more productive - which robots certainly do - at some point real people should have to work much fewer hours - or not at all.
That is not what is happening in America! We are working employees harder and longer and the profits of the workers increased productivity go to the richest. The goal in this system is to keep the workers so desperate they will work for little. Yet, we live in a world that is so technologically advance that everyone's basic needs could be met. But that will not happen with our current system.
Current thinking demands low wages, more pollution, along with more human suffering and disease, and the net result is a few, who have more wealth than they can spend, get more.
PS: About the Obama years, I have been writing about the economy's inability to employ everyone for a long time. My most common comment is from economist Richard Wolff who points out that we have huge numbers of unemployed, and we have 20% of our tools, factories, and resources sitting idle. An economy that cannot put the two together to produce what we need is an economic "failure" - of the first order.
PPS: About "The Skills You Need", there is no MAJOR shortage of workers because of lack of skills. If that were true, you would see a sector of the economy experiencing big pay increases, because of demand. You may find small sectors with such problems, but there is no such MAJOR sector of our economy in which that is happening.
(Quote)...See MoreThe emergence of driverless cars are estimated to destroy 5 to 6 million jobs driving taxis, buses, vans, trucks and e-hailing vehicles.
As autonomous Uber vehicles are about to hit the streets of Pittsburg, the company's chief executive Travis Kalanick says its human drivers have nothing to worry about. Mr. Kalanick said:
(Quote)
"I don't think the number of human drivers will go down anytime soon. In fact, I think in an autonomous world, it goes up."
I noticed the liberal mouthpiece Trump-hating media is quick to come out with all sorts of fake news from "unnamed sources" so why won't some of these sources produce some Comey notes? Maybe they still waiting for the authors to finish a final edit LOL!
You see, amigos: In one of his closing acts as president, Obama ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to "share" information with the terror-sponsoring, drug-smuggling Castro regime.