"Between 30 and 40 percent of California's forest firefighters are state prison inmates. (Snip) Participants make $2 per day in the program and $2 an hour when they're on a fire line. (Snip) (The program) saves the state roughly $80 million a year."
As if these inmates do not have families that might need financial help or maybe the money could be banked for when the inmates get out. But no, the article explains just how this is okay!
For example: They're outside the walls, doing good work, learning a skill that they may not get behind bars."
If you doubt that this is exploitation, there is this "You can't deny how dangerous this work is!"
And this, "Attorney General Kamala Harris argued that extending an early prison-release program to "all minimum custody inmates at this time would severely impact fire camp participation—a dangerous outcome while California is in the middle of a difficult fire season and severe drought."
Collectively, this country will screw over anyone to put an extra dollar in their pocket! Paying a fair price for work done; never crosses the country's mind!
America is now all about screw thy neighbor, and your post indicates that you have thoroughly absorbs that philosophy. Or as economist Mark Blythe (Brown University) says:
(Quote)
And this to the credit of the Trump folk is something that they get that the Democrats do not want to even acknowledge. They have created this neo-liberal system…where it is individually rational for any firm to rip the other guy's face off for a profit. But what if we all end up faceless? Everybody loses. That is the race to the bottom.
(End quote
The point here is simple: If they can pay them crap wages, they can do it to you too!
"Trump recently tweeted that he fired Flynn for "lying to the FBI," contradicting his earlier statements denying he knew Flynn had done anything wrong until he fired him for allegedly lying to Pence."
Bob R/CAConsidering the tax cuts don't go into effect until 2019, and the corporations don't pay taxes on employee earnings (in other words, these wages can't come from any tax savings), your claim is a bit fantastical.
The less affluent citizens and workers invariably shoulder the healthcare and quality of life costs while corporations profit from cheaper production and remediation costs. The rich almost never get the toxic runoff near their children's playgrounds or infiltrating their water supplies, or endure the injuries and exposures from gutting OSHA and similar workplace protections.
Sad the vulnerable - who are greater in number but lesser in voice - have to bear these costs so those in the top echelon can enjoy even greater prosperity. A great society protects everyone, and a true functional democracy gives everyone a voice.
Kennedy was the voice of society's conscience:
We do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Don't take the easy shortcuts to results' rather, invest our resources wisely and equitably.
Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country. Don't put your own greed before the betterment of our nation and species. I'm looking at you, Congress, preparing to vote for deficit-exploding tax cuts....
Long Time LurkerWhenever wealth is shifted by government decisions, it is a "redistribution." Some have argued heavily on this board that "redistribution" by tax reform that favors the masses is wrong. Now that actual tax reform proposes to shift in the opposite direction, I wonder if they still favor the same argument.