"Our work shows a sudden drop in brand sentiment following announcement of the refugee hiring initiative on Jan. 29th, to flattish from a run-rate of ~+80 (on an index of -100 to +100). Net sentiment has since recovered, but has seen significant volatility in recent weeks," equity analyst Jason West wrote in a research note.
> When I look at the wasteful spending of the money I spend > in taxes, my neighbors are the least of my worries.
Too bad. There are millions like the one I described.
> One of the requirements for refugees coming to America is > that they find/maintain employment. This policy > strengthens the participation and assimilation of refugees, > on their path to citizenship. Equating refugees and > immigrants who follow the laws with criminals spits in the > face of Americans. > > -ltl
Is that anything like illegals that are released and are required to show up in court for a judge to hear their case, but none of them ever do?
And yet you insist that these people, who apparently don't want to work, are hired before legal refugees who do. > >> One of the requirements for refugees coming to America is >> that they find/maintain employment. This policy >> strengthens the participation and assimilation of refugees, >> on their path to citizenship. Equating refugees and >> immigrants who follow the laws with criminals spits in the >> face of Americans. >> >> -ltl > > Is that anything like illegals that are released and are > required to show up in court for a judge to hear their case, > but none of them ever do?
No it's not. Equating legal refugees and immigrants with criminals is like saying all Texans are lazy layabouts because your neighbor is.
Frankly Emily, I think you need to start hanging out with a better class of people. The first generation Americans and green card holders I socialize with are all highly respected professionals, some of whom arrived as refugees, many of whom are Mexican, and others of whom are Muslim.
For a harsh look at this condition, I offer, for your response, this quote from Chris Hedges article "The Dance of Death." Notice in the quote Pres. Trump is just the "ringmaster" of our current disastrous circus.
(Quote)
The ruling corporate elites no longer seek to build. They seek to destroy. They are agents of death. They crave the unimpeded power to cannibalize the country and pollute and degrade the ecosystem to feed an insatiable lust for wealth, power and hedonism. Wars and military “virtues” are celebrated. Intelligence, empathy and the common good are banished. Culture is degraded to patriotic kitsch. Education is designed only to instill technical proficiency to serve the poisonous engine of corporate capitalism. Historical amnesia shuts us off from the past, the present and the future. Those branded as unproductive or redundant are discarded and left to struggle in poverty or locked away in cages. State repression is indiscriminant and brutal. And, presiding over the tawdry Grand Guignol is a deranged ringmaster tweeting absurdities from the White House.
I say this because the health insurance industry (and some other parts of health care) are corrupt. They no longer operate based on win-win deals. Their economic model is all about “the ripoff!”
I believe, once an industry is corrupted it cannot be saved. Thus, IMHO, things will only get worse until we do a government takeover. In that vein, the Republican plan will be a big help, and the best example is found in the article, “The GOP health bill is a $600 billion tax cut — almost entirely for the wealthy.”
Obamacare has taxes on the rich an others to pay for health care. The Republicans are now giving a 600 billion dollar tax break to the rich, and still think the average American will see lower costs.
Ain't going to happen! Medicare for All, here we come! Worse and better, going to Medicare for All will cause an 8&37; drop in GDP as health care expenditures decrease. Then when people spend the save money in other ways, particularly if it is spent locally, the GDP will likely increase by more than 8&37;.
I mean, imagine you own a restaurant, and the people in your community find the tax to pay for Medicare for All is half of what their insurance premiums were. It is call “disposable income!”
Th...See More "Analysis from the Brookings Institution says that 15 million people could lose coverage under Speaker Paul Ryan’s American Health Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has yet to score the Ryan plan, although the Brookings Institution’s report does not bode well for the House leadership’s bill.
The [Brookings Inst.] reports, “We conclude that CBO’s analysis will likely estimate that at least 15 million people will lose coverage under the American Health Care Act (AHCA) by the end of the ten-year scoring window. Estimates could be higher, but it’s [sic] is unlikely they will be significantly lower.”
The Kaiser Family Foundation states that the Ryan plan’s tax credits aid wealthier Americans more than lower-income individuals. Older Americans would face comparatively less aid through tax credits than younger counterparts.
American Medical Association CEO James Madara also criticized the Republican leadership’s tax credits, saying, “We believe credits inversely related to income, rather than age as proposed in the committee’s legislation, not only result in greater numbers of people insured but are a more efficient use of tax-payer resources.”"
The source for the above? HuffPo? CNN? the "failing" NYT? No, Breitbart!
About "Obama tried and fail*d", I am not an Obama fan, nor did I support Obamacare. IMHO, he was sold out to big corporations from day one! However, so are the Republicans!
Lastly, about that "blast from the past", I am not talking about the past, but the future. Get with the program!
Former President Barack Obama popped into Omaha to dine on taco salad with Warren and Susie Buffett at Happy Hollow Club on Sunday. Yes, Warren Buffett picked up the tab.
The lunch lasted about two and a half hours and was Obama’s only stop while in Omaha.
Buffett and Obama have a longstanding relationship that has included campaign support, economic policy advice and visits between the White House and Omaha. In 2011, Obama awarded Buffett the nation’s highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
If co...See More "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday threw cold water on President Donald Trump’s insistence that Mexico will pay for his proposed border wall.
“Uh, no,” McConnell said flatly, asked whether he thinks Mexico will foot the bill in an interview with POLITICO Playbook’s Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer.
If constructed, a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is expected, by some estimates, to cost $14 billion, if not much more. Even many Republicans are skeptical of the proposal because of the cost, and its biggest critics argue that it's unnecessary in addition to expensive."
How much does each illegal family cost the US taxpayer? How much does it cost the individual state - in particular those border states? Below is just the cost for the American taxpayer -- Here is just the tip of the "iceberg" when it comes to the costs of illegals. Go to the fairus.org site to see the actual breakdown and you will find that $28.6 billion for just the American taxpayer a year. The cost of the wall between $12 and $15 billion. Plus some of that $12-15 billion will create jobs. :)
So looking at the numbers...why wouldn't we build a wall?
Key Findings -- - Illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion a year at the federal, state and local level. The bulk of the costs — some $84 billion — are absorbed by state and local governments. - The annual outlay that illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers is an average amount per native-headed household of $1,117. The fiscal impact per household varies considerably because the greatest share of the burden falls on state and local taxpayers whose burden depends on the size of the illegal alien population in that locality. - Education for the children of illegal aliens constitutes the single largest cost to taxpayers, at an annual price tag of nearly $52 billion. Nearly all of those costs are absorbed by state and local governments. (Texas spends over $3.5 billion a year to educate illegal aliens as of 2009.) - At the federal level, about one-third of outlays are matched by tax collections from illegal aliens. At the state and local level, an average of less than 5 percent of the public costs associated with illegal immigration is recouped through taxes collected from illegal aliens. - Most illegal aliens do not pay income taxes. Among those who do, much of the revenues collected are refunded to the illegal aliens when they file tax returns. Many are also claiming tax credits resulting in payments from the U.S. Treasury.
fairus.org
On 3/10/17, EasTexSteve wrote: > Mexico won't have a choice. > > > On 3/09/17, Chalky wrote: >> "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday >> threw cold water on President Donald Trump's insistence >> that Mexico will pay for his proposed border wall. >> "Uh, no," McConnell said flatly, asked whether he thinks >> Mexico will foot the bill in an interview with POLITICO >> Playbook's Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer. > >> If constructed, a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is >> expected, by some estimates, to cost $14 billion, if not >> much more. Even many Republicans are skeptical of the >> proposal because of the cost, and its biggest critics argue >> that it's unnecessary in addition to expensive." > >> ETS will probably say Mitch is a RINO. > >> LOL > >> "Build the Wall"
ChalkyOn 3/10/17, AW wrote: > Even if Mexico doesn't per se write a check to pay for the wall, > wouldn't the fact that no more illegals come across the border > actually pay for the wall? So the wall pays for itself? > > How much does each illegal family cost the US taxpayer? How > much does it cost the individual state - in particular...See MoreOn 3/10/17, AW wrote: > Even if Mexico doesn't per se write a check to pay for the wall, > wouldn't the fact that no more illegals come across the border > actually pay for the wall? So the wall pays for itself? > > How much does each illegal family cost the US taxpayer? How > much does it cost the individual state - in particular those > border states? Below is just the cost for the American taxpayer > -- Here is just the tip of the "iceberg" when it comes to the > costs of illegals. Go to the fairus.org site to see the actual > breakdown and you will find that $28.6 billion for just the > American taxpayer a year. The cost of the wall between $12 and > $15 billion. Plus some of that $12-15 billion will create jobs. > :) > > So looking at the numbers...why wouldn't we build a wall? > > Key Findings -- > - Illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion a > year at the federal, state and local level. The bulk of the > costs -- some $84 billion -- are absorbed by state and local > governments. > - The annual outlay that illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers is > an average amount per native-headed household of $1,117. The > fiscal impact per household varies considerably because the > greatest share of the burden falls on state and local taxpayers > whose burden depends on the size of the illegal alien population > in that locality. > - Education for the children of illegal aliens constitutes the > single largest cost to taxpayers, at an annual price tag of > nearly $52 billion. Nearly all of those costs are absorbed by > state and local governments. (Texas spends over $3.5 billion a > year to educate illegal aliens as of 2009.) > - At the federal level, about one-third of outlays are matched > by tax collections from illegal aliens. At the state and local > level, an average of less than 5 percent of the public costs > associated with illegal immigration is recouped through taxes > collected from illegal aliens. > - Most illegal aliens do not pay income taxes. Among those who > do, much of the revenues collected are refunded to the illegal > aliens when they file tax returns. Many are also claiming tax > credits resulting in payments from the U.S. Treasury. > > fairus.org > > On 3/10/17, EasTexSteve wrote: >> Mexico won't have a choice. >> >> >> On 3/09/17, Chalky wrote: >>> "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday >>> threw cold water on President Donald Trump's insistence >>> that Mexico will pay for his proposed border wall. >>> "Uh, no," McConnell said flatly, asked whether he thinks >>> Mexico will foot the bill in an interview with POLITICO >>> Playbook's Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer. >> >>> If constructed, a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is >>> expected, by some estimates, to cost $14 billion, if not >>> much more. Even many Republicans are skeptical of the >>> proposal because of the cost, and its biggest critics argue >>> that it's unnecessary in addition to expensive." >> >>> ETS will probably say Mitch is a RINO. >> >>> LOL >> >>> "Build the Wall"
ETS, according to the National Park Service, the photos released of President Obama's inauguration and Trump's inauguration were BOTH taken shortly before each fellow was sworn in.
Don't worry, I have it on good authority that EasTexaSteve is really a bored high school troll from NYC named Emily. "He"'s never taught or lived in Texas. All that stuff about his wife and career and political leanings is made up to get us agitated.
ChalkyOn 3/11/17, Lulu ;-) wrote: > > On 3/11/17, EasTexSteve wrote: >> On 3/11/17, Chalky wrote: >> >>> Trump has appeared on this show. >>> >>> Called after the election to thank him. >>> >>> Someone he evidently does trust.... >>> >&g...See MoreOn 3/11/17, Lulu ;-) wrote: > > On 3/11/17, EasTexSteve wrote: >> On 3/11/17, Chalky wrote: >> >>> Trump has appeared on this show. >>> >>> Called after the election to thank him. >>> >>> Someone he evidently does trust.... >>> >>> Yep, such a 'reasonable' source of info. /s >> >> It doesn't take much of a theorist to debunk Obama's >> birth certificate. It only takes a working knowledge of >> Adobe, and a knowledge of text graphics, and graphics >> manipulation. Although, I don't think Trump or the >> source you cited does. I always he assumed he took an >> experts word for it. > > Don't worry, I have it on good authority that > EasTexaSteve is really a > bored high school troll from NYC named Emily. "He"'s > never taught or > lived in Texas. All that stuff about his wife and career > and political > leanings is made up to get us agitated. > > Goodnight Emily! ;-)
> When I look at the wasteful spending of the money I spend > in taxes, my neighbors are the least of my worries.
Too bad. There are millions like the one I described.
> One of the requirements for refugees coming to America is > that they find/maintain employment. This pol...See More