Loretta LynnOn 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: > On 2/17/17, making America great again wrote: >> On 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>> treatment of his daughter at fashion week. >>> >>> He did proudly tweet this headline from The Hill: >>> >>> 'Trump signs bill undoing Obama coal mining rule' "The ...See MoreOn 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: > On 2/17/17, making America great again wrote: >> On 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>> treatment of his daughter at fashion week. >>> >>> He did proudly tweet this headline from The Hill: >>> >>> 'Trump signs bill undoing Obama coal mining rule' "The >>> stream protection rule was intended to protect waterways >>> from mining waste." >>> >>> >>> -ltl >> I'm pretty sure there are already laws prevented that but, > the >> earlier laws didn't destroy the coal mining industry as was >> Obama's intent. and, we know Hilary would have been happy > to do >> that. But, there are lots of people who work in that > industry >> and Hillary would have been happy to destroy their > livelihoods >> without a backward glance > > You've never been to Appalachian coal country, have you? You > don't know that even when coal production was thriving that > jobs were on the decline, do you?
Actually yes. I know the region. I also study energy production. That's the problem when you assume, it makes an...well, it makes one out of you.
long-time lurkerOn 2/17/17, Loretta Lynn wrote: > On 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: >> On 2/17/17, making America great again wrote: >>> On 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>>> treatment of his daughter at fashion week. >>>> >>>> He did proudly tweet this headline from The Hill: &...See MoreOn 2/17/17, Loretta Lynn wrote: > On 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: >> On 2/17/17, making America great again wrote: >>> On 2/17/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>>> treatment of his daughter at fashion week. >>>> >>>> He did proudly tweet this headline from The Hill: >>>> >>>> 'Trump signs bill undoing Obama coal mining rule' "The >>>> stream protection rule was intended to protect >>>> waterways from mining waste." >>>> >>>> >>>> -ltl >>> I'm pretty sure there are already laws prevented that >>> but, >> the >>> earlier laws didn't destroy the coal mining industry as >>> was Obama's intent. and, we know Hilary would have been >>> happy >> to do >>> that. But, there are lots of people who work in that >> industry >>> and Hillary would have been happy to destroy their >> livelihoods >>> without a backward glance >> >> You've never been to Appalachian coal country, have you? >> You don't know that even when coal production was >> thriving that jobs were on the decline, do you? > > Actually yes. I know the region. I also study energy production. > That's the problem when you assume, it makes an...well, > it makes one > out of you.
You say you are familiar with the area, yet you don't answer about the decline in jobs even as production met its peak. Why would the good people of Appalachia want more exploitation of their resources for fewer jobs?
The National Hispanic Survey provides additional evidence for use by anti-voter fraud conservatives and bolsters an analysis by professors at Old Dominion University who say non-citizens registered and voted in potentially large numbers.
I cannot believe that the CIA during the Obama administration would spy on the French candidates and possibly interfere in the election of another country. Will be interesting to see where this goes, and how high up the chain of command it goes.
He's incapable of thinking he's less than anyone. nfmOn 2/16/17, Chalky wrote: > > Evidently he's getting wrong information on his electoral college > win. > > If he's not investigating this readily available info, what else is he > clueless about? >
Ooppsss