The Democrats are outraged at Pres. Trump's immigration order. It seems they want to defend all immigrants as if their policy is "if you can get here you can stay!" Tell us, under what circumstances does a Democrat say to an illegal immigrant "You have violated our immigration law (only), and you must be deported to the country from which you came!"
The raid fiasco is all on Trump's shoulders. nmOn 2/04/17, It's going to take a long time to clean up Obama's mess wrote: > On 2/03/17, No, "bad things"--President Obama did NOT > "sign off" on > this wrote: >> On 2/03/17, bad things happen wrote: >>> On 2/02/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>>> Well, I'm sorry th...See MoreOn 2/04/17, It's going to take a long time to clean up Obama's mess wrote: > On 2/03/17, No, "bad things"--President Obama did NOT > "sign off" on > this wrote: >> On 2/03/17, bad things happen wrote: >>> On 2/02/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>>> Well, I'm sorry the liberals didn't throw a sufficient >>>> fit. Like I said, I am not of a partisan mindset. That >>>> said, I think the failure of this raid exceeds the >>>> action that landed Hilary in the hot seat. >>> >>> Let's see: the Navy planned this raid. The SecDef >>> signed >> off >>> on it as did the president. It was delayed because the >>> Navy planners wanted a moonless night and, possibly >>> because the terrorists were tipped off, they walked >>> into an ambush. In the Benghazi raid 4 Americans >>> including the ambassador were killed, the consulate >>> sacked after the SecState, Clinton- denied improvements >>> to their security. Then the gov't lied about what >>> happened and how the raid occurred. Seems like >> one >>> was worse than the other. You can't blame Trump for >>> that. >> You >>> can but it meaningless. >>> >>>> I am angry about the past evolution of the US >>>> government. It came to blows with this election when >>>> we were given a choice between vomit and sh*t. Sh*t >>>> won. We need to stop giving our Constitutional values >>>> to corporations. Trump seems to be hellbent on fast >>>> tracking out economy to Goldman Sachs and Exxon. He >>>> has placed a self proclaimed leninist puppet master in >>>> front of security and to alarm and accelerate division >>>> so he can push this agenda. >>>> >>>> -ltl >>> >>> That's a curious tirade 2 weeks into a new >>> administration. Trump promised to rebuild the economy >>> and this is how its done. If you think you know better, >>> contact your congressional representatives, senators or >>> the White House and explain your reasoning. You're free >>> to think what you like but I rather doubt you're in a >>> position to know what happened or why. Maybe your vast >>> experience in special forces informs your opinion? > > Sure you did, he allowed this mission to go forward > through planning > and it was only coincidence that they had to delay until > after he > left office. Trump gave them the final go-ahead. Unfortunately, they > were Betrayed at some point because they walked into an ambush. For > all you know it was someone in the Obama White House he spilled the > beans.
On 2/04/17, The raid fiasco is all on Trump's shoulders. nm wrote: > On 2/04/17, It's going to take a long time to clean up > Obama's mess wrote: >> On 2/03/17, No, "bad things"--President Obama did NOT >> "sign > off" on >> this wrote: >>> On 2/03/17, bad things happen wrote: >>>> On 2/02/17, long-time lurker wrote: >>>>> Well, I'm sorry the liberals didn't throw a sufficient >>>>> fit. Like I said, I am not of a partisan mindset. That >>>>> said, I think the failure of this raid exceeds the >>>>> action that landed Hilary in the hot seat. >>>> >>>> Let's see: the Navy planned this raid. The SecDef >>>> signed >>> off >>>> on it as did the president. It was delayed because the >>>> Navy planners wanted a moonless night and, possibly >>>> because the terrorists were tipped off, they walked >>>> into an ambush. In the Benghazi raid 4 Americans >>>> including the ambassador were killed, the consulate >>>> sacked after the SecState, Clinton- denied improvements >>>> to their security. Then the gov't lied about what >>>> happened and how the raid occurred. Seems like >>> one >>>> was worse than the other. You can't blame Trump for >>>> that. >>> You >>>> can but it meaningless. >>>> >>>>> I am angry about the past evolution of the US >>>>> government. It came to blows with this election when >>>>> we were given a choice between vomit and sh*t. Sh*t >>>>> won. We need to stop giving our Constitutional values >>>>> to corporations. Trump seems to be hellbent on fast >>>>> tracking out economy to Goldman Sachs and Exxon. He >>>>> has placed a self proclaimed leninist puppet master in >>>>> front of security and to alarm and accelerate division >>>>> so he can push this agenda. >>>>> >>>>> -ltl >>>> >>>> That's a curious tirade 2 weeks into a new >>>> administration. Trump promised to rebuild the economy >>>> and this is how its done. If you think you know better, >>>> contact your congressional representatives, senators or >>>> the White House and explain your reasoning. You're free >>>> to think what you like but I rather doubt you're in a >>>> position to know what happened or why. Maybe your vast >>>> experience in special forces informs your opinion? >> >> Sure you did, he allowed this mission to go forward >> through > planning >> and it was only coincidence that they had to delay until >> after > he >> left office. Trump gave them the final go-ahead. > Unfortunately, they >> were Betrayed at some point because they walked into an > ambush. For >> all you know it was someone in the Obama White House he > spilled the >> beans.
“We expect to be cutting a lot out of Dodd-Frank because, frankly, I have so many people, friends of mine, who have nice businesses who can’t borrow money. They just can’t get any money because the banks just won’t let them borrow, because of the rules and regulations in Dodd-Frank.” -Trump
The newest example is the drug naloxone, which is used to reverse opioid overdose. The title of the article tells it all, "The price of a life-saving overdose treatment has increased 680&37; to $4,500 in the last 3 years."
The lesson is, capitalism does not foster competition. It eliminates competition. Worse, it will even take over your government. By way of Medicare and others, the federal government pays for the lion's share of drug costs in this country, and they are barred by law from negotiating lower prices.
And finally, our economic system kills people. There are still Americans who cannot afford the medicine they need with many suffering needlessly and others dying.
It is time for something different! Something that works for sick people!
My Russian friend tells me, after the fall of communism, there were still old Russians who insisted that the economic system of the old Soviet Union worked and worked well. Yes, they were delusional!
Currently, some Americans are just as delusional as those old Russians.
:::snip::: Sources familiar said Viola had been looking for ways to divest from his businesses -- including ownership of the hockey team -- to take the top civilian Army post.
He had planned to transfer ownership to other family members but turn over operations responsibilities to the team’s vice chairman, but that arrangement DID NOT MEET PENTAGON REQUIREMENTS, according to sources.
On 2/03/17, Chalky wrote: > > :::quote::: > President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Army abruptly > withdrew his name from consideration late Friday night, citing > his inability to get around strict Defense Department rules > concerning his family businesses. > > :::snip::: > Sources familiar said Viola had been looking for ways to divest > from his businesses -- including ownership of the hockey team > -- to take the top civilian Army post. > > He had planned to transfer ownership to other family members > but turn over operations responsibilities to the team’s vice > chairman, but that arrangement DID NOT MEET PENTAGON > REQUIREMENTS, according to sources. > > :::end quote::: > > > YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP. >
No, we raise Christain Alt-right, white nationalist, racist terrorist right here at home. Still, none of your examples fit the bill as evidence to your argument.
We don't know how temporary or far reaching Trump's plan is. Yes, this country has banned people and rounded them up based on religion. Name a time when America banned based on religion that was actually good for the country.
According to Time, "You have a bunch of bad hombres down there," Trump told Pena Nieto, according to the excerpt seen by the AP. "You aren't doing enough to stop them. I think your military is scared. Our military isn't, so I just might send them down to take care of it."
And you've gotta love this- "Trump tasked his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner — a real estate executive with no foreign policy experience — with managing the ongoing dispute, according to an administration official with knowledge of the call."
As one of my kids commented, "I honestly can't even tell what's the Onion and what's not anymore"
I would think that the death toll from Mexican drug gangs and it's spill over into North America with their forcing American schoolchildren to Market drugs for them would be ample cause for the American president to make very clear to the Mexican president that business-as-usual should end. Apparently the lives of Mexicans, and the lives of syrians are less important then the potential embarrassment arising from offending foreign leaders. Our president supposed to curry favour or seek approval for their policies before and acting them? I think not.
On 2/02/17, This is the new reality the president doesn't think evil sho wrote: > On 2/01/17, Lulu wrote: >> "Give me what I want or I'll invade your country." >> >> According to Time, >> "You have a bunch of bad hombres down there," Trump told >> Pena Nieto, according to the excerpt seen by the AP. "You > aren't >> doing enough to stop them. I think your military is scared. > Our >> military isn't, so I just might send them down to take care of > it." >> >> And you've gotta love this- >> "Trump tasked his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner >> — a real estate executive with no foreign policy experience — >> with managing the ongoing dispute, according to an >> administration official with knowledge of the call." >> >> As one of my kids commented, "I honestly can't even tell > what's >> the Onion and what's not > > I would think that the death toll from Mexican drug gangs and > it's spill over into North America with their forcing American > schoolchildren to Market drugs for them would be ample cause for > the American president to make very clear to the Mexican > president that business-as-usual should end. Apparently the > lives of Mexicans, and the lives of syrians are less important > then the potential embarrassment arising from offending foreign > leaders. Our president supposed to curry favour or seek approval > for their policies before and acting them? I think not.
LuluOn 1/31/17, Chalky wrote: > ....or not? > > You can't make this stuff up! > > Can we have just *one* day in this administration the truth > reigns? >
Did any of these actions occur without intel showing some risk to national security? Read beyond the memes, watch the news videos so you can hear what people say, in their own words. Trump tweets are public. Apparently the new features that include religious questions are objectionable to those who believe in freedom of religion.
We were screwed when we chose party alliances over what is best for us. As soon as the parties put forth their nominations, we knew there would be issues. Trump won. It's on him. If he can't handle it or if his voters can't stand it, they will have to come up with convincing evidence that the masses of humanity filling American streets is simply wrong because you saw it in a meme or the denial of Spicer, who rushed to the podium in his first try to lie to the American people. Trump isn't even attempting to say anything to reel it in. He said the action was carried out as planned. This means he either planned this disruption, or he is ignoring the ramifications. I personally think he did both. Good luck convincing those with sound hearing and reasonable visual acuity. Your work is cut out for you.
Carter's ban was part of a multi-pronged approach designed to pressure the government of Iran to release the American hostages, and included banning US exports to Iran, freezing Iranian assets and cutting diplomatic ties. It was not some vague gambit to keep out "bad dudes."
"....The events of the last few days have revealed a new and significant dimension in this matter. The militants controlling the Embassy have stated they are willing to turn the hostages over to the Government of Iran, but the Government has refused to take custody of the American hostages. This lays bare the full responsibility of the Ayatollah Khomeini and the Revolutionary Council for the continued illegal and outrageous holding of the innocent hostages. The Iranian Government can no longer escape full responsibility by hiding behind the militants at the Embassy.
It must be made clear that the failure to release the hostages will involve increasingly heavy costs to Iran and to its interests. I have today ordered the following steps...."
Obama's mess wrote:
> On 2/03/17, No, "bad things"--President Obama did NOT
> "sign
off" on
> this wrote:
>> On 2/03/17, bad things happen wrote:
>>> On 2/02/17, long-time lurker wrote:
>>>> Well, I'm sorry th...See More