Have you ever heard of a student not getting advanced to candidacy because they are not a member of a professional organization and it's not on their resume? This is an Ed. Leadership program. The state doesn't require this...it's a university thing. Any way to fight it? Worth it?
Ne...See MoreOn 4/05/10, Anon student wrote: > Have you ever heard of a student not getting advanced to > candidacy because they are not a member of a professional > organization and it's not on their resume? This is an Ed. > Leadership program. The state doesn't require this...it's a > university thing. Any way to fight it? Worth it?
Never heard of such a thing. Join if it will help you advance to candidacy.
If you are interested in gaining some SMART tools to become better prepared as an adjunct in any classroom in the colleges or adult ed programs offered by public school dist., community-based and/or faith-based programs, please visit my website for a free information meeting to learn more.
...See MoreI started this thread to exchange thoughts and ideas related to textbooks. Please feel free to add your input and experiences.
There is a movement on my campus to reduce the cost of textbooks various ways. It is receiving lip-service from the Provost in the form of email messages asking faculty to consider less expensive options.
I do agree that faculty should take extra care to: 1. Choose textbooks that are well-written, helpful, and relevent. 2. Use the textbook enough to justify the expense. 3. Avoid using ancillary items or bundles unless they are essential (some statistics books bundle software that is not useful and it takes students out of the used book market). 4. When more than one book will do, choose the less expensive option. 5. If one textbook can be found that can be used for two or more courses in a sequence then go with that. My department teaches a two course statistics sequence that used one textbook. We also use one writing guide in all our classes that require reports--starting with our First-Year Experience (FYE) course.
However, have some concerns about other issues. My overarching concerns are that: (1) These suggestions about lowering book costs are promoting "surface learning" in place of "deep learning", and (2) students don't want to read and we don't want to make them do anything uncomfortable.
Here are some the issues from our Provost and others:
1. Selling books - I believe strongly in keeping most of your textbooks as resources, references, or tools of your profession. I kept most of my books from college and regret the ones I sold. A mechanic uses wrenches, a doctor uses a stethoscope, and so my engineering students should consider their books as their tools of the profession along with calculators, software and computers.
2. A push to use on-line texts is another promotion of surface learning. You can't write in a computer book, carry it around, keep it, etc.
3. Eliminating textbooks - Another surface learning promotion..."Just tell me what you want me to know and I will cram it in for the test"....(to be forgotten in a week). In my 20+ years of teaching I tried a few classes without a textbook and the students suffered. Another version of this idea is using PowerPoint notes pages in lieu of a textbook. I use PowerPoint notes in several classes I teach, but not instead of a textbook.
4. Book Rental - See my comments about selling books...same thing.
5. Use the internet - IMHO, that is part of the problem. A student told me once he couldn't do an assignment because he "Googled it and nothing come up." I about flipped out.
I will admit that I resent the frequency at which some publishers come out with new editions. However, I think textbooks are one of the best teaching tools we have if we use them wisely. I sometimes post reading notes telling the students which sections are well written and supplementing poorly written points. Some students benefit from illustrations, some from examples, some from explanations, some from the ability to review.
I had an interesting thing happen this week. Some of my students ordered bootlegged versions of the textbook from overseas. A lot of these copyright violators are from China and Singapore. Anyway, the homework problems are all out of order or missing so the students are contacting me about what to do!!! They seem to think that if they buy a bootlegged book with the wrong problems I should help them sort it out!!
Lately on the first day of class I give the reasoning behind the book selected for the class and the benefits for keeping it in their library. Also, I have the ability to email the class about 3 weeks before the first class meeting so I send them a message announcing what the texts are so they can shop around. Students can usually get good used textbooks at reasonable prices.
Here is another thing I just remembered: In my doctoral program the two best classes I had were the ones where the instructor had us buy the most books and do the most reading. She also started each class with student-led discussions over the material.
I believe that students are responding to the culture created by the institutions they attend(ed). An excellent read on this subject is: Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter, George D. Kuh, et al, Jossey-Bass (2005), ISBN: 0787979147
The findings in this book are based on a study of 20 schools that stood out from among 700 institutions nationwide that had participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). This study was part of DEEP (Documenting Educational Effectiveness Project). These schools were not of any particular type and varied from large to small, public to private, and secular to religious. This book explores the common elements of DEEP schools and is a great read for anyone developing criteria for prioritization purposes. A well researched book.
With respect to this topic, the researchers found that at the DEEP schools there was a culture of students preparing (e.g. reading) before coming to class and the instructor's lectures and activities scaffolding off of the material. From what I see, my university system is doing everything it can to promote surface learning and just checking courses off of curriculum lists.
Outcomes assessment is supposed to be focusing on student learning. Done right it works. But in a surface learning culture it is just bean counting and science fiction.
I apologize for my cynicism...I spent all morning last Thursday at an accreditation preparation retreat and am still trying to recuperate.
With respect to keeping books: I still use books and notes from graduate school. I also use references and excerpts from my dissertation research 10 years ago. I consider them part of my professional library.
On 5/06/10, adding a vent of my own wrote: > I teach science and cannot convince the students to buy the book. > I've given up that particular fight and keep reminding them it is > their loss that they don't get the in-depth information. > Just a few years ago, when I started teaching at the college level, I > was surprised at how my students simply expected to get an A. > That attitude has changed a bit to one of simply wanting the C in > order to transfer credit. Therefore, reading is completely > unimportant to them. Good enough is good enough for them. > > Yes, I still have my hard workers and those who need scholarships who > work hard and use the book to their advantage, but it sure seems to be > the exception rather than the rule. > > Here's my real vent. > The students are renting lab manuals and that makes me crazy! > I tell them over and over again that I will not accept photocopied lab > book pages and then they whine that they cannot re-sell the book when > I have them rip out pages and hand them in. We have the same > conversation every other week. > It's a LAB book, people, suck it up and chalk it up as an educational > expense. Grrrrr! > > As for your original post, Bernoulli, I'm glad you brought it up. > On the one hand, it makes me sick how expensive text books are these > days and I feel sorry about that particular expense, especially when > some instructors rarely use the book. It teaches the students that > books are superfluous and they become cynical about the expense. > > As much as I would like to agree with your attitude that books are > tools to be used, I cannot. I saved every single book from college > and I think I used 3 of them in 20 years. I finally gave them all > away, and have not regretted it. > In all honesty, I get great information from the Internet and it is > easier and faster to use than running to my bookshelves all of the > time. I do keep my lecture notes from college (well, from grad > school) and do refer to those occasionally. > Anyway, even if I did use my books faithfully, my students would never > think that would apply to them. > > So, what to do? > I only have control over what goes on within my own classroom. I can > choose to go hardline and utilize reading assignments as I see fit, or > I can follow the trend and encourage my students to read the text, yet > not rely upon it as a make-or-break issue.
He was going to respond, "Well, yes, that would be possible if we waited a week so that he could compile 50 other questions relating to using the software." The idea is that one does not just learn to "plug and chug" the numbers, but that one reads the basic textbook and understands the principals behind the software which is programmed. Instead, he just did not respond at all....and let her figure out she should have been studying all along.
On the other end what is not fair is for some professors to simply give a computerized test of say 10 or even 20 questions with just a yes or no answer and no credit given for different aspects of solutions in a complicated engineering class. The professor who does not care about teaching or grading has the best of both worlds as the computer spits out the answer, and he does not even have to show the student where one went wrong. And often, the exam is a very large amount of the grade and not just say a weekly, module test as my husband does on Collab. So the skim the top studying is meeting the skim the top teaching, and we wonder why the U.S. is heading in a negative direction in so many fields.
-study habits/skills -reading strategies -r...See MoreToday I was brainstorming about what areas I need to focus on in the coming years so I am preparing my students academically for college courses since foreign language classes at the high school level in California are considered a college-prep elective. Here are the areas/skills I came up with:
RESEARCH PAPERS --finding research sources (books, database articles, etc.) --evaluating research sources -- integrating research sources (quoting, paraphrasing) --citation (in-text and Works Cited) --MLA vs. APA --how to add analysis for analytical papers (vs. informative papers)
Etc.
You could spend a semester on that alone!
On 4/14/10, Daniel Hanson wrote: > Today I was brainstorming about what areas I need to focus > on in the coming years so I am preparing my students > academically for college courses since foreign language > classes at the high school level in California are > considered a college-prep elective. Here are the > areas/skills I came up with: > > -study habits/skills > -reading strategies > -research papers > -note-taking > -cooperative learning > > Am I missing anything?
On 4/19/10, rw wrote: > You could also break those down into subtopics. For instance: > > RESEARCH PAPERS > --finding research sources (books, database articles, etc.) > --evaluating research sources > -- integrating research sources (quoting, paraphrasing) > --citation (in-text and Works Cited) > --MLA vs. APA > --how to add analysis for analytical papers (vs. informative > papers) > > Etc. > > You could spend a semester on that alone! > > On 4/14/10, Daniel Hanson wrote: >> Today I was brainstorming about what areas I need to focus >> on in the coming years so I am preparing my students >> academically for college courses since foreign language >> classes at the high school level in California are >> considered a college-prep elective. Here are the >> areas/skills I came up with: >> >> -study habits/skills >> -reading strategies >> -research papers >> -note-taking >> -cooperative learning >> >> Am I missing anything?
I wish to discuss some things I have thought about while being a college teacher. Some may disagree and I would be happy to see different viewpoints. And, I make no claim to have covered all the important areas. I just try to cover some that seem important to me, that are on my mind now.
My philosophy of teaching includes communicating effectively the course material, but using humor, student discussion, and such, and encouraging critical thinking, not just memorization of the material. Some memorization is needed. We are not pure entertainers. But, we need to do more. Otherwise, most of the material will soon be forgotten and the course will have little or no effect on the student. Actually, how much will students recall years later? Probably, not much. So, it is important that they learn critical thinking and have a sense of what scientific research is (I explain the scientific method: theory, hypotheses, experimental vs. control groups, etc.) and how that method differs from non-research approaches, such as general everyday anecdotal thinking.
For my teaching here at University of Texas-Pan American, a Hispanic serving school, I have learned how to teach Hispanic students who, typically, are the first in the family to attend college. At first, students did horrible on my tests, making me think they had not learned much. I decided I had to teach them how to be college students.
1. I figured out the importance of teaching them how to study, how to review the chapters, how to read the chapters by first skimming them, etc.
2. I have also learned the importance of telling the students of my confidence in their ability to do well. Many probably have little confidence in their academic ability.
With these approaches, I have improved the grades that students make in my class, by getting them to study more and more effectively, to put more time into studying, and to care about their grades.
I used a slightly different approach in other kinds of schools I have taught at: regional state universities or the University of California-Santa Cruz where I had my sabbatical in 1972-73, or a small, private liberal arts college. In those places there was not as much necessity to teach people how to study, although there was for some at the regional universities, especially at the one that was open admissions. In every place, you have to take into account the culture of the institution and of the students.
My philosophy of teaching—which has previously led to two awards for outstanding teaching--includes combining humor with specific information and with ways of looking at things. Thus, I include much information about psychology research and theories, along with class discussion to help students see the relevance to their own lives. I am good at getting discussion, but also good at stopping it if it goes too far. I like to have the students involved in the class and see it as something that gives them needed learning, as opposed to just something they have to do. I encourage critical thinking, so that they can use it all their life, long after they have long left my class. One way I stress critical thinking is to get them to see different sides of an issue, not just telling them "this is the truth."
However, there is no one right way to teach. Others may be relatively humorless in their class, and while their use of humor might improve things, this may just not be their style. But, they may offer a good class by being organized, intelligent, and providing up to date information in the field they are teaching. Also, course content makes a difference. It may not be so useful to be humorous or to ask for student opinions in a field like physics or biology as much as in more vague fields like psychology or the other social sciences.
Evaluations have typically been very good, and support my belief that I am doing a good job in teaching. I love teaching and research, and it shows.
There are many different ways to learn. Some of it is practical. I tell my students the first day that I learned well in college by coming to every class, taking good notes, and sitting on the front row. In addition, students need to try to see how the material relates to their own life, which makes it much more meaningful, and thus easier to recall for a test, but also more readily used in everyday life then and later on, after they have left the class.
Having worked with learning disabled students, I know that there are many ways to learn, and some ways are better for one student than for another. However, there is great value in hard work, such as putting in many hours reading the material, going over it, etc. But, some students have styles which mean that, for example, hearing material is superior to reading it for retention, or vice versa. Others will have yet a different preferential style for learning.
We need to take account of the research, our own experiences, and what others have to say about the best ways to learn. We need to keep an open mind about teaching and learning. Motivation is very important, too. The teacher who cares about teaching will usually do a better job than the teacher who does not care so much. The student who wants to learn will typically learn more than the student who is just doing it for the grade or to get a better job when he/she graduates.
The culture is important too. This includes: the culture of the school as an organization, the culture of the students, their parents, and of the teachers and school administrators. All these cultural issues contribute to whether or not students will learn. We need to keep all this in mind when considering teaching and learning.
Nice seeing your post here on Teachers.net! It's late now, but I plan to print it out and read and study it and get back via this site. You are a great professor and a great person! Keep up the good work!
Sincerely,
Hardy Parkerson, J.D. Retired Lawyer President, Southern Christian University "The World Is Our Campus!
On 4/14/10, Russell Eisenman wrote: > COLLEGE TEACHING: SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES > By Russell Eisenman, Ph.D. > University of Texas-Pan American > > I wish to discuss some things I have thought about while > being a college teacher. Some may disagree and I would be > happy to see different viewpoints. And, I make no claim to > have covered all the important areas. I just try to cover > some that seem important to me, that are on my mind now. > > My philosophy of teaching includes communicating > effectively the course material, but using humor, student > discussion, and such, and encouraging critical thinking, > not just memorization of the material. Some memorization is > needed. We are not pure entertainers. But, we need to do > more. Otherwise, most of the material will soon be > forgotten and the course will have little or no effect on > the student. Actually, how much will students recall years > later? Probably, not much. So, it is important that they > learn critical thinking and have a sense of what scientific > research is (I explain the scientific method: theory, > hypotheses, experimental vs. control groups, etc.) and how > that method differs from non-research approaches, such as > general everyday anecdotal thinking. > > For my teaching here at University of Texas-Pan American, a > Hispanic serving school, I have learned how to teach > Hispanic students who, typically, are the first in the > family to attend college. At first, students did horrible > on my tests, making me think they had not learned much. I > decided I had to teach them how to be college students. > > 1. I figured out the importance of teaching them how to > study, how to review the chapters, how to read the chapters > by first skimming them, etc. > > 2. I have also learned the importance of telling the > students of my confidence in their ability to do well. Many > probably have little confidence in their academic ability. > > With these approaches, I have improved the grades that > students make in my class, by getting them to study more > and more effectively, to put more time into studying, and > to care about their grades. > > I used a slightly different approach in other kinds of > schools I have taught at: regional state universities or > the University of California-Santa Cruz where I had my > sabbatical in 1972-73, or a small, private liberal arts > college. In those places there was not as much necessity to > teach people how to study, although there was for some at > the regional universities, especially at the one that was > open admissions. In every place, you have to take into > account the culture of the institution and of the students. > > My philosophy of teaching—which has previously led to two > awards for outstanding teaching--includes combining humor > with specific information and with ways of looking at > things. Thus, I include much information about psychology > research and theories, along with class discussion to help > students see the relevance to their own lives. I am good at > getting discussion, but also good at stopping it if it goes > too far. I like to have the students involved in the class > and see it as something that gives them needed learning, as > opposed to just something they have to do. I encourage > critical thinking, so that they can use it all their life, > long after they have long left my class. One way I stress > critical thinking is to get them to see different sides of > an issue, not just telling them "this is the truth." > > However, there is no one right way to teach. Others may be > relatively humorless in their class, and while their use of > humor might improve things, this may just not be their > style. But, they may offer a good class by being organized, > intelligent, and providing up to date information in the > field they are teaching. Also, course content makes a > difference. It may not be so useful to be humorous or to > ask for student opinions in a field like physics or biology > as much as in more vague fields like psychology or the > other social sciences. > > Evaluations have typically been very good, and support my > belief that I am doing a good job in teaching. I love > teaching and research, and it shows. > > There are many different ways to learn. Some of it is > practical. I tell my students the first day that I learned > well in college by coming to every class, taking good > notes, and sitting on the front row. In addition, students > need to try to see how the material relates to their own > life, which makes it much more meaningful, and thus easier > to recall for a test, but also more readily used in > everyday life then and later on, after they have left the > class. > > Having worked with learning disabled students, I know that > there are many ways to learn, and some ways are better for > one student than for another. However, there is great value > in hard work, such as putting in many hours reading the > material, going over it, etc. But, some students have > styles which mean that, for example, hearing material is > superior to reading it for retention, or vice versa. Others > will have yet a different preferential style for learning. > > We need to take account of the research, our own > experiences, and what others have to say about the best > ways to learn. We need to keep an open mind about teaching > and learning. Motivation is very important, too. The > teacher who cares about teaching will usually do a better > job than the teacher who does not care so much. The student > who wants to learn will typically learn more than the > student who is just doing it for the grade or to get a > better job when he/she graduates. > > The culture is important too. This includes: the culture > of the school as an organization, the culture of the > students, their parents, and of the teachers and school > administrators. All these cultural issues contribute to > whether or not students will learn. We need to keep all > this in mind when considering teaching and learning.
I've started reading your paper you posted on Teachers.net. And about your practice of telling your students about your confidence in their abilities, I was reminded of this poem that Dr. Virgie Dronet from McNeese once quoted in a scholarly publication, and it is this:
Say Something Nice
One day someone said Something nice about me; And all undeserved Though I thought it to be, I treasured it deep On my heart's lowest shelf; Until one day I quite surprised even myself, When I learned I was earnestly striving to be That something nice Someone had said about me.
Once I asked her who the author of the poem was, and she did not have any recollection of having quoted it in her published paper in a national journal. I still do not know who the poet who wrote it is/was.
When I was a senior in high school my Senior English teacher called me up and asked me, "Son, since you are about to graduate from high school, what are your plans?" I said, "Oh, Miss Whitten, I'd like to go to college, but I know I am not smart enough." To which she retorted, "Boy, what are you talking about! You're smart!" No one had ever told me that before. Even though I had wonderful parents, when I would do or say something wrong, my mother would say to me, "Well, dumb cluck!" Well, Miss Whitten's saying that encouraged me like nothing had ever encouraged me before. There is more to it all than this, but this is something relevant to your paper/posting and I thought you might want to see it, just in case you have not seen it before.
Keep up the good work!
Sincerely,
Professor Hardy Parkerson Southern Christian University Lake Charles, LA "The World Is Our Campus!"
On 4/14/10, Russell Eisenman wrote: > COLLEGE TEACHING: SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES > By Russell Eisenman, Ph.D. > University of Texas-Pan American > > I wish to discuss some things I have thought about while > being a college teacher. Some may disagree and I would be > happy to see different viewpoints. And, I make no claim to > have covered all the important areas. I just try to cover > some that seem important to me, that are on my mind now. > > My philosophy of teaching includes communicating > effectively the course material, but using humor, student > discussion, and such, and encouraging critical thinking, > not just memorization of the material. Some memorization is > needed. We are not pure entertainers. But, we need to do > more. Otherwise, most of the material will soon be > forgotten and the course will have little or no effect on > the student. Actually, how much will students recall years > later? Probably, not much. So, it is important that they > learn critical thinking and have a sense of what scientific > research is (I explain the scientific method: theory, > hypotheses, experimental vs. control groups, etc.) and how > that method differs from non-research approaches, such as > general everyday anecdotal thinking. > > For my teaching here at University of Texas-Pan American, a > Hispanic serving school, I have learned how to teach > Hispanic students who, typically, are the first in the > family to attend college. At first, students did horrible > on my tests, making me think they had not learned much. I > decided I had to teach them how to be college students. > > 1. I figured out the importance of teaching them how to > study, how to review the chapters, how to read the chapters > by first skimming them, etc. > > 2. I have also learned the importance of telling the > students of my confidence in their ability to do well. Many > probably have little confidence in their academic ability. > > With these approaches, I have improved the grades that > students make in my class, by getting them to study more > and more effectively, to put more time into studying, and > to care about their grades. > > I used a slightly different approach in other kinds of > schools I have taught at: regional state universities or > the University of California-Santa Cruz where I had my > sabbatical in 1972-73, or a small, private liberal arts > college. In those places there was not as much necessity to > teach people how to study, although there was for some at > the regional universities, especially at the one that was > open admissions. In every place, you have to take into > account the culture of the institution and of the students. > > My philosophy of teaching—which has previously led to two > awards for outstanding teaching--includes combining humor > with specific information and with ways of looking at > things. Thus, I include much information about psychology > research and theories, along with class discussion to help > students see the relevance to their own lives. I am good at > getting discussion, but also good at stopping it if it goes > too far. I like to have the students involved in the class > and see it as something that gives them needed learning, as > opposed to just something they have to do. I encourage > critical thinking, so that they can use it all their life, > long after they have long left my class. One way I stress > critical thinking is to get them to see different sides of > an issue, not just telling them "this is the truth." > > However, there is no one right way to teach. Others may be > relatively humorless in their class, and while their use of > humor might improve things, this may just not be their > style. But, they may offer a good class by being organized, > intelligent, and providing up to date information in the > field they are teaching. Also, course content makes a > difference. It may not be so useful to be humorous or to > ask for student opinions in a field like physics or biology > as much as in more vague fields like psychology or the > other social sciences. > > Evaluations have typically been very good, and support my > belief that I am doing a good job in teaching. I love > teaching and research, and it shows. > > There are many different ways to learn. Some of it is > practical. I tell my students the first day that I learned > well in college by coming to every class, taking good > notes, and sitting on the front row. In addition, students > need to try to see how the material relates to their own > life, which makes it much more meaningful, and thus easier > to recall for a test, but also more readily used in > everyday life then and later on, after they have left the > class. > > Having worked with learning disabled students, I know that > there are many ways to learn, and some ways are better for > one student than for another. However, there is great value > in hard work, such as putting in many hours reading the > material, going over it, etc. But, some students have > styles which mean that, for example, hearing material is > superior to reading it for retention, or vice versa. Others > will have yet a different preferential style for learning. > > We need to take account of the research, our own > experiences, and what others have to say about the best > ways to learn. We need to keep an open mind about teaching > and learning. Motivation is very important, too. The > teacher who cares about teaching will usually do a better > job than the teacher who does not care so much. The student > who wants to learn will typically learn more than the > student who is just doing it for the grade or to get a > better job when he/she graduates. > > The culture is important too. This includes: the culture > of the school as an organization, the culture of the > students, their parents, and of the teachers and school > administrators. All these cultural issues contribute to > whether or not students will learn. We need to keep all > this in mind when considering teaching and learning.
I received and thank you very much for the fine donation to Southern Christian University. Should you desire, I will be glad to send you a receipt and an appraisal so that you might deduct your gift on your federal and state income tax returns for the year 2010. If I can ever be of help to you here in Southwest Louisiana and/or Southeast, Texas, please feel free to call on me. Again, thank you very much for the wonderful gift!
Sincerely,
Hardy Parkerson, President Southern Christian University "The World Is Our Campus!"
On 4/15/10, Hardy Parkerson, B.A., J.D. wrote: > Dear Doctor Raftery, > > Yes, I will graciously accept such a donation > to Southern Christian University; 127 Greenway Street; > Lake Charles, LA 70605; 337-478-4370; > [email removed]
I just gotta do it! I can't quit! Just gotta do it! I gotta make it! I gotta do better, it's plan to see; Gotta read Boone Pickens' biography.
Don't know how long my kite's gonna fly; I'm sure I'll make it bye and bye. Sometimes I write poems on a whim. And spend my time recitin' them.
I read "All About Music" from BLUE MOON CAFE: Best thing I've read in many a day. "All About Music" gave me the cries; Made big old tears come to my eyes.
I'd never heard of Grayson Capps, Nor any of those other Orleans chaps; But Capps' story makes me cry. He's quite a writer, and that's no lie!
They say that Capps went to Tulane. When I was there, some called it "Jewlane". "Jewlane" and "Jewcomb" there on Broadway, Where all are welcome: Jew, Gentile, Lesbian, Gay.
At night I walked down Natchez Alley With a sexy beauty whose name was Sally. She was a red-head from Fairhope, AL: Just a typical beautiful Newcomb gal.
I rode the dog to get to school. My mother said, "That Hardy's no fool! Though we're not rich, he'll make it yet. Of that I'm sure; I'm willin' to bet."
On the dog from Tulsa with a girl named Alice, We both got off of the dog in Dallas And went Downtown and shook the hand Of Roger Craig, the "Rambler Man",
Who said he saw the man shoot John, And L.H.O. was not the one. He'd told Earl Warren what he'd seen, he said. And 'twasn't long 'fore he was dead.
But what he said I've in my log Entitled "For Those Who Ride the Dog."
Poetry is strange, funny. Sometimes when I write a poem that I do not think is good, I find later that the more I read it sometimes the better I like it. Of course, we poets know the stories behind our poems, and that gives them an extra dimension, a special meaning. Of course, I have learned that most poets like their own poems, for they are a reflection of how they think. As a man thinketh in his heart, so are his poems! That is, if he will write some. I can't imagine not writing some poems. Sometimes I just have to do it. It just comes time sometimes to sit down and write a poem, good or bad; for better or worse. Of course, we poets are a strange breed. I'll have to admit this one above was thrown together pretty fast, but it came after an evening of sitting in Books-A-Million drinking their coffee and reading their books for free. I had just read a couple of short stories out of a book edited by a writer from Fairhope, AL, named Sonny Brewer. I am sure I had taken some notes while reading these two short stories, and my poem above came out of these notes and what I had remembered about reading from the book entitled BLUE MOON CAFE III. I went back to Books-a-Million to buy it, but all of the copies of it had been sold out. I guess I'll have to go there and order it. But, my! aren't those books expensive at BAM! Even a small paper-back will cost $12.00 to $15.00, and such. Oh, well! Thank the Lord for libraries, but there's nothing like owning your own copy of a book. At least you can read and learn by osmosis when you've got the book. People who get their Ph.D.s in Library Science often write their dissertations on the great bibliomaniacs of history, guys who collected and hoarded thousands and thousands of volumes, some of which they even read. Well, I am one of those bibliomaniacs and at one time had upwards of 50,000 hard-bound volumes that I eventually had to dispossess myself of. Well, let me tell you! It's almost impossible to dispossess onself of 50,000 hard-bound volumes, and I ended up having to pay the owner of the property where I had set up my library a thousand dollars just so he could hire dumpsters and men to throw those 50,000 volumes away. What a broken heart I had to have to do this, but my friend who had let me use his upstairs library space had sold the building, and I just could not have left him with all these books in his buildiing when he turned the property over to the new owner. I had to act fast, and I did. Of course, there is more to the story than I am telling here, but this is somethin to think about. I wish I were a writer, but I am not; but I do really like to write. Even if nobody else likes to read what I write, I like to go back later, sometimes years later, and read what I have written. It seems to get better with years, like old wine, or even good whiskey, Of course, I wouldn't know about whisley. (If you believe that....) Thanks for taking the time to read this! Keep up your own good work of writing! As my friend says, "Keep a-truckin'!" I say to you, "Keep a-writin'!"
anonadjunctThanks, bernoulli, Where I teach, the anonymous surveys are created by the admin and the instructor has to have a student distribute and collect them while the instructor is out of the room. Then the student delivers them to the appropriate office. The instructor sees them much later. I do like your idea of surveying the students myself, maybe at t...See MoreThanks, bernoulli, Where I teach, the anonymous surveys are created by the admin and the instructor has to have a student distribute and collect them while the instructor is out of the room. Then the student delivers them to the appropriate office. The instructor sees them much later. I do like your idea of surveying the students myself, maybe at the beginning of the semester asking them to check their preferred instructional modes, and then requesting some formal feedback through a survey form mid-semester. With the end-of year evaluations that you don't see until later, the utility is limited because it is too late for you to address the students concerns. during the semester, I always ask the students to talk to me, meet with me, ask me questions, help me to help them, etc. I consider myself approachable. Now in the grad course that I was taking, it appeared that the instructor took little if any time to prepare, repeatedly canceled class, rarely kept us for anything approaching the full class time, showed us videos that did not relate to the content area, was not able to answer a basic, no-brainer question I asked about the content area, could not produce a rubric for the final project when asked. Although I believe in giving constructive criticism to a person's face, rather than filling out anonymous forms or complaining to the person's superiors behind their backs, I really felt doubtful about how he would respond if I told him directly about my perceptions. I paid for this course with my own money and am really trying to improve my expertise in this area to improve my job skills. I learned little from the course, except what i found out from my own research. I resented the way he seemed to be "phoning it it," and stressed over how I would fill out the course evaluation form. When the time came, the instructor handed them out and collected them himself, rather than have a student do it. I resolved my dilemma by trying to write honest, but constructively phrased criticism,focusing on the instructional aspects rather than the teacher himelf, such as "I would have preferred if the videos we watched had related to the subject area." I just couldn't bring myself to sugarcoat the truth. Since the students were handing the forms directly to the instructor, and the class was quite small, I handed him my form and told him I felt uncomfortable with the forms and I would rather address my concerns directly to him, and if he wanted to pitch it after reading it that was fine with me.(Since he had the form in his hand I had no control over what he did with it anyway.) He stuck it in the envelope but I don't know what he did with it after that. I would like to avoid this instructor in the future but he teaches another course that I need to take, and at this time no one else teaches it. It just felt very strange being in the position of simultaneously being the subject of these student evaluations and also filling out one myself to evaluate someone else.
On 5/12/10, bernoulli wrote: > You are talking about an instructional assessment survey. They > don't really tell how much learning is taking place. I get very > high ratings from my students, but don't know if they really > learned anything. Note that I also give outcomes assessment > surveys in some classes as well as a few other types of surveys. I > always ask them to write comments on the back about what they > liked and didn't like. That feedback has been the most helpful. > > Try this: Create a "tools assessment survey" where you ask the > students to evaluate the effectiveness of the various learning > tools in the course: homework, quizzes, tests, textbook, Project > instruction, PowerPoint presentations, handouts, software, on-line > resources, syllabus, etc. I have a list of about 20 tools. They > can also write a response about how to improve the tools. Anyway, > I found the responses to this survey to be very helpful in > improving the course and the students don't feel like they are > criticizing the instructor in a way that will put them at risk. > > > > > On 5/11/10, ap wrote: >> You can remedy that very easily by giving your students a >> form to fill out. You can ask as many questions as you would >> like and you can make it as personal or anonymous as you'd >> like. >> Just like everything else, the college needs a paper trail >> just in case they have to get rid of an ineffective >> instructor. >> >> >> >> On 5/11/10, anon. adjunct wrote: >>> I am taking a college course taught by an adjunct and I >>> teach a course as an adjunct at a different college. I was >>> wondering what thoughts you all have about those end-of- >>> semester course evaluation forms that are filled out >>> anonymously and the instructor gets the forms months later >>> after they have been compiled by department heads. As a >>> teacher myself, I woudl much prefer that students tell me >>> personally, in a timely manner, if they want something from >>> the course that they are not getting, rather than write >>> something critical at the end of the course when it is too >>> late form me to address the concerns. The exception would >>> be if the instructor is a jerk or was obviously sluffing >>> off, but if the teacher is neither of those, why not talk >>> to the teacher directly, man to man, or whatever the case >>> may be. Your thoughts, please.
One thing I did was take critical questions out of our university's survey such as the overall score the students give to the professor (ours is on a 4-point scale). Consistently, this score is slightly higher than the one they give overall at the end of the course when they know the survey is anonymous.
HOwever, after years of being subject to student evaluations (15 to be be exact) I see to care less and less about them as I can't control them very well. Part of the evaluation hinges on how easy you were on missed assignments, how hard the course is, the natural engagement of the material, etcetera -- things I can't always control.
Also, if you get a few negative informal leaders in the class, they can wreak havoc with your evaluation.
My evals are generally pretty good, though -- usually well above average, but still, I think they are only a partial indicator of the work you do in class.
And how they are used has a huge impact on how rigorous professors are. One school handed out gift certificates with professors with the highest evaluation. Over the next few trimesters, I found students more vocal when I wouldn't take late assignments, having expectations of higher grades, and I felt pressure to reduce rigor to keep my evaluation up.
I honestly think student evaluations are the enemy of academic rigor when not used properly. They should represent only a small portion of a professor's overall evaluation.
I replied with a little food for thought, but it was removed. They apparently didn't like the parallel between teacher bullying and administrator bullying. I think it is very telling, and a very important point.
"It sounds like the same techniques that administrators use on teachers. Is it any surprise when teachers use these same techniques on their students? Food for thought..."
The list of unacceptable behaviors: (how many of these have teachers experienced from administrators?)
Giving punitive or mean-spirited responses Withholding approval Using embarrassment Making kids keep secrets from other staff and parents Teasing to torment Public ridicule Making them feel that some retribution awaits them in the future Taking out worries/frustrations from home on students Terrorizing (creating fear to torment or manipulate) Publicly or privately humiliating Purposefully attempt to attack/hurt/take away their pride, dignity, or self-respect Public degradation Manipulating the social order to foster rejection Threatening exclusion or revelation of personal information Starting malicious rumors or gossip Repeatedly punishing a child when other children get away with the same behavior Humiliating students to stop disruption Spiteful to students Deliberately or knowingly hurting students' feelings Putting students down to punish them Setting up students to be bullied Isolating to set or keep apart; divide or separate Excluding children from a group
Ne...See More