Tenure is a sort of protection granted to faculty members that makes it difficult to fire them for other than serious infractions. The original purpose was to protect the freedom of speech of faculty members and not stifle creative and original thinking and scholarship. Tenure was invented because faculty members who were excellent teachers were being fired because of philosophical, political, or religious differences with their superiors.
Tenure was never intended to make faculty members totally fireproof, but in practice it often protects very lazy and disruptive people. This can hurt students, departments, and schools. For this reason tenure has come under attack many times over the years.
IMHO, tenure today often protects faculty from decisions made by inept and agenda-driven administrators.
I have tenure and only care about it as protection from bad administrations. I work hard and am not afraid of losing my job for lack of productivity.
If you are offered tenure, then take it as some measure of protection.
Some people feel that tenure is protecting legions of lazy professors. My assessment of productivity based on the colleagues I work with is that 2/3 of faculty are extremely hard working and dedicated. They put in more than their share of time each week and work nights and weekends to keep up. The other 1/3 is a mixture of people who are either doing their job minimally or are deadwood.
In other words, tenure is a red herring. Lousy administrations have to have someone to blame when the system is not working.
The following classes will be held at Renaissance Academy in Phoenixville, three days a week, M/W/F, and rostered into the school day, classes beginning at 11:05am & 12:15am. We are looking to fill this position immediately. Compensation: $5000.00 total.
Eastern University is a Christian university of the arts and sciences which integrates faith, reason, and justice for students in its undergraduate, graduate, Seminary, urban, professional and international programs. Applicants should have a religious commitment compatible with its mission. The university complies with federal and state guidelines of nondiscrimination in employment; members of protected classes are encouraged to apply. Eastern is a Christian university in the Evangelical tradition.
Qualifications: • vibrant Christian faith (affirmation of Eastern's doctrinal statement) • *master's degree or higher in the discipline (or closely related discipline) you teach* • experience teaching a college course (preferred) • appropriate professional expertise • preferred: familiarity with educational technology (e.g., Blackboard) or teaching online
All applications must be submitted electronically which includes a cover letter and current curriculum vitae or resume to: [email removed].
Please let me know as soon as possible if you would be interested. We need to fill this position immediately.
Most lawyers brag about the big cases they have won. I brag about the big ones I have lost. I hold the world's indoor record for losing the big ones. I have been beaten many times before a jury, but never by a bad lawyer. Always by the best. Shall I name a few of them? Ed Rundell, of Alexandria, LA, who not only has a law degree, but a Ph.D. from Texas University in Austin. How about Andy Plauche, now of New Orleans, and Stephen Berniard, still of Lake Charles? And Reid Hebert, now deceased? Reid beat me many times, but I always kept coming back. I swore I'd beat him, but he died before I could. One day after I had lost a hard- fought civil jury trial to the great insurance defense lawyer Stephen Barniard of Lake Charles, one that I did not think could be lost; I was defeated, dejected, down and depressed; and I returned to my office on a Thursday afternoon after the verdict had come in against me and my client. I wondered why I had even entered the law, and I am sure I thought about just quitting it. Just a few minutes after I had arrived back at my office, the phone rang. It was Stephen Berniard on the phone. "Hardy," he said, "Pull out old So-And-So's file, and let's see if we can settle it!" I said, "Steve, why do you want to settle a case with me? You beat me every time we go to court." "Yes, yes," he said, "I know! I know! But your luck's gotta change. I don't want to be on the other side when it does." There is something to be said for trying civil and criminal jury cases, even if you lose. The word gets around that you are not afraid to go to trial and that you are not afraid of a jury. This will ultimately result in more and better settlement offers. Also, there is no better place to learn law and evidence and trial procedure and practice than by preparing for and trying jury cases to verdict. EXPERIENTIA STULTOS DOCET (Experience teaches even fools.) There is more to it all than this, but this is something for an aspiring trial lawyer to think about. Sincerely, Hardy Parkerson, Attorney; Lake Charles, LA
I did not see student classes replacing the curriculum, just supplementing it.
I guess the issue is trying to get students engaged. In most of the classes where I have projects I let the student pick a topic within the scope of the course. Hopefully they pick something that is also of interest to them. It seems to work for students that have some motivation to explore their interests.
Getting students engaged in learning is a huge topic in higher education. I've seen it a lot at the recent conferences I have attended.
We give a survey in my department every few years asking students a lot of questions related to advising, their attitudes and practices toward classes, etc. The students with GPA less than 2.5 report a stronger tendency to ignore classes they don't think are important than the 3.0+ GPA students. I suppose that has been true for decades, but many students overload themselves with school and work and their classes just become a game of survival. Hard to get them engaged
So, I asked my online students their thoughts. Over the 11 years I've taught online, I'll periodically ask again. Here are the most common responses: 1) Don't ask me to do anything unless there is a grade involved. 2) I know several people in this class, and they don't pull their share of the weight in online classes - no group projects, no interaction with anyone but you, please (this actually is a very common comment) 3) I'm seriously overbooked and must make decisions daily about what to do. Chatting is really low on my list. 4) Most of us are in the same classes all day long. We talk about class outside class, so why do we need to do it in class? 5) I'm working from dialup - this software doesn't work well with dialup. 6) Not worth my time, rather work on assignments for grades. 7) Discussion boards aren't managed well - I don't think the instructor reads them during the week (ouch - that one really hurt and I do better now). 8) Let me just post and not have to respond to others.
So, I use the discussion board (never synchronous chat, since that means everyone must be online at the same time - an anti-online situation) for the weekly attendance. I'll post the prompt, give them 8 days to respond and grade the response. Past the first DB, when they learn to use the DB functions, I don't ask them to reply to each other. I'll frequently post example responses (acting as myself) and haunt the DB while it's open.
Is it a great experience? No, not really. That might be because of my course content, but I think mostly because my students really are very busy - holding down full time jobs, young moms, overload classes.
marjorytStudents may be very sensitive about posting work for a grade, so I'll post very generic prompts. I think they appreciate that, and then we use "assignments" for sensitive work. Most students will tell me horror stories about having their content taken.
In the early 1980s I saw a large man in a business suit standing beside a taxi-cab on Canal Street in New Orleans in front of the Marriot Hotel. I asked him if I and my traveling companion could share a cab with him to the Airport. He took one look at my traveling companion who was a beautiful woman and promptly said, “Jump in!” So she and I both got into the back seat of the cab and waited for the tall, impressive-looking man to get in himself. I noticed that many likewise impressive looking people were shaking his hand and seeing him off from in front of the Marriot on Canal Street; and when he finally got into the cab, he got into the passenger side of the front seat of the cab. As the cab pulled out, he reached over the back of the front seat and offered his hand and said, “I am General Westmoreland.” As the cab continued to the airport, in order to keep him talking I said, “Sir, you mean you don’t travel with body guards?” He abruptly said, “No and I don’t want any!” Still to keep him talking, I said, “Sir, isn’t it wonderful that Haig has just been appointed Secretary of State!” to which he gruffly responded, “Yeah! Yeah! Haig was one of my field commanders in Viet Nam. Nixon called him back to Washington and promoted him from the rank of Colonel to Four Star General in the matter of about two years. Made a lot of the career Army officers angry!” I knew I had said the wrong thing. Next I said, “Sir, I just finished reading Nguyen Kao Ky’s book,” to which he again gruffly responded, “Yeah! Yeah! That was a bunch of baloney! He made the Diem Family look bad. Those were fine people!” Again, I knew I had said the wrong thing. He then asked me, “Have you read my book?” To which I responded that I did not know he had written one. I asked him the title of it and he told me that the title of it was A SOLDIER REPORTS. To which I told him that I would have to get it and read it. He said, “Give me your card, and I will send you a copy! It will be the paper-back edition. Now if you want the hard-back edition, you will have to buy it yourself at the local bookstore.” I gave him my card, and sure enough, he sent me an autographed paperback copy of his book. To keep him talking, I asked him, “Sir, who were some of the great leaders that you have known and dealt with during your career?” He started off by telling me that it was General John J. Pershing had been the one who pinned his second lieutenant bar on him. Then he talked about President Nixon. He said that he had dealt with President Nixon during the Viet Nam War, and--exact words--"If Nixon had listened to me, we would have won that war!” I told him that I was a Lieutenant in the Louisiana Army National Guard, and he wanted to know the name of my unit, for he wanted to mention it when he autographed the book he was to send to me. Then, again, to keep him talking, I said, “We have a general from Lake Charles, General Leonard Pauley.” To which he promptly said, “Yes, I know Pauley!” Then he said, “You had another one from Lake Charles, General Eddleman.” He probably called his first name, I don’t recall. Since I had never heard of General Eddleman before, when I got back to Lake Charles, I mentioned this General Eddleman to my wife’s grand-mother who was born in 1904 and had lived in Lake Charles most all of her adult life; and she advised me that she remembered him well. (A GOOGLE search shows the grave marker of a General Clyde David Eddleman, who is buried in Arlington National Cemetery.) I did my best to keep him talking, and I did a pretty good job of it; but I do not recall much more that he said. When we got to the airport, i said, “Now, Sir, I’m paying for the cab fare,” to which he retorted, “Oh, no you’re not! I’m paying!” To which I responded, “Well, it’s kinda hard for a Lieutenant to argue with a Four Star General!” When he sent me the autographed paper-back edition of his book, he had a nice letter with it in which he referred to my traveling companion as “your lovely wife.” He had noticed too, for she was indeed a beautiful woman. I found it amazing, and my friend did too, that ones so insignificant as us, particularly while we both were still in our 30’s, would have such an interesting experience and be able to ride along and talk with such a great American military leader. That was an experience that I shall never forget. When I got home, I went across the street from my house to visit with my neighbor who was a ranking Army officer and Viet Nam veteran to tell him about this experience; and when I told him about saying to General Westmoreland, “Sir, isn’t it great that Haig has been appointed Secretary of State!”, before I could even report what General Westmoreland had responded, my neighbor, the ranking Army officer, immediately responded, “Boy, that was the wrong thing to have said!” To which I immediatly responded, “And so I promptly learned!” This is a true story, as true as my memory recalls it these twenty-five or so years later. - Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles, LA —The preceding unsigned comment was added (to Wikipedia) by Hardy Parkerson (talk • contribs) 01:46, March 20, 2006 (UTC)
Whatever happened to classrooms? Now it's all done online. Whatever happened to classroom teachers? They used to be so fine!
Now it's pay your fees, get your drgrees, Online, from Law to Medi-cine. But tell me, Doc, 'for you cut on me, please, That you didn't get yours online!
The rankings are biased for research universities and basically ignore comprehensive universities.
There were a lot of fairly small, lesser known foreign universities that outranked US universities that don't make any sense at all. Most of the Big 10 universities, for example, dwarf foreign universities in size, quality, and productivity
Tenure is a sort of protection granted to faculty members that makes it difficult to fire them for other than serious infractions. The original purpose was to protect the freedom of speech ...See More