College Professors Chatboard

Join Teachers.Net

Chatboards

Recent Groups

Professors

MEMBERS

2 Members

+ Join Group

Pinned Posts

ALLAll Teachers

Teachers.Net LIVE CHAT Support group - Tues eve!

Featured Jobs

Full-timeMontessori Teacher

Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada

TemporaryTeachers, rural schools

Peace River North School District

Full-timeHead Teacher: 2nd/3rd Grades – Mills College Children’s School

Mills College

Teaching Jobs on Teachers.Net

Featured Job special only $39!

https://teachers.net/jobs

Become a Teachers.Net sponsor!

College Professors Chatboard

The 98/2 Rule and Making Administrative Decisions

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Dec 27, 2012

When making decisions for the school and his staff, he uses the 98/2 rule.

Comment

(1)

report post

Voice of Reason The 98/2 rule also applies to administrators.

On 12/27/12, Teachers.Net Gazette wrote: > When making decisions for the school and his staff, he uses > the 98/2 rule.

May 17, 2013

report post

The Importance of Assertiveness in Teachers

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Jan 9, 2013

Dr. Robert Rose, author of Abuses of Power in Education; Challenging Practically Everything (Outskirts Press, 2008), shares insight gained during his radio show dialogue with Dr.Howard Seeman, as they explored their belief in the importance of assertiveness in teachers.

Comment

report post

"Are You Suffering From Hostile Intention Attribution Bias?"

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Jan 12, 2013

From "Are You Suffering From Hostile Intention Attribution Bias?" to international test score comparison, to history teachers closing the textbooks and trivia fun, there's something for everyone!

Comment

report post

"Are You Suffering From Hostile Intention Attribution Bias?"

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Jan 12, 2013

From "Are You Suffering From Hostile Intention Attribution Bias?" to international test score comparison, to history teachers closing the textbooks and trivia fun, there's something for everyone!

Comment

report post

[Academic] Rigor vs Vigor - What do you think?

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Jan 27, 2013

School principal ("Head of School") Todd Nelson says:

"We are fairly accepting of the use of the word “rigor” as a positive term for high standards and accomplishments in lots of things, including education. As it turns out, “vigor” might be a much better choice."

Read in the very short piece linked below, why Todd Nelson ...See More

Comment

(1)

report post

Prof Phil On 1/27/13, Teachers.Net Gazette wrote: > School principal ("Head of School") Todd Nelson says: > > "We are fairly accepting of the use of the word “rigor” as a > positive term for high standards and accomplishments in lots > of things, including education. As it turns out, “vigor” > might be a much better choice." > &g...See More

Jan 30, 2013

report post

Problem Based Learning (parts 1, 2,3)

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Feb 4, 2013

Do you want your students to develop high-level communication skills? The ability to arrive at informed judgments? The ability to function in a global community? Flexibility, persistence, and resourcefulness? Try Problem-Based Learning.

Comment

report post

All Schooling Is A Game – The Kids & Teachers Merely Players

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Feb 11, 2013

The enjoyment, challenge, competition, or satisfaction of playing the game lies in players following the rules and competing in quest of the established or agreed upon goal and being declared a winner. The "school game" has all the characteristics of any other game except for the following, which is all based on compelled participation:

{...See More

Comment

report post

21 Reasons to "Be Proud of Public Education"

by Teachers.Net Gazette

Feb 12, 2013

This article is one to share with other educators and the public!

Comment

report post

Article: "Do You Have a Student Teacher?"

by Hal Portner in Teachers.Net Gazette

Jun 30, 2013

Having a student teacher requires a delicate balance between encouragement and evaluation. Read Hal Portner's tips in the article linked below.

[link removed]

Comment

report post

student evaluations

by adjunct

Jul 19, 2013

I have a theory about student evaluations, which is that the more mature, motivated students tend to get more out of the course and give you higher evaluations. The students who come late, skip class, goof off during class, miss assignments, etc. tend not to do well, and as a result they get less out of the class, get a poor grade and, because they...See More

Comment

(8)

report post

view previous comments

Wife of Prof (Retired) It is great to hear that at least some colleges of higher learning are taking the bull by the horns to make undergraduate teaching count in quality and for tenure and promotion. However, it is still the exception to the rule because universities today are being run by outside interests in many cases or having to bend to outside interests as higher ...See MoreIt is great to hear that at least some colleges of higher learning are taking the bull by the horns to make undergraduate teaching count in quality and for tenure and promotion. However, it is still the exception to the rule because universities today are being run by outside interests in many cases or having to bend to outside interests as higher education is 'big bucks' from the sports domains to the research centers. A stupid secretary happened to see the criteria that is used in his department to review the annual reports which interested professors take a great deal of time to write up. Well, it was "she" - secretary to the chair who had the rating system and it was strictly" bean counting of how many papers, what kind of papers, research contracts, amounts etc. So basically not even the chair in his "dysfunctional" department saw what one did - not to worry as he views it as "his fiefdom" anyhow.

The sad fact is that families have so little idea in many institutions what little interest there is in teaching or preparation for actual classes AND yet the loans are breaking many a student's back. Now this is not happening in every place, but it is well worth it for families to dig a little in researching their teen's options. Try and talk to students who are in final year or recent graduates to feel how prepared they were for the job scene or graduate programs.

On 8/10/13, Prof Phil wrote: > On 8/09/13, Vet Teacher wrote: >> On 8/03/13, Prof Phil wrote: >> >> There's an interent contradiction in teaching - society expects us >> to be the frontline of society's judgment - if we didn't give grades >> in high school, everyone could get into Harvard. If we didn't give >> grades in college, everyone could go to Harvard Law School, >> Harvard's Business School or Harvard Med. >> >> But there's not enough room for everybody at Harvard and no society >> can be one of only lawyers, MBAs and doctors. American likes to say >> of itself that everyone here can by anything they want to be but the >> plain truth is that not everyone can go to Harvard. Of course that's >> a metaphor... >> >> So how do you be a good teacher yet fulfill society's expections of >> teachers and keep the bar raised and hold firm against the >> increasing push of the masses trying to get to the top? >> >> I could write volumes on that even though the volumes I'd write >> might not have the defintive answer to the question but to say - >> it's not easy. >> >> But the posts that precede this one and essentially dismiss >> the 'ratings' of teachers don't not speak to the truth of the >> matter - even if it is true that the rateyourprof. etc. sites are >> not valid. And the truth of the matter is - there are bad teachers >> out there and at every level. Is every teacher bad? Hardly. Are >> there bad teachers? >> >> Yes there are. And they're not just deemed bad because they're hard >> or give low grades. To believe that's the case is like believing in >> unicorns and Santa Claus. There are bad doctors out there. Not every >> one is bad by any means but there bad doctors out there. There are >> doctors out there who lose their licenses. >> >> there are bad car mechanics, bad lawyers, bad accountants and >> incompetent people in every profession and occupation. No profession >> or occupation is immune. >> >> While you spend time and energy refuting the infant ratings sites, >> what method would you suggest for ferreting out the bad teachers? If >> you deny they exist, that denial is a part of the problem rather >> than a part of any solution to it. >> >> Society deserves accountability for the billions of dollars it >> spends on education even while we as teachers say society does not >> spend enough. I'm a teacher who freely admits I've seen bad >> teachers - sadly I've even seen one or two who were near to criminal >> in their behavior toward students. Almost as often I've seen schools >> look the other way when they've got a bad teacher in their midst. >> >> Your statements about the ratetheprof. suggest there are no bad >> teachers out there. The ratetheprof. website may not help get rid of >> bad teachers but it's sadly foolish to deny their existence. >> >>> On 7/26/13, Prof Phil wrote: >>>> On 7/19/13, adjunct wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have a theory about student evaluations, which is that >>>>> the more mature, motivated students tend to get more out of >>>>> the course and give you higher evaluations. The students who >>>>> come late, skip class, goof off during class, miss >>>>> assignments, etc. tend not to do well, >>>>> and as a result they get less out of the class, get a poor >>>>> grade and, because they are too immature to take >>>>> responsibility, give the instructor a poor or mediocre >>>>> evaluation. My college used to use handwritten anonymous >>>>> student evaluations, and a few weeks later the forms would >>>>> be returned to you. Sometimes you could recognize the >>>>> handwriting and this supported my theory. The college >>>>> changed to computerized evals, but this summer I taught a >>>>> noncredit course with handwritten evals and the college did >>>>> not require the instructor to leave the room and have a >>>>> student collect and turn them in. Of course, the one >>>>> mediocre eval was from the student who came late to class, >>>>> returned late from breaks, texted during class,etc. This is >>>>> not a problem when you have only one or two students of this >>>>> type. But when you occasionally luck into a class with more >>>>> squirrelly students than usual, it can reflect poorly on you >>>>> in your college's estimation. I do not like this. >>>> >>>> My 30+ years of experience at the college level supports your >>>> theory. I will also add that it seems to be either the most >>>> satisfied or least satisfied who report on the "rate your >>>> professor" websites. If a professor has very few ratings they >>>> are probably not accurate or reliable...probably from one >>>> extreme or another. >>> >>> Just to add something interesting, about 10 years ago it turned >>> out a student in one of my classes happened to own the most >>> widely used "rate your professor" websites for our campus. >> He >>> revealed that to me and asked if he could buy me lunch and pick >>> my brain on how to improve it. One of my suggestions was to add >>> a place where a reviewer could put down the grade they received >>> in the course. My belief is that for several reasons the >> opinion >>> of a student with a low grade in a class is not as useful as the >>> opinion of one who gets a high grade. He agreed and added >> the >>> field to the website. Most students supply the grade in their >>> review. I think it added credibility to the site. >>> >>> On another note, I have looked at about a half-dozen of these >>> sites over the years. They range from basing their evaluations on >>> "how easy" and instructor is to "how much you will learn." The >>> reviews for the same instructor can vary greatly between these >>> two sites because of the criteria used. I now tell my students >>> that if they use these sites to find the ones that talk about >>> how much you can learn. >>> >>> My theory is that if you try to take all the easy teachers in the >>> long run you spend more time because you end up self-teaching >>> yourself stuff later on (especially in technical majors). I have >>> expressed this theory to students and many agree. > > I agree with most of what Wife of Prof says. > > Addressing adjunct: my suggestion to students who use the "Rate Your > Professor" websites is to look at the criteria for the website and to > also be careful if there are only a few ratings. If a teacher is not > doing a good job of teaching, the serious students will say so in > abundance. > > We have one adjunct and one tenured faculty member in my department > that, in my humble opinion, are not teaching the material. They both > are easy graders and give lots of A's. They get good instructional > assessment evaluations from many students because they like the easy > grades. If you read the "what did you learn" website the ratings are > not so good. > > I estimate that roughly 80% of the teachers at my institution are hard > working teachers who teach adequately and earn their pay. 20% are > marginal or undeserving. How does that compare to doctors, lawyers, > engineering, managers, and other professions? I don't know. Getting rid > of lecturers who are poor teachers is not that hard, but getting rid > of tenure-track instructors who are poor teachers is difficult. > > My department is addressing the quality of teaching issue by making it > very clear to our new tenure-track faculty in their RTP criteria and by > our actions. From the very beginning we are visiting their classes and > doing what we can to help them from develop. We are making it clear we > want them to succeed and are monitoring them so we can help. So far > that is working out well. Letters written by professors based on their > observations are used in evaluating for tenure and promotion...in > addition to the traditional instructional assessment surveys. > > I also think a big reason that genuinely bad teachers survive is due to > weak-kneed administrators who don't have the guts to do anything when > presented with a strong case. At our campus HR is part of that problem > also. > >

Aug 16, 2013

report post

Prof Phil On 8/16/13, Wife of Prof (Retired) wrote: > > It is great to hear that at least some colleges of higher learning are > taking the bull by the horns to make undergraduate teaching count in > quality and for tenure and promotion. However, it is still the exception > to the rule because universities today are being run by outside intere...See MoreOn 8/16/13, Wife of Prof (Retired) wrote: > > It is great to hear that at least some colleges of higher learning are > taking the bull by the horns to make undergraduate teaching count in > quality and for tenure and promotion. However, it is still the exception > to the rule because universities today are being run by outside interests > in many cases or having to bend to outside interests as higher education is > 'big bucks' from the sports domains to the research centers. A stupid > secretary happened to see the criteria that is used in his department to > review the annual reports which interested professors take a great deal of > time to write up. Well, it was "she" - secretary to the chair who had the > rating system and it was strictly" bean counting of how many papers, what > kind of papers, research contracts, amounts etc. So basically not even the > chair in his "dysfunctional" department saw what one did - not to worry as > he views it as "his fiefdom" anyhow. > > The sad fact is that families have so little idea in many institutions what > little interest there is in teaching or preparation for actual classes AND > yet the loans are breaking many a student's back. Now this is not > happening in every place, but it is well worth it for families to dig a > little in researching their teen's options. Try and talk to students who > are in final year or recent graduates to feel how prepared they were for > the job scene or graduate programs. >

In my area we have lots of parents (especially Asian families) who feel that the name of the institution their child goes to is super important and they are willing to pay lots of money to send their child there. These parents are not adequately concerned about the learning that takes place or making sure their child is in the right major. I know that many expensive private institutions and major public research universities do a great job with undergraduates, but as mentioned above, many large research-centered institutions are not really devoted to undergraduate teaching. When I was in grad school at one of these research universities, I remember a faculty member even telling me that he and most of the others did not care about their undergraduate program--only the grad program.

One thing in favor of these institutions is they do get to pick from the cream of the crop of high school applicants. Many of these students are going to do well in college in spite of the teaching and go on to be very successful.

As long as parents are willing to pay for the name and employers hire based on name, a lot of these quality problems will continue.

Aug 19, 2013

report post

« prev page

Teacher Chatboards