I agree with Debbie Miller that studen...See MoreMy favorite quotation for this chapter came from one of the sidebars--"Gradual release is not a linear process but rather a recursive and dynamic one." (Stephanie Harvey)
I like the notion that we can "release" the students but then go back to modeling or add more scaffolding if they need it.
I agree with Debbie Miller that students need to be involved with the lessons right from the start, instead of just WATCHING us, the teachers, constantly just modeling. The need to be actively learning, not just watching us do all the work.
Idea about my teaching inspired by this chapter: 1. I've been starting my classes with SSR time. However, I think I'm going to move SSR to the end of class and have students practice the strategy using their SSR book/reading. This will, I think, have a second benefit of making some of the harder-sell students buy into SSR since their will be a "purpose" to it.
aOn 6/24/11, judy5ca wrote: > Thanks, Teri, for getting us started (typing is a little easier > today). > > I love the quotation you selected about gradual release. Most > good teachers used gradual release even before it was called > that, but Miller so clearly defines its meaning and worth. I > was cheering as I read her lesson, her perfect lesson. I love > the way she takes us through the whole process (minilesson, > conference, sharing) while detailing her purpose and her thinking. > > I'm excited about her language "learning about ourselves as > readers" and plan to steal that. She finished her conference > asking, "So what are you learning about yourself as a reader > today?" and made the focus of sharing what we're learning about > ourselves as readers. Brilliant! Her focus never wavers. > > My most favorite concept was putting "children in authentic > learning situations where they practice applying them" because > "digging into the thinking process ultimately leads to > independence." This is always my goal. > > Judy > > > On 6/24/11, Teri wrote: >> My favorite quotation for this chapter came from one of the >> sidebars--"Gradual release is not a linear process but >> rather a recursive and dynamic one." (Stephanie Harvey) >> >> I like the notion that we can "release" the students but >> then go back to modeling or add more scaffolding if they >> need it. >> >> I agree with Debbie Miller that students need to be >> involved with the lessons right from the start, instead of >> just WATCHING us, the teachers, constantly just modeling. >> The need to be actively learning, not just watching us do >> all the work. >> >> Idea about my teaching inspired by this chapter: >> 1. I've been starting my classes with SSR time. However, >> I think I'm going to move SSR to the end of class and have >> students practice the strategy using their SSR >> book/reading. This will, I think, have a second benefit of >> making some of the harder-sell students buy into SSR since >> their will be a "purpose" to it. >>
On 6/25/11, PMo wrote: > I agree, Judy -- I just loved that way Miller focuses, again and > again, on "what are you learning about yourself as a reader"? > But I really recognized my class she discussed the way in which a > concluding-share can turn into a wearying topic-fest rather than > an exploration of what was HAPPENING for the readers as they > read. These are pieces that I will be using a LOT in the year > to come, as well as her point that, during one-to-one sharing, we > need to "make it clear it's not just one turn each and we're > done..." THIS is something I have struggled with, and want to do > more thinking about. > > aOn 6/24/11, judy5ca wrote: >> Thanks, Teri, for getting us started (typing is a little easier >> today). >> >> I love the quotation you selected about gradual release. Most >> good teachers used gradual release even before it was called >> that, but Miller so clearly defines its meaning and worth. I >> was cheering as I read her lesson, her perfect lesson. I love >> the way she takes us through the whole process (minilesson, >> conference, sharing) while detailing her purpose and her > thinking. >> >> I'm excited about her language "learning about ourselves as >> readers" and plan to steal that. She finished her conference >> asking, "So what are you learning about yourself as a reader >> today?" and made the focus of sharing what we're learning about >> ourselves as readers. Brilliant! Her focus never wavers. >> >> My most favorite concept was putting "children in authentic >> learning situations where they practice applying them" because >> "digging into the thinking process ultimately leads to >> independence." This is always my goal. >> >> Judy >> >> >> On 6/24/11, Teri wrote: >>> My favorite quotation for this chapter came from one of the >>> sidebars--"Gradual release is not a linear process but >>> rather a recursive and dynamic one." (Stephanie Harvey) >>> >>> I like the notion that we can "release" the students but >>> then go back to modeling or add more scaffolding if they >>> need it. >>> >>> I agree with Debbie Miller that students need to be >>> involved with the lessons right from the start, instead of >>> just WATCHING us, the teachers, constantly just modeling. >>> The need to be actively learning, not just watching us do >>> all the work. >>> >>> Idea about my teaching inspired by this chapter: >>> 1. I've been starting my classes with SSR time. However, >>> I think I'm going to move SSR to the end of class and have >>> students practice the strategy using their SSR >>> book/reading. This will, I think, have a second benefit of >>> making some of the harder-sell students buy into SSR since >>> their will be a "purpose" to it. >>>
This quotation reveals the biggest problem with my class. There is no authentic purpose. The sole rationale for my class is to get the students to pass the state test (which is a graduation requirement). No matter how much I try to convince the students that the purpose of my class is to improve their reading skills for college and life--they just see it as test prep. I've even had students complain to me that I don't do enough skill and drill with them!
The only materials for my class are articles and stories that I've gathered over the last five years. I really want to devise thematic units--to give some authentic purpose to what we are reading--however it is really hard when I have to find all of the reading material on my own and the school has no money to purchase anything.
Okay, enough of my whining...the other things I really liked from this chapter ...
1. I really LOVED the opening of class scenario on page 60. We're required to write the objective on the board every day, but, I admit, I never really did anything with it. I love how analyzing the day's objective, in relation to the long-term target, basically became the class's bellwork. Way to start the class with critical thinking.
2. I also really liked how the teacher/students put brackets around parts of the text they wanted to (or thought they needed to) read deeper. I'm definitely going to add this to my list of annotations to share with my students.
I love teaching students to annotate. I think it's a very valuable tool for comprehending text, it slows down the faster readers so they can think more deeply and holds the thinking of those who are slower and may have difficulty remembering their thoughts by the time they get to the end of the piece. In class, we annotate & highlight on the actual text whenever we can. If we can't annotate on the text, I have students write their thougths, questions, comments, on charts, in a notebook, or if I have to, stickies. I can also make a copy to put under the document camera and we can annotate as group.
But how will the use of technology affect the ability for us to annotate in the future? Can you annotate on a kindle? I think I remember the answer is no (obviously I don't have one).
In 2 years all of our student testing (benchmarks, unit testing, summative and end of grade tests) will be via computer. I've looked at samples of the testing program, the only annotation tool available is a highlighter. Other than that, they cannot make margin notes nor can they cannot type into the text to insert their thoughts, ideas, questions, etc.
I guess I'm wondering if I am missing something out there. Are there programs or parts of existing programs that allow one to annotate text in digital format?
Yes, Parker, I HATE that we teach them so many marking strategies all year long and then on the STAR test, I have to teach them to use their "MAGIC, INVISIBLE PENCILS" to annotate the test booklets as you're not allowed to mark in them in 2nd and 3rd grade. I hear in the upper grades where they use scantrons that you ARE allowed to mark in the test booklets. I hope that is true for these kidlets as they grow older.
I teach 11th/12th grade "retakes." My students have a combined test book/answer sheet for the test. There are some school and district personnel who try to tell the kids not to write in the books at all. I tell the students to write in the book, just not on the tracking bar or near the answer choices (which is what the testmaker instructs). This does involve some re-training as most kids learn to cross out the letter of the incorrect answers when using process of elimination. I have to train them to draw an X at the end of the answer choice instead of on the letter.
judy5caWelcome, Annette. Jump into any chapter of Comprehension Going Forward (hope that's the title--scroll down if you want to check). I'm still thinking a lot about the early chapters, so feel free to post there. Judy
On 6/28/11, annette wrote: > I am a little late but I would love to join the latest > professional reading.
I am struggling to pass this test-both times by 2 or 4 pts. Is there any prep for this in western mass. area that anybody can RX? I have taken a zillion practice tests but am very frustrated. Changed jobs recently to Title One high school level and I feel like I should give up teaching after 34 years, M.Ed and 40 credits beyond!!!
dcI'm sorry, Karen. I'm not familiar with this test or with test prep for it. You've tried googling test prep for this test, I'm sure, right? Try asking your state union association? Sorry I can't be more helpful.
What did you all think of this chapter? I really liked her approach and I plan on buying her book just to read more about her Book Lover's Book. She seems to have her kidskeep a simple book log, notes, and responses all in one notebook that she uses for accountability and assessment, as well as for the kids to "capture their thinking".
What do you all use to capture kids' thinking? Do kids write on a worksheet on a clipboard? Do they write in a journal? A piece of paper? Sticky note?
I also liked that she does whole class novel studies. I have seen the power of doing that more and more and enjoy our whole class novel studies in third grade. I have seen more kids "turned on" to reading chapter books just from this approach. The trick is to balance the reading enjoyment with the discussion, so you don't tip away from the power of the book itself with too many "teachable moments". She recommends doing only one or two (max) whole class book studies a year. I do many more than that. She then uses those book studies as anchor studies for her book clubs.
How many of you do whole class novel studies? Do any of you do "book clubs" in the same way that she does?
What did you all think of this chapter? I really liked her approach and I plan on buying her book just to read more about her Book Lover's Book. She seems to have her kidskeep a simple book log, notes, and responses all in one notebook that she uses for accountability and assessment, as well as for the kids to "capture their thinking".
What do you all use to capture kids' thinking? Do kids write on a worksheet on a clipboard? Do they write in a journal? A piece of paper? Sticky note?
I also liked that she does whole class novel studies. I have seen the power of doing that more and more and enjoy our whole class novel studies in third grade. I have seen more kids "turned on" to reading chapter books just from this approach. The trick is to balance the reading enjoyment with the discussion, so you don't tip away from the power of the book itself with too many "teachable moments". She recommends doing only one or two (max) whole class book studies a year. I do many more than that. She then uses those book studies as anchor studies for her book clubs.
How many of you do whole class novel studies? Do any of you do "book clubs" in the same way that she does? She sits outside of the book clubs and listens in, while scripting their conversations and discussions. She is available as a resource but only when they ask for her help. Interesting!
> I also liked that she does whole class novel studies. I have > seen the power of doing that more and more and enjoy our > whole class novel studies in third grade. I have seen more > kids "turned on" to reading chapter books just from this > approach. The trick is to balance the reading enjoyment > with the discussion, so you don't tip away from the power of > the book itself with too many "teachable moments". She > recommends doing only one or two (max) whole class book > studies a year. I do many more than that. She then uses > those book studies as anchor studies for her book clubs. > This was the part of the chapter I liked best--it validated something I had planned to try this coming year. A colleague and I had discussed having some sort of "anchor text" although we didn't call it that. Now I am even more determined to begin the year this way. I have a novel picked out for my senior reading students (a novel called Meg by Steve Alten about a 60 foot prehistoric shark that wrecks havic in the modern day Pacific) but now for my juniors. I was going to use Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (the original British version, which is just different enough to "hook" the kids who have already read it) but Blauman said the anchor text should be at a level to challenge the students. Harry Potter is too easy for that. So now I'm stuck. Any suggestions for a novel for 11th grade reluctant readers????
> How many of you do whole class novel studies? Do any of you > do "book clubs" in the same way that she does? She sits > outside of the book clubs and listens in, while scripting > their conversations and discussions. She is available as a > resource but only when they ask for her help. Interesting! >
I love book clubs/literature circles and have used them successfully, but I have never scripted their conversations. Something else to try this coming year :)
I tried "book clubs" 2 years ago and I was quite unhappy with the way I made it work. Last year I just couldn't figure out a way to fix it. I have lots of book sets and really need to come back to the fold. I want the kids to independently discuss the book (and I teach what a discussion entails), but I'm rarely happy with their independent discussion. Control freak?
Judy
On 7/01/11, dc wrote: > Building a Better Book Club, by Leslie Blauman > > What did you all think of this chapter? I really liked her > approach and I plan on buying her book just to read more > about her Book Lover's Book. She seems to have her kidskeep > a simple book log, notes, and responses all in one notebook > that she uses for accountability and assessment, as well as > for the kids to "capture their thinking". > > What do you all use to capture kids' thinking? Do kids > write on a worksheet on a clipboard? Do they write in a > journal? A piece of paper? Sticky note? > > I also liked that she does whole class novel studies. I have > seen the power of doing that more and more and enjoy our > whole class novel studies in third grade. I have seen more > kids "turned on" to reading chapter books just from this > approach. The trick is to balance the reading enjoyment > with the discussion, so you don't tip away from the power of > the book itself with too many "teachable moments". She > recommends doing only one or two (max) whole class book > studies a year. I do many more than that. She then uses > those book studies as anchor studies for her book clubs. > > How many of you do whole class novel studies? Do any of you > do "book clubs" in the same way that she does? She sits > outside of the book clubs and listens in, while scripting > their conversations and discussions. She is available as a > resource but only when they ask for her help. Interesting! >
I'm VERY excited about this book that was on my doorstep today when I got home from vacation: Texts and Lessons for Content-Area Reading by Daniels and Steineke (pub. Heinemann) 23 great strategy lessons with 1 page text (from newspapers, magazines, etc.). There are also 10 text set lessons--really amazing. Years ago I saw Katie Wood Ray and she suggested teaching from what she called "stacks;" these were piles of articles, etc., to support the lesson/unit. I was just never able to pull it all together. Now, here it is--done for me!
There's too much for me to describe, but it's been a long time since I was ready to scrap my curriculum for one new text. Fortunately, my lesson plan book is at home and I read through my reading launch lessons and they're fabulous (so humble, I know) so I'll have to figure out how to use this wonderful resource.
I agree. I believe the Common Core does expect us to use scaffolding to help the students read grade-level texts; no more dumbing down the curriculum. This has been a pet peeve of mine, so I'm thrilled. One of the two senior English teachers at my school bought "dumbed down" versions of the classics of British literature. To her that was differentiating. Then, when the low readers (the kids who were also in my intensive reading class) still didn't get it--let's face it, Beowulf and Canturbury Tales and Shakespeare, even dumbed down, can be complex-- she said they were lazy or weren't trying. And she got mad at me for offering to help them! I hope the Common Core gets this point across to teachers and, if they don't know how to scaffold and/or are not willing to learn, then it is probably past time for them to retire.
TeriOn 7/01/11, judy5ca wrote: > I read somewhere that it's for grades 6+, but of course I > can't find the grade recommendation now. > > I'm VERY excited about this book that was on my doorstep > today when I got home from vacation: > Texts and Lessons for Content-Area Reading by Daniels > and Steineke (pub. Heinemann) > 23 gre...See MoreOn 7/01/11, judy5ca wrote: > I read somewhere that it's for grades 6+, but of course I > can't find the grade recommendation now. > > I'm VERY excited about this book that was on my doorstep > today when I got home from vacation: > Texts and Lessons for Content-Area Reading by Daniels > and Steineke (pub. Heinemann) > 23 great strategy lessons with 1 page text (from newspapers, > magazines, etc.). There are also 10 text set > lessons--really amazing. Years ago I saw Katie Wood Ray and > she suggested teaching from what she called "stacks;" these > were piles of articles, etc., to support the lesson/unit. I > was just never able to pull it all together. Now, here it > is--done for me! > > There's too much for me to describe, but it's been a long > time since I was ready to scrap my curriculum for one new > text. Fortunately, my lesson plan book is at home and I > read through my reading launch lessons and they're fabulous > (so humble, I know) so I'll have to figure out how to use > this wonderful resource. > > I hope Parker reads this. > > Judy
I have the book. Actually, I bought it at the IRA Convention in May...about two minutes after leaving the workshop Daniels and Steineke hosted.
This just seemed to piggy-back on the previous chapter about Leslie Blauman's Book Clubs. She seemed to be commenting on her observations of the book clubs in that classroom.
Leslie seems to do a very good job (much better than I do) of "visiting each four-way share, nudging, celebrating, assessing, and gleaning new discoveries to bring back to the whole group." I'm thinking that this is why I am (like Judy) not always satisfied when I have attempted book clubs in the past. I am not nudging them enough. I am not pushing them enough. I get frustrated with the surface level discussions and am not skilled enough yet at nudging them forward into deeper thinking and conversations.
And of course, I'm frustrated with the lack of transfer with this type of teaching/learning and success on THE TEST! I GET that these authors are trying to convince us to "rebel" and teach this way anyway (I would LOVE to teach this way full-time), but they are not the ones in the meetings with admin going over test results and comparing one classroom's results with another. When you see that drill and kill DOES translate to success on the test in other classrooms, you feel the pull to put more of that into your teaching day. I wish I could be the type of person that just says, "Screw it! I know that real reading and real writing full time is the best way to life-long success, so that's what I'll do...who cares about my test results!" but I'm not there yet in my evolution as a teacher. How many of you are? How do you think this through in your head each day?
Leslie BlaumanHi Teri and Judy, I absolutely had to respond to your conversation - because, like you, I live it. I'm still in the classroom! Test scores. Accountability. (Our state test scores were just released today) I get your frustration about the transfer from authentic instruction to those tests - that we're held accountable for. But hang in there. Believe...See MoreHi Teri and Judy, I absolutely had to respond to your conversation - because, like you, I live it. I'm still in the classroom! Test scores. Accountability. (Our state test scores were just released today) I get your frustration about the transfer from authentic instruction to those tests - that we're held accountable for. But hang in there. Believe me - it works. And isn't the bottom line to get our students to be readers and writers? And since I live it, I can say that when the kids LOVE reading and writing (but know how to take the test - as a genre) - they improve on the test. The last entry in your conversation ends with the idea to take away what works for you - and to use it in your classroom. I don't know if that point came through in my chapter on Book Clubs - but in my book, The Inside Guide to the Reading and Writing Classroom (yes, it's for grades 3-6 - but could be applicable to high school.) I emphasize that it's so important to set it all up - have to have the classroom running seamlessly - otherwise book clubs are chaotic. Gotta have that training in place first. Don't rebel - I don't - and yes, I sit with administrators going over my test results. Think about what your kids NEED! Drill and kill does kill the kids - but we have to be wise and make sure that we are giving our kids the skills that the test requires. It's tough. Start slow - Does this make sense? I'm just thrilled you're thinking about it. Teaching is tough these days. But just know that I'm in it with you.... LeslieBlauman On 7/02/11, dc wrote: > Chapter 6 Thinking and Talking Our Way Through the Words by > Chryse Hutchins > > This just seemed to piggy-back on the previous chapter about > Leslie Blauman's Book Clubs. She seemed to be commenting on > her observations of the book clubs in that classroom. > > Leslie seems to do a very good job (much better than I do) > of "visiting each four-way share, nudging, celebrating, > assessing, and gleaning new discoveries to bring back to the > whole group." I'm thinking that this is why I am (like > Judy) not always satisfied when I have attempted book clubs > in the past. I am not nudging them enough. I am not > pushing them enough. I get frustrated with the surface > level discussions and am not skilled enough yet at nudging > them forward into deeper thinking and conversations. > > And of course, I'm frustrated with the lack of transfer with > this type of teaching/learning and success on THE TEST! I > GET that these authors are trying to convince us to "rebel" > and teach this way anyway (I would LOVE to teach this way > full-time), but they are not the ones in the meetings with > admin going over test results and comparing one classroom's > results with another. When you see that drill and kill DOES > translate to success on the test in other classrooms, you > feel the pull to put more of that into your teaching day. I > wish I could be the type of person that just says, "Screw > it! I know that real reading and real writing full time is > the best way to life-long success, so that's what I'll > do...who cares about my test results!" but I'm not there yet > in my evolution as a teacher. How many of you are? How do > you think this through in your head each day?
Change is supposedly good and I have to hope that down the road we will see great gains from all of this testing. If not, then I hope that we will go back to the way we used to teach!
Thanks again for dropping by. A real author! YEAH!
On 7/03/11, Teri wrote: > On 7/03/11, LS wrote: >> Just popped in to see what was on anyone's reading list and >> after reading a few posts thought I would mention Cris >> Tovani's new book So What Do They Really Know. After >> reading a few of Teri's posts, I thought you might like to >> check it out. Available for online viewing from >> Stenhouse. I love the way she has set up her reading >> workshop in the high school setting. > > I'll have to check out the online viewing, but the book is > already in my Amazon basket so I'll get it as soon as it's > released. Thanks.