My other teacher friend, who is slated to have a 3-4 combo, and I are going to meet again tomorrow to start looking at the trajectory of standards with the goal of figuring out some kind of curriculum for 3-5. We're trying to think globally. I'm really impressed with the skimming/scanning of Owocki's Common Core Lesson Book. We're going to try to use that to help us.
On 7/23/12, Linda wrote: > Judy, > I was sick today at our ELA common core training > because we were told that the reason there is a need > for common core is because teachers weren't really > teaching. In other words, if we had been "really > teaching" then education wouldn't be in the state > it's in now. What that means, I don't know. > > Cavey, We were told today that growth on the new Common > Core assessment would count for 50% of our teacher > evaluation.
The state is looking to identify and nurture truly exemplary teachers and bring along those who aspire to be. The truly exemplary teachers ( like you) have been lumped with those just barely getting by. We needed some way to recalibrate the system. I am not a fan of everything I have heard, and I know there will be lots of issues to deal with, but I still do believe that we ultimately have to look at how effective we are and try to support, encourage, mentor and, if need be, weed out those who are not effective at helping students to learn.
Like Erin said, it is very eye opening to get into lots of classrooms and work with lots of individuals. It makes me realize just how important, and sadly rare, a truly exemplary teacher is. My ultimate goal, however, is to work with those who are willing to help them become the best they can be to improve student learning.
On 7/23/12, judy5ca wrote: > cavey, I know this comes from a good place in your heart, but I am bothered > when you write, "As long as we are working toward the ultimate goal of > improving teaching and student performance that's all we can do." I like > CCSS, but I hope no one is assuming that we haven't worked toward > "improving teaching and student performance" in the past. I mean, > seriously, isn't that what we always have done every single day? I don't > mean to be contentious, and I always honor your thinking, but I just can't > let this one go unaddressed. > Judy > > > > > > On 7/23/12, cavey wrote: >> Linda, >> Our situation in Va is not nearly as extreme as that described in >> Louisiana. There was a pay for performance pilot group this year, but >> that's it so far. The pilot project is helping to work out the kinks in >> the evaluation system. I'm reeling from trying to figure out how all of >> the new performance evaluation measures will be calculated and how we >> will have time to do it. Teachers in grades 4-8 and Algebra will have >> student growth percentiles which will factor into 20 percent of their >> evaluations. However, there are lots of caveats and lots of >> calculations that will come into play. Teachers will be setting their >> own performance goals which will make up 40% of the total evaluation on >> a three year evaluation cycle. Teachers not in the grades with student >> growth percentiles will set ( with their administrators) other measures >> of student performance to evaluate to make up the 40%. >> During this first year, we are really going to have to focus on just >> working with teachers to determine how to set these goals. >> Here is the link to the DOE website if you are really interested. >> >> I have been in this game long enough to not get too upset too early. We >> will be working through things to get the system hammered out over the >> next few years. As long as we are working toward the ultimate goal of >> improving teaching and student performance that's all we can do. >>> >>> On 7/20/12, cavey wrote: >>>> I went to a training on the new >>>> evaluation system last week, and I am reeling. The only >>>> consolation we have is that everyone is in the same situation and >>>> we will all once again be building the plane in flight. >>>> >>>>
Linda, It sounds like your group is trying to be helpful and put together units of study that include the CC Standards. The performance tasks of those readings are to be similar in nature to the performance tasks in appendix B. I purchased a membership to the common core mapping project which is putting together units of study like your group is suggesting. You can preview what they've done so far at [link removed]
I honestly do not see this as a major shift in my teaching. Citing evidence from the text has always been a focus during discussion and in written responses. We use the McGraw/Hill basal series Treasures and when using the Weekly Skills test (typically not on a weekly basis) the hardest part and the most important part to discuss with students is the written response portion where the question must be answered using details from the text.
I'd love to hear more about what other districts are saying and how they plan to implement Common Core. I just heard that we are not going towards a national test but instead states with PARC will take a PARC test and those with SMARTER will take one created by them. I thought one of points of this system was to then be able to compare states' progress. Which then makes me feel like we are a pawns in someone's nefarious scheme with the public TOTALLY uninfomred. Sorry- new tangent I'll reserve opinion on:)
> > > Linda, > It sounds like your group is trying to be helpful and put together > units of study that include the CC Standards. The performance tasks > of those readings are to be similar in nature to the performance > tasks in appendix B. I purchased a membership to the common core > mapping project which is putting together units of study like your > group is suggesting. You can preview what they've done so far at > [link removed]:)
I am looking for Salt Hands by Jane Chelsea Aragon.I have checked Amazon but it is an older book- copyright 1989 and the cheapest copy is $25.00. A bit over my budget lol Any idea where else to look?
One of my big goals this year comes from CCSS. I'm working on having kids retell and then cite text when forming opinions. I'm wondering if you have any brilliant ideas for going about this. I'm simply modeling and we're practicing a lot.
I'm having a modicum of success, but hope you have additional suggestions for me.
Best story from this year: Emily was citing text ("You know how Mr. Say said....") and sharing her thinking when she interrupted herself to say, "Wait, I'm changing my thinking..." I loved that! I loved it so much I didn't even interrupt her to point out to the other kids what a remarkable example of synthesis we'd just heard.
Intensive reading classes have been doing this for years--we all laughed when administration introduced citing text as one of the things that made CCSS so difficult! Mostly, they just need to practice. However, you can make a game, who can find the evidence first.
Of course modeling Judy!! I love the example you gave...how perfect is that!
I am quite certain you did it, but maybe an anchor chart with some prompts for evidence..
Evidence Based Terms
because... for instance... for example... the author said... according to the text... it said...on page... from my reading of....I know that...
PROVE IT!!
Just wanted to add, I am having the very best year in a few years. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE first grade! I feel 20 years younger and I wear a smile every day to work.
Hope everyone is having a year just like mine! Terry
Have any of you read the book Making Thinking Visible? I'm looking for something for our whole staff to read to address our problem of practice and this one is looking quite good to me--judged solely by "look inside" at Amazon. Help??? Thanks, Judy
On 7/23/12, Linda wrote: > Judy, > I was sick today at our ELA common core training > because we were told that the reason there is a need > for common core is because teachers weren't really > teaching. In other words, if we had been "really > teaching" then education...See More