YES. The pre-made California Missions are still vexing me. Since I have...See MoreI was in Michael's today getting some last-minute Valentine stuff for my K-1 kids when I saw them. Lined up in a rack, organized with tabs in alphabetical order. Above the display are bags of accessories - tile roofs, cisterns, flora and fauna, little cemetery crosses.
YES. The pre-made California Missions are still vexing me. Since I haven't vented about them in awhile, allow me to spew a little.
When my boys were younger, the 'mission project' was an exercise in parent 'creativity,' complete with sawn lumber, nuts, bolts, screws, and poorly affixed dirt. Variations on the theme included sugar cubes, popsicle sticks, and cut-up cardboard. Toothpick cemetery 'crosses' were a nice touch.
You have to wonder what the instructional efficacy is for these things but the final straw has to be the pre- fabricated mission KIT. Yes, you can buy the kit, slide Tab A into Slot B and have yourself a genUine model of a California Mission of your choice.
How does such a thing get graded? What is the rubric - how well the slots fit together? Creativity in placing it on a base? Do you get extra points if you bring in San Juan Capistrano and everybody else has Santa Barbara, San Fernando, and Buenaventura?
Then...... what happens to all of them? Is there a craiglist section for pre-owned replicas of California Missions? How many California garages have these atrocities in the rafters? What are they.......heirlooms?
Michael's should be ashamed of themselves. A store that caters to creativity stocking these......non-recyclable THINGS.
You don't know parental pain til you've had to do an authentic Native American longhouse. You have to go out in the woods, gather real authentic branches, take these branches back in and soak them in water til they bend. Most branches that you find in the woods on the ground, don't bend. Most branches also don't hold together well with Elmer's glue either. You have to use hot glue and when the branches pop off, you have to do it again and again. Then you have to go back in the woods and try to find more bendable branches. Popcicles sticks just won't do. Oh no, not for an authentic longhouse! We're in Virginia for pete's sake. I have no idea why we were even building a longhouse anyway. I think they got to pick any old type of native structure but I could never talk my kids into teepee or igloo. Oh no, we're a longhouse family.
We actually did some very lovely longhouses. They were rivaled only by my relief map of VA made out of salt dough and my model of a cell made with cookie dough.
I could almost see it if they were remo...See Moreto building useless stuff like this anyway, since it's just going to wind up cluttering up people's houses or in the dumpster? Wouldn't it make more sense for the students to look at photographs or slides of the real things, and discuss the real-life challenges that went into making them at the time?
I could almost see it if they were remotely authentic, but come on, missionaries didn't use sugar cubes, and Native Americans didn't use glue guns. If the parents are doing the building these days, I'm surprised you haven't taken branches in hand and staged an angry revolt.
We had to something like this when I was in third or fourth grade, and I thought it was stupid then. I forget what the structure was, but I used a cardboard box and a few Barbie and Ken dolls and got an A. The teacher barely looked at them, too. Her big thing was making sure we all took them home the same day, because they were piled up all over her shelves in the way. Mom had to drop me off at school that day and pick me up (I usually walked), and after all the painting and costume making (they did have to wear Native American clothes, which I patched together out of an old pillowcase dyed brown), their house wound up in the trash, and Barbie, Ken and Francie went back into their Toys R Us house where they belonged. I think it was Ken whose eyes I scrubbed off trying to remove the makeup. Big waste of time and Ken's eyesight for a pointless, stupid project that taught us nothing but how to be annoyed.
There should probably be a "Useless Project-Based Busywork" section on every teacher's evaluation sheet.
On 2/16/11, cavey wrote: > Oh puleeezzeeee. At least missions can be built with square little blocks > and sugar cubes. These things are even and stack up neatly. > > You don't know parental pain til you've had to do an authentic Native > American longhouse. You have to go out in the woods, gather real authentic > branches, take these branches back in and soak them in water til they bend. > Most branches that you find in the woods on the ground, don't bend. Most > branches also don't hold together well with Elmer's glue either. You have > to use hot glue and when the branches pop off, you have to do it again and > again. Then you have to go back in the woods and try to find more bendable > branches. Popcicles sticks just won't do. Oh no, not for an authentic > longhouse! We're in Virginia for pete's sake. I have no idea why we were > even building a longhouse anyway. I think they got to pick any old type of > native structure but I could never talk my kids into teepee or igloo. Oh > no, we're a longhouse family. > > We actually did some very lovely longhouses. They were rivaled only by my > relief map of VA made out of salt dough and my model of a cell made with > cookie dough.
On 2/19/11, judy5ca wrote: > Teri, take your time getting it because we're going to read > Schmoker first (if mine ever arrives--it shipped). > > Brad, ROFL, aren't you surprised this reading comp book doesn't > have "Attention: Judy" as a subtitle? > > > > > On 2/19/11, Teri wrote: >> When would you start? It looks like a great book, but I need >> time to get it first :) >> >> On 2/17/11, judy5ca wrote: >>> Oh, please please please, does anyone want to join me in >>> reading this after Schmoker? >>> Judy
On 2/19/11, judy5ca wrote: > Teri, take your time getting it because we're going to read > Schmoker first (if mine ever arrives--it shipped). > > Brad, ROFL, aren't you surprised this reading comp book doesn't > have "Attention: Judy" as a subtitle? > > > > > On 2/19/11, Teri wrote: >> When would you start? It looks like a great book, but I need >> time to get it first :) >> >> On 2/17/11, judy5ca wrote: >>> Oh, please please please, does anyone want to join me in >>> reading this after Schmoker? >>> Judy
The two main points of reinforcement for me: 1. Practice improves students AND teachers. 2. Videotaping ourselves is fabulous feedback. I've been taped many times and, after I get done wincing, I always learn something to improve my teaching. Just recently my coach taped my reader's workshop. For the first time I actually saw a couple of things I did well--that was a shocker. Of course, there was plenty to improve. And, as Willingham suggests, we watched it with our collaborative group (6 teachers + coach) and they had plenty to say, too.
But the exciting new thinking for me is his suggestion to just observe kids NOT during school. This really is a brilliant idea! Maybe I'll take in a 5th grade soccer game.
Judy, re: watching students outside of class: That's what was great about having kids the same ages as my students. I was on all of the sidelines for soccer games, programs, etc. I could see them in a "different light". Now that my kids have grown, I don't have that opportunity to do that as readily. Now I have a better feel for teenagers, however, and KNOW that I don't ever want to teach that age group! HAHA! Admire those who do!
I read the first 2 pages of the intro and am in love. Who knew there are people outside the classroom who consider authentic literacy? I don't have a ton of time to read right now, but let me know what kind of schedule you're considering, Jan. Cavey, did yours come yet? dc, are you getting it? Brad? Kim?
judy5caOh, no, just when I think I'm figuring out how to be humane in this situation, you add info dependent on something I didn't share: armswinger is one of the biggest all-time behavior problems in the history of my school. I have come to love him, but he is the most disruptive student I've ever had. He was out for 3 days last week and the tone in my c...See MoreOh, no, just when I think I'm figuring out how to be humane in this situation, you add info dependent on something I didn't share: armswinger is one of the biggest all-time behavior problems in the history of my school. I have come to love him, but he is the most disruptive student I've ever had. He was out for 3 days last week and the tone in my class was relaxed, calm, easy-going; I promise you this is a huge change from our normal tension. This kid is one who makes adults roll their eyes. In fact, the janitor and lunch ladies came to see me to let me know that the whole cafeteria was a much-improved place at lunchtime due to armswinger's absence last week. I'm still glad I didn't let on because I learned a lot from our discussion. I only tell you this now because you might want to know. Judy P.S. Whenever I let armswinger off the hook (or try to be understanding of the fact that his mother, a drug addict, is not in the picture), I am roundly criticized by my colleagues for being too "easy" on him. Imagine my shock when some of you perceived I was too tough. LOLOLOL P.P.S. Armswinger will be gone another week. As I said, I love him, but never have I been so happy to fill out an independent study contract.
On 3/06/11, Jan wrote: > On 3/06/11, dc wrote: >> Jan, I definitely see your points about "beating a dead horse" >> with children and consequences. Your points are valid. I'm >> sure I responded without carefully understanding the unique and >> individual situation of both of those boys and their offenses. >> I could tell that Judy felt "not supported" by the principal >> and perhaps that is the result of her knowledge of those two >> children and their prior offenses and impulses. You make very >> good points about sometimes the "visit" to the principal is >> just consequence enough! I know if my own kids had had >> to "visit" the principal, they probably would have peed their >> pants! > > You are very right that Judy's knowledge of the history of the boys > makes a difference....and we didn't have that. What we do in terms > of management is very dependent on history. A first offense is > handled very differently that a third or fourth offense....or even > a second offense for that matter.
On 3/06/11, judy5ca wrote: > Oh, no, just when I think I'm figuring out how to be humane in this > situation, you add info dependent on something I didn't share: > armswinger is one of the biggest all-time behavior problems in the > history of my school. I have come to love him, but he is the most > disruptive student I've ever had. He was out for 3 days last week and > the tone in my class was relaxed, calm, easy-going; I promise you this > is a huge change from our normal tension. This kid is one who makes > adults roll their eyes. In fact, the janitor and lunch ladies came to > see me to let me know that the whole cafeteria was a much-improved > place at lunchtime due to armswinger's absence last week. I'm still > glad I didn't let on because I learned a lot from our discussion. I > only tell you this now because you might want to know. > Judy > P.S. Whenever I let armswinger off the hook (or try to be understanding > of the fact that his mother, a drug addict, is not in the picture), I > am roundly criticized by my colleagues for being too "easy" on him. > Imagine my shock when some of you perceived I was too tough. LOLOLOL > P.P.S. Armswinger will be gone another week. As I said, I love him, > but never have I been so happy to fill out an independent study contract. > > > > > > On 3/06/11, Jan wrote: >> On 3/06/11, dc wrote: >>> Jan, I definitely see your points about "beating a dead horse" >>> with children and consequences. Your points are valid. I'm >>> sure I responded without carefully understanding the unique and >>> individual situation of both of those boys and their offenses. >>> I could tell that Judy felt "not supported" by the principal >>> and perhaps that is the result of her knowledge of those two >>> children and their prior offenses and impulses. You make very >>> good points about sometimes the "visit" to the principal is >>> just consequence enough! I know if my own kids had had >>> to "visit" the principal, they probably would have peed their >>> pants! >> >> You are very right that Judy's knowledge of the history of the boys >> makes a difference....and we didn't have that. What we do in terms >> of management is very dependent on history. A first offense is >> handled very differently that a third or fourth offense....or even >> a second offense for that matter.
dcLove this book! Oh how happy I would be if this is the way we talked about "school/education reform!"
How many can I buy to put into the hands of every politician in the state of California? Not that they would actually read it, however. They would prefer to just listen to Bill Gates. It's easier than reading a book.
We have a Union in NYS. Our union recommends that we not agree to a pay freeze to "save some jobs" because in reality, you don't know if those ppl would be laid off anyway, even if/after you agreed to the pay freeze. I know some ppl in our community think... oh, it's only 3%, you can't give up that? What they don't know is, if they did the math, it's not just 3% of this year's salary. Since raises are compounded on each year's salary..... by the time I retire, I stand to lose $20k+..... so that is a lot to ask.
Food for thought.
On 3/06/11, dc wrote: > You'rs so right, Jan.....the whole issue becomes morale-busting, > even for those who don't get pink slips. Then we have the > issues of "well if you would just vote to have furlough days > and/or take a pay cut, then I wouldn't lose my job!" "Yeah, > well, if you would just leave, then I could retire with more of > my salary. I've been taking pay cuts for 5 years!" Not that > anyone says it with THOSE EXACT WORDS, but the emotions are > there and they are RAW and everyone has a valid point. > Personally, even though I have college tuition bills up the ying- > yang, I would ALWAYS vote to have more teachers, lower class- > sizes, and less pay, so that others may have a job, but not > everyone is able to or can respond in the same way. > We're only able to do this because of saving the fed. stim. > money, so it's going to be back to being dire next year and the > year after, I'm afraid. Oh well, we can take a breath for ONE > YEAR at least.
dcOh, I'm so sorry, Erin. It's so tough to go through that. Our district went through massive pink slips for four years in a row. It's not fun. Take care.
Jan, can you clarify this statement. I've read this book twice now, I believe (Kindle on phone) and never straight through but have dipped and dabbed so much...
And what do you all think of this idea of requiring a minimum number of books read and papers written? Do you all have these requirements in your districts?
Brad, we "kind of" have set numbers of books and writing for each grade level. We have a list of core lit books we are supposed to expose all kids to during that grade. We also have one writing assessment each trimester with a specified rubric that all students in that grade level utilize. For example, in third grade, we teach narrative the first trimester, expository the second trimester, and descriptive the third. It is not specified how many papers the kids must write each trimester, but you have to do several in that genre in order to prepare them for the end of the trimester writing assessment.
On 3/06/11, Rachel wrote: > Hello all! I am currently a student teacher, and have a > couple questions about differentiation at the middle school > level. Since the idea is to engage all students using > various techniques, how does on reach out to a kinesthetic > learner when reading literature in the classroom? I'm > looking for something beyond readers theatre. While I've > been student teaching, I've been trying to make my lessons > more visual. Students often say that they understand > something better when they can see it. Since the only form > of technology I have in the classroom is an overhead, how > else can I make my lesson visual, especially when reading > literature? It's such a challenge trying to make sure that > each student is engaged. How does everyone keep up?
We have discussed some authors who have discounted the idea that it is necessary for teachers to teach to "the multiple intelligences". You should vary your teaching style for content reasons (to fit the content) and vary it to decrease boredom, but it is not possible, nor is it proven to raise achievement, to teach to each individual child per their unique "intelligence". You might want to read the book that we just finished discussing on this board, Why Don't Students Like School, by a cognitive scientist named Daniel Willingham, for more information on this subject.
In general, does anyone have any tips on how to differentiate a lesson to reach out to all students in a class, even in a classroom with minimal technology (No computer or SMART board)?
You don't know parental pain til you've had to do an authentic Native American longhouse. You have to go out in the woods, gather real authentic branches, take these branches back in and soak them in water ...See More