For the past few years we have been purchasing lots of good nonfiction leveled readers with a Science theme. Each year we select a different publisher, so that we can have 6 copies of similar topics/themes for our reading groups. Now, we need to move onto Social Studies. The search seems to be more difficult.
Thanks for the suggesti...See MoreAre you referring to the magazine - Time for Kids? Yes, they are good, but we can't buy consumables with our Reading First money. We aren't allowed to have fundraisers for the purchase of magazines either -- new rules from only our district.
It must be books that can be used over and over from year to year.
Thanks for the suggestion anyway.
On 7/23/08, Karen wrote: > Time for Kids are really good and they go along with our > social studies program.
BTW, I have read some headlines which have said Reading First did not help as much as originally planned. I was very disappointed to hear this because it does seem to have worked for some of our neighboring district. What is your interpretations of these studies(?)? Thanks, Annie
I think that there are programs that work for some kids, and programs that do not work. I feel that schools are spending tons of money on programs to get our kids reading. We are bending backwards in doing everything except raising/rearing those children. No matter how it's cut, one cannot teach children who are not in school and children whose parents do not give a rip. Parents/guardians have to do their part, also. They need to see that their child is fed, well rested, has their homework done. Parents need to step up to the plate and do their share. I can go on...
On 7/07/08, RTI Annie wrote: > > Last year was our school's first year at using the RTI > process. Anyone else doing such? We are not, however, a > reading first school although we "borrow" some practices > from them. > > BTW, I have read some headlines which have said Reading > First did not help as much as originally planned. I was very > disappointed to hear this because it does seem to have > worked for some of our neighboring district. What is your > interpretations of these studies(?)? > Thanks, > Annie
NFMOn 7/08/08, Kinder Gal wrote: > I also read that same article. We are just becoming > a "Reading First" school, just having our initial training > right after school got out. We had "borrowed" some > practices from them prior to this. > > I think that there are programs that work for some kids, and > programs that do not work. ...See MoreOn 7/08/08, Kinder Gal wrote: > I also read that same article. We are just becoming > a "Reading First" school, just having our initial training > right after school got out. We had "borrowed" some > practices from them prior to this. > > I think that there are programs that work for some kids, and > programs that do not work. I feel that schools are spending > tons of money on programs to get our kids reading. We are > bending backwards in doing everything except raising/rearing > those children. No matter how it's cut, one cannot teach > children who are not in school and children whose parents do > not give a rip. Parents/guardians have to do their part, > also. They need to see that their child is fed, well > rested, has their homework done. Parents need to step up to > the plate and do their share. I can go on... > > > On 7/07/08, RTI Annie wrote: >> >> Last year was our school's first year at using the RTI >> process. Anyone else doing such? We are not, however, a >> reading first school although we "borrow" some practices >> from them. >> >> BTW, I have read some headlines which have said Reading >> First did not help as much as originally planned. I was > very >> disappointed to hear this because it does seem to have >> worked for some of our neighboring district. What is your >> interpretations of these studies(?)? >> Thanks, >> Annie
I am new to reading first. Our first week of school consist of 1/2 day classes. We are instructed to begin our 90 minute reading block on the very first day. What and how do other schools teach RF when trying to get organized that first week of school? (I teach K.)
I would start with t...See MoreOn 7/13/08, Kinder Gal wrote: > I am new to reading first. Our first week of school > consist of 1/2 day classes. We are instructed to begin > our 90 minute reading block on the very first day. What > and how do other schools teach RF when trying to get > organized that first week of school? (I teach K.)
I would start with the back to school theme if you teach second grade which teaches the strategies of reading. The would review phonics and PH awareness by reviewing abc and the songs. The probably making words game. For fluency read a back to school story ask questions about the story. Also I would have them practice the procedures for how I want them to work in their centers. I would probably have bacic centers for them to practice. Reviewing the letters of the alphabet. some examples can be stamping, making words, computers sites, listening to a story, sorting the the letters. Hope this helps. Just remember work on a slow pace and the 90 minutes will go very fast. chery
On 7/31/08, intervention tchr wrote: > Jeer. I am confident some(MANY) teachers will not try as hard to reach > every student. Reading First at least held them accountable for every > child. Some of the teachers on my campus will go back to art papers, > worksheets,busy seatwork, and call it reading. They are the ones who > STRONGLY opposed reading first. I agree you can teach the 5 components > in other ways than Reading First, but many of my teachers did not!! > When I return to the classroom after Reading First next year, I plan to > use what I have learned over the past years. > >
On 7/23/08, Christina/GA wrote: > On 7/22/08, Tessa- 1st / FL wrote: >> Both. >> >> Jeer because our lit and data coaches have been great. >> >> Cheer because there's too much required testing and the scripted >> reading program was too rigid. Also, cheer because they shouldn't >> force teachers to travel across the state to attend a conference, >> even if we're paid. The $$$ won't put the miles back on my car! >> >> Why can't they just give us money without tons of restrictions on >> it??!! > > > I totally agree! I hate the scripted reading, and the bad part for us has > been that the texts are no longer GA state standards. So for the past 3 > years I have not been teaching all of the standards, if I follow their > guidelines. And the testing is horrbile.
State Reading First directors came up with the idea for the National Association for Reading First after learning about plans in Congress to eliminate the $1 billion-a-year grant program, according to Debora Scheffel, who directs the program in Colorado.
The organization will promote inclusion of Reading First principles in the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act, and work to disseminate information on research-based instruction and intervention.
The association's founders hope to sign up enough members—annual membership is $50—to help bolster their case that Reading First has a lot of support from the field. Kathleen Kennedy Manzo
Stephen Krashen writes in response: Their website contains a poll, inviting readers to vote on whether Reading First has positively or negatively impacted their district or school. Right now, the poll is running strongly AGAINST reading first, which must be annoying to the organizers of the group. But: The poll is not scientific at all, and is easily influenced by special groups pumping in their votes. Right now, the results are against Reading First, but Reading First supporters have tremendous access to compliant voters (e.g. everybody working for McGraw-Hill, everyone working in a captive Reading First district - vote now or we lose our funding!) and can easily add thousands of votes supporting Reading First. (Of course I am sure that many who vote to support Reading First are sincere in their support. My point is that the results of these kinds of polls are always suspect.) Posted by: Stephen Krashen
> From Education Week blogs: > > State Reading First directors came up with the idea for the > National Association for Reading First after learning about > plans in Congress to eliminate the $1 billion-a-year grant > program, according to Debora Scheffel, who directs the > program in Colorado. > > The organization will promote inclusion of Reading First > principles in the reauthorization of the No Child Left > Behind Act, and work to disseminate information on > research-based instruction and intervention. > > The association's founders hope to sign up enough > members—annual membership is $50—to help bolster their case > that Reading First has a lot of support from the field. > Kathleen Kennedy Manzo > > > Stephen Krashen writes in response: > Their website contains a poll, inviting readers to vote on > whether Reading First has positively or negatively impacted > their district or school. Right now, the poll is running > strongly AGAINST reading first, which must be annoying to > the organizers of the group. > But: The poll is not scientific at all, and is easily > influenced by special groups pumping in their votes. Right > now, the results are against Reading First, but Reading > First supporters have tremendous access to compliant voters > (e.g. everybody working for McGraw-Hill, everyone working in > a captive Reading First district - vote now or we lose our > funding!) and can easily add thousands of votes supporting > Reading First. (Of course I am sure that many who vote to > support Reading First are sincere in their support. My point > is that the results of these kinds of polls are always suspect.) Stephen Krashen
I am having a hard time making out my schedule. Nothing in my day is consistent except for the 90 minutes of reading and 30 minutes of intervention. How can I justify not having recess, social studies, or science and yet teach the standards. This is frustrating.
Amen. An...See MoreOn 8/30/08, first time reading first wrote: > I am having a hard time making out my schedule. Nothing > in my day is consistent except for the 90 minutes of > reading and 30 minutes of intervention. How can I justify > not having recess, social studies, or science and yet > teach the standards. This is frustrating.
Amen. And good luck teaching kids who haven't had recess. It's counter-productive, because they're so restless. But admins don't understand reality.
I did: 20-25 min warm-up (question of the day, word wall, making our spelling words, read-aloud and discussion), then about 25-30 minutes whole group reading a simple story, partner reading, "comprehension" questions (the stories are so simple you'd have to be a moron not to understand. Tad Ran, what can Tad do? That's right, run! Ha, ha). Then 10-15 minutes guided reading per group (which was non-reading first balanced literacy). :) Good luck.
We all have a reading block of 90 minutes. Thirty minutes of this is walk-to-read (leveled reading) with almost all school personnel having a group - to help with differentiated instruction or multi- tiered instruction. The intensive and strategic interventions were in addition to this.
RtI is a SpEd process. Don't forget that. It's about making sure kiddos have had adequate instruction before they are identified as learning disabled. If, after a lot of good instruction they are still not making it, it's time to dig deeper. It's about doing something better than the discrepancy model which is not scientifically research based.
Has it been a lot of work? Yes. Do I agree with every single aspect? No. I like and support DIBELS testing but I don't think the word use fluency and retell fluency are fair to use in deciding groups. These are pretty weak in my humble opinion. There are areas I still have reservations about in assessment mainly .Has it been overall successful in my school? Oh, my, yes!
I think teaching has gotten very hard. I love, love, love teaching but it is not as easy as it used to be 25 years ago when I started. However, I have to keep in mind the district didn't hire me to do my thing. They hired me to do their thing. Mary On 9/17/08, Tessa- FL wrote: > Hope this hels: > > Tier 1: your normal whole-group thing. > Tier 2: differeintiate (which I still can't spell): > high/medum/low, although I feel like I have 1 low and 2 mediums > this year, and last year low, lower and lowest! For this part we > do a lot of readinga-z, and the low group usually re-reads the > whole group stuff. 10-15 minutes per group. I'll also work on > worksheets with them that the medium groups complete alone. > Tier 3: Not my job thankfully! We have teachers that pull out the > lowest of the low. They miss really useless classes like math, > writing, science, or social studies (because the only important > class is reading, right?) I don't know how we're able to get away > with non-teachers doing the tier 3, but somehow we do. Welcome to > the crazy world of NCLB!
JoOn 8/23/09, Not in a Reading First School though wrote: > We don't use the terminology Tier 1,2, 3 anymore. We refer to the > categories as benchmark (at benchmark or above), strategic (not quite > benchmark), and intensive (considerably below benchmark). The > intensive are those who - if after a lot of extra instruction and > inter...See MoreOn 8/23/09, Not in a Reading First School though wrote: > We don't use the terminology Tier 1,2, 3 anymore. We refer to the > categories as benchmark (at benchmark or above), strategic (not quite > benchmark), and intensive (considerably below benchmark). The > intensive are those who - if after a lot of extra instruction and > interventions - do not make adequate gains are likely to be referred > to Special Education after two or three intervention cycles. We give > all the intensive students at least one shot of extra instruction for > 30 minutes every day - not a reteach of the regular curriculum but a > scientifically researched intervention program. Some also join an > afterschool program and get a third shot. The strategic students get > a 30 minute preteach of the regular program or a scientifically > researched based instruction depending on their needs. The reading > teachers and their assistants do the second shot with the intensive > students. The classroom teacher and reading assistants do the second > shot with the strategic. > > We all have a reading block of 90 minutes. Thirty minutes of this is > walk-to-read (leveled reading) with almost all school personnel > having a group - to help with differentiated instruction or multi- > tiered instruction. The intensive and strategic interventions were in > addition to this. > > RtI is a SpEd process. Don't forget that. It's about making sure > kiddos have had adequate instruction before they are identified as > learning disabled. If, after a lot of good instruction they are > still not making it, it's time to dig deeper. It's about doing > something better than the discrepancy model which is not > scientifically research based. > > Has it been a lot of work? Yes. Do I agree with every single aspect? > No. I like and support DIBELS testing but I don't think the word use > fluency and retell fluency are fair to use in deciding groups. These > are pretty weak in my humble opinion. There are areas I still have > reservations about in assessment mainly .Has it been overall > successful in my school? Oh, my, yes! > > I think teaching has gotten very hard. I love, love, love teaching > but it is not as easy as it used to be 25 years ago when I started. > However, I have to keep in mind the district didn't hire me to do my > thing. They hired me to do their thing. > Mary
I am working at a school that is using Flexible Grouping during the guided reading. This is K-2. So, some students from K are going to a 1st grade room, 2nd to a 1st, etc.
I am trying to find a letter to send parents and the rationale behind this. Any advice as to where to look?
We met...See MoreOn 9/08/08, Laura wrote: > I am working at a school that is using Flexible Grouping > during the guided reading. This is K-2. So, some students > from K are going to a 1st grade room, 2nd to a 1st, etc. > > I am trying to find a letter to send parents and the > rationale behind this. Any advice as to where to look?
We met with parents for the students affected. They responded well when we told them we thought it was best for the student's success. I think this is the kind of thing that needs to be discussed in person, unless it's way too many students.