Does anyone do reading fluency in middle school? We have a separate language arts class and a reading class. I think my principal gave me a class period per day and labeled it reading fluency. I believe I will be pulling kids from different classrooms at this time. Need ideas?
On 7/25/10, carrie wrote: > Does anyone do reading fluency in middle school? We have a > separate language arts class and a reading class. I think > my principal gave me a class period per day and labeled it > reading fluency. I believe I will be pulling kids from > different classrooms at this time. Need ideas? > > If this was your class, what would you do?
Often when we talk about developing reading skills we talk about what "good readers" do. The terms good and bad are used so often in school and society where bad is very negative. Bad behavior is typically followed by punishment of some sort or some uncomfortable natural consequence.
Trying to break through to the student who continue to struggle with reading our words have so much to do with breaking through the built up emotions and negative feelings that struggling to master the skill of reading has created.
While using this terminology is supposed to help the student recognize the appropriate skills that need to be utilized to be able to comprehend what is read, I've heard it used so often in so many ways that it concerns me.
Good readers do not summarize after every paragraph. Good readers actually can read multiple paragraphs and understand the content. I'm not saying that summarizing in order to access the content at a later time is not a good study strategy or learning strategy, nor am I saying that this is not an excellent strategy for some students to use who are poor readers. Often I hear students being told that this is a behavior of a good reader when in fact it is not.
This connotations with good/bad are trigger words for students who have struggled with skills or behavior. They tend to instantly seize up at the sound of them.
I plan to replace the good/bad vocabulary in my classes with alternative words that address the skills needed to read and comprehend.
What words would you use instead of "good reader"? My first choice would be "skilled readers". I will continue to discuss good strategies to use to aid in the skills of reading and compreheding, but I plan to eliminate the good/bad to the task at hand.
Read my students 30 seconds in English and ask them how easily i seemed to read it on a scale of 1-10.
Do the same with 30 seconds of Spanish, where my pron is dodgy and I stumble over the odd word.
Do the same in Arabic, where my reading becomes laboured and disjointed.
I would then explain to them that this is because I've spent thousands of hours reading in English, hundreds in Spanish and probably only a couple of hundred only in Arabic, thus making the link between practice and reading skills explicit for them.
Robben WainerOn 8/04/10, Jo wrote: > I've pondered this for a long while and wanted to know how > others feel regarding the words we use with our students. > > Often when we talk about developing reading skills we talk > about what "good readers" do. The terms good and bad are > used so often in school and society where bad is very > negati...See MoreOn 8/04/10, Jo wrote: > I've pondered this for a long while and wanted to know how > others feel regarding the words we use with our students. > > Often when we talk about developing reading skills we talk > about what "good readers" do. The terms good and bad are > used so often in school and society where bad is very > negative. Bad behavior is typically followed by punishment > of some sort or some uncomfortable natural consequence. > > Trying to break through to the student who continue to > struggle with reading our words have so much to do with > breaking through the built up emotions and negative > feelings that struggling to master the skill of reading has > created. > > While using this terminology is supposed to help the > student recognize the appropriate skills that need to be > utilized to be able to comprehend what is read, I've heard > it used so often in so many ways that it concerns me. > > Good readers do not summarize after every paragraph. Good > readers actually can read multiple paragraphs and > understand the content. I'm not saying that summarizing in > order to access the content at a later time is not a good > study strategy or learning strategy, nor am I saying that > this is not an excellent strategy for some students to use > who are poor readers. Often I hear students being told > that this is a behavior of a good reader when in fact it is > not. > > This connotations with good/bad are trigger words for > students who have struggled with skills or behavior. They > tend to instantly seize up at the sound of them. > > I plan to replace the good/bad vocabulary in my classes > with alternative words that address the skills needed to > read and comprehend. > > What words would you use instead of "good reader"? My > first choice would be "skilled readers". I will continue > to discuss good strategies to use to aid in the skills of > reading and compreheding, but I plan to eliminate the > good/bad to the task at hand.
Teaching Reading comprehension we begin with a construct we describe as formiddable; one that contributes, or adds to, or helps to gain or achieve insight. In this way when we discuss intuition we are not discussing a state of anxiety or dreams, but rather the purpose there in achieving the goals we set, and how we can accomplish them by acquiring the skills that are needed through Literacy Development
I use the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-4) which is relatively quick to administer and it's objective. There are graded reading lists which give you an idea of where to start, and graded passages with different kinds of comprehension questions. You can let kids look back at the passage if they can't recall the information. We had to use the DRA for reading comprehension, but that was based on passage recall and it was sometimes hard to tell whether the problem was comprehension or memory. I also like the idea of making your own comprehension passages and questions with material that the student is going to read in class. It is less objective, but it does give the classroom teacher some idea about who needs support in comprehending the texts. I've also used Gray Oral Reading and the Woodcock Johnson Reading Mastery Test to get more information when students are having trouble.
Mark PenningtonHere's my take on reading comprehension assessments. Unlike PA, phonics, encoding, fluency, word recognition, etc. assessments, a reading comprehension test provides no precise and "teachable" data. If you can't teach to it, why give it?
Marie - your question puts me in mind of the current "Choice Literacy" newsletter article: [link removed].
I don't have any answers for you. What is your focus with the students? I could see working on affixes, which could support the classroom teacher's word walls.
You may be able to do the same on a smaller scale. Can you focus your Word Wall on words ALL (well, most) should have mastered? Could they be your anchor, and each child keep a separate list individualized to their own needs?
On 9/05/10, new 2 wrote: > Just an insight: > ...See MoreMy word wall is determined by the children. After journal writing period, we discuss words that they think that everyone would use on the word wall....words that they have trouble spelling, because, grandmother, etc. They have ownership of it, and they use it more often because of this.
On 9/05/10, new 2 wrote: > Just an insight: > There may be no continuity among classes in your building for > this reason. In our district, word walls are for the words > each class needs to learn. High frequency and some > phonetically regular words are used during the week and put > on the Word Wall as anchors for specific phonetic sounds or > (HF) words that must be spelled correctly at all times. > Last year I had a VERY low group. Therefore my Word Wall had > many basic words on it (determined by assessing the whole > class on a master list). My colleague had a very high > group. She immediately skipped to a higher list and had > different phonics lessons. > > You may be able to do the same on a smaller scale. Can you > focus your Word Wall on words ALL (well, most) should have > mastered? Could they be your anchor, and each child keep a > separate list individualized to their own needs? > > Just an idea.
I'd like to hear thoughts on the purchase of BAS or the QRI for 6-8 middle school students. I know they both give you diagnostic information... just wondering if one is better than other for ms students.
On 8/30/10, Sally wrote: > I'd like to hear thoughts on the purchase of BAS or the QRI > for 6-8 middle school students. I know they both give you > diagnostic information... just wondering if one is better > than other for ms students.
Teachervision has a blank form you can use. If you click the link Running Record you will see additional information about the different cuing systems. Hope this helps. [link removed]