Welcome to the Standardized Testing Chatboard. This chatboard is for teacher discussions of standardized testing, high stakes testing, and other topics related to standardized testing.
Were your testing dates rescheduled? O...See MoreOn 6/03/11, Bob Reap (Teachers.Net) wrote: > Welcome to the Standardized Testing Chatboard. This > chatboard is for teacher discussions of standardized > testing, high stakes testing, and other topics related to > standardized testing. > > Bookmark this resource and contribute often!
Were your testing dates rescheduled? Our district also missed several days; however, we were not allotted extra preparation time.
DeAnnI have not seen the documentary, but your comments spark interesting thoughts. I think in trying to make sure that all students succeed and no one is left behind, we have settled for mediocre for everyone. That leaves students at the top who would be the innovators and creators without the support they need to grow as well.
I see two distinct sets of students. Those that are the high achievers. Funny, this concept is pushed so hard on t-net. Nothing but being the best you can be in academics because that should come first is highly pushed. Those that aren't. These sets of students will come into play when I discuss high school.
I saw elementary schools (and do see it now), pushing tons of outside of school work on students. Often times work that the student can not independently do. Often times taking hours on end in elementary school. Not all buy into it. Those that don't are seen as the students whose parents don't care or students that don't care. Problem is, many of these young children are putting in longer days than the teachers are contracted to put in. One can say the Chinese kids do that so what is the problem. The problem is, when we were an innovative,creative superpower the kids weren't getting homework loads like this. The Chinese haven't been an innovative, creative super power in a long time. They tend to take and replicate technology. They are great at doing exactly what they are told. Way different skills sets.
Now at the ms and high school level it is time to choose. Honors/AP or regular education. What a night and day choice for kids. I can speak of our district in saying the only courses that really prepare the kids for college is the honors class. Sure gen ed will give you high enough grades to get into college and mostly OK SAT scores, it doesn't give the skills necessary to do well in college. It is a tough road for those kids to make the leap. Some do well, many others don't, but little do we hear about he drop outs. Now the Honors/AP group end up giving up their lives. The work load is staggaring. These are the kids that Race to Nowhere discusses in HS. Those that are the high achieving students that would be glazed over board in regular classes that get little to no homework. These are the same kids that actually did all of that homework in elementary school because they were told that is what you do. If it is assigned you respect the authority and experience of the teacher and do what is given. These kids are going to school and studying an additional 6-8 hours after school. They also need to be involved in clubs, activities, and now even jobs to look good for univeristy. Since university applictions are up even at state schools, the expectation is top grades, top classes, and top everything if you want to go to college.
That is what the movie is about. The robbing of life experiences for an education that supposedly is "superior" to that of 20 years ago. What they found out is there is no way a student can actually handle the workload without cheating. Since behavior grades are built into so many classes (even AP) and some kids are taking 5 AP classes because there is only gen ed or AP, they can't even decide if the homework assigned is irrelevant to them because they have already mastered the skills. If they don't do the work it is an automatic zero which is mostly unrecoverable. Colleges don't like to see poor grades in AP classes. So, students cheat. APs have become open to all and many kids in the classes don't have the skills. So, they cheat their way through. AT many schools kids aren't even passing their end of the year AP tests. They might have good grades (all assigned by the teacher not specified in the AP program), but they fail the AP test miserably.
So, what happened to college prep classes that had higher level learning, more in depth learning, but reasonable homework loads? What happened to allowing kids to have time to explore, have friends, have family time?
Could you imagine 20 hour days and the expectation to be in the top classes, in sports, in clubs, hold a job, be upbeat and friendly so you have a social circle, hold offices, etc? What does a teacher say to a student when they let something slide? Are they understanding? Why homework over holidays, spring break, winter break, summer?
I'm honestly surprised more kids haven't gone bonkers. If you want HS classes in which your eyes won't glaze over, you must give up your life. If you take less chanllenging ones and you are highly intelligent, you are doing a disservice to yourself. You could do better and you are being lazy. This is what we are telling kids every step of the way. Often it is to motivate the poor performers, but the high achievers hear the message too. The only acceptable thing is to be the best in everything you do. Everything else is failure.
The URL says "standardized-testing." The page title says "Standardized Testing." The subtitle says "Post a Message on the Bullying Chatboard." I just want to be entered for the Kindle.
Bob Reap (Teachers.Net)On 6/03/11, Pat wrote: > The URL says "standardized-testing." The page title says > "Standardized Testing." The subtitle says "Post a Message > on the Bullying Chatboard." I just want to be entered for > the Kindle.
You've posted to the right board - thanks for the heads up, I've fixed that.... :o)
On 6/03/11, Praline wrote: > It is amazing how much time we spend on testing, even for > first graders... every week, a spelling test, a math test, an > English test, and a reading test. Then we do DIBELS 3 times a > year. We also do math and reading district test at the end of > the school year. We also do math Blitz 3 times a year. > > > > > On 6/03/11, Dorothy B. wrote: >> Why do decision makers ignore all the evidence? Show me one >> study that shows positive results of all this testing?
From the outside looking in, it seems my own kids are always preparing for standardized testing and criteria ref. tests, and end of book tests. Sometimes it seems they spend 1/3 of the time taking tests!
With all this emphasis on testing, it seems that the curriculums are being written solely to meet all the criteria on the standardized tests. In order to cram everything in before "The Test", teachers are expected to push students through the material at a faster pace. For many children, this appears to be too much material at too fast a pace.
I'm just not sure that the way testing is currently being used is really benefitting the students.
On 6/03/11, Dana A. wrote: > As a teacher in Louisiana, I've observed that there is a > great emphasis put on standardized test scores. I know that > we need to assess students' progress, but I wonder if too > much emphasis is put on test results. For example, if our > 4th and 8th graders do not meet the required scores, they > must go through summer remediation and take the test again. > If they fail again, they must repeat the 4th/8th grade. > > With all this emphasis on testing, it seems that the > curriculums are being written solely to meet all the > criteria on the standardized tests. In order to cram > everything in before "The Test", teachers are expected to > push students through the material at a faster pace. For > many children, this appears to be too much material at too > fast a pace. > > I'm just not sure that the way testing is currently being > used is really benefitting the students.
No test is without bias. But the other concern is the amount of time th...See MoreOn 6/03/11, Chan wrote: > But aren't the tests supposed to measure what the students > were supposed to have mastered? If they don't master the > material (even without the testing to measure it) then why > should they be allowed to go on to the next grade?
No test is without bias. But the other concern is the amount of time that goes into test prep.
Too many people make it seem as if the "high stakes" tests have no connection to what each state says should be taught. Either a student masters the state-mandated standards or he doesn't: I don't see the reasoning behind all this griping and complaining about the tests. They're just a tool; they're not the end-all and be-all of educational achievement.
Standardized tests are not a valid measure of a good education. Instead, they usually just predict future school success, which is a tautological begging of the question about “a good education”. And besides: standardized testing has many “side effects” harmful to our children, teachers, administrators, schools, and our whole society. Let me explain.
Standardized tests do not test whether our students are getting a good education.
A good education is, and was supposed to be [as Socrates wisely taught] for living the “good life” before we die; and as W.E.B. Du Bois rightly prescribes: for learning to be a valuable citizen of society.
On 6/03/11, In Teachers.Net Gazette, June 2011 wrote: > Excerpt from the article, the full version of which is > linked below: > > Standardized tests are not a valid measure of a good > education. Instead, they usually just predict future school > success, which is a tautological begging of the question > about “a good education”. And besides: standardized testing > has many “side effects” harmful to our children, teachers, > administrators, schools, and our whole society. Let me explain. > > Standardized tests do not test whether our students are > getting a good education. > > A good education is, and was supposed to be [as Socrates > wisely taught] for living the “good life” before we die; and > as W.E.B. Du Bois rightly prescribes: for learning to be a > valuable citizen of society.
And besides: standardized testing >> has many “side ...See MoreThe students are under a LOT of stress during testing. (Despite the 'fun brain food breakfast' they may get at school on the mornings of testing, or the pizza party reward after testing is completed.) Testing is scary to many kids! If could be enough to set certain children back.
And besides: standardized testing >> has many “side effects” harmful to our children, teachers, >> administrators, schools, and our whole society. Let me > explain.