You work less than 3 days a week: expect to not receive your letter of reassurance in May or April (you are not going to return to the district in the fall).
On 8/15/15, Anita Raze wrote: > I forgot to mention... St. Lucie County requires that you > work 1 > day a month from Sept to May. Palm Beach County requires > that you > work a minimum of 10 days a year, covering both > semesters. > > > On 8/15/15, Anita Raze wrote: >> >> >> Palm Beach Co. Fl: $84 elementary and middle schools $91 >> high schools per diem. St. Lucie Co. FL: $71 per diem. >> >> >> >> On 8/11/15, Emma K wrote: >>> On 8/11/15, Sue Anderson wrote: >>>> What is the pay for subs?How many days can you work? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> / >>> It depends hugely on where you are and what your >>> qualifications are. Where I am, OTs (as they're called >>> here) can teach every day but PD days, if there is work >>> but retired >>> teachers can only teach 50 days, to limit how much work >>> they can take away from the full time OT's. Pay here is >>> pretty good, but this is Canada and from what I read >>> here, it's very >>> different from most places in the US and even in the >>> US, there's a really wide range.
After so many years of having subbed in all grades and at all levels, I might as well post some tips regarding how to survive subbing for so long. Hint: If you can survive a brutal dictatorship, you have it pretty much made.
1. The second you enter a site, never forget who you are as well as your place
When you enter a site, never forget that you are a substitute teacher. You are there for the duration of the assignment and that's it. The school is in no way obligated to you in any way shape and form, and you are not part of the staff, and never will be. In fact, there are some full time teachers who will probably regard your mere presence as a major inconvenience or worse to the social order of the school-and that's the ones you are not even covering for. Be respectful and in your best behavior. Accept that you will probably never be referred to Mr/Ms. Insertyournamehere, but as "the sub" from the custodian to the Generalissimo aka principal.
2. Accept that you have surrendered all of your constitutional rights including the Bill of Rights the second that you enter the vicinity of the school site. Welcome to the police state.
Even in the vicinity of the school site (meaning the adjacent blocks to the site) your behavior will be noted by the students and parents taking their kids to school, the crossing guards, the security officers, the teachers and generals aka administrators who are doing yard and bus duty, and even the teachers who are parking their cars in the parking lot-as you approach the site.
This surveillance intensifies manifold when you are actually inside the site. You will be evaluated by everyone there, from the office staff to the students themselves to the informants aka teaching assistant/parent volunteer/student teacher/resource specialist/you get the point. Every single thing you do and say or don't say-as well as your body language and facial expressions or lack of thereof will be readily reported to the Generalissimo or his or her adjuntants.
3. What did you say, p e r v e rt?
A school site is not the place to express your personal opinions about anything when you have the status of substitute teacher-in other words, a person with no rights whatsoever. Remember: you are in a police state, you freedom loving, fairness minded, justice oriented naive being! An example of this is the appearance of anyone there. You might see female staff wearing things like mini skirts and other clothing that can be revealing. You might see ladies who are indeed pretty. You will see students at the higher levels who wear clothes that are really not appropriate to a school setting. Your reaction to this should be simple: none at all. Never comment on anyone's appearance no matter what. Really. No matter what. No matter what. No matter what. Never offer any compliments of any kind. None. Remember...everything you say and do can and will be used against you.
4. What are you looking at, pe r v e rt?
Which leads to the following: no matter how pretty a woman teacher or staffer looks..no matter any physical traits either a man or a woman might have (i.e. morbid obesity, other anormalities, or phyisical beauty), NEVER look directly at them for any reason. Perfect the art of averted vision-when you are not focusing at the person at all but at what is around their sides. This is widely used in astronomy for observing faint objects-go ahead and look it up. And this goes millionfold when dealing with students. Never look at female students directly, but if you absolutely have to, keep the glances to absolutely minimum.
4. What do you think you are doing, p e d o?
You might see female teachers hugging students. Please, if you really want to remain employed, it is best for you to not start this practice. and if you already do, please get rid of it immediately. The very last thing you want is to be accused of inappropriate touching of students. In the world of school sites, there is no such thing as accidental touching. And there is no such thing as differentiation between hugging and other types of contact. You hugged the student? Well, you touched the student. So, never hug them or touch them for any reason.
5. Keep to the script
Stick to the lesson plan like glue, and never teach anything that is not tied to the plan even if you think it might add more detail or illustrate the points in further detail. You don't know the students, and you don't know if your war experience you are narrating in order to further illustrate a history lesson on war might make a student feel uncomfortable. And if you make a kid uncomfortable, this is probably the last thing you will do at the school site. You don't know if that illustration you are doing to illustrate the concept of hydrodynamics (a teardrop shape and water flowing around it) can be misinterpreted as drawing a female reproductive organ.
6. This is not the place to share your emotions, opinions, or concerns. So, shut up, sub, if you want to remain employed. The site is not the land of the free, get it?
No matter how friendly or open the teachers or admins might look, remember that they are not your friends. They have no vested interest in your well being and will likely use anything you say against you no matter how friendly they seem or how they show that big smile toward you. You told the Generalissimo you wish to attend training to further your management skills? Oops, you just admitted that you are and incompetent sub who cannot manage classes. You told the teacher that you had some issues in other places with difficult students? Probably you just asked that teacher to ban you from her or his own fiefdom aka classroom because you just admitted that you have problems controlling kids (even if in the said cases, those kids were nothing short of protofelons who would readily turn on their own mothers if that advanced their goals).
No matter how ridiculous anything seems to be in the police state aka site, never comment on anything anywhere-especially at the teacher lounges. You can be lulled into a false sense of security when you, the sub who is an eternal outsider, hear staffers b tching about their students, the economy, Common Core, their leadership, the current political state of affairs, and so on...and you feel the need to join in. Please...don't. Just don't. Remember, you are an outsider and your opinions are not really welcome as it is...imagine if you offer a viewpoint that might as well be your death warrant at the site. Your ideas could well be the lead teacher's nemesis and you will be on these teacher's bad side. Translation? Probably being banned from the site. Just carry on with the day, stick to the plans like glue, and keep your opinions to yourself.
On 9/23/15, Eric7100 wrote: > Ze, > > Thanks for your previous response to my question. You (and > Pixie) continue to make some very good > points/ideas/suggestions that I will definitely keep in mind. > > Today, I had the unfortunate experience of having to be alone > with a single student - a 5th grade boy. I was subbing for > the learning support teacher in a "pull-out" resource room. > This student is the only one who comes to her for math support > (individualized lessons) between 9:00 AM and 10:20 AM. There > are no other students or adults in the room during that time. > (There is an aide who shares the room, but she has other > duties during that time.) > > Of course, I had the door wide open and conducted the lesson > at a large table near the door, in full view of the hallway. > But I had no other choice but to be in the room alone with > this student, as this is what the learning support teacher > (who I was filling in for) does every day. > > Hypothetically, it could've been even worse. I know for > certain that if there had been noise in the hallway that > interrupted our lesson (especially if the student was taking a > test), then the school would've insisted that we close the > door so that any noise distractions would not interrupt the > learning process. > > What are your thoughts regarding a situation like this? > Sometimes, it is impossible not to be alone with a student in > a room.
On 10/02/15, Lee wrote: > If you feel uncomfortable being in the room with him, go to > the library. I often see teachers working one on one with > students there. There will be other people around yet should > be quiet enough for you to get the work done. > > Lee > > On 9/23/15, Eric7100 wrote: >> Ze, >> >> Thanks for your previous response to my question. You (and >> Pixie) continue to make some very good >> points/ideas/suggestions that I will definitely keep in > mind. >> >> Today, I had the unfortunate experience of having to be > alone >> with a single student - a 5th grade boy. I was subbing for >> the learning support teacher in a "pull-out" resource room. >> This student is the only one who comes to her for math > support >> (individualized lessons) between 9:00 AM and 10:20 AM. > There >> are no other students or adults in the room during that > time. >> (There is an aide who shares the room, but she has other >> duties during that time.) >> >> Of course, I had the door wide open and conducted the > lesson >> at a large table near the door, in full view of the > hallway. >> But I had no other choice but to be in the room alone with >> this student, as this is what the learning support teacher >> (who I was filling in for) does every day. >> >> Hypothetically, it could've been even worse. I know for >> certain that if there had been noise in the hallway that >> interrupted our lesson (especially if the student was > taking a >> test), then the school would've insisted that we close the >> door so that any noise distractions would not interrupt the >> learning process. >> >> What are your thoughts regarding a situation like this? >> Sometimes, it is impossible not to be alone with a student > in >> a room.
Before the secretary looked at the keys (that I turned in), she did mention sometimes the door lock is tricky and doesn't lock sometimes, and you need a custodian to lock it.
In your opinion what is likely going to happen to me? Will I be written up? What are the consequences?
California is where this happened.
The secretary said the room key was not on the string chain with the two other keys. She said it was on a small key chain by itself. Also, (as a sub. teacher) I have to turn in a (evaluation) report to the office each day I sub, so I am evaluated for that day. One thing I checked off on the report was "Were you given a room key and did you turn it in". It said something like this. I checked this off. I checked several things off as well (for example I checked off I left a note for the teacher).
pixieZe is absolutely right, except that you may not even be aware that there even was any "incident." But then a month later you get a letter from HR, saying you have been blocked from a school, with no explanation, and you have no idea why. You wrack your brains trying to remember that day, and to recall anything out of the or...See MoreZe is absolutely right, except that you may not even be aware that there even was any "incident." But then a month later you get a letter from HR, saying you have been blocked from a school, with no explanation, and you have no idea why. You wrack your brains trying to remember that day, and to recall anything out of the ordinary. You call HR and they give you some vague answer, reading from some memo that they received from the school, and you still don't know what they are talking about, and you have no idea who complained, and they won't tell you. Or if you are able to figure out what they are referring to, for example a staff member thought you were not doing your job when you were doing what another staff member had told you to do, you wonder, why didn't she say something to me at the time so I could have cleared this up? You lie awake at night in a cold sweat, worrying and paranoid. You desperately want to avoid any more complaints, because if you get a couple more, you could lose your job. I got through the last school year without any complaints, perhaps because I am very picky about what assignments I accept, but you can never relax at all because for all you know there could be a letter in your mailbox tomorrow. All you can do is be as careful as you can and hope for the best.
On 9/27/15, Ze Povinho wrote: > Where I am, one district I am aware of does publish the > cost of > replacing keys; this is found in the faculty handbook of > one of > its high schools. > > If the faculty member loses the key, s/he will be billed > the amount of any replacement needed. > > This can be from replacing the key system of a single classroom > door (about 130 dollars) to replacing all locks in all > gates and doors of a high school (about 17000 dollars if > a master key > is lost). > > Needless to say, this in extreme offense in the > Dictatorship aka school site. Where I am you NEVER want > to lose keys, period. > > As for the school sub evaluation, if you are going to be > excluded, don't expect it to happen in the same day of > the report. It usually takes about a week or so before > the exclusion is in effect and Subfinder blocks you from > the site. > > Meanwhile, you think that things are wonderful since you > have not received any emails or letters...but about a > week or so later (or maybe a month later, when you > totally forgot about this incident), you now note that > Subfinder has blocked you from the site despite your > having been told that "you did a good job" and "don't > worry about (insert the incident here)." > > Ze
I love this! Like walking a tightrope! On 9/28/15, pixie wrote: > Ze is absolutely right, except that you may not even be > aware that there even was any "incident." But then a month > later you get a letter from HR, saying you have been > blocked from a school, with no explanation, and you have > no idea why. You wrack your brains trying to remember that > d...See MoreOn 9/28/15, pixie wrote: > Ze is absolutely right, except that you may not even be > aware that there even was any "incident." But then a month > later you get a letter from HR, saying you have been > blocked from a school, with no explanation, and you have > no idea why. You wrack your brains trying to remember that > day, and to recall anything out of the ordinary. You call > HR and they give you some vague answer, reading from some > memo that they received from the school, and you still > don't know what they are talking about, and you have no > idea who complained, and they won't tell you. Or if you > are able to figure out what they are referring to, for > example a staff member thought you were not doing your job > when you were doing what another staff member had told you > to do, you wonder, why didn't she say something to me at > the time so I could have cleared this up? You lie awake at > night in a cold sweat, worrying and paranoid. You > desperately want to avoid any more complaints, because if > you get a couple more, you could lose your job. I got > through the last school year without any complaints, > perhaps because I am very picky about what assignments I > accept, but you can never relax at all because for all you > know there could be a letter in your mailbox tomorrow. All > you can do is be as careful as you can and hope for the > best.
pixie reposting/clarifyingI'm reposting my response to math teach to clarify a couple of lines: > I have been in that situation, yet subs compete for those LTS > gigs out of the hope that it will lead to a real job. > Although I struggle on a sub's pay, and I am certified, I > can't really say that I would wish to be a "real" teacher, > (not that th...See MoreI'm reposting my response to math teach to clarify a couple of lines: > I have been in that situation, yet subs compete for those LTS > gigs out of the hope that it will lead to a real job. > Although I struggle on a sub's pay, and I am certified, I > can't really say that I would wish to be a "real" teacher, > (not that that would be an option for me anyway) because of the fact that many states evaluate teachers based on the students' standardized test scores, as if the teacher is the only variable in the kid's life. The other day I heard a radio interview with Dale Russakoff, author of the new book, "The Prize: Who's in Charge of America's Schools?" about how NJ Gov. Christie, Newark Mayor Cory Booker, and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg teamed up to "fix" Newark's schools. It seems that teacher input was largely excluded from the process. She mentions "Race to the Top that President Obama and Arne Duncan, the education secretary, put in place, which encouraged states to change their laws so the teacher evaluations were based increasingly on the student test scores - how students - whether students grew or not on their annual tests would determine whether teachers were rated effective or ineffective" She said she spent time interviewing the measurement scientist who developed the NJ system for measuring whether students grew or not from year to year on their standardized tests, and he said, "the system was never intended to judge teachers. It was only intended to measure whether children are growing or not because it doesn't tell you why they're growing or who caused them to grow or why they're failing and who caused them to fail." > > Here is the link: [link removed]..
So what do these kids from the city do once the bus drops them off? They goof off, create disruptions, don't study, etc. And if you write them up too many times YOU are accused of discrimination, as Ze correctly pointed out in his posts. So these kids can cause disruptions in your classroom, interrupting the learning process, and you can lose your job, house, etc. as a result.
LTS as a chance of getting hired full time? Not a CHANCE in this district. I've been told by several people that NO ONE who has worked as a sub got a full time job here. In addition: There was an opening last year for a full time teacher with a requirement that the applicant must possess a High School certification. I have one. The one that got the job had middle school certification. Yes it was for a middle school position, but the district wants the flexibility of having a teacher work at both levels.
On 9/22/15, pixie reposting/clarifying wrote: > I'm reposting my response to math teach to clarify a > couple of lines: >> I have been in that situation, yet subs compete for >> those LTS gigs out of the hope that it will lead to a >> real job. Although I struggle on a sub's pay, and I am >> certified, I can't really say that I would wish to be a >> "real" teacher, (not that that would be an option for me >> anyway) because of > the fact that many states evaluate teachers based on the > students' standardized test scores, as if the teacher is > the only variable in the kid's life. The other day I > heard a radio interview with Dale Russakoff, author of > the new book, "The Prize: Who's in Charge of America's > Schools?" about how NJ Gov. Christie, Newark Mayor Cory > Booker, and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg teamed up to > "fix" Newark's schools. It seems that teacher input was > largely excluded from the process. She mentions "Race to > the Top that President Obama and Arne Duncan, the > education secretary, put in place, which encouraged > states to change their laws so the teacher evaluations > were based increasingly on the student test scores - how > students - whether students grew or not on their annual > tests would determine whether teachers were rated > effective or ineffective" She said she spent time > interviewing the measurement scientist who developed the > NJ system for measuring whether students grew or not from > year to year on their standardized tests, and he said, > "the system was never intended to judge teachers. It was > only intended to measure whether children are growing or > not because it doesn't tell you why they're growing or > who caused them to grow or why they're failing and who > caused them to fail." >> >> Here is the link: >> [link removed]..
Subbing has started three weeks ago for me, and as I have subbed in my new district, I have discovered that having subbed for 15 years in the other one that resembled a totalitarian dictatorship can really harm you in the "nice" one. Here is the explanation.
When one is exposed to what I have been exposed in the old district for 15 years, one gets so used to everything that one has built immense tolerance toward the abuse heaped by both faculty and students, and toward the dystopian nature of the school regime. Insults, high levels of noise, and what one could call extreme bullying no longer seem to matter.
When I sub for my new district, I am still on constant guard, always fearing the emails and subfinder system. But the real danger now comes from the behavior of the students and the tolerance developed after 15 years.
In the new district, there are classes that do show some misbehavior but nowhere as severe as the ones shown toward me in the other district. Yes, in the new district I have never been insulted but there are times that the students can get relatively loud.
But for me, that kind of behavior really, really is nothing compared to the veritable hell on earth that the other district was.
It turns out that in the new district, showing moderate levels of noise and not showing military recruit style behavior is considered bad behavior at that district. So, one can be much more easily banned and written up at the new district, and I have found out that the district is just as bad when it comes to secret exclusions. But for me, I have developed so much tolerance to the real bad behavior, being screamed at and assaulted and all that, that for me on a daily basis, that the so called "bad behavior" in the new district is a nonissue to me. If these teachers I cover for in the new district were exposed to even one quarter of the treatment I got, they would really understand that what they see as bad behavior is really a nonissue.
And I have found out that it is better to never report any issues to the office, especially at the elementary school level. The danger of being banned is exceedingly high in this case. Yes, the issue will be dealt with by the admin, but you will very likely be punished for it. And the best way to avoid any trouble is to just do one's job and never be at the teacher lounges for any reason...to be as invisible as possible and to "stay under the radar" of ANY administrator (counselors, deans, assistant principals, vice principals, or the principal or even the senior teachers). And in the classroom, the less one says, the better. Really. You learn to do everything as if you lived in a brutal dictatorship, even in a so called "good" and affluent district.
Want to explain your side? Might as well talk to a rock because it is virtually impossible to reason with admins regarding this matter.
On 9/17/15, Ze Povinho wrote: > Good evening. > > Subbing has started three weeks ago for me, and as I have > subbed in my new district, I have discovered that having > subbed for 15 years in the other one that resembled a > totalitarian dictatorship can really harm you in the > "nice" one. Here is the explanation. > > When one is exposed to what I have been exposed in the > old district for 15 years, one gets so used to everything > that one has built immense tolerance toward the abuse > heaped by both faculty and students, and toward the > dystopian nature of the school regime. Insults, high > levels of noise, and what one could call extreme bullying > no longer seem to matter. > > When I sub for my new district, I am still on constant > guard, always fearing the emails and subfinder system. > But the real danger now comes from the behavior of the > students and the tolerance developed after 15 years. > > In the new district, there are classes that do show some > misbehavior but nowhere as severe as the ones shown > toward me in the other district. Yes, in the new district > I have never been insulted but there are times that the > students can get relatively loud. > > But for me, that kind of behavior really, really is > nothing compared to the veritable hell on earth that the > other district was. > > It turns out that in the new district, showing moderate > levels of noise and not showing military recruit style > behavior is considered bad behavior at that district. So, > one can be much more easily banned and written up at the > new district, and I have found out that the district is > just as bad when it comes to secret exclusions. But for > me, I have developed so much tolerance to the real bad > behavior, being screamed at and assaulted and all that, > that for me on a daily basis, that the so called "bad > behavior" in the new district is a nonissue to me. If > these teachers I cover for in the new district were > exposed to even one quarter of the treatment I got, they > would really understand that what they see as bad > behavior is really a nonissue. > > And I have found out that it is better to never report > any issues to the office, especially at the elementary > school level. The danger of being banned is exceedingly > high in this case. Yes, the issue will be dealt with by > the admin, but you will very likely be punished for it. > And the best way to avoid any trouble is to just do one's > job and never be at the teacher lounges for any > reason...to be as invisible as possible and to "stay > under the radar" of ANY administrator (counselors, deans, > assistant principals, vice principals, or the principal > or even the senior teachers). And in the classroom, the > less one says, the better. Really. You learn to do > everything as if you lived in a brutal dictatorship, even > in a so called "good" and affluent district. > > Want to explain your side? Might as well talk to a rock > because it is virtually impossible to reason with admins > regarding this matter. >
On 9/18/15, Judy wrote: > Totally agree with you, Ze. Quit subbing 3 years ago for such > issues. Tired of being blamed for students' bad behavior. Let > Central Office find somebody else. Then districts scratch > their heads and wonder why there is a lack of subs. > > > On 9/17/15, Ze Povinho wrote: >> Good evening. >> >> Subbing has started three weeks ago for me, and as I have >> subbed in my new district, I have discovered that having >> subbed for 15 years in the other one that resembled a >> totalitarian dictatorship can really harm you in the >> "nice" one. Here is the explanation. >> >> When one is exposed to what I have been exposed in the >> old district for 15 years, one gets so used to everything >> that one has built immense tolerance toward the abuse >> heaped by both faculty and students, and toward the >> dystopian nature of the school regime. Insults, high >> levels of noise, and what one could call extreme bullying >> no longer seem to matter. >> >> When I sub for my new district, I am still on constant >> guard, always fearing the emails and subfinder system. >> But the real danger now comes from the behavior of the >> students and the tolerance developed after 15 years. >> >> In the new district, there are classes that do show some >> misbehavior but nowhere as severe as the ones shown >> toward me in the other district. Yes, in the new district >> I have never been insulted but there are times that the >> students can get relatively loud. >> >> But for me, that kind of behavior really, really is >> nothing compared to the veritable hell on earth that the >> other district was. >> >> It turns out that in the new district, showing moderate >> levels of noise and not showing military recruit style >> behavior is considered bad behavior at that district. So, >> one can be much more easily banned and written up at the >> new district, and I have found out that the district is >> just as bad when it comes to secret exclusions. But for >> me, I have developed so much tolerance to the real bad >> behavior, being screamed at and assaulted and all that, >> that for me on a daily basis, that the so called "bad >> behavior" in the new district is a nonissue to me. If >> these teachers I cover for in the new district were >> exposed to even one quarter of the treatment I got, they >> would really understand that what they see as bad >> behavior is really a nonissue. >> >> And I have found out that it is better to never report >> any issues to the office, especially at the elementary >> school level. The danger of being banned is exceedingly >> high in this case. Yes, the issue will be dealt with by >> the admin, but you will very likely be punished for it. >> And the best way to avoid any trouble is to just do one's >> job and never be at the teacher lounges for any >> reason...to be as invisible as possible and to "stay >> under the radar" of ANY administrator (counselors, deans, >> assistant principals, vice principals, or the principal >> or even the senior teachers). And in the classroom, the >> less one says, the better. Really. You learn to do >> everything as if you lived in a brutal dictatorship, even >> in a so called "good" and affluent district. >> >> Want to explain your side? Might as well talk to a rock >> because it is virtually impossible to reason with admins >> regarding this matter. >>
On 9/08/15, Jean wrote: > I hope that things go well for you with the LTS, BJ. Our > school began today. I didn't have a job (I would have liked) > by 10 p.m., so I blocked myself out for today. Turns out > that it was a good thing, because my daughter stopped by > today to say that tonight (yikes!) would be the best time to > have cake and presents for her birthday (which isn't for > three more days) since she isn't working today. I guess I'll > be busier today than I had planned. > > Still struggling to get through the first year after mom's > death. I'm on month eight. I still cry a lot over having > lost her. Sometimes, I think that she has sent messages to > me. I find myself reading a lot of books about messages from > beyond. I'm either crazy or she is still here with me in > spirit. I guess there's no way to know for certain. I feel > both foolish at times and comforted at other times. > > I hope that my first sub job this year will be music. I > imagine that will help. I guess I'll be going out to buy a > birthday cake today, though. It will be a surprise party (to > me), since I thought we would be celebrating this weekend.
I'm wondering if anyone has applied to this, or is considering it, or if anyone has strong feelings about that (in terms of wage being comparatively low, etc.)
On 9/11/15, Jodie Shupac wrote: > Hello! I am a journalist and am looking into a piece about > supply teaching at The Community Hebrew Academy of > Toronto (C.H.A.T.), which is advertising for supply > teachers that do not necessarily have an Ontario teaching > certification. > > Pay rate is $15/hr. > > I'm wondering if anyone has applied to this, or is > considering it, or if anyone has strong feelings about that > (in terms of wage being comparatively low, etc.) > > Thanks! >
On 9/11/15, Judy wrote: > I live in Kentucky, so $15 an hour is good pay for this area, > but for Toronto, that would probably bee low pay. > > On 9/11/15, Jodie Shupac wrote: >> Hello! I am a journalist and am looking into a piece about >> supply teaching at The Community Hebrew Academy of >> Toronto (C.H.A.T.), which is advertising for supply >> teachers that do not necessarily have an Ontario teaching >> certification. >> >> Pay rate is $15/hr. >> >> I'm wondering if anyone has applied to this, or is >> considering it, or if anyone has strong feelings about that >> (in terms of wage being comparatively low, etc.) >> >> Thanks! >>
After careful consideration this summer, I decided not to go back to that school. I just don't feel welcome there anymore. The good feeling of working there is gone. Besides, I have plenty of other schools to work at where I am treated like a professional. There is nothing I hate more than backstabbing and two faced people.
n 9/01/15, Amy wrote: > After careful consideration this summer, I decided not to go > back to that school. I just don't feel welcome there > anymore. The good feeling of working there is gone. Besides, > I have plenty of other schools to work at where I am treated > like a professional. There is nothing I hate more than > backstabbing and two faced people.
days a week. Pay is over 120 dollars per day, though.
You work less than 3 days a week: expect to not receive
your letter of reassurance in May or April (you are not
going to return to the district in the fall).
On 8/15/15, Anita Raze wrote:
> I forgot to m...See More