Please could you pass on any job listings or directional advice about where to find something in the Ventura County School districts, particulary in the Thousand Oaks area.
On 3/23/09, Matthew Killian wrote: > I am nearly finished with my MA from the School for > International Training (SIT) in Brattleboro, VT. I will be > returning to Southern California in June 2009 in order to > find a teaching position. > > Please could you pass on any job listings or directional > advice about where to find something in the Ventura County > School districts, particulary in the Thousand Oaks area. > > Thank you for your time, > Matt Killian
I have a couple of fourth grade students who seem to have a very limited vocabulary. Of course, it greatly hinders their reading ability. They have both increased their independent reading time, but have so far to go.
What is the best way you have found to increase vocabulary skills?
I am working on a thematic unit on pioneer life/westward expansion and I need a new book for my high-achieving readers. It needs to be at a 4th grade level, and about covered wagons. (I have one picked out for life on the prairie.)
I already have the Laura Ingalls series but have decided not to use it, so many of the kids have read it/had it read to them and I want something new...
We are using Sarah, Plain and Tall later in the year, so that won't work either.
I ordered a book called Bound for Oregon but have decided not to use it because it introduces the N--- word, and I think my class is too young for an academic discussion about that. If it came up at school I would handle it, but I don't want to be the one that teaches it to them!
If anyone is still reading, I am also trying to remember a book I read when I was a kid. It was about a girl that traveled west with her family to homestead, she was very afraid and thought if she could trade her uncle something precious for a lion's tooth charm he had, it would make her brave. He agreed that if she made an apple dumpling from her own apple tree he would trade with her. The uncle's name was Romeo. I remember the girl had a bossy sister named, I think, Miney, and she called the apple tree Miss Appleseed... does anyone remember this book? I can't find it anywhere...
Don't forget to give back the 1 you borrowed, thus, the answer is 352 instead of 351.
In your example 47 -38 Simply add 1 to the 47 making it 48, then subtract 38 from the 48, and don't forget to take back the 1, which would be 9.
497 x 36. Start by multiplying 497 x 10. Do that 3 times. then do 497 x 5 which would be half of 497 x 10. Finally, do 497 x 1. Add all the products.
497 x 10 = 4970 497 x 10 = 4970 497 x 10 = 4970 497 x 5 = 2485 497 x 1 = 497 = 17,892
Teach students to use the distributive property to break apart numbers. Children need to understand what they're doing, then they can come up with their own strategies to solve problems, afterwhich, algorithms will make more sense.
On 3/26/09, Adrienne wrote: > This student is certainly in trouble! The best thing would be to back > up and get him solid on the prerequisite skills for division. If you > can't and you must teach him division now, then let's dissect the > problem and look at it one step at a time. > > 1. The student doesn't understand the difference between > multiplication and division. This is the root of the problem. Work > with manipulatives and the same fact family (6x2, 2x6, 12/6 (of > course use other symbol for division), 12/2.) to help him practice > and understand the relationship. Although students may not be able to > choose the correct operation for a situation/word problem, they > should be able to use manipulatives to show division and > multiplication. In addition, have him manipulate post-it notes with > 2, 6, and 12 each written on one post-it note and symbols in between > to show the relationship between mult. and division. > > 2. The student doesn't know facts. The multiplication chart can > actually be used for division. The student just has to understand how > it is organized so he can quickly find the dividend and work from > there. You could start a math fact program to help him learn his math > facts. Until he knows them, he can use the chart. Introduce one fact > family at a time and build on that one, keeping all math fact family > cards in the review pile so he doesn't forget them. I usually start > teaching a fact family by using the What's Missing Game. Use post it > notes 2, 6, 12 to show him that math facts are just like phone > numbers, they are numbers that go together. (Don't include symbols at > this point.) Have him close his eyes and take one post-it note away. > Ask him to tell you which one is missing and why (The 2 is missing > because 2 times 6 equals 12 or a student could say because 12 divided > by 6 equals 2.) Switch the order of the post-it notes some of the > time, so that he sees the bigger number first. Then I write the math > fact very large on the board, in shaving cream etc. and have the > student trace over it several times while saying the entire fact. > (The speaking while tracing is critical.) Then I create a flashcard > for each of the facts, writing the math fact one one side of an index > card and the math fact including the answer on the other side of the > card. The student practices the cards each day, saying the entire > math fact before stating the answer. I explain why saying the entire > math fact is important by asking the student to tell me the last four > digits of his phone number. After the student tells me, I ask the > student how they figured it out. The student usually says that he > started from the beginning of the phone number. I explain that he has > memorized the phone number as a chunk and that is exactly what I what > him to do with the math facts. > > 3. The student doesn't know how to borrow. Until the student does > know how to borrow, he/she is going to either have to use a > calculator or you can only give him problems that don't require > borrowing. (I actually prefer the latter, even though it will be more > work for you.) Teaching when to borrow is sometimes easier for the > student if the student says "I have" before subtracting. > > For instance: > 47 > -38 > ___ > > I have 7 can I take away 8. (Or, if he could say, I have 7 balloons, > can I take away 8 balloons?)If he doesn't understand this, then you > will need to go way back in subtraction. > > 4. The student doesn't know where to put the number. He will need to > go back to more simple problems. Begin with problems (with known math > facts) such as 13 / 4 and have him use manipulatives as he does the > problem. (The best thing to do is teach division using math facts > that he already knows. It will be much less confusing to him because > only one thing,the division process, will be new for him. You will > have to make up your own problems, but it will pay off.) If he is > still having trouble deciding where to put the numbers, have him only > do the first step of the problems for a day or so.(Putting the 3 at > the top of 13/4.) Have him ask aloud while pointing to the empty > space, the divisor and the dividend, "What (point to blank space) > times 4 (point to the divisor) is close to 13 (point to the dividend) > without going over. > > The next day (or after more than one day), review the first step and > then add this second step, continuing to have him also use the > manipulatives - He should touch the 3 and the 4 with his pencil while > saying 3 times 4 equals 12 aloud. He should then write the 12 in the > proper space. > > The next day (or after more than one day) add one more step. Be sure > that he points and talks aloud as he does each step. (He should say, > "Subtract, make sure it is lower, write the remainder at the top." > while doing these steps.) > > On 3/25/09, Cheryl wrote: >> Thanks for responding,Kat. He does know the steps of D,M,S,C,B, >> but doesn't understand what to do at that step. In other words, >> if we have 324/4, he doesn't understand how to transfer to the >> next step. He'll divide 32/4 and get 8, but doesn't remember >> whether to put it on top, or underneath and then if he puts the >> answer on top, doesn't remember to "fall off the cliff and >> multiply". I just don't know how to reach him. I have tried >> showing him that the process goes in a circle, but nothing is >> clicking with him. Even the multiplication chart is confusing to >> him to use for division. His mind can't seem to flip from one >> operation to another. >> Cheryl
On 3/24/09, Cheryl wrote: > Help! > I am a 5th grade teacher and need help reaching one of my > students in the area of long division. He cannot complete a > long division problem. He forgets the steps (even when > there is a list of steps right beside him). He gets > multiplication and division confused, doesn't know his > multiplication facts, so I have resorted to a > multiplication chart which is successful for > multiplication, but not with division. His subtraction is > weak and often doesn't realize when he needs to borrow. I > have tried color coding each step for him, but it's more > work for him to remember colors and remember when to switch > them. He was getting special services, but mom pulled the > plug and now the little guy has nothing to fall back on. > He is a very visual learner. Does anyone have any tricks > different from conventional methods of teaching long > division? > Cheryl
follow your union guidelinesOn 3/25/09, Leigh wrote: > When do you think would be the appropriate time to turn in a > transfer request? > > School ends the first week of June. The transfer is for > next school year.
I was just wondering if its too early to turn in now with 8 weeks of school still left.
On 3/25/09, follow your union guidelines wrote: > On 3/25/09, Leigh wrote: >> When do you think would be the appropriate time to turn in a >> transfer request? >> >> School ends the first week of June. The transfer is for >> next school year.
I teach the exploration of America, then we get to the Pilgrims at Thanksgiving. Our Open Court unit is the American Revolution, and we teach that in March, so I make sure I finish the colonies and slavery in December/Jan/Feb.
Then we are Moving West in Open Court, and I throw in some Ellis Island and inventors too. What is your schedule that you follow?
For math, our district has us first teach place value, decimals and multiplication/division, then we teach decimals/fractions/percents, but only with a sense of 5/10 = 50%. After that we move on to a huge fraction unit, geometry unit, algebra with linear equations, and finally probability is touched on before I review for May state testing.What is your schedule that you follow?
In May we also have to do our state's CBA (curriculum-based assessment, like the state test but it's a written project done in class over a few weeks and graded by me using the state rubric). The topic is called You Decide and it's basically an essay dealing with what the Consitution and other founding documents have to say about a chosen current issue/argument. Kids choose the current issue and write persuasively for or against it in relation to constutional rights and responsibilities.
Math: getting new textbooks next year. Things will change... but here is what I am doing this year:
All-Year: multi-strand spiraling daily work: written practice, introduction to larger concepts with manipulatives, and ongoing assessment (we use EveryDay Counts Math Calendar). Basically every day we do a little number sense, a little algebra, a little geometry, a little... you get the idea. It all builds on itself.
Our 'units' during 2nd hour of math: September: patterns/algebra October: some graphing; Factors and Multiples November/December: multiplication and division- review mostly January: fractions; geometry February: fractions, con't; measurement March: algebra review; decimals; multi-strand problem solving April (state testing): applied math using all strands May-June: not sure what I'm going to do yet. Depends on what the kids need. I think I'll do some InterAct units dealing with geometry or measurement.
Meanwhile, a group of 8 moms complained to the principal that their girls didn't want to have anyone know they had trouble. The moms want the teachers to stay after school to work individually with their daughters for free. The moms feel this is part of the teachers' jobs.
It turns out that the 8 kids have volleyball, swim practice, baseball practice, and lacrosse practice. So now, the moms want the principal to have the teachers come in on weekends to help their kids. This is to avoid having the kids miss their sport team practices.
The moms put sports ahead of academics every time. However, the girls are supposed to receive 3's and 4's on their work. If the teacher gives a 2 because the kid has a 60-79% average, the teacher is "terrible".
As teachers, we find this group of moms to be rude bullies.
Anyone else out there have this type of blatant behavior from parents?
We based our system on the research of Guskey, O'Connor, Davies and ...See MoreUnfortunately, it looks like a lot of schools have required their teachers to switch to standards-based without doing the necessary research and inservicing of staff. To be realistic, it took our staff almost 3 years to get our heads around this huge shift in philosophy.
We based our system on the research of Guskey, O'Connor, Davies and Cooper. We had to look at what outcomes we were assessing so our kids could have clear targets. Our kids had to be educated on what the clear targets were as well. When all was said and done, we came up with:
EX-excelling expectations (not exceeding) ME-meeting expectations (this is a huge category and we are researching how to communicate growth most effectively. We are presently saying "Johnny is achieving in the lower end of the ME range ...) AP- approaching expectations LI- limited knowledge of outcomes
No number grades are ever given. Each assessment is assessed by the whether the clear targets/outcomes were met. Sometimes a quiz or test will receive 5 or 6 "grades" because that is how many targets/outcomes were being met on the assessment.
We have divided each subject area into a number of report card strands to categorize these scores. For example, language arts has 5 strands on the report card so therefore I have 5 mark sheets to enter scores in and then I use the scores to come up with an overall report card score.
Sounds complicated, but with a lot of hard work, it is a very good way of knowing exactly what the kids have learned. We also keep our behaviours separate from our achievement scores and give lots of "practice" (assessment FOR learning) before the "game" (assessment OF learning).
Remember - baby steps. And it helps to have staff members who are very knowledgeable on assessment practices to help you along the way. Remember - it took us 3 years to understand this! Remember to support each other. Without my fellow staff members' support, I would have had a very difficult time with this. Now I can't imagine teaching/assessing any other way. (I have taught 18 years)
Best of luck!
On 4/05/09, ny/5 wrote: > This is just another one of those things in education where, > theoretically, it may be a good idea; but because it is explained > vaguely, at best, it's interpreted differently by all. Just look > at all these posts! Some are transferring 1-4 to A's, B's, C's > etc.; some are using percentages and within the percentages the > cutoff level of what is mastery varies. I've always thought > proficiency would be a better term than mastery anyway. If the > curriculum wasn't so jam packed and there were actual opportunities > to bring students to levels of mastery, then that would be a > different story. But when state standards require students to > learn a new concept a day in math, and administrators are saying to > keep the pace and don't worry if they get it or not because the > curriculum spirals and they'll get it eventually, there's very > little room for true mastery. And.. that's not even factoring in > chronic absenteeism, lack of motivation, and developmental > readiness.
On 4/05/09, Head Monkey wrote: > Unfortunately, it looks like a lot of schools have required their > teachers to switch to standards-based without doing the necessary > research and inservicing of staff. To be realistic, it took our staff > almost 3 years to get our heads around this huge shift in philosophy. > > We based our system on the research of Guskey, O'Connor, Davies and > Cooper. We had to look at what outcomes we were assessing so our kids > could have clear targets. Our kids had to be educated on what the > clear targets were as well. When all was said and done, we came up > with: > > EX-excelling expectations (not exceeding) ME-meeting expectations > (this is a huge category and we are researching how to communicate > growth most effectively. We are presently saying "Johnny is achieving > in the lower end of the ME range ...) AP- approaching expectations LI- > limited knowledge of outcomes > > No number grades are ever given. Each assessment is assessed by the > whether the clear targets/outcomes were met. Sometimes a quiz or test > will receive 5 or 6 "grades" because that is how many targets/outcomes > were being met on the assessment. > > We have divided each subject area into a number of report card strands > to categorize these scores. For example, language arts has 5 strands > on the report card so therefore I have 5 mark sheets to enter scores > in and then I use the scores to come up with an overall report card > score. > > Sounds complicated, but with a lot of hard work, it is a very good way > of knowing exactly what the kids have learned. We also keep our > behaviours separate from our achievement scores and give lots of > "practice" (assessment FOR learning) before the "game" (assessment OF > learning). > > Remember - baby steps. And it helps to have staff members who are very > knowledgeable on assessment practices to help you along the way. > Remember - it took us 3 years to understand this! Remember to support > each other. Without my fellow staff members' support, I would have had > a very difficult time with this. Now I can't imagine > teaching/assessing any other way. (I have taught 18 years) > > Best of luck! > > On 4/05/09, ny/5 wrote: >> This is just another one of those things in education where, >> theoretically, it may be a good idea; but because it is explained >> vaguely, at best, it's interpreted differently by all. Just look >> at all these posts! Some are transferring 1-4 to A's, B's, C's >> etc.; some are using percentages and within the percentages the >> cutoff level of what is mastery varies. I've always thought >> proficiency would be a better term than mastery anyway. If the >> curriculum wasn't so jam packed and there were actual opportunities >> to bring students to levels of mastery, then that would be a >> different story. But when state standards require students to >> learn a new concept a day in math, and administrators are saying to >> keep the pace and don't worry if they get it or not because the >> curriculum spirals and they'll get it eventually, there's very >> little room for true mastery. And.. that's not even factoring in >> chronic absenteeism, lack of motivation, and developmental >> readiness.
On 3/23/09, Matthew Killian wrote: > I am nearly finished with my MA from the School for > International Training (SIT) in Brattleboro, VT. I will be > returning...See More