WendyI had a blast making fall 'snowflakes' this year, cutting fall colored papers with autumn objects instead of winter snowflakes. This would be good for a range of ages, because even young kids can make snowflakes, while the older children can try the more challenging intricate designs.
Also, here is an owl crafts roundup: [link removed]
I am participating in a week-long project and would like to come up with a clever title so that it would be more appealing to the students. Right now it's called "Intro to Art Glass" and that is sooooooo boring. If you have any suggestions that would catch the attention of 7th & 8th graders please let me know. Thanks!
WOW!!! I can't believe how many responses ...See MoreThanks for your suggestion Jef. I also posted something on the Art Teachers Chatboard and received lots of suggestions as well. They were very technical so I didn't quite "get it" but am even more excited about learning all about Art Glass. Taking all responses into consideration, here's my reply:
WOW!!! I can't believe how many responses I've received. Thanks again for all of your suggestions. There are so many good choices and CLEARLY I know nothing about the art of art glass so many of your suggestions have gone WAY OVER my head! Thank goodness an expert is teaching the class! I'm sure that after I've finished the class I will totally crack up (pun intended - haha) at the titles! I've narrowed it down to about 10 (see below) and will submit the list to the project committee and let them decide.
Classy Art Glass Sassy, Classy Art Glass How To Become A Glass Artist In 5 Days Thru the Looking Art Glass Glass ... it's what's for class heART of GLASS Art Glass ... half empty or half full? You be the judge! First Class Art Glass Class (say that fast 5 times!) Glasstastic ... art glass made FUN! Kiss My Glass! (I do love this one BUT..!)-no pun intended :-)
Thanks again,
Michelle
On 10/26/09, Jef Flanders wrote: > On 10/26/09, Michelle Kumar wrote: >> I am participating in a week-long project and would like to >> come up with a clever title so that it would be more >> appealing to the students. Right now it's called "Intro to >> Art Glass" and that is sooooooo boring. If you have any >> suggestions that would catch the attention of 7th & 8th >> graders please let me know. Thanks! >> >> Michelle > > How about something like - Not a liquid, not a solid, exploring > the fascinating possibilities created from glass.
Michelle KumarIt was down to two choices so I combined them into one clever title. And the winner is:(drumroll please) Glasstastic ... How to Become a Glass Artist in 5 Days! Thanks again for everyone's suggestions. I appreciate it so much!!!
2. Are balances of color, volume - shapes, in general - important to observe in estimating the point and value of a modern abstract painting, sculpture, etc.?
3. I mounted/stretched a well-used paint rag - frankly, I cannot tell the difference between that and some of the works shown on "Art in the 21st Century." Please comment.
4. How would one tell the difference between a Pollock and a work that I create by using the same "method"?
5. Is craft a necessary element in art?
6. I am looking down at papers I have dropped on the floor. If I secure them where they are and cut that portion of the floor that contains them, have I a legitimate work of modern art?
7. I am given the impression that doodles by monkeys might well become modern art "sensations" - if only they were given the publicity rendered by a wealthy patron. Please comment.
8. How do YOU teach the art of Pollock, Rothko, and of the artists shown in "Art in the 21st Century"?
I have often thought many o...See MoreArt, to me, is something pleasing to the eye. It must also make me feel something. Of course, something pleasing to my eye is not necessarily pleasing to another's eye.
It seems, though, in the art world, that anything can be art as long as someone likes it, and, in most cases, is willing to pay for it.
I have often thought many of the same questions you propose.
I have also wondered if I tagged my 2nd grade son's art projects as being created by a 50-year-old man with Alzheimers (no offense to anyone) we may make a fortune. LOL!
~Teri :D
On 10/29/09, L. Swilley wrote: > Those of us who have been watching "Art in the 21st > Century" must wonder: > > 1. How does one teach artworks after Picasso? > > 2. Are balances of color, volume - shapes, in general - > important to observe in estimating the point and value of a > modern abstract painting, sculpture, etc.? > > 3. I mounted/stretched a well-used paint rag - frankly, I > cannot tell the difference between that and some of the > works shown on "Art in the 21st Century." Please comment. > > 4. How would one tell the difference between a Pollock and > a work that I create by using the same "method"? > > 5. Is craft a necessary element in art? > > 6. I am looking down at papers I have dropped on the floor. > If I secure them where they are and cut that portion of the > floor that contains them, have I a legitimate work of > modern art? > > 7. I am given the impression that doodles by monkeys might > well become modern art "sensations" - if only they were > given the publicity rendered by a wealthy patron. Please > comment. > > 8. How do YOU teach the art of Pollock, Rothko, and of the > artists shown in "Art in the 21st Century"? > > Looking forward to your comments. > > L. Swilley
Shouldn't a sound Art course examine the historical d...See MoreArt courses everywhere are belittled because of so many art teachers who ignore art history - the close and difficult examination of the changes of styles over the centuries - favoring instead a "creative" approach urging the students to paint, draw, etc. according to their own lights.
Shouldn't a sound Art course examine the historical development of style and the students' attempts to reproduce those?
- Rod Liddel. The London Time...See More"Congratulations to the Gallery of Modern Art in Glasgow for its exciting, publicly funded installation which encourages people to scrawl obscenities on the pages of the Bible. This particular work of brilliance is called Untitled 2009 and is designed to celebrate 'sexual, gender and theological diversity'..."
- Rod Liddel. The London Times.
Then there are the "works of art," like a crucifix in a vat of urine, sheets strung across a river, photos of masses of nudes stretched out on a pavement, etc.
Then there are Rothkos and Pollocks.
Where does it end, and - more importantly for Art teachers - how is it dealt with in Art courses?
In college a painting was making the local New York City scene, and was written up in a few articles. This painting was shown to us in three classes, by three different teachers.
My "Experimental Studio" teacher raved about it. Look at the lines, see how it affected the picture plane, the concepts..wonderful!
My "Art History/Aesthetics" teacher gave it a nod, noting that it was an important work, of artistic historical significance, but not as well done as it should have been.
My "Traditional Painting" teacher called it crap. Worse than crap. Not art.
In order to get good grades, I had to recall what each professor's opinion was. Each chose to use that image for part of their final exams. And for each one, I dutifully wrote down what each one had expressed. Art School is not about having opinions of your own.
Art is all about opinions. It is never objective. Is an Amish quilt ART? What of the porcupine quill decorated clothing of the Native Americans? And who decided that oldest recorded cave paintings were done by men? Why are women painters ignored in Jansen's, "History of Art?" What of the sand paintings done by monks that are pure emphemera--created only to be decontructed?
What is Art? Tell your students that Art is expression, learning, and questioning. It also reflects history. Deconstruction and Dada came out of Depressions and Wars.
Ideas of Art come from what was made to last. A well-constructed oil painting can last centuries. What of Julian Schnabel's paintings with broken plates attached? When the adhesive dries out, and the bits begin to fall off, will they be replaced, or allowed to fall off as a continuation of the "painting-in-progress"? Is that Art?
You can drive yourself crazy trying to pin it down.
If a student wants to learn something Objective, then a course in Chemistry or Mathematics is the order of the day. But Art will remain fluid, ever-changing, and always moving forward.
If you want to impress on your students, "What is Art?", I can suggest that you have them take a trip to an art conservator to show how pieces are restored, whether it's a painting, a sculpture, or items like tapestries. And some of the best works of Art have been systematically destroyed by well-meaning conservators. (i.e. "The Last Supper," by DaVinci and the Sistine Chapel's ceiling by Michelangelo.)
The best way to teach students about Art is to bring up the very question--"What is Art?" If they want a career in the Arts, first make sure to destroy the myth that an artist is a black-clad, cigarette-smoking nihilistic neurotic who would never "sell-out." Artists are productive, healthy people who are passionate at what they do, and enjoy being able to do what they love for a living.
Being Famous is not Art. Being infamous is not Art. Creating is Art, and Art is Creating.
Does any one know how to make chalk semi-permanent, so that it will stay on the chalkboard until you erase it with a wet cloth. I remember hearing that you could soak it in something to achieve this but don't remember what. Can anyone help?
old teachdissolve sugar in hot water until it is saturated. Let chalk soak overnight. Keep in baggie when not in use or it will dry out. Will not show on board until it dries. Must use water to erase.
There are markers that you can buy that ...See MoreOn 11/15/09, kteacher in IL wrote: > Does any one know how to make chalk semi-permanent, so that > it will stay on the chalkboard until you erase it with a > wet cloth. I remember hearing that you could soak it in > something to achieve this but don't remember what. Can > anyone help?
There are markers that you can buy that do this but I am trying to find out where to buy them. I borrowed some from a fellow teacher and I haven't had to redo my board for at least a semester.
L. Swilley On 11/17/09, L. Swilley wrote: > > And besides the nonsense of this "art," notice the > beginning paragraph of page 2: unsatisfactory work is "good > enough for Sao Paolo"!!