On 12/17/05, Veronica wrote: > Does anyone teach "Success For All" reading, and if you > do, what is your opinion of its quality and effectiveness?
This is my sixth year at a school without SFA and that is one of the major reasons I transferred. It was totally ineffective for children who couldn't get something the first time through (had to meet the time schedule, don't you know!) and comprehension was difficult for the children, most of whom became little word callers. One school in our district has thrown all their SFA stuff away. The one I was at is in its third year of not making AYP. When I was there, the SFA police would come to your classroom and harass you about posters, not being precisely on the time schedule, etc. etc. Slavin has made a TON of money from SFA, and if you'll look at the studies supporting it, they are written by Slavin or his wife or some of his co-workers. You would be wise NOT to adopt this program.
I'm teaching 6th grade lang. arts for the first time this year, also 6th grade science for the first time, so I'm overwhelmed. (My experience is teaching math).
Through IRIs and cloze tests, the students' readiing levels have been established. I have set up levelled groups and assigned novels to each of the groups accordingly. I am trying to collect activities that groups could conduct on their own, in order to differentiate as well as to relieve me from having to DO so much. In other words, I would like to set up "baskets" which contain their novels, instructions for that class period, and any worksheets, games, or materials they need for that class. This way they could work together on vocabulary, grammar, writing, literature response, etc. as appropriate for their reading level. I'll train them to grab their group's basket off the shelf and get to work on their own. I've collected some ideas from the internet and books already, but I'd love to have more. Any comments, suggestions? Forgive me if this topic has been addressed.
A TRIBUTE TO MARTIN LUTHER KING JR by Phyllis C. Murray
Marching for man's freedom American hero and countryman Righting the wrongs of discrimination Taking his place throughout the nation. Instilling the need for freedom's urgency. Nobleman, marching for man's dignity. Let's not forget Martin's vision, Keeping his dream alive can be a just decision. Illuminate the way. Help one another, Now that we know all men are brothers, Grow in truth and peace together.
"The sudden and violent death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., places a serious and profound obligation on all Americans, black and white-an obligation to continue and broaden the now stilled efforts of Dr. King to build a society where racial justice and peace prevail. That dream of a new and just American society is shared by millions on millions of American--and that dream will not die.
We have been proud to walk with Dr. King in Mississippi and in Washington and to work with him in establishing freedom schools in the South. In this tragic hour, we dedicate ourselves to his cause."
-Albert Shanker, Former United Federation of Teachers President upon learning of the death of Martin Luther King.
I am a new third grade teacher. I am getting reading to teach a unit on folktales. I am looking for helpful site, lesson ideas and project ideas. thanks
I just started a job as reading coach. It is a new position and it is also my first teaching position. I have some education in teaching reading but no experience. I work in a middle school, with students grades 5-8 . I just started this job just before the Christmas break and so far I have just gone through some test results for the 5th and 6th grades.
The most recent standardized test they have taken in the NWEA so I started with those results and according to them about one third of the kids in the 5th and 6th grade are reading below grade level, some are even at beginner reading level. So I was also given the results of their GATES test from last year and the results were quite different. For example one 6th grade student was at a 4th grade level according to her resent NWEA but at a 10th grade level on her GATES from last year. According to the GATES the lowest reading level I am dealing with is 3rd grade.
It was suggested to me that the NWEA results might have turned out low because the students are unfamiliar with computers and it is a computer based test. So I am relying more heavily on last years GATES.
I am going to spend next week assessing a target group (anyone who tested low on both the NWEA and the GATES) with DIBELS. I think at that point I will be able to say who my students will be, unless another test (NECAP results are expected to come in January- a test some New England states use for NCLB) or other factor makes itself known. The Special Ed. teacher offered to conduct the Woodcock Johnson on some of them but I just feel like these kids are getting tested to death. They are supposed to take the NWEA again in the spring as it is a test that is given twice per year.
In the meantime, the elementary school has been gradually introducing the Wilson program. I am going to be in the training in March along with the third grade teachers. So between now and then I want to start some kind of program.
I am looking at the Reading Intervention program from High Noon. If anyone is familiar with it please tell me about your experience. IF anyone has another suggestion about what to use between now and the time I get the Wilson training please make suggestions.
My options are to either pull the kids out one-one, in small groups or collaborate with their LA teachers. Not all the teachers are open to collaboration.
On 12/28/05, Dee wrote: > My students will be doing a research report this January. > Any ideas on topics they can research? I am a 6th grade > Language Arts teacher. > > Thanks!
What about an I-Search? Students pick a topic of interest to theM? Try google for more info.
On 12/28/05, Dee wrote: > My students will be doing a research report this January. > Any ideas on topics they can research? I am a 6th grade > Language Arts teacher. > > Thanks!
I am a first year fifth grade teacher and am completing a unit for an English Language Acquisition professional development. I am trying to find a motivation/background building activity for my lesson on too, to, and two. Does anyone know of any good books or examples? I thought maybe I could have the class make up sentences on their own and then go back and check their own work once we learn more about using the words. Thanks!
Helllo, I am in a school that uses Open Court and then Step up to Writing (for the writing). I teach 3rd grade. We are on the imagination unit and did poetry. My question is, how do you grade poetry. Do you grade it the same way that you would a paragraph? That does not seem right. I am a first year teacher, so this would really help. Thanks.
On 12/30/05, Beginning Teacher wrote: > Helllo, > I am in a school that uses Open Court and then Step up to > Writing (for the writing). I teach 3rd grade. We are on the > imagination unit and did poetry. My question is, how do you > grade poetry. Do you grade it the same way that you would a > paragraph? That does not seem right. I am a first year > teacher, so this would really help. Thanks.
Maybe we can assist each other. There are many rubics on line to grade poetry. However just keep in mind that writing poetry for kids does include recognizing their creativity. some examples for grading the poems would be: did the students follow the given directions does the poem exemplify what you are teaching, objectives can the student explain what the poem means allow other students to listen as the poem is shared to provide feedback from peers. does spelling count was the poem written in the correct format
I hope that this helps. Please email me the lesson plan that you used for the imagination story. Thanks and have a great day! a fellow teacher Linda
After reading all the posts on this site about Sylvan, I have to say that there is very little understanding of what Sylvan Learning Centers (SLC) are and can do. Many centers have experienced and committed educators working as a team, and the kids benefit greatly. Some centers have teachers with specializations, too, which does indeed allow it to tailor programs to suit the needs of individual learners.
Having said that, it must be said that SLCs, as franchises, are only as good as the directors and teachers who work in them. Not all human beings are equal, regardless of how highly standardized the product may be. I imagine some Sylvans are not as well run, or may have less experienced teachers. Furthermore, SLCs are sometimes limited in what they can offer. Parents who are thinking about signing up their learning-disabled, ESL or special-ed child at a SLC need to find out if anyone at that center has background and experience with any of those areas. Additionally, the centers are not usually not able to disagnose these problems, and so the program may not work for the child. If you are a parent reading this, all you need to do is ASK if the center has someone with the background you are looking for. ASK what the degree level and teaching backgrounds are of the directors and teachers. Many parents fail to do their own homeowrk in this area and then feel cheated when a such a program doesn't produce desired results.
To close, I would also like to say that the kids who do best at Sylvan tend to have supportive parents, and have cooperative school teachers who don't see Sylvan as a threat to their job. It takes a village, you know...
After reading all the posts on this site about Sylvan, I have to say that there is very little understanding of what Sylvan Learning Centers (SLC) are and can do. Many centers have experienced and committed educators working as a team, and the kids benefit greatly. Some centers have teachers with specializations, too, which does indeed allow it to tailor programs to suit the needs of individual learners.
Having said that, it must be said that SLCs, as franchises, are only as good as the directors and teachers who work in them. Not all human beings are equal, regardless of how highly standardized the product may be. I imagine some Sylvans are not as well run, or may have less experienced teachers. Furthermore, SLCs are sometimes limited in what they can offer. Parents who are thinking about signing up their learning-disabled, ESL or special-ed child at a SLC need to find out if anyone at that center has background and experience with any of those areas. Additionally, the centers are not usually not able to disagnose these problems, and so the program may not work for the child. If you are a parent reading this, all you need to do is ASK if the center has someone with the background you are looking for. ASK what the degree level and teaching backgrounds are of the directors and teachers. Many parents fail to do their own homeowrk in this area and then feel cheated when a such a program doesn't produce desired results.
To close, I would also like to say that the kids who do best at Sylvan tend to have supportive parents, and have cooperative school teachers who don't see Sylvan as a threat to their job. It takes a village, you know...
This is good information to thing about Sylvan Learning Center. I visited a center today. I like it. Of course I'm wondering about the cost. My daughter does have an IEP and learning issues. Her regular teacher and ESE teacher recommeded this to help close the gap in her learning. It sounds great I hope it works. I don't know. I'm visiting another Sylvan center, next, it's just a different location. I'm trying to find the easiest one to get to from our house. And compare centers too. Thanks for the info.
On 1/01/06, ESL teacher wrote: > After reading all the posts on this site about Sylvan, I > have to say that there is very little understanding of what > Sylvan Learning Centers (SLC) are and can do. Many centers > have experienced and committed educators working as a team, > and the kids benefit greatly. Some centers have teachers > with specializations, too, which does indeed allow it to > tailor programs to suit the needs of individual learners. > > Having said that, it must be said that SLCs, as franchises, > are only as good as the directors and teachers who work in > them. Not all human beings are equal, regardless of how > highly standardized the product may be. I imagine some > Sylvans are not as well run, or may have less experienced > teachers. Furthermore, SLCs are sometimes limited in what > they can offer. Parents who are thinking about signing up > their learning-disabled, ESL or special-ed child at a SLC > need to find out if anyone at that center has background > and experience with any of those areas. Additionally, the > centers are not usually not able to disagnose these > problems, and so the program may not work for the child. > If you are a parent reading this, all you need to do is ASK > if the center has someone with the background you are > looking for. ASK what the degree level and teaching > backgrounds are of the directors and teachers. Many parents > fail to do their own homeowrk in this area and then feel > cheated when a such a program doesn't produce desired > results. > > To close, I would also like to say that the kids who do > best at Sylvan tend to have supportive parents, and have > cooperative school teachers who don't see Sylvan as a > threat to their job. It takes a village, you know...
On 12/17/05, Veronica wrote:
> Does anyone teach "Success For All" reading, and if you
> do, what is your opinion of its quality and effectiveness?
This is my sixth year at a school without SFA and that is
one of the major reasons I transferred. It was totally
ineffective for children who coul...See More