I am a graduate student at Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi. I am conducting research for my master's degree in Curriculum & Instruction, specializing in math. Specifically, I created a survey regarding the role of virtual manipulatives in today's mathematics classroom. I am in the process of distributing this survey to as many mathematics teachers as possible. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Below is a direct link to the survey:
[link removed]
PLEASE forward this e-mail on to any teachers you know who are currently teaching mathematics-- elementary, middle, or high school. With your help, I hope to receive results from all over the country.
Any help you can provide in publicizing this survey is greatly appreciated.
I noticed they have a graduate certificate program in ESL at Indiana State University. It's only 12 credits, offered on-line, and can be completed over the summer. Have any of you taken this course? Does this meet the state requirements and allow you take the ESL certification test?
I have taught ESL overseas for 4 years and am looking for the easiest / least expensive way to add an ESL endorsement to my Michigan certificate. I talked to the Michigan department of ed about taking this course and they said that they would accept it as long as it met all of the state of Indiana's criteria. Meaning if I had an Indiana certificate, I would be eligible to take the Indiana ESL teachers certification tests after completing this course.
I would really appreciate any info. you might have.
Accelovance is looking to help protect teachers during the upcoming flu season. Volunteers are needed to participate in a study to evaluate pomegranate extract (derived from the seeds of the pomegranate fruit) and how it might help protect against the common cold and flu. This all natural approach to the flu season is being studied as a possible alternative to the flu vaccine.
-Participants will be compensated $415 for their participation and cannot have had the flu vaccine this year or plan to get it.
Even if YOU aren’t interested, others might be. So tell your friends. As a way to say “thank you” Accelovance has a referral program, the Study Buddy program, that compensates you $25 for each personal referral, who participates in this study, or another one in the future. This program also compensates others who refer their teacher friends – so please pass this along as well!
Off-topic but important: A vote for a Democrat representative is a vote for amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens and open borders. The only folks standing in the way are House Republicans. I'm not taking sides, just advising the consequences.
Well, we know what happened, but you're actually wrong. Only a few House Republicans support restrictions on illegals. In fact, one of the biggest champions for Amnesty is George W. Bush, so the GOP has, IMO, dropped the ball on this one.
I think this is one example where both parties are answering to corporations who want to hire illegals and not the people electing them. Trouble is, we don't have anyone but a few rogue politicians to vote for who support restrictions on illegals. What we need is a third party! Or four or five, if you ask me.
On 11/06/06, Larry wrote: > Off-topic but important: A vote for a Democrat > representative is a vote for amnesty for 20 million > illegal aliens and open borders. The only folks standing > in the way are House Republicans. I'm not taking sides, > just advising the consequences.
If you are a teach students in grades 4-9, we invite you to participate in a special pilot study for a federally funded research project, the e-Learning for Educators Initiative.
The Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative (inTASC) at Boston College is conducting a pilot study to examine the characteristics of test items that will be used in the large-scale research project and you may be eligible to participate in this pilot study. You will only need to complete an online survey, and administer two online tests to your students, and you will eligible for a $100 stipend.
ELIGIBILITY
In order to be eligible you must: • Be a teacher in grades 4- 9 • NOT be a teacher in the following list of states. (The larger research study will occur in these states and thus these teachers cannot participate in the pilot study). o Alabama o Delaware o Kentucky o Mississippi o Missouri o New Hampshire o Pennsylvania o West Virginia • Be able to administer an online test to a class of students.
COMPENSATION
All teachers who participate will receive instant feedback about student performance. You can use this feedback to assess your students and inform future instruction.
In addition to the feedback about your students’ performance, the first 140 teachers to complete the requirements (10 in each sub-content area) will receive $100 for each sub-content area. Completing the requirements means taking the teacher survey and administering both tests to your students.
REQUIREMENTS
You can participate in multiple sub-content areas (listed below). Participation requirements are:
• You will take one online survey, estimated to take 30-45 minutes to complete. • You will administer two online tests to a class of at least 15 students. Each test takes one full class period; the total amount of participation time needed from your students is two class periods. You will need Flash v8 or higher to administer the students tests. This software is free for download at [link removed]
These requirements are for each sub-content area chosen. The sub-content areas are:
4th and 5th Grade ELA sub-content areas: • Vocabulary • Reading Comprehension: Narrative • Reading Comprehension: Expository • Writing 5th and 6th Grade Math sub-content areas: • Fractions • Algebraic Thinking • Measurement
7th and 8th Grade ELA sub-content areas: • Vocabulary • Reading Comprehension: Narrative • Reading Comprehension: Expository • Writing 8th and 9th Grade Math sub-content areas: • Proportional Reasoning • Functions • Geometric Measurement
For more information about the study and to sign up, please visit:
[link removed]!”
Once you sign up, you will be directed to the Teacher Management Page. Here you can download the files “Pilot Instructions” and “Stipend and Contact Information” for further details.
You can also contact the researchers at efe.[email removed].
If you teach students in grades 4-9, we invite you to participate in a special pilot study for a federally funded research project, the e-Learning for Educators Initiative.
The Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative (inTASC) at Boston College is conducting a pilot study to examine the characteristics of test items that will be used in the large-scale research project and you may be eligible to participate in this pilot study. You will only need to complete an online survey, and administer two online tests to your students, and you will receive a $100 stipend.
This study will conclude on Friday, December 8, so sign up now and participate! We need your help to collect data for this important study! For more information, or to sign up, please visit [link removed]
ELIGIBILITY
In order to be eligible you must: • Be a teacher in grades 4- 9 • NOT be a teacher in the following list of states. (The larger research study will occur in these states and thus these teachers cannot participate in the pilot study). o Alabama o Delaware o Kentucky o Mississippi o Missouri o New Hampshire o Pennsylvania o West Virginia • Be able to administer an online test to a class of students.
COMPENSATION
All teachers who participate will receive instant feedback about student performance. You can use this feedback to assess your students and inform future instruction.
In addition to the feedback about your students’ performance, the first 140 teachers to complete the requirements (10 in each sub-content area) will receive $100 for each sub-content area. Completing the requirements means taking the teacher survey and administering both tests to your students.
REQUIREMENTS
You can participate in multiple sub-content areas (listed below). Participation requirements are:
• You will take one online survey, estimated to take 30-45 minutes to complete. • You will administer two online tests to a class of at least 15 students. Each test takes one full class period; the total amount of participation time needed from your students is two class periods. You will need Flash v8 or higher to administer the students tests. This software is free for download at [link removed]
These requirements are for each sub-content area chosen. The sub-content areas are:
4th and 5th Grade ELA sub-content areas: • Vocabulary • Reading Comprehension: Narrative • Reading Comprehension: Expository • Writing 5th and 6th Grade Math sub-content areas: • Fractions • Algebraic Thinking • Measurement
7th and 8th Grade ELA sub-content areas: • Vocabulary • Reading Comprehension: Narrative • Reading Comprehension: Expository • Writing 8th and 9th Grade Math sub-content areas: • Proportional Reasoning • Functions • Geometric Measurement
For more information about the study and to sign up, please visit:
[link removed]!”
Once you sign up, you will be directed to the Teacher Management Page. Here you can download the files “Pilot Instructions” and “Stipend and Contact Information” for further details.
You can also contact the researchers at efe.[email removed].
2007 is the big reading adoption year in IN. What do think looks good? Anybody had experience with using any of the programs on the state adoption list? Thanks, Jane
Our district had thought about waiting a year to adopt because some of the publishers' materials wouldn't be ready for preview. Now they say they will be, so we are going ahead. This has been a problem in the past; I hope we get to see everything.
As for meeting all standards - if I were you, I'd look very closely at that. A good example is with our math texts. They say they meet IN standards but there is sooo much more that it can't possibly all be taught and so in essence we are paying for much more than we can possibly cover, with not enough material to really teach the standards. Our classroom teachers hate our math series. So just be very careful when previewing. The publishing companies do an excellent snowball job.
On 12/23/06, SOME BETTER THAN OTHERS wrote: > I have seen them all at IRA Convention in Chicago, but > listened to Pearson-Scott Foresman reps. Pearson reps said > that their series meets almost all Science/Social Studies > standards for IN. That would be great!!! Textbook Caravan > begins in January, hope to see and hear more there. > > > On 12/21/06, Jane wrote: >> 2007 is the big reading adoption year in IN. What do think >> looks good? Anybody had experience with using any of the >> programs on the state adoption list? >> Thanks, >> Jane
Our district has narrowed our choices to Harcourt Trophies and MacMillan McGraw Hill. It's a hard decision to make. A colleague is piloting MacMillan and she really likes it. Has anyone heard anything about either?
On 1/02/07, Susan/IN wrote: > Our district had thought about waiting a year to adopt because > some of the publishers' materials wouldn't be ready for > preview. Now they say they will be, so we are going ahead. > This has been a problem in the past; I hope we get to see > everything. > > As for meeting all standards - if I were you, I'd look very > closely at that. A good example is with our math texts. They > say they meet IN standards but there is sooo much more that it > can't possibly all be taught and so in essence we are paying > for much more than we can possibly cover, with not enough > material to really teach the standards. Our classroom > teachers hate our math series. So just be very careful when > previewing. The publishing companies do an excellent snowball > job. > > On 12/23/06, SOME BETTER THAN OTHERS wrote: >> I have seen them all at IRA Convention in Chicago, but >> listened to Pearson-Scott Foresman reps. Pearson reps said >> that their series meets almost all Science/Social Studies >> standards for IN. That would be great!!! Textbook Caravan >> begins in January, hope to see and hear more there. >> >> >> On 12/21/06, Jane wrote: >>> 2007 is the big reading adoption year in IN. What do think >>> looks good? Anybody had experience with using any of the >>> programs on the state adoption list? >>> Thanks, >>> Jane
Every teacher is entitled to a duty-free lunch and planning and preparation time. Except for a few minor changes made in the 1995 rewrite of the Texas Education Code, the statutes have essentially remained the same.
Duty-free lunch – Texas Education Code, Sec. 21.405 By law, each classroom teacher and full-time librarian gets at least a 30-minute lunch period “free from all duties and responsibilities connected with the instruction and supervision of students.” According to a Texas Attorney General opinion, the term “duty” would include a directive that teachers remain on campus during lunch, because it would relate to student instruction or supervision. Districts cannot require teachers to stay on campus during their 30-minute lunch even if the campus is “closed” for students.
The law provides exceptions—personnel shortages, extreme economic conditions or unavoidable/unforeseen circumstances—which give districts the right to require teachers to supervise lunches, but not more than one time per week.
The rules adopted by the commissioner of education set the bar very high before a district can assign a teacher to lunch duty. Scheduling problems do not create unforeseen circumstances. They exist when an epidemic, illness, or natural or man-made disaster leaves no one available to do the duty. An extreme economic condition exists when hiring a person to supervise lunch would cause the district to raise taxes to the extent that the district might face a tax roll-back election. A personnel shortage exists only after all available nonteaching personnel—superintendent and business manager included—have been assigned to the duty and the district has diligently recruited community volunteers to help.
Planning and preparation time – Texas Education Code, Sec. 21.404 The law entitles every teacher to planning and preparation time, during which the district can require the teacher to engage in no activity other than parent-teacher conferences, evaluating student work, and planning. Teachers must have at least 450 minutes of planning time every two weeks in increments of not less than 45 minutes within the instructional day.
Examples:
A teacher could have five 90-minute conference periods within a two-week period, instead of a 45-minute conference period each day. A district can provide 50- minute blocks of planning time daily, and exceed the minimum requirement, but it could not provide 50 minutes one day and 40 minutes the next.
A district cannot schedule a 7:45 a.m.-3:15 p.m. instructional day, and then give teachers 3:15 p.m.-4:00 p.m. to plan after the students leave.
Conference period cases often involve requirements for group planning or staff development during planning periods. According to the commissioner of education, if a district gives teachers no more than the statutory minimum planning time, the district cannot ask teachers to engage in group-planning during one of those planning periods.
Example:
A district that schedules 50-minute planning periods every day could ask teachers to plan as a group one day every two weeks, but the district could not take one planning period for group planning and another for staff development.
Well, we know what happened, but you're actually wrong.
Only a few House Republicans support restrictions on
illegals. In fact, one of the biggest champions for Amnesty
is George W. Bush, so the GOP has, IMO, dropped the ball on
this one.
I think this is one example where both parties are answering...See More