On 2/23/09, ??? -- -- what are YOUR thoughts specifically to the OP wrote: > You've given no specifics as to which aspects of this piece of > legislation you oppose. > > > On 2/22/09, anony1 wrote: >> is a bad bill proposal. I hope people look into this dumb >> thing and tell the lawmakers to vote NO.
If I was to let them know I wasn't coming back, could they just drop me at the end of May (to save them paying me for june and july) since Missouri is "at will"?
Even I'm not exactly sure how at-will works, but my principal made it clear at the beginning of the year that basically we can quit if we want, and just be paid through that day we quit, or they could terminate us.. yada yada, I don't really know, but I'm not too concerned now!
Would anyone care to share ways that your school (esp elementary ones) motivate/encourage students just before their MAP testing occurs? (or also, during?) Thanks in advance!
What affects the marketability of a professional educator? If you had to interview for a job as an educator, today, would you be hired, or would there be factors that affect your marketability? Take this survey...find out! Results will be posted May 11, 2009. NO NAMES PLEASE!
My husband is considering a job in the area and we may move. I was wondering if anyone teaches in Fulton, can tell me about the schools, the town and IF there are any elementary teaching positions open. I have taught K-1 for 19 years. I appreciate any thoughts. Thanks!
I have taught for 10 yrs in MO. I took this school yr off to stay home with my infant son. I have great references, experience, and wonderful evaluations. I was even told by one principal in an interview she wanted to hire me, then in a follow up email, she said she had no openings. I can't seem to get a job! What's up with this?
On 4/20/09, To the OP from Sharyl wrote: > Where are you located? I mean generally -- not that you have to > give the specific town. > > > > On 4/19/09, jen/1st wrote: >> It's cheaper to higher a first year teacher than one with 10 >> years experience. Plus, most districts get a financial kickback >> when they higher from certain colleges. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/18/09, where are you in Missouri? wrote: >>> On 4/18/09, teacher mom wrote: >>>> I have taught for 10 yrs in MO. I took this school yr off >>>> to stay home with my infant son. I have great references, >>>> experience, and wonderful evaluations. I was even told by >>>> one principal in an interview she wanted to hire me, then >>>> in a follow up email, she said she had no openings. I >>>> can't seem to get a job! What's up with this?
On 4/22/09, s wrote: > > I can relate...eleven year...See MoreI totally agree. It rips at your heart. You know you are a great teacher and would be an asset to their district, however it comes down to money. And that gets my goat, because they push and push you to advance your degree and then shut the door in your face once you have gotten it!
On 4/22/09, s wrote: > > I can relate...eleven years here, one year off, perfect teaching record > and high recommendations and NOTHING....I have to agree with Jen...it's > because we are too expensive...schools can hire first year teachers at a > fraction of the cost! I went back to school to get my Masters, and it's > like a dead weight now b/c no one wants to pay me for that "extra" > education. Isn't that sad? A friend of mine told me recently that it > amazes her that she was paid $90,000. plus for working in a chamber of > commerce and teachers make $30,000. - $50,000. and they are ONLY > educating our future....sad, isn't it? > > On 4/20/09, To the OP from Sharyl wrote: >> Where are you located? I mean generally -- not that you have to >> give the specific town. >> >> >> >> On 4/19/09, jen/1st wrote: >>> It's cheaper to higher a first year teacher than one with 10 >>> years experience. Plus, most districts get a financial kickback >>> when they higher from certain colleges. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4/18/09, where are you in Missouri? wrote: >>>> On 4/18/09, teacher mom wrote: >>>>> I have taught for 10 yrs in MO. I took this school yr off >>>>> to stay home with my infant son. I have great references, >>>>> experience, and wonderful evaluations. I was even told by >>>>> one principal in an interview she wanted to hire me, then >>>>> in a follow up email, she said she had no openings. I >>>>> can't seem to get a job! What's up with this?
On 6/02/09, It is give and take... wrote: > I apologize that no one has responded to your query in four > weeks. It may be one of the most important issues that a test > coordinator has to address. > > Over the years our school given the MAP in several different > formats. If one session is administered per day, and the MAP is > stretched over three weeks, the students and instructors are > not as fresh and pumped up the last week as they are the first. > If two sessions are given per day, you can finish all three > sessions in two weeks. I have seen very little difference in > the results. > > I would think that DESE would have collected data and have > facts for testing coordinators to use to support decisions. The > data wouldn't be difficult to collect, just have each school > mark the actual dates that they give each session on a bubble > sheet. They could collect data to support whether students who > take the MAP with the entire group score higher than students > who have to make up a session due to absences. But instead, we > have the personal opinions of regional leaders, teachers, and > testing coordinators that drive the way you set up your tests. > > All that said, I personally prefer to give two sessions in one > day; one in the morning and one in the afternoon. Teachers are > not giving difficult lessons that require homework the > remainder of a day if only one session is tested, so the day is > often not strongly academically structured (meaning many > schools virtually give students fun, stress-free activities to > fill up the hours in which the MAP is not given, so the day is > a waste academically anyway). > > I would also like to see the assessment window from the last > week in April until the third week in MAY. Many schools still > have an additional six-week term after they have given the MAP. > Students tend to think that "learning is over" after the MAP, > and it is more difficult to get them to work on lessons. If > the MAP was later, that learning window might be extended > another month. > > 4/22/09, Gena wrote: >> I am the Assessment Coordinator for our District. We >> usually spread the MAP testing in grades 3rd-6th out over >> two weeks taking one or maybe two sessions a day. I teach >> kindergarten so I do not give the MAP test, but I make the >> schedule. The state recommends that you only give 1 session >> a day. My teachers feel the kids would do better to NOT >> stretch it out over 2 weeks. They would rather give a >> session in the AM and one in the PM in one week. I am >> wondering what other districts are going and if you have >> seen any trends in results?? Thanks!!
ITA with moving the MAP window later. Schools that get out earlier would be able to start earlier w/in the window. With all the emphasis and oxygen given to the MAP, it is hard to keep the kids going for an additional three weeks or month.
On 2/22/09, anony1 wrote: > is a bad bill proposal. I hope people look into this dumb > thing and tell the lawmakers to vote NO.