I just heard this morning that Standard 6 is being removed from our Evaluation Instrument. This is a positive thing since Standard 6 doesn't actually measure our personal performance as teachers.
AHmmm ... I can believe that. My information came straight from my principal, and I don't think he'd just go around saying things that aren't true; however, if this thing has essentially been hidden elsewhere, he could have been fooled.
Believe whatever you like. This has been discussed for months. O...See MoreOn 4/27/16, A wrote: > Hmmm ... I can believe that. My information came straight from > my principal, and I don't think he'd just go around saying > things that aren't true; however, if this thing has essentially > been hidden elsewhere, he could have been fooled.
Believe whatever you like. This has been discussed for months. Our NCAE rep is up on it. It's a ruse.
On 4/18/16, High School Teacher wrote: > I had tenure in my other district and then moved to a new > district. However, I moved in the summer of 2014. The NC > Public School Benefits and Employment manual states that > an > employee loses their career status "if a career status > employee leaves the LEA in which he/she had career status > prior to July 1st, 2013" Therefore, if the employee > leaves > after this date are they exempt?
Second, as someone else said, yes, this is just a poke to remind us that if we move from one job to another, we lose Career Status. It's always been true that Career Status is granted by the LEA, and if you move from county to county, you lose it. The facts:
- Those of us who earned Career Status in the past can continue to "own it" only as long as we remain in our current LEAs. If we move to another LEA, we lose it.
- The state tried to take it away from those of us who earned it, but they couldn't. Personal opinion: I don't think they'll be able to do it. They tried hard -- very hard -- and failed.
- The legislature is soooo anti-Career Status, and they've been able to block younger teachers from being granted this benefit. This IS perfectly legal, and I suspect it's the wave of the future (just as older teachers don't have to pay state taxes on retirement, whereas people my age will).
- What no one seems to know: If you leave an LEA where you had Career Status, then return to it later, do you still have it?
As for what's commonly termed &...See MoreWell, first, no one in K-12 education actually has tenure. What we have is "Career Status", which means we don't have to sign a new contract each year and cannot be fired without due process /evidence that we've actually done something wrong. Actual tenure is something college professors can have.
As for what's commonly termed "tenure" among public school teachers, these are the facts:
- If you've earned it, essentially this job protection is yours as long as you remain employed in your district. - If you move to another district, you give it up voluntarily and don't automatically get it back if you return later. This is a very good reason to stay with your current district. - If you take a leave of absence, I think you lose it -- I'm not 100&37; sure on that one. - Renewing your license had no effect on your tenure. Tenure is not re-granted every 5 years.
As for the state taking away tenure by 2018, they are rabid to make this happen, but -- yes -- their idea of taking away a benefit that's already been granted was ruled unconstitutional. Doesn't stop them from talking about it, but they can't actually do it; the bottom line is, don't let them convince you they can do it.
They were trying to "buy tenure" from teachers with that $500 deal a year or two ago, but that fell flat too. That was a big dishonest mess, and they ended up looking like a bunch of smacked asses over it.
I personally think it's unlikely that younger teachers will have "tenure", which is a really bad thing for them. Essentially it means that they'll all be on year-to-year contracts without any real job security.
I had tenure in my other district and then moved to a new district. However, I moved in the summer of 2014. The NC Public School Benefits and Employment manual states that an employee loses their career status "if a career status employee leaves the LEA in which he/she had career status prior to July 1st, 2013" Therefore, if the employee leaves after this date are they exempt?
How are we the 8th most populous state and the narrative only calls for getting us paid to the national average? If we're becoming such a great state to live in then why should we only be average?
Why are we not easily paid in the top 15? Why should we be average?
union yesUnintended consequences. Government overreach without reasoning. Single women were mostly teachers-who cares about them, they were just waiting for husbands anyway.
I do think that's a part of how we ended up in this situation. I had a great-great-great aunt who lived with us when I was a kid -- she was very, very old (born in 1895) and was a retired teacher. She was a typical teacher from the days when our pay scale and pension were first standardized by the state:
She was born into a good family, an educated family, and she earned a 2-year degree at Lenoir-Rhy. She didn't marry 'til she was almost 40 (okay, that was unusual). She was exactly the person society in those days wanted as a teacher: Well educated, highly motivated, and not married. She wasn't paid much (But why would a little lady need money? She lived with her father, who provided her with housing.) However, she did need to be provided with a retirement income; after all, she couldn't be expected to be smart enough to save for herself; thus, the pension.
I started school in 1970, and at that point the stereotype of elementary teachers was true: Nice ladies who taught school a couple years 'til they married -- maybe a year or two more until they became pregnant -- and then quit. For good. I specifically remember my mother loving my 1st grade teacher and being so disappointed that she left to have a baby; thus, she never taught any of my four younger siblings.
The other thing that affects our pay -- and perhaps this is the biggest item -- is that society doesn't value working with children (from preschool to high school, it's true). And society traditionally doesn't value "women's work", though I really think that's changed.
Yes, it's easy to see how all these things add up to today's situation.
It is amazing that North Carolina's Governor can pay overtime to the Highway Patrol to catch speeders going 1 mile over the limit but cannot afford to pay our teachers a wage that keeps them out of the bottom 4&37; for our country's educators.
Amazing yes, surprising no. NC Highway Pat...See MoreOn 3/29/16, Bill M wrote: > It is amazing that North Carolina's Governor can pay > overtime to the Highway Patrol to catch speeders going 1 > mile over the limit but cannot afford to pay our teachers > a wage that keeps them out of the bottom 4&37; for our > country's educators.
Amazing yes, surprising no. NC Highway Patrol are very reliable Republican voters, they wear uniforms, and carry guns...of course there is money for the cops' overtime.
When officers write more tickets, the state collects more money; not only can they pay the overtime, they make money. When they pay teachers, the state spends more money.
If you're looking at this superficially from a money-only point of view, and if you're not concerned about keeping teachers happy /retaining them, then it makes sense.
"Courtesy of Ed NC’s Alex Granados, N.C. Rep. Paul Stam, a Republican from Wake County who served as one of the primary sponsors on yesterday’s highly controversial anti- LGBT bill, is expected to file legislation soon that includes a sweeping set of changes for teacher and administrator pay and certification.
The bill has not been filed yet, but Stam passed out a copy of its key points to members of the legislature’s Selection Committee on Education Strategy and Practices Wednesday morning.
Based on Stam’s presentation, the bill would declare individual teacher pay to no longer be public record. With lawmakers expected to consider differentiated pay scales, Stam says it would curb jealousy among school teachers.
While the proposal does not mention public records exclusions on administrator pay, Stam indicated the legislation would limit administration severance packages to one year’s salary and bonus in order to place restrictions on ballooning administrator deals across the state.
The proposal would also open up teaching without a license to individuals with a master’s or doctorate degree in a certain content area.
Additionally, Stam’s bill speeds teacher certification for the spouses of active duty military personnel and axes the “break in service” designation that educators say can lead to lower salaries for teachers who move into administration. More on this legislation as it develops."
- How is this connected to the "highly controversial anti-LGBT bill"?
- Do we really care whether salaries are public knowledge? I don't.
- Is jealousy among teachers a big issue? I don't think so. For example, when the legislature attempted that ill-fated "sell your tenure for $500" project a few years ago, I didn't see anyone at my school jumping to get it, much less begrudging the money to anyone else. Recently the younger teachers have received big raises. I haven't heard a single older teacher speak against this -- oh, we all want a share of the pie ourselves, but no one's upset with or jealous of the younger teachers.
This jealousy thing sounds like the legislature is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Another example of them failing to listen to us.
On 3/24/16, from public records wrote: > The GA is not done with teacher's and maybe admin salaries > yet. > > > "Courtesy of Ed NC’s Alex Granados, N.C. Rep. Paul Stam, a > Republican from Wake County who served as one of the > primary sponsors on yesterday’s highly controversial anti- > LGBT bill, is expected to file legislation soon that > includes a sweeping set of changes for teacher and > administrator pay and certification. > > The bill has not been filed yet, but Stam passed out a copy > of its key points to members of the legislature’s Selection > Committee on Education Strategy and Practices Wednesday > morning. > > Based on Stam’s presentation, the bill would declare > individual teacher pay to no longer be public record. With > lawmakers expected to consider differentiated pay scales, > Stam says it would curb jealousy among school teachers. > > While the proposal does not mention public records > exclusions on administrator pay, Stam indicated the > legislation would limit administration severance packages > to one year’s salary and bonus in order to place > restrictions on ballooning administrator deals across the > state. > > The proposal would also open up teaching without a license > to individuals with a master’s or doctorate degree in a > certain content area. > > Additionally, Stam’s bill speeds teacher certification for > the spouses of active duty military personnel and axes > the “break in service” designation that educators say can > lead to lower salaries for teachers who move into > administration. More on this legislation as it develops."
I have 30 years in as of this year. For those of you who are retiring this year, how did you make the decision? I am burned out but I am scared to make this huge decision.
On 3/15/16, A wrote: > Detroit workers had their pension system guaranteed by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <i>specific</i> > language in the Michigan state constitution. It did not > help. When there is no money, there is no money. > > > I don't disagree with you, but Detroit had some rather > specific circumstances that led to their problems. They > were paying unionized > factory workers with modest skills very, very large > salaries -- and > then generous pensions (I'm not anti-union, but those > unions were short-sighted in their actions). Their union > participated in pushing > them towards an unsustainable position. California's > doing something > similar in some areas with its overly-liberal salaries > and pensions. > > NC is in a stronger financial situation than those areas. > > Does that make me feel completely secure about my > pension? No, but I > also don't really think we're going belly-up like Detroit > either. >
Get OutOn 2/20/16, Melinda wrote: > I have 30 years in as of this year. For those of you who > are retiring this year, how did you make the decision? I > am burned out but I am scared to make this huge decision.
Do not give this state one more year of your life. Get Out now!!!!!!! If I had 20 in I would get out. The hell with NC
On 3/10/16, TJ wrote: > Hello NC teachers. I'm new to NC, wake county. I was fulfilling > a PD requirement from NYS to become certified in Art ED, before > we had to relocate for my husbands job. I've been searching for > PD options for teachers that are not employed in the school > system. > I've looked at the museums and universities, but I'm wondering > if there are any teaching resource centers, workshops, even on- > line options. > The information doesn't have to be directly related to art. > Thanks in advance : ) >
Greetings - After using the benefit estimator on the NC Orbit system I was wondering if anyone has any insight on how close the estimate is to actual payout. I am checking many scenarios to see if I could slide on out a little early without giving up too much money. Whew! Thanks! LF
On 3/05/16, Lisa wrote: > Greetings - > After using the benefit estimator on the NC Orbit system > I was wondering if anyone has any insight on how close > the estimate is to actual payout. I am checking many > scenarios to see if I could slide on out a little early > without giving up too much money. Whew! Thanks! LF