Please review...See MoreThere has been such a push for charter schools, yet when one looks at the facts…charter schools are performing WORSE than any other group of schools. These articles are from the NY TIMES and use research data and facts. If we are going to improve our schools…WE should be using FACTS to make decisions…NOT catch phrases.
Only about 20% of charter schools do better than regular public schools. About 40% do the same job and 40% are worse.
The American system keeps children in school until they are 18 and all students are tested. In other countries many students aren't in a high school unless their studies are geared towards academics. Others go to trade or technical schools or work. When the students are tested only the top academic students are tested. It's not an accurate comparison.
These statistics mean absolutely nothing. What regular public schools are they compared too? Are budgets taken into account? Charter schools are often expected to do more with less. For example, the distict gets 20%, the charter gets 80% for a student that goes there in the district the charter school lies around me. > > The American system keeps children in school until they are 18 and > all students are tested. In other countries many students aren't in > a high school unless their studies are geared towards academics. > Others go to trade or technical schools or work. When the students > are tested only the top academic students are tested. It's not an > accurate comparison.
So then you are saying that the organization that ranks education systems in the world is less accurate then you? So then, where do YOU put our education system?
I'm trying to gather feedback regarding educators attitudes towards merit pay or (PFP) pay for performance. It is a SHORT survey. If you could, please take a few minutes to participate and please forward the link to any other educators that you think might be intersted in participating. This is for a graduate class project. Thanks!
> My dentist is great! He sends me reminders so I don't forget checkups.
> He uses the latest techniques based on research. He never hurts me, and > I've got all my teeth.
> When I ran into him the other day, I was eager to see if he'd heard > about the new state program. I knew he'd think it was great.
> "Did you hear about the new state program to measure effectiveness of > dentists with their young patients?" I said.
> "No," he said. He didn't seem too thrilled. "How will they do that?"
> "It's quite simple," I said. "They will just count the number of > cavities each patient has at age 10, 14, and 18 and average that to > determine a dentist's rating. Dentists will be rated as excellent, good, > average, below average, and unsatisfactory. That way parents will know which > are the best dentists. The plan will also encourage the less effective > dentists to get better," I said. "Poor dentists who don't improve could > lose their licenses to practice."
> "That's terrible," he said.
> "What? That's not a good attitude," I said. "Don't you think we should > try to improve children's dental health in this state?"
> "Sure I do," he said, "but that's not a fair way to determine who is > practicing good dentistry."
> "Why not?" I said. "It makes perfect sense to me."
> "Well, it's so obvious," he said. "Don't you see that dentists don't > all work with the same clientele, and that much depends on things > we can't control? For example, I work in a rural area with a high > percentage of patients from deprived homes, while some of my colleagues > work in upper middle-class neighborhoods. Many of the parents I work > with don't bring their children to see me until there is some > kind of problem, and I don't get to do much preventive work. Also, > many of the parents I serve let their kids eat way too much candy > from an early age, unlike more educated parents who understand the > relationship between sugar and decay. To top it all off, so many > of my clients have well water which is untreated and has no fluoride in > it. Do you have any idea how much difference early use of fluoride can > make?"
> "It sounds like you're making excuses," I said. "I can't believe that > you, my dentist, would be so defensive. After all, you do a great job, > and you needn't fear a little accountability."
> "I am not being defensive!" he said. "My best patients are as good as > anyone's, my work is as good as anyone's, but my average cavity count is > going to be higher than a lot of other dentists because I chose to > work where I am needed most."
> "Don't' get touchy," I said.
> "Touchy?" he said. His face had turned red, and from the way he was > clenching and unclenching his jaws, I was afraid he was going to damage > his teeth. > "Try furious! In a system like this, I will end up being rated > average, below average, or worse. The few educated patients I have who > see these ratings may believe this so-called rating is an actual measure of my ability > and proficiency as a dentist. They may leave me, and I'll be left with only the most > needy patients. And my cavity average score will get even worse. On > top of that, how will I attract good dental hygienists and other > excellent dentists to my practice if it is labeled below average?"
> "I think you are overreacting," I said. "'Complaining, excuse- making > and stonewalling won't improve dental health'... I am quoting from a > leading member of the DOC," I noted.
> "What's the DOC?" he asked.
> "It's the Dental Oversight Committee," I said, "a group made up of > mostly lay persons to make sure dentistry in this state gets improved."
> "Spare me," he said, "I can't believe this. Reasonable people won't > buy it," he said hopefully.
> The program sounded reasonable to me, so I asked, "How else would yo > measure good dentistry?"
> "Come watch me work," he said. "Observe my processes."
> "That's too complicated, expensive and time- consuming," I said. > "Cavities are the bottom line, and you can't argue with the bottom line. > It's an absolute measure."
> "That's what I'm afraid my parents and prospective patients will
> think. This can't be happening," he said despairingly.
> "Now, now," I said, "don't despair. The state will help you some."
> "How?" he asked.
> " If you receive a poor rating, they'll send a dentist who is rated > excellent to help straighten you out," I said brightly.
> "You mean," he said, "they'll send a dentist with a wealthy clientele > to show me how to work on severe juvenile dental problems > with which I have probably had much more experience? BIG HELP!"
> "There you go again," I said. "You aren't acting professionally at all."
> "You don't get it," he said. "Doing this would be like grading schools > and teachers on an average score made on a test of children's > progress with no regard to influences outside the school, the home, > the community served and stuff like that. Why would they do something > so unfair to dentists? No one would ever think of doing that to > schools."
> I just shook my head sadly, but he had brightened. "I'm going to write > my representatives and senators," he said. "I'll use the school analogy. > Surely they will see the point."
> He walked off with that look of hope mixed with fear and suppressed > anger that I, a teacher, see in the mirror so often lately.
> *If you don't understand why educators resent the recent federal > NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT and much of the current rhetoric from > Trenton and DC, this may help. If you do understand, you'll enjoy this > analogy, which was forwarded by John S. Taylor, Superintendent > of Schools for Lancaster County, PA. [and slightly modified to better > reflect NJ].
A fellow teacher told me it is NJ law that cell phone use is banned in schools for students. This sounds like BS to me, anyone know any facts about this?
ban_cell_phones_in_schoolEast Brunswick, a highly regarded district of 9000 students, has banned the use cellphones. Staff cannot use cell phones in public areas. It is great and everybody seems happy. If parents have an emergency, they can call the office.
On 12/04/10, ban_cell_phones_in_school wrote: > East Brunswick, a highly regarded district of 9000 students, > has banned the use cellphones. Staff cannot use cell phones in > public areas. > It is great and everybody seems happy. If parents have an > emergency, they can call the office. > > It is wonderful; teachers can teach. > > Every serious district should do the same. >
Your local high school is the best source of information on the application process. They'll stear you in the right direction, they deal with the certification process all the time.
On 11/15/10, David wrote: > I could really use some help with this, cause I'm getting > nervous. I'm trying to get a Certificate of Eligibility so > I can teach alternate route. I took the Praxis and had my > test scores forwarded to the DOE (I passed). Now, before I > go ahead and take the 24-hour class, I need to know, will > they accept my transcripts from only the school I graduated > from or do they need all transcripts? I called DOE's > hotline and someone told me I only needed to send one, but > I don't trust them. Hehe. My GPA from the college I > graduated (Montclair) is a 3.175, but from another school > (Ramapo) it's very low (1.something). Its also very > annoying to get Ramapo to send out their transcripts, they > require you to have them send them directly to whoever > needs them (as opposed to giving them to me). Anyway, what > I don't like is that I only know to call the same > information hotline at the DOE for questions. Does anyone > know where I can get this information and also whether I > should be sending application materials directly to the DOE > without talking to someone first? Thank you so much.
On 11/15/10, David wrote: > I could really use some help with this, cause I'm getting > nervous. I'm trying to get a Certificate of Eligibility so > I can teach alternate route. I took the Praxis and had my > test scores forwarded to the DOE (I passed). Now, before I > go ahead and take the 24-hour class, I need to know, will > they accept my transcripts from only the school I graduated > from or do they need all transcripts? I called DOE's > hotline and someone told me I only needed to send one, but > I don't trust them. Hehe. My GPA from the college I > graduated (Montclair) is a 3.175, but from another school > (Ramapo) it's very low (1.something). Its also very > annoying to get Ramapo to send out their transcripts, they > require you to have them send them directly to whoever > needs them (as opposed to giving them to me). Anyway, what > I don't like is that I only know to call the same > information hotline at the DOE for questions. Does anyone > know where I can get this information and also whether I > should be sending application materials directly to the DOE > without talking to someone first? Thank you so much.
Applications are being received in the Personnel Office from any of our personnel desiring to be considered for the position(s) listed below:
Language Arts Teacher – Colonia Middle School
All letters of application, or applicable application form, must be in the Personnel Office, School Street, Woodbridge, New Jersey, 07095, no later than December 1, 2010.
November 22, 2010
TO: All Certified Personnel
RE: Certified Vacancies
Applications are being received in the Personnel Office from any of our personnel desiring to be considered for the position(s) listed below:
All letters of application, or applicable application form, must be in the Personnel Office, School Street, Woodbridge, New Jersey, 07095, no later than December 1, 2010.
Any help is appreciated. H...See MoreHave you or someone you know taken advantage of this act? I had my first baby before this was in effect, and I'm trying to get some info seeing as though we are hoping to get pregnant soon. I've googled this and read "fact sheets" but hoping to get some advice from someone who has gone through the paperwork, etc.
I heard that you can't sub in the same classroom for 20 consecutive days. It that true? If so why is that? What would happen if you did sub for more than the 20 consecutive days?
I believe they would have to give you teacher pay retroactive to the first day you subbed in the classroom. So instead of getting $90/day to sub you would be bumped up to $225/day (That is an estimate, of course).
On 11/28/10, Steve wrote: > On 11/27/10, gayle wrote: >> I heard that you can't sub in the same classroom for 20 >> consecutive days. It that true? If so why is that? What >> would happen if you did sub for more than the 20 >> consecutive days? > > I believe they would have to give you teacher pay retroactive > to the first day you subbed in the classroom. So instead of > getting $90/day to sub you would be bumped up to $225/day (That > is an estimate, of course).
I will be out of money in January after collecting since end of June. Are they extending? There are very few jobs out there, lots of competition. And not many jobs outside of teaching, either.
Does anyone know how long benefits last? I heard some people were on it for 99 weeks. This is only my first round.
On 12/14/10, OP wrote: > On 12/10/10, Echo wrote: >> I'm in the exact same situation. >> I think we can collect for a year. > > I hope so. I want to work, but there are no jobs out there. Hope > it gets better soon.