Has anyone in S.C. that first applied for NB in the 2008- 2009 year, didn't get certified in 2009-2010, but just certified this past Nov. of the 2010-2011 school year heard word if we get grandfathered in and get the $7500. plus the back pay now(like done in past) or do we have to wait until July 2011 to start getting the stipend w/o backpay? If we...See MoreHas anyone in S.C. that first applied for NB in the 2008- 2009 year, didn't get certified in 2009-2010, but just certified this past Nov. of the 2010-2011 school year heard word if we get grandfathered in and get the $7500. plus the back pay now(like done in past) or do we have to wait until July 2011 to start getting the stipend w/o backpay? If we have to wait till July 2011 then that means when our cert. is up in 2020 that they will only have paid us for nine years. It is suppose to paid for the life of the cerificate. So does that mean if I'm ready to give teaching up and go into admin.at the end of my cert. that I have to teach an extra year to finish getting my money, that is if they don't wipe it out before then. I keep getting conflicting reports. You know I'm very grateful that I passed this second year and I don't have the $2500. hanging over me and my families head which could've been any of us but after all my hard work and dedication that was put into this I was hoping and praying for a reward at the end for my myself and family. That's like telling a child they don't get a trophy until next season. I'm glad I did this and I do love teaching and the kids (it is my calling-not for the money!Ha) BUT I did this yes to better myself as a teacher and tool and for my family income. Would I do it all again w/o the incentive? NO WAY!!!!
My district said we get the pay starting with Feb. and get back pay included in all checks for the rest of the school year. BUT the pay will be adjusted from the $7500. to a lower amount to include the furlough days. Has anyone else heard about this? My question also is if we are owed the backpay for 6 months then does the district get all the money at once and hold onto it or is it sent monthly to them. If the districts have it then why don't we get the backpay all at once? Yes, I also get the same feeling about asking questions about the stipend but we shouldn't feel that way because back in 2007 when I started this long road they advertised the extra pay increase to encourage us to do it.
On 1/24/11, TB wrote: &g...See MoreCan't tell you about Berkley, but Richland 1 just told teachers that those who started in 2009-2010 and certified in 2010 ARE NOT going to get backpay for the district stipend - the first payments would start July 2011.
And that was after ignoring questions from teachers since November on that very topic.
On 1/24/11, TB wrote: > On 1/23/11, Susan wrote: >> Certified this year (started 2007). Heard we will get >> backpay and stipend is supposed to begin in January. I >> emailed Jenna with CERRA - she said that the money would be >> sent to districts before the end of the month (January). I >> have emailed/called our NBC liaison SEVERAL TIMES WITH NO >> RESPONSE... I get the feeling that it is considered bad form >> to be asking about the stipend...why is that? > > > > > My district said we get the pay starting with Feb. and get > back pay included in all checks for the rest of the school > year. BUT the pay will be adjusted from the $7500. to a > lower amount to include the furlough days. Has anyone else > heard about this? My question also is if we are owed the > backpay for 6 months then does the district get all the money > at once and hold onto it or is it sent monthly to them. If > the districts have it then why don't we get the backpay all > at once? Yes, I also get the same feeling about asking > questions about the stipend but we shouldn't feel that way > because back in 2007 when I started this long road they > advertised the extra pay increase to encourage us to do it.
A bill designed to simplify South Carolina's decades-old funding formulas for public education and stop automatic pay raises for teachers advanced Tuesday in the Legislature.
A House Ways and Means panel unanimously approved the bill to update the state's 1977 Education Finance Act, still the state's basis for student funding.
After years of talking about an overhaul, without making any headway, legislators seem ready to seriously tackle it this year. The state's $830 million budget shortfall is prompting more lawmakers to listen, said House Ways and Means Chairman Dan Cooper, R-Piedmont.
"It's so complicated," said Cooper, the bill's sponsor. "It's been tacked onto for 33 years."
The bill, drafted after months of meetings, would add more money for students who are poor or are learning English, but reduce money for others. Districts could see small changes in their distributions, based on their student populations, "but there will not be a huge windfall or shortfall," Cooper said.
While a state budget office estimate issued Monday said the bill could cost the state's general revenue account between $70 million and $145 million, Cooper says the measure has no net cost, but rather shifts funds from a different pot of money for education. Under a 1984 law, 1 percent of state tax collections goes to a separate education account, to be spent on specific programs approved by the Legislature.
The shift gives districts more flexibility to spend money as they see fit for their particular needs, Cooper said.
The bill would also would direct the education agency to develop a pay-for-performance plan for teachers by Dec. 1, as it gets rid of automatic increases in pay for each year a teacher's in the classroom. The state salary schedule increases yearly for up to 22 years of service.
But the Legislature has frozen the increases for two years amid Great Recession budget shortfalls. Some districts, however, have opted to continue to fund pay raises entirely from local property taxes. With an even-greater-the-usual mishmash of pay across the state, legislators consider it an opportune time to revamp teacher salaries.
Teachers would continue to see pay raises based on their education level, such as a bachelor's versus a master's degree, but Cooper said it's not fair to automatically reward all teachers simply for another year in the classroom.
"They're getting rewards whether they're a good teacher or not," said Cooper, whose wife is a teacher.
A spokesman for state schools chief Mick Zais called the legislation a good step forward and likes the idea of streamlining nearly a dozen funding categories. Zais, who advocated pay-for-performance while campaigning last year, also looks forward to tackling that issue, said his spokesman J.W. Ragley.
But the Republican superintendent is studying the idea of funding all grade levels the same. Currently, students are weighted differently according to their grade level, but the proposal would give the same base amount for each student, while adding money for other categories such as gifted and talented.
"There's no longer a difference between a first grader and an 11th grader. Does that match reality?" Ragley asked.
The full Ways and Means Committee will consider the bill next.
Zais also point...See More"The state's first Republican schools superintendent in 12 years wants to move teacher and principal salaries into a mandatory pay- for-performance system. A proposal moving through the House, and backed by GOP legislative leaders, could direct Zais to develop such a plan by Dec. 1, for implementation beginning in 2012-13."
Zais also points out that experience only matters during the first four years. And, postgraduate degrees don't seem to boost student achievement. So, advanced degrees would not guarantee a larger salary. Also, he doesn't think NB certification increases student learning. Yet, he isn't willing to take a stance on closing the program, which will cost SC 68 million dollars in the next fiscal year.
The best teachers should make more than their principals, he said.
This, I agree with!!
Oh, may I add, Nikki Haley advocates pay for performance.
SC teachers, SPEAK UP and BE HEARD!!
On 2/06/11, sc teach wrote: > Good points. My admin already does this. If they don't like a > teacher, they put the teacher back on SAFE T, and give them low > evaluations, and there is nothing they can do about it. Plus > what about schools where the parents actually enforce behavior > and academics at home. I work in Richland county 2 at a title 1 > school, and the majority of my students don't do homework or > study. And the only thing the parents care about is them coming > to school for breakfast and lunch. But, now I guess my pay will > be tied to their performance (or lack of). >> >> yes, what bums me out is with performance pay -- what if your >> admin for whatever reason does not like you? Not your FB >> friend, bar buddy, etc. Then what do you do when you get a >> low evaluation that is unwarranted? What about admins who >> pick and choose where their son/daughter will be (in certain >> classes) then fix schedules so the child has some "friends" >> in classes with them? What then? So, I am concerned about >> merit pay/raises based on performance... >>> >>>
NIAGARA UNIVERSITY, N.Y. (Feb, 2011) – Niagara University is now accepting applications from K-12 teachers nationwide for a summer program entitled Crossroads of Empire: Cultural Contact and Imperial Rivalry at Old Fort Niagara. The week-long residential sessions, which take place July 11-15 and July 18-22, 2011 at Old Fort Niagara and Niagara University, have been made possible by funding obtained from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH).
Directed by Thomas A. Chambers, Ph.D., chair of Niagara University’s history department, the workshops are focused on the vital history that emanated from Old Fort Niagara, one of most significant and well-preserved 18th century historic sites in North America. Fort Niagara served as an important crossroads between the empires of Great Britain, France, the Haudenosaunee (the native people who inhabited what is now much of New York state and surrounding areas), and, later, the United States as they battled each other for control of the North American continent. The Fort threatened American territory during the Revolution, was occupied by both sides during the War of 1812, and then a peace treaty secured the Fort and region for the United States.
This workshop will immerse NEH Summer Scholars in the world of 18th century life, from both the Native American and European perspective. Participants will interact with historic interpreters, clamber about ramparts dating to the 1700s, handle beaver pelts and trade goods like fishhooks and beads, and perhaps even fire a musket. One unique feature will be an overnight stay at the French Castle, the three-story stone fortress and trading post perched above the crashing waves of Lake Ontario that dates back to 1726. By week’s end NEH Summer Scholars will understand the perspective of the Iroquois people who first inhabited this region, as well as the struggles of ordinary European soldiers who bled and died to control Fort Niagara.
Teachers of grades K-12 at schools in the United States or its territorial possessions, or Americans teaching in foreign schools where at least 50 percent of the students are American nationals, are eligible for this program.
Teachers selected to participate as NEH Summer Scholars will receive a stipend of $1,200 at the end of the residential workshop session. Stipends are intended to help cover travel expenses to and from the project location, books, and ordinary living expenses.
The deadline for applications is March 1, 2011.
For eligibility and application information, please call 716.286.8091, e-mail [email removed].
Niagara University is located 11 miles south of Old Fort Niagara.
Niagara University Founded by the Vincentian Community in 1856, Niagara University is a private liberal arts university with a strong, values-based Catholic tradition. Its four academic divisions include the colleges of Arts and Sciences, Business Administration, Education, and Hospitality and Tourism Management. The university also maintains an Academic Exploration Program that provides a learning community for students who are undecided about their major, as well as numerous opportunities through Continuing Education. -30-
What do y'all think about this? I worry b/c there is much good ol' girl/boy favoritism that goes on in my area: admin pick and choose particular students in favored teachers' classes. Any other thoughts?
Can anyone point me in the direction of a system that is truly fair, though? One that really works for students and teachers. I am not aware of a merit pay program that truly works, but that obviously does not mean that no such program exists. I am familiar with TAP, but the way, and I support it in theory, but I am still skeptical about implementation.
Is there real evidence that students learn better and/or more when teachers receive merit pay? If so, how is that actually demonstrated? Again, I have my reservations, but am 100% open to the idea that it might work for kids.
This article is interesting -- [link removed]
But I tend to come down on Alfie Kohn's side in this debate. -- [link removed]")
Thank you to the original poster for asking an interesting question.
Regards, Art Lader Aiken, S.C.
On 2/18/11, I Know MY opinion, but... wrote: > What do y'all think about this? I worry b/c there is much > good ol' girl/boy favoritism that goes on in my area: admin > pick and choose particular students in favored teachers' > classes. Any other thoughts?
On 3/17/11, Art Lader wrote: > Good question. I think it's an interesting idea and I am open > to it. > > Can anyone point me in the direction of a system that is truly > fair, though? One that really works for students and teachers. > I am not aware of a merit pay program that truly works, but > that obviously does not mean that no such program exists. I am > familiar with TAP, but the way, and I support it in theory, but > I am still skeptical about implementation. > > Is there real evidence that students learn better and/or more > when teachers receive merit pay? If so, how is that actually > demonstrated? Again, I have my reservations, but am 100% open > to the idea that it might work for kids. > > This article is interesting -- > [link removed]?
We invite you to join us for our one-week workshops in June 2011. As NEH Summer Scholars at the “American History through the Eyes of a California Family” workshop, you will use the artifacts and archival sources of both the Dominguez Rancho Adobe Museum and CSU Dominguez Hills Special Collections to trace the Dominguez family history for over two centuries. Their history and lands are entwined with California 's rich Indian, Spanish, Mexican and American history.
NEH workshops feature well known scholars, hands-on work with artifacts and archival documents, workshops and experiential learning opportunities that will bring history to life, and field trips to deepen historical and cultural connections. Workshops address the Dominguez family business and inheritance strategies and their relationship to natives and migrants from varied social and cultural backgrounds. Successful applicants whose title will become NEH Summer Scholars will also analyze how territorial industrial expansion transformed the American people and how massive immigration after 1870, including the Chinese, some of whom became laborers on Dominguez lands, formed new social patterns and concepts about national identity.
$1200 stipends are offered to help cover travel, lodging, and meal expenses.
Workshops will be offered twice and applicants may apply to one, but not both, workshops. The first is the week of June 13-17, 2011 and the second is the week of June 20-24, 2011. Continuing Education Units offered. Applications due March 1st.