I am desperate for guidance on what type and the length of student samples to submit for Component 2 Literaxy Reading Language Arts. I have met with a mentor (who honestly does not know and just refers me back to website and tells me to call 1-800 number). I have been working g on an instructional unit on theme with upper grades. I have work sample...See MoreI am desperate for guidance on what type and the length of student samples to submit for Component 2 Literaxy Reading Language Arts. I have met with a mentor (who honestly does not know and just refers me back to website and tells me to call 1-800 number). I have been working g on an instructional unit on theme with upper grades. I have work samples showing the growth of the required one student in a constructed response question from literature we have read. I want to use these samples to document the child's growth in responding to a constructed response question on theme. The first response is only a couple of sentences and the second one showing the growth is a full paragraph. I can not get any clarity on whether or not this is correct. On page 5 of Component 2 Option B it says- select samples that reflect the student's ability to do different kinds of writing ( story summary, poem, story retell, original writing, report, poem, etc...) I am confused as to how am I supposed to show growth of a student if they are required to do different types of writing. If I could get some explicit guidance on what will be acceptable for the the beginning and ending work sample, it would be appreciated. Thank you
I am extremely nervous about the students writing pieces. I've read about what I need to do but it is not registering. Maybe it's because I'm nervous. Can you recommend anything to help me?
Your kids need to write a narrative piece and an expository piece. If you aren't clear on the difference between the two, then do some research. For both genres, the kids will write something - a first draft if you will. You will analyze their writing and then decide what skills you need to teach to help them do better on their next piece. You will teach the skills using whatever methods you have found effective: mini lessons, peer editing, small group work etc. Then the kids write again (same genre, often the same topic, but not always) and you again analyze to see if they improved on the skills you taught. They might OR might not. Whatever the outcome, you plan what is next: move on to another skill or reteach etc. You choose 2 students's work to feature. they can be the same 2 kids for each genre or different kids. You do that for both genres.
Essentially, the assessors are looking to see if you follow the steps on Architecture of Accomplished Teaching - the NB version of an accomplished lesson/unit plan. This can be found in the GENERAL portfolio directions. It's a red, helix graphic. Here is user friendly acronym to use: SSTARS
S = Students S = Set Goals T = Teach A = Assess R = Reflect S = Start Over
The prompts in the Written Commentary follow some (not all) of those steps, so your responses are the evidence.
If the kids don't make the progress you hoped for, don't panic. The assessors want to see what YOU DO to address that issue...that's the most important thing to explain in your writing.
I hope this helps you get started.
On 11/12/16, Julie wrote: > I am extremely nervous about the students writing pieces. > I've read about what I need to do but it is not registering. > Maybe it's because I'm nervous. Can you recommend > anything to help me?
On 11/10/16, Biophysteach wrote: > Finally...woohoo! > > Excited to get going on this last part...seems like they > released the "new" component 2 so long ago. > > Good luck to everyone trying to finish up under the new format > this year. > > On 11/10/16, NC SC wrote: >> Component 4 is POSTED! >> >> [link removed]
SWAnyone wanting to share what they are using for their unit objectives? My initial thoughts are very broad. Increase reading achievement as measured by reading text levels... (certification area-Early and Middle Childhood/Literacy)
I was wondering if there are any support groups available for Library Media National Board Certification? I saw the EC-Gen, but I am curious if there is anything in my certificate area.
I'm currently working on my Library Media Specialist (completed 1 and 3 in spring and working on 2 and 4 now) and have struggled to find any support groups. I would love to have someone else to bounce ideas off of. Email me, Hilary, at [email removed]
The rubric on Level 4 says that the teacher "helps students effectively apply feedback from assessments in ways that positively impact the students' learning...use assessment as a tool to take responsibility for their own learning."
I am trying to decide when and how to give students the self-assessment. 1. Should they complete the self-reflection-before or after they receive feedback on the formative assessment? It sounds like the description in the Level 4 rubric requires that students respond to some type of feedback in the self-assessment. In that case, they should do the self-assessment AFTER they have feedback. Is this correct? 2. Is it okay for students to consider feedback about their formative assessment from peers instead of me and then complete a self-assessment?
Here are the steps I am considering for peer feedback and then self-assessment- Students will... 1. receive feedback from peers first in the form of a checklist and suggestions 2. complete a self-assessment based on their peers' feedback as they re-examine their formative assessment 3. have the opportunity to make changes to their formative assessment 4. receive feedback from me in the form of a graded rubric I will... 1. plan and teach according to what the formative results show me are problems. 2. give students the summative assessment. It seems to me like these steps listed above allow students to best "evaluate their learning as well as identify ways to improve performance and understanding" that is mentioned on page 5 under the student self- assessment section.
One last question. Am I way off? Is this description in Level 4 referring to students applying feedback only from the formative to the summative rather than within the formative?
I know I tend to over complicate things, but it seems that my students have a deeper self-reflection after they peer edit.
On 11/11/16, aprice wrote: > I would love some help deciphering the Student Self- > Assessment required for the Formative Assessment. > > The rubric on Level 4 says that the teacher "helps > students effectively apply feedback from assessments in > ways that positively impact the students' learning...use > assessment as a tool to take responsibility for their own > learning." > > I am trying to decide when and how to give students the > self-assessment. > 1. Should they complete the self-reflection-before or > after they receive feedback on the formative assessment? > It sounds like the description in the Level 4 rubric > requires that students respond to some type of feedback > in the self-assessment. In that case, they should do the > self-assessment AFTER they have feedback. Is this > correct? > 2. Is it okay for students to consider feedback about > their formative assessment from peers instead of me and > then complete a self-assessment? > > Here are the steps I am considering for peer feedback and > then self-assessment- > Students will... > 1. receive feedback from peers first in the form of a > checklist and suggestions > 2. complete a self-assessment based on their peers' > feedback as they re-examine their formative assessment > 3. have the opportunity to make changes to their > formative assessment > 4. receive feedback from me in the form of a graded > rubric > I will... > 1. plan and teach according to what the formative results > show me are problems. > 2. give students the summative assessment. > It seems to me like these steps listed above allow > students to best "evaluate their learning as well as > identify ways to improve performance and understanding" > that is mentioned on page 5 under the student self- > assessment section. > > One last question. Am I way off? Is this description in > Level 4 referring to students applying feedback only from > the formative to the summative rather than within the > formative? > > I know I tend to over complicate things, but it seems > that my students have a deeper self-reflection after they > peer edit.
KimOn 11/11/16, Amy wrote: > Any idea of a more narrow window for score release than > before Dec 31, 2016? Typically, the scores are real eased the Friday before we get out for Thanksgiving-- if not sometime earlier that week.
I believe the NB strives to release scores the Saturday before or after Thanksgiving. This has happened often, but not always - as those who received scores last year can attest. I'm crossing my fingers for a November date, near Thanksgiving. But as far as I know, there have been no official "hints" narrowing down the date.
Patience!! (Easier said than done!)
On 11/11/16, Amy wrote: > Any idea of a more narrow window for score release than > before Dec 31, 2016?
On 11/09/16, aship005 wrote: > When completing the 2nd section for my certificate area, > there is a spot labeled "assignments and prompts" with 3 > pages for each narrative and expository. What are they > expecting other than the prompt? It says > "Instructional/supporting materials." Does this mean I > should focus on sheets that relate to grammar and > mechanics if that's what my students struggled with or > should I focus on a sheet that compliments the narrative > writing style? My students have a hard time with run on > sentences, but I don't know if this is the kind of > supporting material they want attached.
SMWhat can we do? I went online and found that Pearson is assessing all our entries and tests. This was my last year and I am devastated. On 11/07/16, AS wrote: > On 11/05/16, Teacher wrote: >> I have retaken the national boards. I absolutely know >> that I did a better job. I know I did very well on the >> computer test. I knew ...See MoreWhat can we do? I went online and found that Pearson is assessing all our entries and tests. This was my last year and I am devastated. On 11/07/16, AS wrote: > On 11/05/16, Teacher wrote: >> I have retaken the national boards. I absolutely know >> that I did a better job. I know I did very well on the >> computer test. I knew every answer. I worked with a NBPTS >> mentor who passed on the first try. But my score did not >> change. If there is no way for me to see my test then I >> feel compelled to seek out a lawyer. Does any one know of >> any legal attempts force NBPTS to show the test to an >> applicant. I know that it scored at least a 3.00. I know >> this. > > I too want to know what is happening. I scored 271 out of > 275. One answer was short .6 of a point. This last year was > my 3rd attempt. I KNOW my essays the second year were > stronger, but were formatted differently. I made minimal > progress on one entry, none on the other. This last year I > have been in an admin program with a 4.0 GPA, so I chose to > re-do a few of my assessments. knowing I needed to make > progress on two. I know my answers were stronger this year > than the previous year.
DITTO! I am freaking out as well. I KNOW I did better.
> On 11/07/16, AS wrote: >> On 11/05/16, Teacher wrote: >>> I have retaken the national boards. I absolutely know >>> that I did a better job. I know I did very well on the >>> computer test. I knew every answer. I worked with a NBPTS >>> mentor who passed on the first try. But my score did not >>> change. If there is no way for me to see my test then I >>> feel compelled to seek out a lawyer. Does any one know of >>> any legal attempts force NBPTS to show the test to an >>> applicant. I know that it scored at least a 3.00. I know >>> this. >> >> I too want to know what is happening. I scored 271 out of >> 275. One answer was short .6 of a point. This last year was >> my 3rd attempt. I KNOW my essays the second year were >> stronger, but were formatted differently. I made minimal >> progress on one entry, none on the other. This last year I >> have been in an admin program with a 4.0 GPA, so I chose to >> re-do a few of my assessments. knowing I needed to make >> progress on two. I know my answers were stronger this year >> than the previous year.
Okay...I have read and read and read - I have printed and highlighted and thought a million times about my lesson (Component 2). But I am stuck as to how to begin. It's all in my head. I have done the Contextual Information Sheet. What next? Is it best to make the 1st of the two 3-minute videos before I start the Unit Overview and the Written Commentary? Maybe that is why I feel so stuck? I normally have no problem writing at all so this is unusual for me. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you so much! Audrey
On 11/05/16, Audrey wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Okay...I have read and read and read - I have printed and > highlighted and thought a million times about my lesson > (Component 2). But I am stuck as to how to begin. It's all > in my head. I have done the Contextual Information Sheet. > What next? Is it best to make the 1st of the two 3- minute > videos before I start the Unit Overview and the Written > Commentary? Maybe that is why I feel so stuck? I normally > have no problem writing at all so this is unusual for me. > Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you so much! Audrey
Your kids need to write a narrative piece and an expository piece. If you aren't clear on the difference between th...See More