I taught French in a private school back in the late 80s and early 90s. There is a very small possibility that I may be teaching it again next year. I was wondering what you thought of the newer textbooks. I find them good as far as presenting current expressions but very lacking in drill and advanced content. Another words, what we would have covered in French 2, for example, seems to be covered now in French 3. I also find way too many graphics on a page and tend to favor the older boooks like Le francais: a devenir, 1978, which I would mix mith some TPRS and additional interactive communicative activities and games.
Does anyone else feel the same? Is anyone else still using older editions of books? I got some pretty good results with them before.
On 10/10/11, Nick wrote: > I taught French in a private school back in the late 80s > and early 90s. There is a very small possibility that I > may be teaching it again next year. I was wondering what > you thought of the newer textbooks. I find them good as > far as presenting current expressions but very lacking in > drill and advanced content. Another words, what we would > have covered in French 2, for example, seems to be covered > now in French 3. I also find way too many graphics on a > page and tend to favor the older boooks like Le francais: a > devenir, 1978, which I would mix mith some TPRS and > additional interactive communicative activities and games. > > Does anyone else feel the same? Is anyone else still using > older editions of books? I got some pretty good results > with them before. > > Thanks in advance. >
Yes, having learned French starting in the late 70's, teaching since 1984, I have noticed the difference. The difference lies in the fact that one would like for students to be able to speak spontaneously and to be able to understand authentic French audio from radio and news casts.
The old way was to impart the ability to read. Grammar content was reformulated after a study was done on the frequency of grammatical notions. The conditional falls far behind the subjunctive in French.
USA methods are again out of date or step, when compared to the French methods such as those sold by CLE international.
Every teacher will have their favorite method, but the one created by Valette (Discovering French) using the communicative approach is very good. As with any tool, it is only as good as the craftsman's skill.
James
On 10/10/11, Nick wrote: > I taught French in a private school back in the late 80s > and early 90s. There is a very small possibility that I > may be teaching it again next year. I was wondering what > you thought of the newer textbooks. I find them good as > far as presenting current expressions but very lacking in > drill and advanced content. Another words, what we would > have covered in French 2, for example, seems to be covered > now in French 3. I also find way too many graphics on a > page and tend to favor the older boooks like Le francais: a > devenir, 1978, which I would mix mith some TPRS and > additional interactive communicative activities and games. > > Does anyone else feel the same? Is anyone else still using > older editions of books? I got some pretty good results > with them before. > > Thanks in advance. >
dianaCheck out AIM Language learning. The focus is on oral language, so students tend to learn the grammar first by speaking the language. We use it at our school and I've been to a couple of the workshops.
On 10/10/11, Nick wrote: > I taught French in a private school back in the late 80s > and early 90s. There is a very small possibility that I > may be teaching it again next year. I was wondering what > you thought of the newer textboo...See More