Now look at the person who Michelle Obama called a wonderful human being. A person who bundled for Hillary. Those who hid his horrible actions are getting a pass. Ben Affleck (who also assaulted a woman on TV). Seth MacFarlane who thinks it's just fine to make jokes about rape. And that's just to name a few who have been complicit in Big Hollywood's sex assault problem. Seems to be a celebrity problem ... and remember, our current president was/is a celebrity. We even have seen his contract allowed sexual harassment.
Interesting how the coach who leaned right was treated worse for his heinous coverup while those in Hollywood who lean left are getting a pass. Do we need more laws against Harvey's actions? Perhaps those who knew of his actions should be held accountable.
Bills sexual assaults. Those are in the past. Harvey's? Just how Hollywood works. Trump? Worst crime ever! Interesting how the media spins things. They are all equally horrible!
I wonder if Harvey pulled his act on his intern, Malia.
It's not just Weinstein. It's Affleck. And Stone. And Cosby. And Polanski. And a whole lot of Hollywood. I cannot take seriously the complaints on the left when they give passes to their own.
Most have never heard of Weinstein? He's a pretty big name. Big bundled for the Clintons and big donor for the Clinton foundation.
Feign outrage? Trump should be tried for the assaults. He deserves his day in court,l and the chance to confront his accusers. I hope that justice is served (although for some, justice is a conviction, not a trial and acceptance of the verdict).
Hopefully the women coming out against powerful men in Hollywood will give strength to those who were assaulted by Trump to also come forward. We deserve to hear the facts in the case and have a jury of his peers decide these cases. All of them. Of course, people such as Hillary may just want us to believe his behavior is in the past, like her husband.
You don't have to play seven degrees of separation to find the sexual predator in the GOP. The GOP hoisted him to "leader of the free world." And Fox News pranced around in brass heraldry.
Bob R/CAIf I told someone that TEC was "fringe left," it would not surprise them that he is in favor of the government determining what is "truth." So I can't be surprised by your position.
Plus, I do not get the "he is in favor of the government determining what is 'truth'." I clearly wrote, "America is now owned from the government to the airwaves by the large corporations." Corporations and other such entities have been lying since the beginning of capitalism.
Then from the article "Clinton spends twice as much as Trump in losing presidential bid", we find "The Clinton campaign, Democratic Party and pro-Clinton expenditure committees and PACs spent a record $1.2 billion, twice as much as the $600 million laid out by the Trump camp, Republicans and pro-Trump groups."
Despite spending 1.2 billion dollars, the Clinton Democrats want us to believe that it was that $150,000 spent by the supposedly Russian sources that caused Hillary to go down in flames against, IMHO, the worst opposing candidate in the history of the country.
Again, there is no publicly available evidence that Russia did anything significant, so now they are blowing all out of proportion an alleged absolutely insignificant assertion, and citing it as the reason for Hillary's disaster.
When will Democratic supporters figure out this is a ruse designed to blame Hillary's horrendous loss on something other than Hillary and the issues. This must be, because the DNC democrats do not want to give up the Wall Street money in favor of helping the average American.
Worse, Hillary; after stealing the primary from Bernie, which is worse than the alleged Russia thing; is now blaming her loss on Bernie - as in this Hillary quote, " His (Bernie's) attacks caused lasting damage, making it harder to unify progressives in the general election and paving the way for Trump's 'Crooked Hillary' campaign."
The problem with this witch is, she has no regard for the will of the people! She wanted the presidency even if it meant cheating. Frankly, when you compare what we know she did with the outrage over the alleged action of Russia, she should be in jail!
Then again, America does not put the rich and powerful in jail - no matter what crime they commit.
We may not be able to conclusively say a given advertising message changed a vote, but we CAN determine that polls significantly change after the news cycle picks up news stories that we CAN connect to these sock puppet accounts.
And we CAN trace the way these fake news stories and amplified leak stories (also a product of the Russian efforts) worked through the public discourse, and were then amplified by the alt-right media, and then crossing over into the mainstream media.
It's not important that EVERYONE understands the mechanics or full impact their strategies and agents and crimes had on our 2016 presidential election. But it is critical for the integrity of our democracy, that a certain SOME people understand this, and do something about it.
It seems evident that our president is in full denial, so I hope that the Republican leadership in Congress is able to grow some leadership, or the Democrats are able to firmly take control and demonstrate some actual leadership, and patriotism, and make decisive moves to prevent or limit the effects of such nefarious attacks on the very sovereignty of our republic.
Start with, "We may not know ALL they did, because we know they used sock puppets, and it's virtually impossible to discern all of these." I have never said that Russia did nothing. However, your statement is affirmation that we do not know what they did. Or, more importantly, if it was really Russia.
Then we have this, "We may not be able to conclusively say a given advertising message changed a vote, but we CAN determine that polls significantly change after the news cycle picks up news stories. . . ." Let us assume that the polls did change. The truth is, you have no clue why they changed. You are just assuming that the change is linked to the variable you want it to be linked to.
Next we find the problem is not really the source of the ads, be it Russia or whatever. The real problem is the ads "were then amplified by the alt-right media, and then crossing over into the mainstream media." At this point, your problem is the corporate monopoly we call the Main Stream Media, and this brings us to a different problem.
The Main Stream Media was against Donald Trump and for Hillary Clinton! And, by the way, they still are!!! Not to say Trump isn't awful; he is! Yet, how is it the Main Stream Media amplified information that damaged the candidate they were supporting?
And again, this is laughable, "the integrity of our democracy." Integrity in our democracy is a fantasy. Face it; your democracy was gone long ago! Before you deal with any minuscule influence the Russian might have had, you need to deal with Israel's lobby, gerrymandering, caging, electronic voting machines, voter suppression laws, and a whole lot more.
IMHO, the truth is, the rich are using their media to sucker you into focusing on a non-issue so that you will not deal with the items I mentioned. In a narrower view, and setting aside spending on the military, the corporate Democrats - that is, the Clinton or DNC democrats, which includes Schumer and Pelosi - are blaming Russia for Hillary's loss, so they can avoid dealing with the real issue. That real issue being that most Americans wanted Hillary to embrace Bernie Sanders' platform, but Hillary and DNC democrats could not do that and still suck up to Wall Street.
T.E.C. - IowaI certainly hope they cannot work together. Anything that comes from either Pres. Trump or Sen. Schumer will be good for corporate America and bad for the rest of us!
#CorruptRepublicanAdministration