Re: Will Democrats accept the Mueller report?
Welcome Guest!
Teachers are welcome to read and post on Teachers.Net.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post pics, links & comments • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Welcome Guest!
You must login to comment on posts.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post links & upload pics • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Welcome Guest!
Your account must login to post.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post, comment, & upload pics • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
In short, Clinton's top campaign chief and a senior counselor to Obama sat on Joule's board alongside top Russian officials as Putin's Kremlin-backed investment fund funneled $35 million into Joule. No one looking at the Podesta fact-pattern can claim to care about rooting out Russian collusion and not rigorously investigate the tangle of relationships.
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/
Bob R/CA
"But - but - Hillary!" they insisted, to no one.
Tim Finnegan
The 1980's called, Bob. They want their foreign policy back. The Cold War has been over or 20 years, according to Obama.
You only want part of the investigation to happen. It will be nice to see the info on the DNC servers, and to see if the Comey memos really exist. No one seems to have seen them, other than Comey and his pack.
You only want part of the investigation to happen. It will be nice to see the info on the DNC servers, and to see if the Comey memos really exist. No one seems to have seen them, other than Comey and his pack.
Bob R/CA
That's true, you do get all bent out of shape when people have different opinions than you. Luckily, you've got Rupert Murdoch's tabloid to reinforce your alarm that someone who worked for someone who is out of office once said something under oath that was "technically true." Don't you miss when our biggest concerns were things that were "technica...See More
Bob R/CA
Run out on her? I'm confused how Podesta saying something under oath that is "technically true" amounts to a felony for Hillary. Maybe the tabloid hasn't explained that yet, get back to "us"
More discussions on the Politics Chatboard...
With friends like this...
Dark days
Before we defend them, we should check if they've paid up
Re: Well, well, well.
Back to Politics Chatboard
Teacher Chatboards
