to keep up with my reading for my admin classes and my book study/PD group(s) at school. Where do you guys find the time to do all of this reading? Thanks to you all, I have a list of books that I want to read....it keeps getting longer.
dcWell, I for one am not taking admin classes. That's a full time job to be in school for you. Lots of reading there. For now, just enjoy the ride and the discussion Tina and hop in when you can!
Is everyone reading the same book at the same time? What is the current book, and what is the next book on the list. Where is the list? I would like to join in at some point. it sounds interesting:)
On 1/30/11, CC wrote: > Is everyone readi...See MoreHi CC, This board works just like all the others here at Tnet. Post when you want. Occasionally someone says, "Let's read this book." Those who wish to read it do so. We also discuss articles. We often discuss our thinking. We're not nearly as organized as you presume, LOL; there's no list. Judy
On 1/30/11, CC wrote: > Is everyone reading the same book at the same time? What is > the current book, and what is the next book on the list. > Where is the list? I would like to join in at some point. > it sounds interesting:)
Post as often as you wish! You don't even need to have read the book to post. Chime in if you see something interesting. Our current book is by Daniel Willingham and it is called Why Don't Students Like School?
We had some brief talk about our next book being "something" suggested by Kim, but now I can't remember what it was! (Almost 50 syndrome going on here!) As Judy said, we are nowhere near as organized as you presume. LOL!
But we welcome you here and hope you will jump in. What grade level/subject do you teach?
You probably remember my mentioning this book. I've nev...See MoreBrad, I started a new thread on this because I really didn't want to usurp the other one. You said, "I've heard of this book, whether through catalogues or you, I really wonder about the premise you state, because it does sound worth exploring. Does he mention classroom implications?"
You probably remember my mentioning this book. I've never seen it in one of the popular education book lists that come in the mail.
Perhaps some chapter titles will help to answer your question.
Chapter 2: Type, Motivation, & Learning Style Chapter 3: Using Type Concepts in Planning Instruction Chapter 4: Type & Teaching Styles Chapter 7: Psychological Type & Education Chapter 9: Introducing Type into Curriculum Reform
And the part about process praise (vs. person praise) cites Dweck. She'...See MoreWell, howdy-doo, this chapter is all about nature/nurture. Not surprising he takes the middle ground: intelligence is a mix of genes and environment and all kids can improve their intelligence through hard work. Who am I to disagree? (do you hear the background vocal?)
And the part about process praise (vs. person praise) cites Dweck. She's one of the authors of the article on the same subject that I linked below. So if you want to read more about this, scroll down. As I said on that post, I agree with this premise wholeheartedly (but I don't always do it).
I sure hope my students believe I have confidence in them, Judy
Feedback from someone important in a child's life has tremendous power. We don't realize how much stock they put into what we say...and how it sticks with them. I have about 200 former students as FB friends. They are 25-45 years old and they will tell me something I said to them when they were in the third grade! It's scary sometimes to think of the influence we can have. One girl in my first class says she learned to love reading because I gave her a copy of Charlotte's Web as first prize for knowing multiplication facts. She had never had her own paperback before and this was the beginning for her. She still has the book...and I signed it! I remember absolutely nothing about that. What scares me is that I'm sure other kids remember something I said or did off the top of my head that had a negative influence.Who knows? At the time, I didn't know the power of feedback so probably just said whatever. I think if I were in the classroom now, I'd be afraid to open my mouth!
On 2/08/11, Jo to Jan - agree 100% wrote: > I agree 100%. Too bad often it comes out of the mouths as you didn't > work hard enough. > > On 2/07/11, Jan wrote: >> >> You are right that many kids are putting forth as much effort as is >> humanly possible so to tell them that they need even more is not going >> to be very motivating. But, we can tell them that it is possible to >> work smarter not harder...we can make our effort more productive. >> That's where the emphasis on effort should be put. >> >> We consider effort and ability to be those attributions that lead to an >> internal locus of control, but we see ability as fixed and not under >> the person's control, whereas effort is totally controllable. Kids get >> discouraged by this because they see themselves as 'dumb' and think >> there is nothing they can do...."I was just born this way." >> >> However,we have learned that the acquisition of certain strategies >> makes our ability work a whole lot better for us and this makes our >> effort more productive. As dc says, her son has all the ability in >> the world to understand what he's reading, but he doesn't have the >> strategies to access it. Now that he is learning them, is ability is >> more accessible to him so his effort is far more productive than it >> was. >> >> >> Many cognitive scientists are suggesting that strategies be made the >> 5th attribution to locus of control,but officially, only 4 are listed. >> Learning strategies is just seen as a boost to ability and effort, not >> a new loci. One very important thing we can do to help kids see that >> the learning of strategies will give him that needed boost, is to label >> for him how much the new strategy is helping....."Wow, James, since you >> learned that strategy of finding the key idea, the time it takes you to >> read and comprehend is so much shorter" If they see the value in >> strategies, they will seek them out on their own as they get older. >> They'll know it's possible to find a better way and they will take >> time to figure it out...or ask someone to help them. And, this >> increases their feelings of competence. >> >> >> On 2/07/11, dc wrote: >>> I have two high school sons. One is an efficient studier. He can >>> study for one hour and master the material. My other son will >>> study the same material for four hours and not have mastery. I >>> would say the second son "worked harder" but if he had continued to >>> study like this for even more hours, he would not have improved his >>> grade. I have to study with him, help teach him how to find key >>> material, make notecards, etc. It is frustrating to watch the >>> number of hours he puts in to studying that do not get him as far >>> as his two siblings who study the same material for far less time.
No, there is no canned list of phrases that will work all of the time. It is learning how to communicate differently. Massive effort since there are so many teaching schools and teachers.
On 2/08/11, Jan wrote: > The problem with feedback is that we can't plan it > ahead...and, to be most > effective,it needs to be immediate. That leads to > statements that we haven't thought out..and don't > realize until we've said them that they didn't quite > sound like we intended. And, once said, retracting them > just isn't possible. I don't know the answer to this > one other than the more we practice, the more automatic > our responses become. I try to memorize a couple of > them and then just substitute a name! > > Feedback from someone important in a child's life has > tremendous power. We don't realize how much stock they > put into what we say...and how it sticks with them. I > have about 200 former students as FB friends. They are > 25-45 years old and they will tell me something I said > to them when they were in the third grade! It's scary > sometimes to think of the influence we can have. One > girl in my first class says she learned to love reading > because I gave her a copy of Charlotte's Web as first > prize for knowing multiplication facts. She had never > had her own paperback before and this was the beginning > for her. She still has the book...and I signed it! I > remember absolutely nothing about that. What scares me > is that I'm sure other kids remember something I said > or did off the top of my head that had a negative > influence.Who knows? At the time, I didn't know the > power of feedback so probably just said whatever. I > think if I were in the classroom now, I'd be afraid to > open my mouth! > > > On 2/08/11, Jo to Jan - agree 100% wrote: >> I agree 100%. Too bad often it comes out of the >> mouths as you didn't work hard enough. >> >> On 2/07/11, Jan wrote: >>> >>> You are right that many kids are putting forth as >>> much effort as is humanly possible so to tell them >>> that they need even more is not going to be very >>> motivating. But, we can tell them that it is >>> possible to work smarter not harder...we can make >>> our effort more productive. That's where the >>> emphasis on effort should be put. >>> >>> We consider effort and ability to be those >>> attributions that lead to an internal locus of >>> control, but we see ability as fixed and not under >>> the person's control, whereas effort is totally >>> controllable. Kids get discouraged by this because >>> they see themselves as 'dumb' and think there is >>> nothing they can do...."I was just born this >>> way." >>> >>> However,we have learned that the acquisition of >>> certain strategies makes our ability work a whole >>> lot better for us and this makes our effort more >>> productive. As dc says, her son has all the ability >>> in the world to understand what he's reading, but >>> he doesn't have the strategies to access it. Now >>> that he is learning them, is ability is more >>> accessible to him so his effort is far more >>> productive than it was. >>> >>> >>> Many cognitive scientists are suggesting that >>> strategies be made the 5th attribution to locus of >>> control,but officially, only 4 are listed. Learning >>> strategies is just seen as a boost to ability and >>> effort, not a new loci. One very important thing we >>> can do to help kids see that the learning of >>> strategies will give him that needed boost, is to >>> label for him how much the new strategy is >>> helping....."Wow, James, since you learned >>> that strategy of finding the key idea, the time it >>> takes you to read and comprehend is so much >>> shorter" If they see the value in strategies, >>> they will seek them out on their own as they get >>> older. They'll know it's possible to find a better >>> way and they will take time to figure it out...or >>> ask someone to help them. And, this increases their >>> feelings of competence. >>> >>> >>> On 2/07/11, dc wrote: >>>> I have two high school sons. One is an efficient >>>> studier. He can study for one hour and master the >>>> material. My other son will study the same >>>> material for four hours and not have mastery. I >>>> would say the second son "worked >>>> harder" but if he had continued to study >>>> like this for even more hours, he would not have >>>> improved his grade. I have to study with him, >>>> help teach him how to find key material, make >>>> notecards, etc. It is frustrating to watch the >>>> number of hours he puts in to studying that do >>>> not get him as far as his two siblings who study >>>> the same material for far less time.
I KNOW that Willingh...See MoreI have to endure a weekly 'newsletter' that features something called 'Brain Bits.' I am not kidding. The trouble is that the 'bits' are cut and pasted from all over the place and one of the little bits got stuck in my craw. It had to do with seeking to connect your teaching to students' interests - making it relevant.
I KNOW that Willingham addressed this very well in an early chapter. In Chapter 7 he alludes to it again and says he mentioned it in Chapter 1.
I searched for the passage and can't find it. Then I looked again. Sigh.
Just so you know, I thought I lost a discontinued set of rubber post office stamps last week. I tore apart my cupboard and stamp bucket and couldn't find them. In desperation, I asked a parent volunteer to go through my bucket again - and she found them immediately. My mother used to send me to look for stuff and I could never find it and then she would yell at me and the stupid thing would have been right there all the time.
Anyway... a new set of eyes, please? These brain bits bite and I want to spit them back out.
ParkerKim, you want Chapter 3 p.63-6, right under What Good Teachers Have in Common. Goes along with the "memory is the residue of thought" comments. On 2/05/11, KimK1ca wrote: > I have to endure a weekly 'newsletter' that features > something called 'Brain Bits.' I am not kidding. The > trouble is that the 'bits' are cut and pasted from all ove...See MoreKim, you want Chapter 3 p.63-6, right under What Good Teachers Have in Common. Goes along with the "memory is the residue of thought" comments. On 2/05/11, KimK1ca wrote: > I have to endure a weekly 'newsletter' that features > something called 'Brain Bits.' I am not kidding. The > trouble is that the 'bits' are cut and pasted from all over > the place and one of the little bits got stuck in my craw. > It had to do with seeking to connect your teaching to > students' interests - making it relevant. > > I KNOW that Willingham addressed this very well in an early > chapter. In Chapter 7 he alludes to it again and says he > mentioned it in Chapter 1. > > I searched for the passage and can't find it. Then I looked > again. Sigh. > > Just so you know, I thought I lost a discontinued set of > rubber post office stamps last week. I tore apart my > cupboard and stamp bucket and couldn't find them. In > desperation, I asked a parent volunteer to go through my > bucket again - and she found them immediately. My mother > used to send me to look for stuff and I could never find it > and then she would yell at me and the stupid thing would > have been right there all the time. > > Anyway... a new set of eyes, please? These brain bits bite > and I want to spit them back out. > > :-)K
Come on over a...See More....with Dr. Barbara Blackburn who has written "Rigor is Not a Four Letter Word." I've been very impressed with Barbara's book because she, first of all, explains rigor once and for all: what it is and how to get it. She gives specific ways to be sure our lessons are rigorous This is a book that is not theory, but practice.
The author states that for the use of extinction to de...See MoreI just finished reading an article entitled "Behavior Management: Making it Work in Middle and Secondary Schools" from a professional education journal in which the authors draw attention to the mistakes that teachers often make that unwittingly strengthen students' negative behaviors.
The author states that for the use of extinction to decrease or eliminate the behavior, the teacher must completely withhold the reinforcement. If a student is screaming to be recognized without raising his/her hand, then this can be a very difficult road to take. In your experience, how often does extinction work?
Many times a student will display disruptive behavior in order to escape from a work assignment, teacher, etc. The easy solution is to remove the disruptive student from the classroom; however,the author states that this can create more problems in the future since the action of removing the student actually reinforces the disruptive behavior. Has this been your experience?
My reason for posting the note is to get some insight from others on the success/failure rate of using these techniques to correct disruptive behavior.
On 2/06/11, Jan again wrote: > > The author of the book you read is pretty much right on. Who > is it? It is very true that we very often reinforce negative > behaviors because WE think they are punishments. Rewards and > consequences are in the eye of the beholder. For some, > staying in at recess is a consequence, or many others it is a > reward. So those teachers using it as a consequence is > reinforcing those who consider it a reward. We see this VERY > frequently. What is a reward for one, is not a reward for > another. > > On 2/06/11, Dale wrote: >> I just finished reading an article entitled "Behavior >> Management: Making it Work in Middle and Secondary Schools" >> from a professional education journal in which the authors >> draw attention to the mistakes that teachers often make that >> unwittingly strengthen students' negative behaviors. >> >> The author states that for the use of extinction to decrease >> or eliminate the behavior, the teacher must completely >> withhold the reinforcement. If a student is screaming to be >> recognized without raising his/her hand, then this can be a >> very difficult road to take. In your experience, how often >> does extinction work? >> >> Many times a student will display disruptive behavior in >> order to escape from a work assignment, teacher, etc. The >> easy solution is to remove the disruptive student from the >> classroom; however,the author states that this can create >> more problems in the future since the action of removing the >> student actually reinforces the disruptive behavior. Has >> this been your experience? >> >> >> My reason for posting the note is to get some insight from >> others on the success/failure rate of using these techniques >> to correct disruptive behavior.
JanOn 2/06/11, Dale wrote: > The authors of the article ("Behavior Management Making It Work in > Middle and Secondary Schools") are Katheryn M. Oberchain and > Shanon S. Taylor. It's a great article....thank you for sharing > your experiences. > Here's a book I can personally recommend :)
On 2/13/11, dc wrote: > I like Amazon too, but I get a 20% discount at BN, free shipping, and a 20% > kickback from Discover card when I use BN. I always put in my book order > at Amazon and then put it in at BN too, and it always comes out cheaper at > BN for me. But BOO on how they treated you Jan. Whenever I have an > incident like that with a company, it always leaves such a bad taste in my > mouth. The other reason I like BN is because I can BROWSE in a real > bookstore. I can't do that at Amazon. I like to browse. Somehow browsing > just isn't the same experience for me online. :( > I guess I will have to use Amazon though for this book because it sounds > really great!
On 2/13/11, judy5ca wrote: > I just got this update from Amazon: > New estimated arrival date: February 18 2011 - February 24 2011 > > I had a feeling it wouldn't be as long as they originally predicted. I > like Amazon. I feel sorry for poor Barnes & Noble, but I like Amazon. > > Looking forward to our discussion, > Judy > > > > On 2/12/11, Jan wrote: >> I think it's sold out at Amazon. I had preordered it. I got a message >> from Amazon that it was coming earlier than expected (only about two >> days earlier) and they would get it out right away. It came 3 days >> later. But, everyone I know is ordering it.....I think half of CSUF >> has it coming....they are expecting there's fairly soon. They >> probably didn;t get too many in the first shipment and they were sold. >> Amazon had it before ASCD which is not uncommon. Strange. >> >> We will not start until everyone is ready..not to worry. >> >> I've given up at BN. I had a big battle with them about a download >> they never got here. Then they charged it and didn't credit it to me. >> By the time my bill came and the credit wasn't on it, they said they >> couldn't refund it because they had no evidence it wasn't downloaded. >> The fact that I made 4 phone calls that night and the guy assured me >> he had put in the credit seemed to fall on deaf ears. They did give >> me the credit finally but it wasn't easy. They guy told me the night >> I called that they were so backed up with the downloads it would not >> come until the NEXT DAY! I told them Amazon could get a whole book >> here in 10 seconds; I find it hard to believe they can't get a short >> booklet here at all. No wonder they are in financial trouble. They >> used to be so good...although never as good as Amazon in my book. Nor >> as cheap! >> >> >> On 2/12/11, judy5ca wrote: >>> I did order it from Amazon (yes to free shipping), but I must have >>> been half-asleep when I ordered because didn't notice the ship date: >>> February 28, 2011 - March 11, 2011 >>> Ugh, I don't know why it is slated to take so long, but I hope >>> you'll wait for me. >>> Thanks, >>> Judy who still loves Amazon >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2/12/11, dc wrote: >>>> Can't order it from Barnes and Noble, it's not for sale there >>>> yet. It's on Amazon, but I can get it for so much cheaper at >>>> BN with my discounts and free shipping, plus I get a 10% >>>> Discover card kickback from Barnes and Noble. Anybody know why >>>> BN doesn't sell it yet?
This follows several pages of describing reading programs for young students--programs that have whole-group instruction and focus very hard on learning letter sounds. He specifically cites Pat Cunningham and Allington.
"Virtually, any student can learn the mechanics of reading to decode grade level text in about 100 days. That means virtually all could be reading shortly after mid-year of first grade. Once they can decode they only need very small amounts of skill review.
"What the do need immediately are extended daily opportunities to read, much of it for pleasure. When we continue to teach reading skills, we prevent the rapid acquisition of knowledge and vocabulary---at a critical formative moment in a child's education.
"When we unnecessarily elongate the process of learning to read, we postpone 'reading to learn'---learning itself by years. It's that simple. Students aren't truly mature readers until they can read and recognize 50,000 words. This many words can't be learned by having students sound out, syllabicate, or learn each one, The only way they can be learned is for us to ensure that they read, by today's standards, enormous, unprecedented amounts of reading material.
Sadly, the default design of literacy programs K-4 reduces actual reading time to a small fraction of what students need to acquire vocabulary and become knowledgeable. By 4th grade, most students are years behind where all of them could be in vocabulary development, general knowledge and thinking skills."
The sad thing is that I have heard reading experts say this exact same thing for 15 years...and, we are still doing what we did then that didn't work.
dcWhat about the book called Mechanically Inclined? I teach little ones, so don't know if they would be appropriate for 10th graders. You might try posting on the Reading/Writing board and see if they have more helpful options for you. Sorry I can't be of more help here.
dcOn 2/13/11, dc wrote: > What about the book called Mechanically Inclined? I teach > little ones, so don't know if they would be appropriate for > 10th graders. You might try posting on the Reading/Writing > board and see if they have more helpful options for you. > Sorry I can't be of more help here.