Have a physics degree and I taught physics and chemistry for a year right out of college, but bailed on it. I remember one of the most stressful aspects was the pressure, time and effort involved with having a new lesson prepared each day for every subject. However, back then we had the texbook, a chalkboard, and a mimeograph machine to produce handouts and exams.
So one big factor in my decision would be whether the materials are light-years better today. I assume there are all sorts of ready made lessons and materials to use with the presentation/lectures?
Education has morphed a great deal since the last time you tried it. Nuts...it has changed exponentially in the last 5-10 years. More importantly, the clientel has changed. Merely "delivering content" won't get it anymore. We're dealing with the"smart phone" generation, the one with a high sense of entitlement, brief attention spans, and (sadly) parents who want to rescue them from everything.
Worse than this, you are contemplating re-entering a field where the needs of students are no longer paramount. Not really. No it's the almighty test score that drives the train, that and ambitious admin whose sole real interest is promoting their own careers, too often at the expense of the staff and students they are supposed to be serving.
Like Muinteoir, I do not seek to discourage, but simply believe you need to know what you are getting yourself into. This isn't your father's education system anymore.
Mr. S.On 3/20/12, Bill T 6 NC wrote: > > > > I feel compelled to echo what Muinteoir has said. > > Education has morphed a great deal since the last time you tried > it. Nuts...it has changed exponentially in the last 5-10 years. > More importantly, the clientel has changed. Merely "delivering > content" won't get it anymore. W...See MoreOn 3/20/12, Bill T 6 NC wrote: > > > > I feel compelled to echo what Muinteoir has said. > > Education has morphed a great deal since the last time you tried > it. Nuts...it has changed exponentially in the last 5-10 years. > More importantly, the clientel has changed. Merely "delivering > content" won't get it anymore. We're dealing with the"smart > phone" generation, the one with a high sense of entitlement, > brief attention spans, and (sadly) parents who want to rescue > them from everything. > > Worse than this, you are contemplating re-entering a field where > the needs of students are no longer paramount. Not really. No > it's the almighty test score that drives the train, that and > ambitious admin whose sole real interest is promoting their own > careers, too often at the expense of the staff and students they > are supposed to be serving. > > Like Muinteoir, I do not seek to discourage, but simply believe > you need to know what you are getting yourself into. This isn't > your father's education system anymore.
You got that right. Way back eons ago, we had something called the Attention Deficit Reducing Yellow Pine Board Of Education. With holes drilled in it to improve the aerodynamics. And normally a 6'3", 240 pound PE coach in charge of it.
Plus when our parents got informed we had been disciplined at school, we automatically received a second punishment of some type on arrival at home. There were still a very few of the toughest cases brave enough to buck the system, but the key being "very few". Nothing like today where 90%+ have no respect for authority whatsoever.
I am looking into doing the SOS Interact Simulation (covers ocean currents) at the end of the year...I lost my copy and really don't want to spend another $50. Does anyone have a copy (hard or electronic) they would be willing to part with at a discount?
I am hoping for some new ideas for teaching vocabulary to my chemistry students. We don't have tons of vocabulary but I want them to learn it when I teach it.
my 2 centsFor kids to internalize vocabulary, they have to work with the words many times. I keep dictionaries in desks. We look words up. We take the words apart and learn the meanings of the word parts. We use the words in written exercises, and then use them orally in class discussions. I use the "I have, Who has?" as a review. There is a big difference b...See MoreFor kids to internalize vocabulary, they have to work with the words many times. I keep dictionaries in desks. We look words up. We take the words apart and learn the meanings of the word parts. We use the words in written exercises, and then use them orally in class discussions. I use the "I have, Who has?" as a review. There is a big difference between teaching the vocabulary words and using them after you have learned them. Teaching vocabulary/spelling has fallen out of fashion in schools, and now we get kids at the upper levels that are language deficient. Teaching vocabulary is something that has to be done on an ongoing basis, has to be emphasized so that students understand the importance, and it has to be tested so that they can show mastery of the words they have acquired. I think teaching science vocabulary is critical for conceptual development. If they don't understand vocabulary, they aren't understanding you when you are teaching orally. I don't think kids just pick up the technical vocabulary needed to progress in science. Vocabulary development is something that a good textbook supports tremendously. Students read a bolded word, see a related illustration, have a glossary at hand in the back of the book, and can use supplemental pages to support the use of unit specific terms. Textbooks rock.
On 3/17/12, Muinteoir - crud, bad HTML; my apologies wrote: > On 3/17/12, Muinteoir wrote: >> It's a looping questioning technique. You give kids cards with >> questions and answers. I always start with the first card >> >> Me: I have the first card, who has a subatomic particle with a >> positive charge? >> >> Student a: (reading from card) I have PROTON, who has elements >> with high electrical conductivity, luster, and malleability >> >> Student b: (reading from card) I have METAL, who has......? >> >> And so on. >> >> I've linked an example that explains it better than I can. >> >> On 3/17/12, Lynne in TN wrote: >>> Thank you very much, Muinteoir! >>> >>> I am familiar with Dinah Zike and the Frayer model, but the "I >>> Have, Who Has" game I'm not familiar with. Could you give me >>> more information? >>> >>> Thank you
On 4/02/12, my 2 cents wrote: > For kids to internalize vocabulary, they have to work with the words many > times. I keep dictionaries in desks. We look words up. We take the > words apart and learn the meanings of the word parts. We use the words in > written exercises, and then use them orally in class discussions. I use > the "I have, Who has?" as a review. There is a big difference between > teaching the vocabulary words and using them after you have learned them. > Teaching vocabulary/spelling has fallen out of fashion in schools, and now > we get kids at the upper levels that are language deficient. Teaching > vocabulary is something that has to be done on an ongoing basis, has to be > emphasized so that students understand the importance, and it has to be > tested so that they can show mastery of the words they have acquired. I > think teaching science vocabulary is critical for conceptual development. > If they don't understand vocabulary, they aren't understanding you when > you are teaching orally. I don't think kids just pick up the technical > vocabulary needed to progress in science. Vocabulary development is > something that a good textbook supports tremendously. Students read a > bolded word, see a related illustration, have a glossary at hand in the > back of the book, and can use supplemental pages to support the use of > unit specific terms. Textbooks rock. > > > > > On 3/17/12, Muinteoir - crud, bad HTML; my apologies wrote: >> On 3/17/12, Muinteoir wrote: >>> It's a looping questioning technique. You give kids cards with >>> questions and answers. I always start with the first card >>> >>> Me: I have the first card, who has a subatomic particle with a >>> positive charge? >>> >>> Student a: (reading from card) I have PROTON, who has > elements >>> with high electrical conductivity, luster, and malleability >>> >>> Student b: (reading from card) I have METAL, who has......? >>> >>> And so on. >>> >>> I've linked an example that explains it better than I can. >>> >>> On 3/17/12, Lynne in TN wrote: >>>> Thank you very much, Muinteoir! >>>> >>>> I am familiar with Dinah Zike and the Frayer model, but the "I >>>> Have, Who Has" game I'm not familiar with. Could you give me >>>> more information? >>>> >>>> Thank you
On ...See MoreThe salt/ice mixture has a lower freezing/melting point than ice alone (colligative properties).
The ice/salt/water mixture will cool to the new melting point and stay there until all the ice has melted. Temperature does not change during changes of phase.
The ice melts because it is absorbing energy from the room.
On 3/26/12, Carla wrote: > Question on the reason salt melts the ice: > One teacher said that salt will lower the temperature of > ice, but if it lowers the temp of ice at 32 degrees > wouldn't that make the ice colder instead of melting it? I > am trying to find a simple way to explain to the kids why > the salt(added to ice) helps the milk turn to ice > cream...Using this in my Matter unit: liquids to solids > Thanks!
On 3/30/12, Lynne in TN wrote: > The salt/ice mixture has a lower freezing/melting point than > ice alone (colligative properties). > > The ice/salt/water mixture will cool to the new melting point > and stay there until all the ice has melted. Temperature does > not change during changes of phase. > > The ice melts because it is absorbing energy from the room. > > > > > > On 3/26/12, Carla wrote: >> Question on the reason salt melts the ice: >> One teacher said that salt will lower the temperature of >> ice, but if it lowers the temp of ice at 32 degrees >> wouldn't that make the ice colder instead of melting it? I >> am trying to find a simple way to explain to the kids why >> the salt(added to ice) helps the milk turn to ice >> cream...Using this in my Matter unit: liquids to solids >> Thanks!
I am using Scott Foresman Science. Our second grade teacher uses the same series and has a teacher resource that helps her students review for the chapter. Does anyone know if there is a similar item available for fourth grade? if so, how can I get a copy? Thanks.
On 3/30/12, retired wrote: > I taught science, mostly physical science, in Georgia for > twenty-six years. I was surprised that base was > consistently used instead of alkali. When I was in high > school and college, base was considered an inferior term > since the word has so many other meanings and connotations > (Duracell and Ray-O-Vac don't advertise basic dry cells) and > alkali has but one definition. > > The only mention of alkali in the last text we adopted was > alkali and alkaline earth metals, and the book had no > explanation why they are called such! > > Georgia state standards don't mention the word alkali at > all, last I read. > > How about your state?
Education has morphed a great deal since the last time you tried it. Nuts...it has changed exponentially in the last 5-10 years. More importantly, the clientel has changed. Merely "delivering content" won't get it anymore. We're dealing with the"smart phone" generation, the one with a high...See More