This measure will not be vetoed by Jan Brewer. The "people that make decisions about education" want for Arizona to decide what the standards should be and not have dictates come from the government. This is the state in it's infinite wisdom with the guidance of our legislators determined that all children have to read at a third grade level or not pass. Many districts have done away with reading intervention and reading teachers because they did not have the money. So now all these kids will be tested for special education to determine if a learning disability in reading is present. If there is a disability the child will pass. Are people wondering why education is so poor in this state? Are they wondering if charters could be the answer? We know that Jan Brewer loves to privatize certain functions so the state can save money. She gave her cronies the right to run private corporations to run jails. The cronies recently lost their private corporation to run jails because the jails were in deplorable condition. But she will allow more charters in so friends and cronies (Dennis Bakke and Imagine Schools) can run private schools. The corporations will use money tricks so that they make oodles of money and the children will not get the needed education.
Does anyone wonder why Arizona education is dead last? The state doesn't need future workers college ready or even able to think. Arizona wants to raise a state of learners to take orders and be caretakers for the elderly population. While the numbers of middle class people who pay taxes dwindles sharply the numbers of people making minimum wage rises sharply. Fewer and fewer people able to pay the taxes to take care of the folks who will never be able to support families. Why aren't there lobbyists at the senate educating everyone about what happens when education is ignored. I really do not understand this place at all. 1062 passed and then the legislators claimed they had not read it.
aztchSpoke too soon. CC here to stay. On 3/06/14, jasped wrote: > The legislators in their infinite wisdom are now debating > in the House Senate whether or not to do away with Common > Core. > > This measure will not be vetoed by Jan Brewer. The "people > that make decisions about education" want for Arizona to > decide what the st...See MoreSpoke too soon. CC here to stay. On 3/06/14, jasped wrote: > The legislators in their infinite wisdom are now debating > in the House Senate whether or not to do away with Common > Core. > > This measure will not be vetoed by Jan Brewer. The "people > that make decisions about education" want for Arizona to > decide what the standards should be and not have dictates > come from the government. This is the state in it's > infinite wisdom with the guidance of our legislators > determined that all children have to read at a third grade > level or not pass. Many districts have done away with > reading intervention and reading teachers because they did > not have the money. So now all these kids will be tested > for special education to determine if a learning disability > in reading is present. If there is a disability the child > will pass. Are people wondering why education is so poor in > this state? Are they wondering if charters could be the > answer? We know that Jan Brewer loves to privatize certain > functions so the state can save money. She gave her cronies > the right to run private corporations to run jails. The > cronies recently lost their private corporation to run > jails because the jails were in deplorable condition. But > she will allow more charters in so friends and cronies > (Dennis Bakke and Imagine Schools) can run private schools. > The corporations will use money tricks so that they make > oodles of money and the children will not get the needed > education. > > Does anyone wonder why Arizona education is dead last? The > state doesn't need future workers college ready or even > able to think. Arizona wants to raise a state of learners > to take orders and be caretakers for the elderly > population. While the numbers of middle class people who > pay taxes dwindles sharply the numbers of people making > minimum wage rises sharply. Fewer and fewer people able to > pay the taxes to take care of the folks who will never be > able to support families. Why aren't there lobbyists at the > senate educating everyone about what happens when education > is ignored. I really do not understand this place at all. > 1062 passed and then the legislators claimed they had not > read it.
How do you know when it's time to hang it up? Teaching for seven years and no longer feel like I am making an impact on learning but still have my passion. The principal does not see my efforts and the pressure to make the grade is overwhelming. Help!!
Well the teachers leaving these somewhat nasty replies are the same ones leaving early! It is your business because these teachers are not giving their all to our future adults. Tell the principal who these slacker are now!!
Shawn Donation!!! You new what you signed up for before you became a teacher!! Time spent does not revolve around contract time!! I hope to god that my child does not have you as a teacher!! We will never see your name posted anywhere as Teacher of the Year!! On 12/18/13, NBCT EA/ELA wrote: > On 12/18/13, Terrie wrote: > >> Well the teachers ...See MoreDonation!!! You new what you signed up for before you became a teacher!! Time spent does not revolve around contract time!! I hope to god that my child does not have you as a teacher!! We will never see your name posted anywhere as Teacher of the Year!! On 12/18/13, NBCT EA/ELA wrote: > On 12/18/13, Terrie wrote: > >> Well the teachers leaving these somewhat nasty replies are >> the same ones leaving early! It is your business because >> these teachers are not giving their all to our future >> adults. Tell the principal who these slacker are now!! > > First of all, that's a huge leap by stating that the > teachers who > leave early are the one's posting. > > I don't > know about your school district, but I have a contract. > Any > time I spend beyond that, I consider it a donation. While I > work beyond my contract almost every day, I don't begrudge > anyone > who leaves at the end of their contract time. Unless > you know > everything about a teacher's personal life, you are > in no > position to judge. Maybe they have to take care of an > aging > parent or have young children that they'd like to > spend more time > with. Perhaps they are getting their work > done at home. In any > event, it is none of anyone's business > what people do BEYOND > their contracted hours. Just because > you spend extra hours does > not necessarily make you a highly > effective teacher. > > P.S. Slacker should be plural
jassRead my thoughts about one teacher of the year in Mass!!! There is a bad intensity to some of the winners of the award. Sometimes an intensity or drive to be something great is not such a good thing. Lance Armstrong is another. On 12/19/13, Shawn wrote: > Donation!!! > You new what you signed up for before you became a > teacher!! > >...See MoreRead my thoughts about one teacher of the year in Mass!!! There is a bad intensity to some of the winners of the award. Sometimes an intensity or drive to be something great is not such a good thing. Lance Armstrong is another. On 12/19/13, Shawn wrote: > Donation!!! > You new what you signed up for before you became a > teacher!! > > Time spent does not revolve around contract time!! > > I hope to god that my child does not have you as a teacher!! > > We will never see your name posted anywhere as Teacher of the > Year!! > > > > > > > On 12/18/13, NBCT EA/ELA wrote: > >> On 12/18/13, Terrie wrote: >> >>> Well the teachers leaving these somewhat nasty replies are >>> the same ones leaving early! It is your business because >>> these teachers are not giving their all to our future >>> adults. Tell the principal who these slacker are now!! >> >> First of all, that's a huge leap by stating that the >> teachers who >> leave early are the one's posting. >> >> I don't >> know about your school district, but I have a contract. >> Any >> time I spend beyond that, I consider it a donation. While I >> work beyond my contract almost every day, I don't begrudge >> anyone >> who leaves at the end of their contract time. Unless >> you know >> everything about a teacher's personal life, you are >> in no >> position to judge. Maybe they have to take care of an >> aging >> parent or have young children that they'd like to >> spend more time >> with. Perhaps they are getting their work >> done at home. In any >> event, it is none of anyone's business >> what people do BEYOND >> their contracted hours. Just because >> you spend extra hours does >> not necessarily make you a highly >> effective teacher. >> >> P.S. Slacker should be plural
Our district has said that soon, teachers in AZ will have their formal evaluation results, AIMS scores, and benchmark scores available on the dept of education website for any administrator to view (or something like that). Does anyone know if this is happening in other states as well, or everywhere in AZ? For so many reasons, incredibly wrong...
> On 12/07...See MoreI agree whole-heartedly! I had a very nasty, vindictive evaluation from a principal AFTER two "glowing" evaluations. I was non-tenured in a right to work state (yes, a conundrum)and a contract was not offered for the following school year. My opportunities for teaching in that state (not AZ)are now zero because of that eval.
> On 12/07/13, anon wrote: >> NO principals don't have that right given the filthy politics in >> public ed. You seem to think teacher "quality" can be >> "objectively" measured, but it can't because teachers are at the >> total control of principals, who can not only make teachers look >> bad but rig classes to where teachers they don't like have more >> difficult students than teachers who suck up to them. >> >> Besides, the "quality" of the teachers has little to do with >> student "performance" on standardized tests because standardized >> tests don't mean squat anyway. Teachers have no control over > the >> outside forces, including and especially transience, which you >> do mention, that affect learning as opposed to test scores.
jassWhat happens during testing and how a student does in life is not reflective of how the student will turn out in life. We do not measure those intangibles that are indicative of future success. There are many admin's who are definitely out to get rid of the teachers at the top of the pay scale. Those admins are usually known to the veteran teachers...See MoreWhat happens during testing and how a student does in life is not reflective of how the student will turn out in life. We do not measure those intangibles that are indicative of future success. There are many admin's who are definitely out to get rid of the teachers at the top of the pay scale. Those admins are usually known to the veteran teachers. I have sat in on school committee meetings where this very issue has been discussed and what is the "right" approach to use to get rid of those teachers. AZ teachers ought to mount a class action suit however most of the good teachers burn out and move to states that want educated students and teachers. On 12/07/13, anon wrote: > On 12/01/13, teacher wrote: >> Our district has said that soon, teachers in AZ will have >> their formal evaluation results, AIMS scores, and benchmark >> scores available on the dept of education website for any >> administrator to view (or something like that). Does anyone >> know if this is happening in other states as well, or >> everywhere in AZ? For so many reasons, incredibly wrong... > > > Teachers there should look into filing a class action lawsuit. > This is ripe for abuse by administrators since evaluations > are NOT objective measures of ability at all but with this > idea is simply a blackballing tool.