Looking for help and a collaborator!
Welcome Guest!
Teachers are welcome to read and post on Teachers.Net.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post pics, links & comments • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Welcome Guest!
You must login to comment on posts.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post links & upload pics • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Welcome Guest!
Your account must login to post.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post, comment, & upload pics • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Sep 12, 2012
Accuracy is not an essential part of this [Linda McMahon] deconstruction formula. For the record, Murphy hasn't skipped 80 percent of the meetings "for his job." McMahon's jobs plan is as much of a work in progress as Murphy's. (Notably, she declines to say how she would pay for the tax cuts at the center of her proposal.) Murphy also leads a bipartisan initiative looking for compromise in Congress.
This is a simple and classic marketing recipe: Say something so many times that people will believe it.
More discussions on the Connecticut Teachers Chatboard...
math in Connecticut
Need Teachers to Answer Questions for an Assignment
Social Studies
Re: retirement
Back to Connecticut Teachers Chatboard
Teacher Chatboards
