Just got my scores for Comp 1. Had to read and re-read to see if I actually passed. I think I did. Why does it have to be so complicated? You should get a statement that says you passed and not have to go through a scoring guide to see if you passed. And what is a score of 2.731 supposed to mean??
NouveauurbanI have encouraged teachers to generate discussions on the importance of self-filtering, which includes not always expressing what is on your mind. This is one of the activities in TK, Teacher Killed Over an iPod Supplementary Questions..
My hero, Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson, started to turn around his abysmal academic record when his mom insisted he turn off the TV and read 2 books weekly starting when he was 10.
Most kids probably need to start reading at home for at least an hour daily in kindergarten, and then just extend the time to 2-3 hours daily thereafter if they want to improve their reading comprehension. Dr. Carson is just very smart, which is why he could get that late start and still benefit substantially.
It's a pity parents don't realize books are just as absorbing a babysitter as a TV show. With academic benefits.
And that's also the reason you can keep throwing money at schools, but kids will continue to fail. They NEED that enjoyable reading time at home for personal entertainment, to give parents a break,and for the practice in reading that will improve their comprehension and fluency.
Many parents see reading as a chore, and subtly transmit that wrong message to their kids, who then also avoid reading, and certainly at home. Way to doom their academic progress. Incredible. Some of my best hours have been spent reading.
Maybe the solution is to let kids read for an hour a day or longer in school. That suggestion is made in all seriousness. Starting in kindergarten, by allowing the already-reading to read instead of being bored, and having reading groups to catch the others up. Perhaps bring down the advanced 5th graders to buddy up with kindergartners to read under the teachers direction.
Assessing students' progress in reading, writing, math, science and social studies doesn't have to depend upon paper, pencil and bubble sheets! Here are 40 unique ways to observe and assess students' understanding of subject matter.
-What do you think are some good aspects of No Child Left Behind?
-What do you think are some negative aspects of No Child Left Behind?
-Do you think No Child Left Behind really benefits the students? Why or why not?
-Now that most states have received the No Child Left Behind waiver has there been any changes in curriculum or the school system? If so, what changes?
-What is your opinion about standardized testing? Does preparing for these tests take away a lot of teaching time? Are they actually beneficial
-Do you think No Child Left Behind has closed the achievement gap?
-Do you feel that No Child Left Behind has reached its goals? Why or why not?
- If you were teaching before NCLB was implemented, was the education system different from the current system? If so, how?
On 11/16/12, Cassye wrote: > I am currently in school and studying to become an > elementary teacher. In one of my classes I have to do a > research project and I picked NCLB as my topic. I was > wondering if i could get some opinion from real teachers > about NCLB and what they think about it.These are the > questions that I am using for my project. Thank you so much > for your time and opinions! > > -What do you think are some good aspects of No Child Left > Behind?
The idea meant well, but it didn't go about it in the right way.
> > -What do you think are some negative aspects of No Child > Left Behind?
Way to much emphasis on testing. Treating every child like a 'cookie cutter' thinking that they all learn the same way and that all can show their knowledge and understanding in the same way.
> > -Do you think No Child Left Behind really benefits the > students? Why or why not?
No!!! It does not take into consideration individual learning styles or individual needs of any kinds - it treats all students as the same, equal. In the perfect world this would be so.
> > -Now that most states have received the No Child Left > Behind waiver has there been any changes in curriculum or > the school system? If so, what changes?
We are moving towards using the Common Core curriculums. I agree with the concept of a common core across the country - I think that is long overdue. But I do have problems with the math - it expects way too much in too short a time, it seems to think that children are little computers and again doesn't allow for slower learners, or learners with disabilities.
> > -What is your opinion about standardized testing? Does > preparing for these tests take away a lot of teaching time? > Are they actually beneficial
I HATE them!!! In the testing and data courses I have taken a well written test is written to assess how well a student has learned material. These tests are written by people who have no idea of what has been going on the classroom! Yes, we have to teach to the test -- and I have never done that before! It isn't fair to give the children a test that they have no understanding of what is expected of them.
This year in New York State they are so ill prepared to give us the tests that we haven't even had a sample given to us to see how material will be presented - how is that fair to eight and nine years old??
The tests take away from teaching time --- I feel like I spend only about half of my time teaching. I am kept busy collecting data, reporting data, guessing how students will do on tests when we don't even know what they will look like!! There are the quarter or less of the class that can keep up the pace that the tests require to be successful on them, there is the half that with just a bit more time,practice can mostly meet expectations; and then there is the bottom quarter that poor babies just get further and further behind because we just have to keep going to help the rest meet expectations. Years ago I could work with this part of the class at their level and help them but not anymore!
> chievement gap?
NO!!!! Ever since the first class I taught that had been under NCLB since kindergarten I have what I call the 'big divide' - basically the haves and the have nots! The ones who get it easily, just a couple in the middle, and the ones who are falling behind and struggling to stay afloat.
> > -Do you feel that No Child Left Behind has reached its > goals? Why or why not?
NO!!! See above.
> > - If you were teaching before NCLB was implemented, was the > education system different from the current system? If so, > how?
YES!! I taught the child. I met their needs, I was able to help them from the level they were at and help them develop their skills and understanding. I could really teach!! Now if it won't be on the test we don't have time to do it. Children in third and fourth grades are stressed about tests!! I dream of classrooms and teaching of fifteen years ago.
Sorry to tell you, a college student, that most of the joy of teaching is gone.
On 12/17/13, History Teacher wrote: > On 12/14/13, anon_dos wrote: >> On 11/16/12, Cassye wrote: >> >>> - If you were teaching before NCLB was implemented, was the >>> education system different from the current system? If so, >>> how? > > Well, the thrust of education was completely different. How to > say? There was no accountability. The process was primary - kids > went to school, teachers taught, taxpayers paid - that's the > process. > What was the outcome? No one knew (I think we still don't know) > but the idea that education should have some measurable outcome > was a new idea and the idea that NCLB is founded upon. Did our > schools work before NCLB? Well, they were up and running - is > that working? > > Hospitals are going through the same process (and long before > Obamacare) It is enough that hospitals exist? Or are they > supposed to effect positive outcomes for society? Is it enough > that schools exist? Or are they supposed to effect positive > outcomes for society? > > Believe it or not, that's new thinking. For quite some time, it's > been enough that schools and hospitals simply exist. No one asked > if they were actually accomplishing anything or not. Kids came > and went every day, patients were admitted to hospitals every > day - should there be more than that? > > People have come to believe there should be more. Hospitals > should track their results and those who enter hospitals should > leave them well - not have died on the operating table from some > horrible mistake or caught some horrible hospital-based > pneumonia. While in the hospital the right things should be done - > not the wrong things. > > The same with schools - while in school children are supposed to > be safe and to be learning but - how do we tell if they are > learning? > > That's the real problem - NCLB mandated that all public schools > test student learning every year and if the students' scores on > these federally mandated tests were not good, the school was > penalized. Some schools have been taken over by the state in my > state because their students do very poorly on these NCLB tests > (the state take-overs has not resulted in a better school...) > > Teaching in this new NCLB regime is very difficult and very > scary. Schools lose money if they don't have good outcomes on > these tests. It's Very Hard to go from working in an institution > that has very little if any accountability and now is being > penalized for not meeting established mandated standards. > > And the structure of schools and classrooms is often antithetical > to achieving good outcomes on these tests. "Teaching to the test" > is a phrase born after NCLB. >> >> >> I was teaching before NCLB. In hindsight, I see NCLB as a >> preparation for Common Core State Standards. It's a slow >> infiltration of the government into states' rights. The >> federal government has already high-jacked public education >> and they're in the process of doing the same with healthcare.
Welcome to the No Child Left Behind Chatboard. This chatboard is for discussions related to the federal No Child Left Behind initiative. Bookmark this resource and contribute often.
All the money in the world is ...See MoreOn 6/26/08, Florida teacher wrote: > No child left behind is not funded appropriately nor does it > take ALL children into account when mandating success. > > > As for my vote, I'll be glad to see the day NCLB is revised > or revoked. > > > A Florida National Board Certified Teacher
All the money in the world is not going to get a child with an IQ of 70 at grade level.
In response to President Bush's Federal No Child Left Behind Act, students will have to pass it to be promoted to the next grade level. In the hopes that it will be uniformly adopted by all the states, it will be called the Federal Arithmetic and Reading Test or (FART).
All students who cannot pass a FART in the second grade will be retested in grades 3, 4, and 5 until such a time as they are capable of achieving a FART score of 80%.
If a student does not successfully FART by grade 5, that student shall be placed in a separate English program, the Special Mastery Elective for Learning Language (SMELL).
If with this increased SMELL program the student cannot pass the required FART test, he or she can graduate to middle school by taking a one-semester course in Comprehensive Reading and Arithmetic Preparation (CRAP).
If by age fourteen, the student cannot FART, SMELL, or CRAP, he will earn his promotion in an intensive one-year seminar. This is the Preparatory Reading for Unprepared Nationally Exempted Students (PRUNES). It is the opinion of the Department of Education that an intensive one year program of PRUNES will enable any student to FART, SMELL, or CRAP.
This revised provision of the student-testing component of House Bill 110 should help clear the air. This is part of the "No School Left Standing Act".
(Disclaimer: The contents of this paragraph do not necessarily reflect its sender's serious opinion about anything, as the sender never seems to have serious opinions about anything!!!)
On 6/26/08, Mikey wrote: > Subject: No Child Left Behind > > In response to President Bush's Federal No Child Left > Behind Act, students will have to pass it to be promoted > to the next grade level. In the hopes that it will be > uniformly adopted by all the states, it will be called the > Federal Arithmetic and Reading Test or (FART). > > All students who cannot pass a FART in the second grade > will be retested in grades 3, 4, and 5 until such a time > as they are capable of achieving a FART score of 80%. > > If a student does not successfully FART by grade 5, that > student shall be placed in a separate English program, the > Special Mastery Elective for Learning Language (SMELL). > > If with this increased SMELL program the student cannot > pass the required FART test, he or she can graduate to > middle school by taking a one-semester course in > Comprehensive Reading and Arithmetic Preparation (CRAP). > > If by age fourteen, the student cannot FART, SMELL, or > CRAP, he will earn his promotion in an intensive one-year > seminar. This is the Preparatory Reading for Unprepared > Nationally Exempted Students (PRUNES). It is the opinion > of the Department of Education that an intensive one year > program of PRUNES will enable any student to FART, SMELL, > or CRAP. > > This revised provision of the student-testing component of > House Bill 110 should help clear the air. This is part of > the "No School Left Standing Act". > > (Disclaimer: The contents of this paragraph do not > necessarily reflect its sender's serious opinion about > anything, as the sender never seems to have serious > opinions about anything!!!)
IrisanrosesOn 6/26/08, Mikey wrote: > Subject: No Child Left Behind > > In response to President Bush's Federal No Child Left > Behind Act, students will have to pass it to be promoted > to the next grade level. In the hopes that it will be > uniformly adopted by all the states, it will be called the > Federal Arithmetic and Reading Test ...See MoreOn 6/26/08, Mikey wrote: > Subject: No Child Left Behind > > In response to President Bush's Federal No Child Left > Behind Act, students will have to pass it to be promoted > to the next grade level. In the hopes that it will be > uniformly adopted by all the states, it will be called the > Federal Arithmetic and Reading Test or (FART). > > All students who cannot pass a FART in the second grade > will be retested in grades 3, 4, and 5 until such a time > as they are capable of achieving a FART score of 80%. > > If a student does not successfully FART by grade 5, that > student shall be placed in a separate English program, the > Special Mastery Elective for Learning Language (SMELL). > > If with this increased SMELL program the student cannot > pass the required FART test, he or she can graduate to > middle school by taking a one-semester course in > Comprehensive Reading and Arithmetic Preparation (CRAP). > > If by age fourteen, the student cannot FART, SMELL, or > CRAP, he will earn his promotion in an intensive one-year > seminar. This is the Preparatory Reading for Unprepared > Nationally Exempted Students (PRUNES). It is the opinion > of the Department of Education that an intensive one year > program of PRUNES will enable any student to FART, SMELL, > or CRAP. > > This revised provision of the student-testing component of > House Bill 110 should help clear the air. This is part of > the "No School Left Standing Act". > > (Disclaimer: The contents of this paragraph do not > necessarily reflect its sender's serious opinion about > anything, as the sender never seems to have serious > opinions about anything!!!) What, then ,happens if the PRUNES doesn't work? Do they offer another program to help them CRAP?