Try this new social learning platform, flip your classroom, distribute your lessons and hand out assignments. Give you students the opportunity to collaborate and discuss their digital knowledge with gostudyit.com
...an approach to organizing classro...See MoreWelcome to the Collaborative Learning Chatboard. This chatboard is for teachers to discuss Collaborative Learning/Cooperative Learning in the classroom - collaborative games, lesson plans, strategies and exercises for teaching collaborative learning.
Wikipedia defines collaborative learning as:
...an approach to organizing classroom activities into academic and social learning experiences. Students must work in groups to complete tasks collectively. Unlike individual learning, students learning cooperatively capitalize on one another's resources and skills (asking one another for information, evaluating one another's ideas, monitoring one another's work, etc.). Furthermore, the teacher's role changes from giving information to facilitating students' learning. Everyone succeeds when the group succeeds.
Make the most out of your collaborative learning and cooperative learning exercises and lessons by collaborating and sharing strategies, approaches, and lesson plans, and just by networking, with other teachers using collaborative learning in the classroom.
disney cathy K(ret)Hi Bob, Although retired I enjoy reading the posts about this interesting subject. DC > > On 6/21/11, Bob Reap (Teachers.Net) wrote: >> Welcome to the Collaborative Learning Chatboard. This >> chatboard is for teachers to discuss Collaborative >> Learning/Cooperative Learning in the classroom - >> collaborative games, ...See MoreHi Bob, Although retired I enjoy reading the posts about this interesting subject. DC > > On 6/21/11, Bob Reap (Teachers.Net) wrote: >> Welcome to the Collaborative Learning Chatboard. This >> chatboard is for teachers to discuss Collaborative >> Learning/Cooperative Learning in the classroom - >> collaborative games, lesson plans, strategies and exercises >> for teaching collaborative learning. >> >> Wikipedia defines collaborative learning as: >> >> ...an approach to organizing classroom activities into >> academic and social learning experiences. Students must >> work in groups to complete tasks collectively. Unlike >> individual learning, students learning cooperatively >> capitalize on one another's resources and skills (asking one >> another for information, evaluating one another's ideas, >> monitoring one another's work, etc.). Furthermore, the >> teacher's role changes from giving information to >> facilitating students' learning. Everyone succeeds when the >> group succeeds. >> >> Make the most out of your collaborative learning and >> cooperative learning exercises and lessons by collaborating >> and sharing strategies, approaches, and lesson plans, and >> just by networking, with other teachers using collaborative >> learning in the classroom. >> >> Bookmark this resource and contribute often!
Ms. S.Love using collaborative learning in my classroom! It gives the kids a chance to take on leaderships roles with their peers. Looking forward to new ideas!!
Now when we do labs, I hav...See MoreOver the years I have learned that letting students pick their groups especially for projects that are weighted more than a daily grade is a good thing to do. Though I have been known to let students pick groups, but some people can't be in the same group. So it is a bit limiting, however, they still get to pick.
Now when we do labs, I have found that labs work out better if I select the group.
On 6/22/11, Bulldog wrote: > Speaking as a student, I always hated it when the teacher > would assign group work. I hated it even more when the > teacher assigned the groups. It always ended up that I would > do the work and the others would coat-tail their way to a > grade they did not earn. I've always allowed my students to > choose their partners to work with in class and on out of > class projects. During the group work time, I patrol the > class offering help and making sure the kids are on task. By > allowing the kids to choose their partner(s), the only one > they have to blame for a poor grade is themselves. They made > a poor choice of a partner. > However, before the groupwork begins, I ask them to look > around and then write down who they think is the smartest or > best student. They hand these in and I then ask if they > wanted to get a good grade, why wouldn't they want to work > with that person? This way, they are able to make a decision > based on academics and not popularity. It works most of the > time (and the nerds get a huge ego boost). > > Bulldog! > > On 6/22/11, Kathy M wrote: >> The county offered a class based upon this book. I like the >> way teachers organized the groups. Make a list of all the >> students arranging them from most talkative to least >> talkative. Number them Make a list from most studious yo >> least studious. Number them. Add the two numbers together >> for each student, put them in order. Groupings are students >> 1&2 with students 16&17. Students 14&15 with students >> 29&30. It worked as a starting point.
Kids need to be taught how to work together. The reason group work so often goes so badly is because teachers ususally don't teach students how to work together. How do you deal with the smart, bossy kid who would rather do everything than share the work and risk someone else doing it wrong and getting him/her a bad grade? How do you deal with the poor reader who is too embarassed so he/she goofs off/pushes back from the table and doodles rather than participates? How do you deal with .... and the list goes on.
It's hard for teachers to teach the diversity in our classrooms. How can we expect kids to work in groups with out any preparation?
Teachers! I am giving an hour presentation on Collaborative Learning tomorrow. If there are any experiences you have where Collaborative Learning really worked in your classroom, please feel free to share so I can share. If you have a disaster story, share that, too!
I found that requiring students to fill out a self-evaluation form at the end of each session and allowing them to complete a form on each team member helped them focus on what they were to do (the evaluation form went along with the task) and helped prevent them from becoming too social. When (not if) they got too talkative, someone in the group almost always got the group back on track by referring to the evaluation forms. If someone in the group didn't, all I generally had to do was move to their group and touch the evaluation form to help them get back on track. They were generally quite honest in both evaluations - of themselves and of teammates. This was in fifth grade.
> On 6/22/11, Novel wrote: >> >> Ask students to prepare a presentation together and each must >> contribute 10 sentences (or 5 or something). This way, they >> all have to invest something in the task because they are all >> responsible for the outcome. >> >> Work in small groups rather than large ones - it is easier to >> be "lost" if there are too many other contributors. >> >> Give roles within the group - chair, minutes keeper, reporter, >> etc, swapping each time. >> >> Give grades for participation and contributions, as well as >> outcome. Use the preparation as an assessment task. Spotlight >> a certain group who are doing well - stop the other groups to >> watch one group as it continues. praise the positive. Set >> other groups going again. >> >> Any help?
Great question! Knowing my students I still would have kept them in the same group but work closer with that group. It would have been unfair to change the groups that were working well together. Our next group lesson they would not have been together. I always try to remix groups to keep the students from excluding anyone and giving them a chance to work with different students.
> My class was studying mid-evil Europe and I assigned groups > to build castles together. One group in particular could > not work together but the other groups were doing great. > They wanted me to change their group. I talked with each > student (3 of them per group) individual to find out the > problem and gave each suggestions on how to handle the > problems, but I did not change the groups. The second day > no progress. By the third day when they saw I was not > changing groups they worked it out. We can't change jobs in > life just because we can't get along, but giving them tools > to work it out helped.
I'm in an inservice for the new standards today. It is making me think that collaboration will be much more meaningful rather than just completing a worksheet together.
I always give students rubrics. One is for the project and the other is for group work. This way they know what to expect and given a timeline they know that they will not have time for socializing.
I have had students who wanted to work alone and I try very hard to keep them working in a group but sometimes it just doesn't work-- there is more arguing and disagreeing going on then work--finally I just let them work alone.
On 6/22/11, parents talk wrote: > On 6/22/11, Connie wrote: >> On 6/22/11, Kathy/ks wrote: >>> I'm in an inservice for the new standards today. It is >>> making me think that collaboration will be much more >>> meaningful rather than just completing a worksheet >>> together. >> I wonder about those students who prefer to work alone and how >> do you help them understand working together is beneficial > > I had one of those students this year. It was hard for him as he > finished 9th and 10th grade in one year. He would complain he was > not part of the class. Then when you included him he was done so > quick the he didn't have the patience to sit and wait for you to > complete the lesson or to work with other students. It does boil > down to social skills. That was what he needed most so I > persisted he work with the other students when there was group > work as group work was not on a daily basis.
On 6/22/11, Terry wrote: > I use collaborative learning as much as possible. My problem is > having the space to arrange my desks in groups. The students like > working in groups and I have been reading more this summer about > project based learning. > > I always give students rubrics. One is for the project and the > other is for group work. This way they know what to expect and > given a timeline they know that they will not have time for > socializing. > > I have had students who wanted to work alone and I try very hard to > keep them working in a group but sometimes it just doesn't work-- > there is more arguing and disagreeing going on then work--finally I > just let them work alone. > > > On 6/22/11, parents talk wrote: >> On 6/22/11, Connie wrote: >>> On 6/22/11, Kathy/ks wrote: >>>> I'm in an inservice for the new standards today. It is >>>> making me think that collaboration will be much more >>>> meaningful rather than just completing a worksheet >>>> together. >>> I wonder about those students who prefer to work alone and how >>> do you help them understand working together is beneficial >> >> I had one of those students this year. It was hard for him as he >> finished 9th and 10th grade in one year. He would complain he was >> not part of the class. Then when you included him he was done so >> quick the he didn't have the patience to sit and wait for you to >> complete the lesson or to work with other students. It does boil >> down to social skills. That was what he needed most so I >> persisted he work with the other students when there was group >> work as group work was not on a daily basis.
judy5ca has no idea what happenedOn 6/22/11, Tallytchr wrote: > Every year we are forced to do "cross grade level" planning. > We meet with the grade level below ours in one session and > meet with the grade level above us at another time. > > The first year, the grade level above us decided this was a > time to let us know all the things we weren't doing to prep...See MoreOn 6/22/11, Tallytchr wrote: > Every year we are forced to do "cross grade level" planning. > We meet with the grade level below ours in one session and > meet with the grade level above us at another time. > > The first year, the grade level above us decided this was a > time to let us know all the things we weren't doing to prepare > the kids for the next level. We were hurt, but we took the > criticism to heart and made many changes. The next year, we > went in expecting to get a little positive feedback, but got > the same thing, just a bunch of complaints. The third year, we > spoke back and let them sort of "have it". An last year, we > asked the principal if we could just have the two team leaders > meet. She was surprised at why but she said she'd consider it > for next year. We shall see. > > The opposite was true with the grade level below. We always > made sure they knew what a good job they did of preparing the > kids to come up. Our experience with the upper grade let us > know we didn't want teachers to feel that way. > > As the years have passed, I've come to realize that just > telling people to collaborate doesn't make it productive. > > A better understanding of what collaboration was supposed to > produce, would have made our experience much more positive.
How do you handle grouping? I often find that mixing students of different levels works best; however, my classes are now ability grouped which makes collaborative learning groups more difficult for me in my middle school language arts classroom.
TallytchrI guess you would have to look at their strengths and weaknesses. Probably wouldn't want to pair too many strong personalities or shy personalities in one group.
It might be easier with ability leveled groups though...not as frustrating for the high kids if the other kids are high too. should work well as long as personalities don't clash.
On 6/22/11, Tallytchr wrote: > I guess you would have to look at their strengths and > weaknesses. Probably wouldn't want to pair too many strong > personalities or shy personalities in one group. > > It might be easier with ability leveled groups though...not as > frustrating for the high kids if the other kids are high too. > should work well as long as personalities don't clash.
I have taught elementary for the last 5 years and I believe the more you let children collaborate the less you will have to use some sort of intervention. Any parent knows that children do learn from others whether it is positive or negative learning. Teachers need to realize the more collaboration in the classroom may lead to a higher noise level ...See MoreI have taught elementary for the last 5 years and I believe the more you let children collaborate the less you will have to use some sort of intervention. Any parent knows that children do learn from others whether it is positive or negative learning. Teachers need to realize the more collaboration in the classroom may lead to a higher noise level but it is what I call productive noise. Of course you do have those few little darlings that are more than willing to chat about other things, so I say to you, make sure you also have "jobs" that students hold with in that group. For example: Encourager(gives positive feedback to group members for participation), Time Keeper(Keeps the group on track and doesn't allow them to drift), and a Recorder(one who keeps the notes of the group's activity). You can also have material person, and clean up person. This set up will allow everyone to have a job in the group and when trained on how it should work runs really smoothly. The teacher becomes more like the facilitator and children are more engaged and enjoy the lesson more. When I did this in my classrooms children didn't want to stop learning. Collaborative Learning is in most every work place. Teachers use Collaborative Learning, which we call Collaborative Planning with team teachers. Lets take what we learn in our own life and use it in the classroom.
Stacy I have used Find Someone Who...on several occasions. It is a great ice breaker. I recently used it with a grade 7 class, but I have also used this with high school students. Everyone seems to like the activit