I really haven't concerned myself with deep state theories. I don't think these theories are so deep. We know that around the world and throughout history, there have been shadow governments seeking to undermine the work of serving societies. In the US, our own representatives bow down to influences other than the constituencies that elected them.
While debates about policies and laws such as the Patriot Act took place, we as a society really didn't bat an eye. Congress openly announces obligations to donors in the face of their constituents and we do nothing. A deep state is not necessary. The US runs on apathy.
Yet, regarding the deep state, some of it is controlled by philosophy. Those in government only allow others in government who subscribe to the Neoliberal philosophy on economics and foreign policy.
The best example is Larry Summers comment to Yanis Varoufakis and others, "Do you want to be an insider or and outsider!" The point being, the system is rigged such that insiders are well cared for by the banks and military industrial complex - the profiteers of the system. The outsiders are "on their own!" And, if too much of a nuisance, they are personally and/or financially destroyed.
It just depends on whether or not your integrity is for sale; and it seems for many Americans, it is! Yet, even that is no surprise when capitalism is your economic system.
In the year since the publication of the so-called Steele dossier — the collection of intelligence reports we commissioned about Donald Trump's ties to Russia — the president has repeatedly attacked us on Twitter. His allies in Congress have dug through our bank records and sought to tarnish our firm to punish us for highlighting his links to Russia. Conservative news outlets and even our former employer, The Wall Street Journal, have spun a succession of mendacious conspiracy theories about our motives and backers.
We are happy to correct the record. In fact, we already have.
Three congressional committees have heard over 21 hours of testimony from our firm, Fusion GPS. In those sessions, we toppled the far right's conspiracy theories and explained how The Washington Free Beacon and the Clinton campaign — the Republican and Democratic funders of our Trump research — separately came to hire us in the first place.
We walked investigators through our yearlong effort to decipher Mr. Trump's complex business past, of which the Steele dossier is but one chapter. And we handed over our relevant bank records — while drawing the line at a fishing expedition for the records of companies we work for that have nothing to do with the Trump case.
Republicans have refused to release full transcripts of our firm's testimony, even as they selectively leak details to media outlets on the far right. It's time to share what our company told investigators.
We don't believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.'s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp."
From the article linked in the previous post: "We don't believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.'s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp."
About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Mos...See MoreWASHINGTON — During a night of heavy drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia's top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton.
About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign.
Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians' role.
The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia's attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump's associates conspired.
If Mr. Papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I. and is now a cooperating witness, was the improbable match that set off a blaze that has consumed the first year of the Trump administration, his saga is also a tale of the Trump campaign in miniature. He was brash, boastful and underqualified, yet he exceeded expectations. And, like the campaign itself, he proved to be a tantalizing target for a Russian influence operation.
For example, economist Richard Wolff says we cannot go back to deporting every illegal, because it would result in a failed state at our southern border - costing us much more. This does not mean open borders. Clearly, many Americans want their citizenship to have more legal significance than an open border policy provides.
Now, I find economist Yanis Varoufakis (Greek) saying we cannot go back to the New Deal of the past. Add to this, Richard Wolff claims if we did, the rich would undo the new "New Deal" in 35 years rather than the 70 years it took this time.
Although not mention as a factor, I notice the New Deal was limited to workers. That would not be acceptable in today's world.
(Quote from Varoufakis' - edited from spoken word)
In the twentieth century, we had the stabilization and civilization of capitalism through the rise of social democracies (Europe) and the New Deal (US). Unfortunately, the paradigm is dead.
The New Deal was about two things. First, it was redistribution within waged labor. A kind of insurance for the working class - for example: unemployment insurance, union pensions, and more
The second dimension was distribution between capital and labor - for example: minimum wage, progessive tax system, and collective bargaining laws.
(Snip)
The first plank is not possible because wages have stagnated to such an extent that it is impossible for the working class to insure itself. And the second plank, the redistribution between capital and labor, is increasingly impossible for two reasons. First, the politics! (Snip) Redistribution requires political governance, and Europe and the United States are ungovernable - utterly and completely ungovernable.
The second, in science fiction terms, is called "the rise of the machines." Artificial intelligence will soon consume all repetitive work and all algorithmic work - especially the moment the machines pass the "Turing Test." Once we have that we will have a massive displacement effect which, for the first time, will overwhelm the creation (of jobs).
Economist Mark Blythe of Brown University had this to say about the Trump tax cuts.
(Quote)
The party of the plutocracy has taken everything they can from the bottom 80% and are now coming after the next 19%.
(End quote)
Capitalism is "dog eat dog", and we are reaching the end point where there are only a few dogs left! And still, they will try to eat each other. This system will end badly - even for the rich.
Time to quit pretending American elections are "sacred!" American elections are rigged, and so many people have figured it out that the largest block of voters consists of those who do not bother to show up!
I really haven't concerned myself with deep state theories. I don't think these theories are...See More