UK Teachers invited to anonymous MSc study on behaviour
Welcome Guest!
Teachers are welcome to read and post on Teachers.Net.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post pics, links & comments • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Welcome Guest!
You must login to comment on posts.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post links & upload pics • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Welcome Guest!
Your account must login to post.
Login to access to these free features:
| • Relaxed spam filters • Post, comment, & upload pics • Get notified of responses |
• Join teacher groups • Apply to teacher jobs • Post a resume |
| LOGIN |
Jun 12, 2017
Anyway - you may as well just give the student a 100% without taking the test if all they have to do is "not do" a question that they don't know the answer to. Answer the questions you know, leave the ones you don't know blank, and you get 100%.
Obviously, this is not a fair or accurate system to measure what someone actually knows or can do. Sure, we need to allow for slower processing, etc. So extra time makes sense. A shorter test makes sense.
But just allowing a student to decide AFTER seeing the questions which ones they will do or not isn't really a workable solution.
Teacher Chatboards
