I'm returning to second grade after a couple of years teaching 1st and I can't find my Month to Month Second Grade Book. Can someone tell me the word wall words that Cunningham recommended you start with on the word wall? I think 2 of them might be: said, because
Cheryl Sigmon wrote: There is no evidence that ability grouping is necessary for Differentiating Instruction. Here’s how teaching all children to read, write and grow in literacy can be accomplished.
I appreciate you taking the time to give me some sound advice and empathy. The reading specialist got angry with me when I asked her to come in my classroom and "show" me how to do these F and P groups during my Core and get everything else done that they expect of me. We have 2 more years of this Reading "Fist" strait jacket to wear and I am hoping I can endure until then. We are a miserable bunch of teachers and I know the kids pick up on that. I'm not saying it's all bad, but our state, Arizona, had an independent consulting firm called West Ed come in from California to help implement RF. They are not mean or hard-nosed for the most part. However, they keep adding layer after layer of unreal expectations on us. Sometimes I feel that if they add too many more layers I will smother! Fair warning to all of you teachers. Don't sign on to Reading First. We were so fooled by it all. It is a nightmare.
On 3/30/07, mcr wrote: > I appreciate you taking the time to give me some sound > advice and empathy. The reading specialist got angry with > me when I asked her to come in my classroom and "show" me > how to do these F and P groups during my Core and get > everything else done that they expect of me. We have 2 > more years of this Reading "Fist" strait jacket to wear > and I am hoping I can endure until then. We are a > miserable bunch of teachers and I know the kids pick up on > that. I'm not saying it's all bad, but our state, > Arizona, had an independent consulting firm called West Ed > come in from California to help implement RF. They are > not mean or hard-nosed for the most part. However, they > keep adding layer after layer of unreal expectations on > us. Sometimes I feel that if they add too many more > layers I will smother! Fair warning to all of you > teachers. Don't sign on to Reading First. We were so > fooled by it all. It is a nightmare.
mcr,
What you might look at is what you can do within the blocks and still meet the core expectations. I know for example from my work with Reading First schools who have been successful with the Four Blocks framework, that we have done extensive work with Book Clubs. What is key to remember is that Reading First does NOT allow any materials outside of core. You must choose materials within core (IE the purchased basal program). However, often if you look at all the reading materials provided, the main selection, the leveled readers, the extra leveled readers, the below readers, the phonic readers, etc. You can usually come up with Book Clubs that work. For example, if Frog and Toad is the main selection, then it is usually ok for a Frog and Toad Book Club lesson that week. Another option is if there is a lesson on fantasy for Dragon Gets By then having several books for the genre of fantasy since the characteristics of fantasy are the purpose of the lesson. You just have to choose from the approved list of books.
How is it "Four Blocks"? We teach one teaching point.
How do you honor Reading First? Where do we get the teaching point? You get it from your state expectations and from your core program. Using the example above, the reason you would choose teaching fantasy is because your core basal told you to teach fantasy or real/not real.
If you were told in your basal/core to teach something else then you would pick another teaching point.
There are TONS of teaching points in the basals. The problem with the core and basal is there are TOO many teaching points. We have to choose one and teach it well.
I feel your pain, and also your appreciation. I liked Brad's response to the other poster...lay low and do what is instructionally sound. Our large urban district adopted a fairly structure, scripted series that is seriously flawed. The publisher's "coach" said, "It doesn't matter what the children are doing at the centers, as long as teacher meets with small groups." (said to a K teacher whose students were gluing cut and paste work to their foreheads). I realized, though, that if I keep inputting fluency scores into the computer, I can stay under the radar and actually make the instructional decisions that a professional should be making. Next year...4 blocks, again. I've done F&P and it has many wonderful aspects. However, it is not really teacher-friendly. The framework of 4-blocks best meets the diverse needs of students, gives me time to work with individuals, teaches students to choose appropriate reading material without me levelling every book, and embraces the instruction of a variety of necessary reading strategies. I hope you will be able to do what you know works for you and your students. I've managed to get a teaching partner to "defect" from the mandated series next year so that I can have a "partner in crime". the sad thing is: we have to hide good instruction because we "might get in trouble".
I am new to grade 3 and will be doing Charlotte's Web with my students. Do any posters have good suggestions on pacing and structure for using this book during the comprehension block? P.S. This is an "easy" book for a third of my class, instructional for the remainder, except for two students who will require a lot of support. Thanks for any tips or suggestions.
I am very discouraged right now. It seems like Building Blocks has almost slipped into oblivion! The BB chatboard is as good as inactive, maybe 1-2 posts a week. And there is little or no mention of BB on any of the 4 blocks websites. I have used BB for several years now, I won all the books and have read them several times, but at times (like right now!!) I need a little inspiration, so I go looking. Finding stuff on the web always gives me new ideas & a little wind in my sails, but it seems like what used to be out there about BB is gone, and nothing new is taking its place.
Is there something going on with BB that I am unaware of? Do I need to start searching for a new literacy framework to use that has support available? I love BB, but it sure seems like it is becoming a little extinct.
Please let me know if you know anything about this!
Some districts in Fl have money to invest in programs and materials. I have been trying to figure this thing out and have bought several of the books thinking that each one would give more insight than the next. Not so. How do you get acquainted with this program. This works really well for elementary, but the district that I am in is incorporating the same thing into secondary that are not passing FCAT. I wanted to do an action research with the other intensive reading teachers at my school, but it seems too time consuming and confusing. Might I add, that this is my 3rd year teaching, but we have been trained extensively in reading. We have either 90 minute or 50 minute classes. What is the deal with this program?
On 4/02/07, kteacher271 wrote: >> It is alive and well. Post here and we'll chat. The >> Building Blocks chatboard was never ever very active. I just >> spent several days in awesome Building Blocks classrooms. >> The teachers incorporated science into their predictable >> charts lessons. > > I am so relieved to know that it is not fading into the > sunset. What has happened to all the info about it that used > to be on the 4 blocks websites? > >> >> What is your favorite part of building blocks? > > It's hard to say what my favorite part is. I don't think I can > choose one activity I like the best. I love morning message, > shared reading, GTKY activities (we do them all year long), > predictable charts, class books, shared writing, journal > writing...I could go on and on. My absolute favorite thing > about it is how developmentally appropriate it is! It is one > of the few framewroks out there that doesn't try to turn K > into 1st grade! > >> >> What are you needing a lift about or more ideas about? > > My frustration right now is the whole letter of the week > thing. We are supposed to do LOTW in my district because > that's how our curriculum is laid out. I know that is not the > most effective or appropriate way to teach letters & sounds, > so I was really curious about how to kind of "fake it" with > LOTW. I was hoping I could find some information about using > name activities, morning message, tongue twisters, etc. to > sneak in what would have the appearance of LOTW to the powers > that be! > > We are also "required" to do guided reading with our Kinders > here. We supposed to start our GR groups in January, a la > Fountas and Pinnell. I haven't done GR groups yet, and I don't > plan on it. But I was curious about the whole "lunch Bunch" > idea from 4 blocks. Is that concept something that would work > just as well with Kinders who are struggling or need an extra > push? > > Other than that, nothing specific right now. I just get in > moods where I need to see ideas in general & read the info on > BB al over again to re-energize a little, only this time I > couldn't find anything! > > Thanks! > Stephanie:)
Hi! I use BB ,too. I don't check this board too often but if you ever want to chat with another BB teacher, e-mail me!
Erica
On 4/14/07, Diana in FL wrote: > Some districts in Fl have money to invest in programs and > materials. I have been trying to figure this thing out and have > bought several of the books thinking that each one would give > more insight than the next. Not so. How do you get acquainted > with this program. This works really well for elementary, but > the district that I am in is incorporating the same thing into > secondary that are not passing FCAT. I wanted to do an action > research with the other intensive reading teachers at my school, > but it seems too time consuming and confusing. Might I add, that > this is my 3rd year teaching, but we have been trained > extensively in reading. We have either 90 minute or 50 minute > classes. What is the deal with this program? > > On 4/02/07, kteacher271 wrote: >>> It is alive and well. Post here and we'll chat. The >>> Building Blocks chatboard was never ever very active. I just >>> spent several days in awesome Building Blocks classrooms. >>> The teachers incorporated science into their predictable >>> charts lessons. >> >> I am so relieved to know that it is not fading into the >> sunset. What has happened to all the info about it that used >> to be on the 4 blocks websites? >> >>> >>> What is your favorite part of building blocks? >> >> It's hard to say what my favorite part is. I don't think I can >> choose one activity I like the best. I love morning message, >> shared reading, GTKY activities (we do them all year long), >> predictable charts, class books, shared writing, journal >> writing...I could go on and on. My absolute favorite thing >> about it is how developmentally appropriate it is! It is one >> of the few framewroks out there that doesn't try to turn K >> into 1st grade! >> >>> >>> What are you needing a lift about or more ideas about? >> >> My frustration right now is the whole letter of the week >> thing. We are supposed to do LOTW in my district because >> that's how our curriculum is laid out. I know that is not the >> most effective or appropriate way to teach letters & sounds, >> so I was really curious about how to kind of "fake it" with >> LOTW. I was hoping I could find some information about using >> name activities, morning message, tongue twisters, etc. to >> sneak in what would have the appearance of LOTW to the powers >> that be! >> >> We are also "required" to do guided reading with our Kinders >> here. We supposed to start our GR groups in January, a la >> Fountas and Pinnell. I haven't done GR groups yet, and I don't >> plan on it. But I was curious about the whole "lunch Bunch" >> idea from 4 blocks. Is that concept something that would work >> just as well with Kinders who are struggling or need an extra >> push? >> >> Other than that, nothing specific right now. I just get in >> moods where I need to see ideas in general & read the info on >> BB al over again to re-energize a little, only this time I >> couldn't find anything! >> >> Thanks! >> Stephanie:)
I am in the process of ordering materials for next year. I was browsing at Carson-Dellosa and saw that there are two new MxM books--for 4th and 5th grades. According to the site, they will be available in June 2007.
I wonder how extensive the update is. I couldn't find any more info on these. (Checked P. Cunningham's & Arens' sites.)
I'm teaching 4th grade next year and we have a district required spelling series. I would really like to use Month-by-Month Phonics for Upper Grades also. Has anyone else used it with a different spelling series?
Hi Everyone, Here I go again, wanting to 'tweak' my writing block organization a bit! I am on five years of 4 blocks, and each year, I never feel my writing block is organized enough.
Can you guys provide some suggestions for:
1. How do your children organize their writing notebooks? I have used a 3 ring binder for several years and divided it into 3 sections: writing tools, work in progress, and then completed pieces. No matter what, the notebboks seem in disarray. How often do your children purge their notebooks, etc.? I just need some tips! 2. Also, how do you organize your writing centers? I want to have various graphic organizers I've introduced, special writing papers, etc at the kiddos fingertips, but I need some ideas on how to do this without making my writing center crowded and chaotic.
I would love if some of you would share some ideas! PLEASE! Thanks a lot, Stephanie
The fourth and fifth grade teachers in my school are new to Big Blocks and are concerned that the making words activities in the Month By Month Phonics book aren't systematic enough. Any thoughts?
My indpendent school is going to start the process of implementing curriculum-- which it has never done in 50 years-- so you can imagine the fight from some of the of the teachers who have been there 15-30 years!!! Well, I think the 4 blocks would be perfect, as much of it is very similar to what we already do... We already do reading and writers workshop, and this has been an unpoken curriculum since the school was founded... much in the big blocks style, though mini-lessons would be new, because with kids under about 7 our school does very little whole group instruction outside of Morning Meeting.
Anyway, I am hoping that this will flow easily into our progressive classrooms. I don't think anyone at our school would do 90 minutes of instruction... nor would they want to be told to do this. As it is now, with a much more integrated program... I couldn't say how many minutes people spend on one thing at a time, because we don't break everything into subjects, at least not in the early primary. I teach 8-9 year olds (about 3rd grade) and do break the day by content area, but this only starts happening at my age. We have very literary kids, but again, the phonics/spelling aspect of the program is lacking. We don't do the state testing or any other kinds of formal assessment, so if this were done, we may find otherwise. But as it is, I think we have a GREAT program, that just needs a little tweaking!
Here was my idea... tell me if you think it sounds feasible with the 4 blocks model...
2-5 Grade classes would have:
Guided Reading grades 2-5 Junior Great Books or other novel studies using shared inquiry format 40 minutes 2-3 x per week (We already do JGB, though not as a whole school, the teachers in these grades adopted and implemented it on their own without direction from the head of school or anyone else)
Working with Words: 30 minutes 2-3 days, except 4-5th classes, which continues with grammar and Greek and Latin word study
We are also doing Handwriting Without Tears, which I do daily for about 10 minutes right now, and was thinking of trying to tie into WWW??
Self-Selected Reading: As usual at daily 30 minutes of reading + 20 minutes of read aloud (we do this already in exactly the 4 blocks way!)
Writing: Journals daily 30 minutes about the same as always at our school, but with whole group mini-lessons 2-3 times per week (This is equivalent to WW, where the students write stories of their choice, conference with the teacher, edit, revise and publish... they go to the school library... this will not be a major shift at all for us)
1st grade:
30-40 minutes of working with words, free choice that includes HWT practice pages, working with words activities, centers???
20 minutes self-selected reading (possibly two 10 minute times) + read alouds another 10 minutes? 20 minutes guided reading (broken up throughout day) 20 minutes of journal with mini-lesson a couple times a week
I think in the 1st grade, the only things that aren't happening are the mini- lessons with writing (we are very individualized in this way) and the working with words in this way. I think right now they play a lot of games and do some whole group instruction in phonics-- we don't do HF words right now. Also, we don't do any guided reading groups at all, which is good, since 4 blocks doesn't either... but could stand to do more choral, big book and other kinds of reading. This varies from class to class right now. Some do it more than others.
I have no idea about Kindergarten, because all of our classes are combined, so there would be prek-k and k-1... this is where the 4 blocks seems like it would be sort of tricky.
On 3/30/07, mcr wrote:
> I appreciate you taking the time to give me some sound
> advice and empathy. The reading specialist got angry with
> me when I asked her to come in my classroom and "show" me
> how to do these F and P groups during my Core and get
> everything else done that they e...See More