I've seen this company advertised in teaching magazines and checked out their website. Does anyone have any experience with them or know anything about them? Sounds too good to be true. If it works, I'd love to try it.
PamOn 7/16/11, Kathy wrote: > On 5/15/10, Nicole wrote: >> I was thinking the same since I was thinking about opening my >> own reading clinic. You have to go to a week long training >> in Kansas city, which isn't too far for me. Have you seen >> how much they charge for this training plus materials? The >> going rate ...See MoreOn 7/16/11, Kathy wrote: > On 5/15/10, Nicole wrote: >> I was thinking the same since I was thinking about opening my >> own reading clinic. You have to go to a week long training >> in Kansas city, which isn't too far for me. Have you seen >> how much they charge for this training plus materials? The >> going rate is $6000. That is way too much money for me. >> There is no guarantee anyhow. > > I live in Houston, and have also researched this reading program. > I found a person in my area who bought program a few years back. > We met and she let borrow her material to look over. The material > is very easy to follow. The lady had used the program and saw > good results. All she did was use the flyers they provided and > took some to her area schools, and she got 4 students. You do not > need to buy the material, you become a tutor under the person > with the licence and when you get students you pay a percentage > back to the licence holder. Being a reading teacher and know what > reading program cost $6000 is not bad. When you buy the program > you then can recuit other under you and they can either pay a > flat fee to use your licenced material of a percentage of thier > income. I am buying the program. >
I am interested in talking to you about academic associates..
would you be willing to contact me?
> On 7/16/11, Kathy wrote: >> On 5/15/10, Nicole wrote: >>> I was thinking the same since I was thinking about >>> opening > my >>> own reading clinic. You have to go to a week long >>> training in Kansas city, which isn't too far for me. >>> Have you seen how much they charge for this training >>> plus materials? The going rate is $6000. That is way >>> too much money for me. There is no guarantee anyhow. >> >> I live in Houston, and have also researched this reading > program. >> I found a person in my area who bought program a few >> years > back. >> We met and she let borrow her material to look over. The > material >> is very easy to follow. The lady had used the program >> and saw good results. All she did was use the flyers >> they provided > and >> took some to her area schools, and she got 4 students. >> You do > not >> need to buy the material, you become a tutor under the >> person with the licence and when you get students you >> pay a > percentage >> back to the licence holder. Being a reading teacher and >> know > what >> reading program cost $6000 is not bad. When you buy the > program >> you then can recuit other under you and they can either >> pay a flat fee to use your licenced material of a >> percentage of > thier >> income. I am buying the program. >>
The DIBELS template document that I've decided to share is not only a tool to document a students scores throughout the year, but also a progress report for parents as well. It is written in Microsoft Word format, so you can make your own changes to fit your school needs. The template shows the benchmark goal for each skill next to the place where the students actual score is placed. Teachers and Parents can easily understand if the student met their goal, and if the goal was not met, or how far below the goal the student actually is. Their is a parent letter to aid in understanding scores and benchmark goals and a page for each grade K-6. This template took a while to create and I would like to help other teachers who are looking for such a template and need to save time.
E-mail me if you have questions or have trouble downloading. The easiest way is to highlight the address below and copy/paste it into the URL. The document's web address is below:
Did anyone else ever read the content and work all of the reading levels prior to their students actually working o this program? Interested in follow up of this program within school districts.
As a Reading Tutor,I was introduced to the Pecci Beginning Reading Series. It's focused on Grade K and Grade 1 and is also great for remedial reading and special ed. It's a simplified phonics method that uses a literature-based format. The stores are fun and teach social skills and are very appealing to my students. For more details, check out [link removed].
I have also recently discovered the Pecci Beginning Reading Series. I like it because it combines Phonics with Literature- based readers. It's a new technique for me. She introduces Sight words by bringing the students' attention to the l. to r. phonics clues. For example, in the word "friend," she doesn't call it a Sight word, but has the students underline the Phonics clues - f r _ e n d. It makes it really easy for the children to read stories that are more interesting and does a lot toward developing reading skills.
"Here’s what I learned from our Spanish-speaking ELL students, and here are the suggestions I will be passing on to content-area teachers about what they can do to help ELL students learn English and learn their content. (And by the way, these ideas will help everyone in the room. There’s nothing strictly ELL about them.)"
Click below to access the article in Teachers.Net Gazette.
Assessing students' progress in reading, writing, math, science and social studies doesn't have to depend upon paper, pencil and bubble sheets! Here are 40 unique ways to observe and assess students' understanding of subject matter.
I am a high school reading intervention teacher and have been given the Degrees of Reading Power as a resource for measuring reading comprehension. How reliable is this test for measuring progress in reading comprehension? I've been told that it's little more than a measure of vocabulary, not comprehension.
On 6/02/14, RTI wrote: > I am a high school reading intervention teacher and have > been given the Degrees of Reading Power as a resource for > measuring reading comprehension. How reliable is this test > for measuring progress in reading comprehension? I've been > told that it's little more than a measure of vocabulary, not > comprehension.
I have been using piecemeal curriculum for my remedial reading class which I and my students liked- Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Reading Skills, Comprehension Skills, etc. My students were comfortable with my set up and have been balking at the Language program even though it teaches the same skills.
This year the entire BOCES region adopted Language, but most schools are using it in middle school.
Here are my questions about the program:
How do you get high school kids to buy into the program, which they think is way too babyish?
How do you deal with constantly flipping from book to resource page to interactive text, etc.?
On 1/23/11, Mindi wrote: > I have been teaching Language! for the past 2 years. I teach students > grades 4-6 and am soon receiving 3 High school students. If taught with > Fidelity the results are amazing. Last year we had 40 students enrolled, > we quickly graduated 7 students out as they achieved grade level status > on a consistent basis. We then filled their seats with other needy > bodies. Of these 40 the 7 we graduated as well as 8 still enrolled > passed state proficiency. How terrific is that! Kids buy in as soon as > they realize they will have success with this learning. No matter the > age, they participate because it breaks down the barriers and allows > them to see a possibility of learning to read. You will be so pleasantly > surprised! Do it! > On 1/09/11, Michelle wrote: >> My district has been using Language! for about 7 years. I taught it >> for a year for 3rd- 5th grade sped and low functioning gen Ed, but I >> also witnessed it being taught at the high school level. The kids >> don't like that the first spelling word of the first week is "a" >> and the rest of the words are super simple, as well, but you'd be >> surprised at how many kids still struggle with them. I think you >> need to approach the fact that it is a little "babyish" In a >> humorous way, and make it fun. As far as flipping back and forth, >> it is a little hard at first, but once you get the hang of it and >> they figure out which book is which, it is not a problem. >> >> It really is a worthwhile program, and while I don't think it is >> totally appropriate for special education students, there are >> aspects of the program that I think are right on the money for >> multiple levels. >> >> Michelle >> >> >> >> On 11/24/10, Mary wrote: >>> I am interested in hearing from other high school teachers that >>> use the LANGUAGE! program. What have been your experiences? Did >>> you find it hard to get buy in from your students? >>> >>> Sam J.--have you reached out to Sopris West to talk with someone >>> with product knowledge? >>> >>> Mary >>> >>> On 11/24/10, Mary wrote: >>>> On 11/11/10, Sam J wrote: >>>>> I am looking for other high school teachers who are actually >>>>> using this program. >>>>> >>>>> I have been using piecemeal curriculum for my remedial >>>>> reading class which I and my students liked- Phonemic >>>>> Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Reading Skills, Comprehension >>>>> Skills, etc. My students were comfortable with my set up >>>>> and have been balking at the Language program even though it >>>>> teaches the same skills. >>>>> >>>>> This year the entire BOCES region adopted Language, but most >>>>> schools are using it in middle school. >>>>> >>>>> Here are my questions about the program: >>>>> >>>>> How do you get high school kids to buy into the program, >>>>> which they think is way too babyish? >>>>> >>>>> How do you deal with constantly flipping from book to >>>>> resource page to interactive text, etc.? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for input
On 1/09/11, Michelle wrote: > My district has been using Language! for about 7 years. I taught it > for a year for 3rd- 5th grade sped and low functioning > gen Ed, but I > also witnessed it being taught at the high school level. > The kids > don't like that the first spelling word of the first week > is "a" > and the rest of the words are super simple, as well, but > you'd be > surprised at how many kids still struggle with them. I > think you > need to approach the fact that it is a little "babyish" In a > humorous way, and make it fun. As far as flipping back and forth, > it is a little hard at first, but once you get the hang > of it and > they figure out which book is which, it is not a problem. > > It really is a worthwhile program, and while I don't > think it is > totally appropriate for special education students, there > are aspects of the program that I think are right on the > money for multiple levels. > > Michelle > > > > On 11/24/10, Mary wrote: >> I am interested in hearing from other high school >> teachers that >> use the LANGUAGE! program. What have been your >> experiences? Did >> you find it hard to get buy in from your students? >> >> Sam J.--have you reached out to Sopris West to talk with someone >> with product knowledge? >> >> Mary >> >> On 11/24/10, Mary wrote: >>> On 11/11/10, Sam J wrote: >>>> I am looking for other high school teachers who are >>>> actually using this program. >>>> >>>> I have been using piecemeal curriculum for my remedial >>>> reading class which I and my students liked- Phonemic >>>> Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Reading Skills, >>>> Comprehension Skills, etc. My students were >>>> comfortable with my set up and have been balking at >>>> the Language program even though it teaches the same >>>> skills. >>>> >>>> This year the entire BOCES region adopted Language, >>>> but most schools are using it in middle school. >>>> >>>> Here are my questions about the program: >>>> >>>> How do you get high school kids to buy into the >>>> program, which they think is way too babyish? >>>> >>>> How do you deal with constantly flipping from book to >>>> resource page to interactive text, etc.? >>>> >>>> Thanks for input